Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 18:10, Wojciech Puchar escribió: really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL on SSD. if... better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's fastest. Yes, you can do that ... until the SSD is full ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 20:05, Anonymous Remailer (austria) escribió: I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS This is not up for discussion. but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. Too many iPads, iPhones, etc? For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk If not spelling, or grammar... and speed will gonna be the differentiator. A high-school education may well have been the differentiator, but that's not important right now. Journaling filesystems are not known for speed. EXT2 will probably outperform ZFS as far as NFS servers go. English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. -- Speed Will Gonna Be The Differentiator ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 18:13, Wojciech Puchar escribió: with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. true. it is consistently slow. REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. There is no tale, only a feature set: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features And everything everyone writes is always true. Did you read the foot notes ? the subsequent links ? Regards, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 07/08/12 16:09, Wojciech Puchar escribió: English is not my native language, so i can make mistakes. ZFS is the way to go if you need consistency + speed on a NFS server/service. Of course ZFS doesn't need fsck. Until it fails. Did you personally try ZFS ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 06:22, Wojciech Puchar escribió: Hi Ashkan, I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. true. it is consistently slow. REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. There is no tale, only a feature set: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed. it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD. Yes ! That's what actually ZFS do with SSD put the most used elements on it. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
El 05/08/12 13:03, Wojciech Puchar escribió: I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. The idea that ZFS is faster than XFS is certainly a new one for me. Do is ZFS supposed to be faster at all? really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use L2ARC/ZIL on SSD. There is no doubt in the benefits of SSD on the fileservers (SMB, NFS,etc.) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Hi Ashkan, I think that XFS JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator. Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed. Regards, El 04/08/12 09:01, ashkab rahmani escribió: hello i have 16tb storage. 8x2tb sata raided. i want to share it on network via nfs. which file system is better for it? thank you ——— Ashkan R ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail tofreebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: BBC debate Battle of the operating systems
2007/1/25, Robin Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bill Moran wrote: In response to Robin Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The BBC is to host a debate on multiple OSes. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6288119.stm They want one individual to represent each OS. Apparently they only want Vista, OS X and Linux, but I don't see why we can't press for FreeBSD. I sent them a comment about how FreeBSD should be included. I think that if enough of us send in comments, they'll re-open the submission. Where did you mail~ usually there's a link like tell us your opinion etc etc, but I could not see one on that page. -- Robin Becker ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no sense in trying to explain to the media what BSD means, its like a try to run the NASCAR or the F1 with a Renault 4. Whats in the media lately ? Linux vs Vista vs OS X, no more ... in fact in my country a News channel show a report where they said Vista the most advanced and powerfull OS of the world, how did you try to make the world understand ? I don`t think that the BBC will understand We need a allied, -- Marco Muskus Movil: 300 5705151 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
