Analysing VMcore files.
I am currently running FreeBSD 7.0 as my desktop OS, and I have a need to analyse VWCores from a RedHat ES system. Knowing very little about analysing dumps, is it possible to do this? or would I have to set up a more comparable environment? -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Analysing VMcore files.
2008/11/24 Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon Burke wrote: I am currently running FreeBSD 7.0 as my desktop OS, and I have a need to analyse VWCores from a RedHat ES system. Knowing very little about analysing dumps, is it possible to do this? or would I have to set up a more comparable environment? In theory, you could set up a Linux environment (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/linuxemu.html) with the binaries from your RedHat system, spawn a Linux shell and go from there as if you're on Linux, but this will almost certainly be more work than just finding a RedHat system (or even installing one in qemu). That is more or less as I thought.It'll probably be easier to stay as I was, using our ESX servers for this. Thank you for your reply. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?
1. Not only is the logo misleading (associating evil) but it also looks like something 10-year-olds could produce in Paint Shop Pro ten years ago. OpenBSD has an artistic touch to theirs, however I was very disappointed when I heard that the new NetBSD logo was in effect. I would like to know how you assume that he is a representation of evil, ok he looks like a little devil char but there is more than one definition of a devil and besides he looks kind of cute. So the logo/mascot has been around a while but that doesnt warrant change. If it does then most companies in the world need to update their logos too. Also freebsd is an operating system, if the developers and such spent all this time maintaining its image rather than its OS then freeBSD would no longer be such a great operating system. 2. If it wasn't for the interesting content and structure of the FreeBSD website, it would be among the less beautiful. Yes, it serves its purpose well by being simple and straight to the point. But a redesign could offer just the same -- simplicity and accuracy -- without being ugly. Aesthetics are not everything, the web site does what its supposed to do. Also i actually like how it looks. A lot of people have strong feelings about all these all singing all dancing webistes. There is just no need. Keep it simple and easy to navigate around thats all thats really important. If the aesthetics really matter more than function to such people who use BSD then they would probably be not using BSD but either windows or linux, where you have a nice pretty GUI to look at all the nice pretty sites. 3. The installation, even though it's text-only, could also be improved by simple restructuring to act more cognitive and human-centered than previously. Everything pertaining to the eye is important to improve. Granted the installer is not the best installer around, but the main point is that it does the job and it is pretty easy to follow in my opinion anyway. Also there are a couple of projects to my knowledge that are aiming to improve it. 4. There should be some kind of FreeBSD business card and letterhead available to all that support this project. I have to ask why? why would people need such things? that i just dont understand How do I know though, that if I manage to pull together a team to work on this refined vision, that we won't be totally ignored even though we produce the most magnificent result? Anyone that are interested, please reply ;-) -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GMail Users Blocked by Spamcop
On 4/22/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In addition to what Shantanoo said, on a personal note - if Gmail gets blocked - that has to tell you something about the client el they have. Not all, but a large percentage. Unfortunate as it seems, when ever email is offered free of charge, it attracts users that are content in doing the things on the Internet that most of us decent folks hate. You know the saying, you get what you pay for... Personally, I could care less if Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail, and any others like them never get removed from the spam lists. Though im using gmail now I actually concur with this. I personally block all mail from hotmail and yahoo, asit gets rid of all the mail i dont want, and it's never had any detrimental effects by doing it. Though gmail will suit me until i get my cable internet access switched to ADSL, which should be sometime soon. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:30:45 +0100, Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael C. Shultz writes: I Agree! My FreeBSD desktop is very stable and user friendly. What ever time I spend fixing/managing desktops is on my friends windows machines, never my own because it always just works. Maybe you can explain to me how to get the following applications to run on a FreeBSD desktop: Adobe Photoshop Use on my SGI workstaion (IRIX), GIMP Adobe Illustrator Use on IRIX, also plenty of gpl etc vector drawing tools are available, Quark XPress Scribus The Sims 2 Works via cedega Flight Simulator Flight gear UltraEdit VI, emacs Visual InterDev Dreamweaver via wine, vi, emacs Microsoft Word Microsoft Excel Microsoft PowerPoint All of MS office can be run via wine, (im using office 2000), or openoffice, koffice, gnome office Microsoft Money Gnucash The Bat! evolution, thunderbird, sylpheed even Opera Available for freeBSD Firefox In ports Microsoft Internet Explorer Firefox, or can use via wine Corel KnockOut Quite probably plugins for GIMP to do that, infact if u know how to use photoshop correctly then why would you need it? Flight Check That looks like soft thats only needed by bad designers, I work with/for design companies on a daily basis and they dont use it Bar Code Pro BARZ_OUT pro MathType Openoffice Math SecureFX gftp does this SecureCRT ssh, kssh SFS If this means smart filesystem, then whats wronf with UFS2, ResierFS, XFS, Rebel GIMP, or stop being so fsckin lazy Fritz 6.0 knights POV-Ray how about erm.. POV-ray? Adobe PageMaker Openoffice,scribus Adobe Streamline Autotrace Adobe Acrobat (full version) openoffice, scribus, Paint Shop Pro GIMP Palm Desktop there is tronnes of pim softwar about and palm, otheriwse i wont be able to use my palm. SimCity simcity 3000 should work through linux compat GeoClock time-zones Ear Test loads of midi apps, and this could be easily witten,its a very simple ms app anyway BlitzIn knights Audio MP3 Editor take a look at http://linux-sound.org/ Forte Agent pan Movie Maker kino, drupal Nikon Scan gimp Rainbow gimp Wacom Intuos its pretty much pnp However, I should point out that I also have applications that will not run on Windows: BIND sendmail syslog sshd ProFTP SFTP Every heard of cygwin? The list is not long for FreeBSD, but every one of these applications is a critical application, and most must run without fail 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Any one of them is enough to justify running a dedicated FreeBSD server. There are alsways alternaitves that can do the exact same job, so i dont see the problem, Oh by the way I am a linux system developer, so i do know what im on about unlike Mr i cant be bothered to update my workstations. For this reason, I have several machines: a FreeBSD server, a Windows XP desktop, and a Windows NT server used as a desktop (to support some legacy applications). I have several machines too, running IRIX, BSD and Linux, I havnt had to for ages as everything i need to do i can do on a *nix box. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB http://simon.geek-web.co.uk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:59:29 +0100, Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Burke writes: Use on my SGI workstaion (IRIX), GIMP I said Photoshop, not GIMP. I use photshop on IRIX i mean, and you can use gimp too, is what i meant. I don't want equivalents, I want the same applications. Why? , if the equiv can get the same job done, just as wel most of the time. I can get Photoshop on the Mac, so moving to a Mac would not present a problem for Photoshop (although it would for most of my other applications). You can get photoshop for unix, mainly IRIX but you can. All of MS office can be run via wine ... Why bother, when it's so much easier to run Windows instead? If this is your attitude why are you even using BSD, why not use MS server and XP? Corel KnockOut Quite probably plugins for GIMP to do that, infact if u know how to use photoshop correctly then why would you need it? Have you ever used KnockOut? No If this means smart filesystem, then whats wronf with UFS2, ResierFS, XFS, No. SFS is a spectrogram analysis system for study of human speech and phonology. There is quite probably a open sourced eqiv. Rebel GIMP, or stop being so fsckin lazy Rebel is a chess program. However, I should point out that I also have applications that will not run on Windows: BIND sendmail syslog sshd ProFTP SFTP Every heard of cygwin? Just as it's illogical to run Windows applications in emulation under another OS, it's illogical to run non-Windows applications in emulation under Windows. WINE is not an emulator, infact that is what wine stands for so get your facts straight There are alsways alternaitves that can do the exact same job ... I don't want alternatives, I want THE SAME PRODUCTS. Why is this so difficult to understand? I don't want to run just any SMTP mailer, I want to run sendmail. It's as simple as that. Why? you now seem to be contradicting your self, why dont you just use windows then? you'll obviously be much happier ... so i dont see the problem ... I do. Many geeks are extremely attached to their operating systems and relatively indifferent to their applications, since they often never do anything critical or serious with their systems, anyway. So they see no problem in using equivalents for certain applications in order to guarantee that they can play with their favorite operating systems. Non-geeks need specific applications for specific purposes, and the OS is irrelevant. So if application X runs on OS Y, then OS Y is the obvious choice. The vast majority of computer users are in this latter category--even many IT professionals are in this category. I would really get your facts straight before you say things, it makes you look ignorant. People use operating systems that suit there needs, not to be geeky, not to look down on other people. Windows is fine if all you want to do is point and click at things. EG, dreamweaver, its a very point click piece fo software, you dont have to know any web language to get a fairly decent web-site out, and that is not really a good thing. Where as if you have more knowledge then you would prefer to be able to have more control and input to the final prdouct where with most M$ apps you dont. If you are implying that it is useless using open operating systems (which it appears you are) then why are you on the mailing list. I've been a system developer, too, several times. But I have neither the time nor the inclination to be one when I'm trying to achieve practical, useful goals with my computers. Playing around with an OS is only practical if you have nothing else to do with a computer except play around with an OS. Excuse me? are you saying the system developers just play around with OS'es. I dont think i'd get paid £30,000 a year to play around, I create systems for a sucsessful solutions company and are used in a lot fo smaller companies who cant afford the extortionate prices of M$. S please stop being so ignorant. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB http://simon.geek-web.co.uk ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:28:52 +0200, Vadim Maksimenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Simon Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:52 PM Subject: Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have changed in the past month or so?? Dumb question: WHY OpenOffice requires java? Is java much more effective and robust than a copiled C/C++ code? As far as I know, java-coded applications are: slow, resource-hungry, have bad multitasking effect. Is that a new stupid fashion or what? I was forced to phase out Oracle branch in my project, when I have discovered it needs java... I'm not entirely sure to be honest. I think it has to do with its relationship with staroffice, as openoffice started with sun releasing code for a previous release of staroffice. So i think that is why its still in java, it would be too much work to re-implement i guess. Also (quote)As far as I know, java-coded applications are: slow, resource-hungry, have bad multitasking effect. (/quote) IMHO, Isnt that pretty much openoffice anyway? -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:58:24 -0600, Joshua Lokken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a thread on this list from yesterday that states plainly that OpenOffice does not build on FreeBSD 5.3: However, it does build on 4.11-STABLE. I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have changed in the past month or so?? -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:56:28 -0600, Joshua Lokken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:52:16 +, Simon Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:58:24 -0600, Joshua Lokken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's a thread on this list from yesterday that states plainly that OpenOffice does not build on FreeBSD 5.3: However, it does build on 4.11-STABLE. I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have changed in the past month or so?? -- Theres no place like ::1 Not sure; I don't run 5.3; It was mentioned yesterday that, specifically, OpenOffice from the ports will not build on 5.3-STABLE. I know that it can be a right pain to do, it took me a couple of days to finally get it done but i managed it. I dont know if things have changed now or will change with the java thing going on, but still thta might be completly different. I'm no sure but im pretty certain that openoffice2 doesnt work either. Though i may be mistaken -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?
1. Not only is the logo misleading (associating evil) but it also looks like something 10-year-olds could produce in Paint Shop Pro ten years ago. OpenBSD has an artistic touch to theirs, however I was very disappointed when I heard that the new NetBSD logo was in effect. I would like to know how you assume that he is a representation of evil, ok he looks like a little devil char but there is more than one definition of a devil and besides he looks kind of cute. So the logo/mascot has been around a while but that doesnt warrant change. If it does then most companies in the world need to update their logos too. Also freebsd is an operating system, if the developers and such spent all this time maintaining its image rather than its OS then freeBSD would no longer be such a great operating system. 2. If it wasn't for the interesting content and structure of the FreeBSD website, it would be among the less beautiful. Yes, it serves its purpose well by being simple and straight to the point. But a redesign could offer just the same -- simplicity and accuracy -- without being ugly. Aesthetics are not everything, the web site does what its supposed to do. Also i actually like how it looks. A lot of people have strong feelings about all these all singing all dancing webistes. There is just no need. Keep it simple and easy to navigate around thats all thats really important. If the aesthetics really matter more than function to such people who use BSD then they would probably be not using BSD but either windows or linux, where you have a nice pretty GUI to look at all the nice pretty sites. 3. The installation, even though it's text-only, could also be improved by simple restructuring to act more cognitive and human-centered than previously. Everything pertaining to the eye is important to improve. Granted the installer is not the best installer around, but the main point is that it does the job and it is pretty easy to follow in my opinion anyway. Also there are a couple of projects to my knowledge that are aiming to improve it. 4. There should be some kind of FreeBSD business card and letterhead available to all that support this project. I have to ask why? why would people need such things? that i just dont understand How do I know though, that if I manage to pull together a team to work on this refined vision, that we won't be totally ignored even though we produce the most magnificent result? Anyone that are interested, please reply ;-) -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boot splash screens in 5.3
HIya, Im trying to find out how to add a bootsplash to 5.3. I've looked at the handbook and only saw details for 3.x. Is it the same process?? I have a 320x200 bmp file already for this, i assume that is the corrct size etc, as i read of a how-to for 3.x. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OpenOffice 1.1.3 won't build under FreeBSD 5.3R
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:04:08 +0200, lordbad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to install it from the ports.Here is most the error output: snip errors ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/ OOo_1.1.3_src/jurt/source/pipe dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- *** Error code 255 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. I looked here and there for a solution, but did not find any. It seems that many other folks have the same problem but rather than investigate it they prefer to simply install the binary package. I have limited understand of the java concepts but perhaps someone amongst you can help me... Also previously people stated that there are two ways around the error. Install jdk14 from ports first, as its the linux jdk that the errors are from. Or disable java for openoffice in the makefile before trying to install it form ports. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.3: cant install openoffice 1.1 from ports
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 19:16:39 -0600, Jay Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 06 December 2004 04:23 pm, Simon Burke wrote: I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great. Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message and i've since made clean. Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and 1.1 wont compile sucessfully. I've tried to compile OO on a couple of FreeBSD boxes. It actually came to a successful conclusion on one, but crapped itself after I used it a few times. I really disliked being redirected to Sun's website to click through their Java license agreements, too. I finally solved the problem by installing Fedora Core 2 on an old laptop that I use as a desktop Windoze replacement - OO was part of the standard setup, and it works quite well so far. Jay I now have a working openoffice. As mentioned before i just needed to install the native jdk14 before i started with openoffice. This wasnt made clear at the start but still it now works. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Swap partition not used?
Hiya, After a while of using 5.3RELEASE, i have noticed a small problem, my swap partition isnt getting used. Well its not a small problem considering that i have only 256mb ram on this machine. boredom# swapctl -l Device: 1024-blocks Used: /dev/ad0s1b 48211256 this i suppose shows that some of it is used but the amount used never increases. I'm currently using 100% memory (installing openoffice from ports, finally). It is in /etc/fstab as: # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options DumpPass# /dev/ad0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 I've tried using swapon -a to add it and it doesnt seem to have worked. Its also does not show in df -ha ,though i cant recall if it is supposed to be there. Though i dont think it has to be mounted? -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Swap partition not used?
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:22:23 -0600, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Burke wrote: Hiya, After a while of using 5.3RELEASE, i have noticed a small problem, my swap partition isnt getting used. Well its not a small problem considering that i have only 256mb ram on this machine. , finally). I've tried using swapon -a to add it and it doesnt seem to have worked. Its also does not show in df -ha ,though i cant recall if it is supposed to be there. Though i dont think it has to be mounted? No, swap doesn't have a mount point, per se. Does swapinfo(8) give the same output as `swapctl -l` ? I can not answer that question at the momment, as i have now got it working by using 'swapon /dev/ad0s1b'. Which makes me think there is a problem with my fstab, i'll take a look at it and see if thats the problem. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.3: cant install openoffice 1.1 from ports
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:37:14 -0800, Tabor Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Burke wrote: I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great. Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message and i've since made clean. Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and 1.1 wont compile sucessfully. Neither can I, I am also running FreeBSD 5.3R, and I attempted to install OpenOffice 1.1 via 'portinstall openoffice' Here is the error that I got: snip build output Making: ../../unxfbsd.pro/slo/com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.obj gcc32 -w -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../inc -I../../unx/inc -I../../unxfbsd.pro/inc -I. -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/dont_use_stl -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/external -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solenv/unxfbsd/inc -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solenv/inc -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/res -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/dont_use_stl -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/freebsd -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/bsd -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I. -I../../res -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include -O -pipe -fno-rtti -fPIC -DFREEBSD -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC300 -DINTEL -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.3/3.2.3/include/g++-v3 -DCVER=C300 -D_USE_NAMESPACE -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1 -DX86 -DNEW_SOLAR -DSTLPORT_VERSION=450 -DOSVERSION=503001 -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -D__DMAKE -DUNIX -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DSUPD=645 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -DCUI -DSOLAR_JAVA -DSRX645 -DSHAREDLIB -D_DLL_ -DMULTITHREAD -w -o ../../unxfbsd.pro/slo/com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.o com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c In file included from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:2, from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:69: /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:27:20: jni_md.h: No such file or directory In file included from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:2, from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:69: /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:45: syntax error before jsize /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:104: syntax error before jbyte /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:107: syntax error before i /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:108: syntax error before j /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:112: syntax error before '}' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:193: syntax error before jint /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:195: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:198: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:201: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:203: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:206: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:209: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:211: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:214: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:217: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:218: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:219: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:220: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:221: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:223: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:225: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:227: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:230: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:231: syntax error before jint /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:231: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:232: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun
5.3: cant install openoffice 1.1 from ports
I've recently done a fresh install of 5.3, i updated ports using cvsup to install gnome2.8, which im using know, great. Problem is that it wont allow me to compile openoffice properly, i cant give an error message as its about 7hrs in i get the message and i've since made clean. Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and 1.1 wont compile sucessfully. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: open source video card hardware!
On Sun, 05 Dec 2004 01:05:35 -0500, jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone else heard of these great idea? If you are intrested sign the petition so the company backing it, Tech Source, will fund it. Please check this link with plenty of info about. http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics Yeah i know of it, im subscribed to the linux kernel list anfd have the original thread from it if your interestd, mind it should be in the archives. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [OT]Help me, Get a Free flat screen
Please help me, I'm trying to get a Free TV, check out this site, if you refer 8 people you get a free TV or Flat screen monitor... snip very sad...and some people still wonder how it is there can be so much spam when so many profess to hate it. I completly agree, though the company im being 'let go' from is just as bad, i mean come on its not spam, its e-mail marketing?? Anyway atleast theres less spam here than you get on the linux kernel list. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help me, Get a Free flat screen
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 10:24:46 -0500 (EST), Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please help me, I'm trying to get a Free TV, check out this site, if you refer 8 people you get a free TV or Flat screen monitor... Copy and paste this link...and add one W to the front and you get a TV ww.FreeFlatScreens.com/?r=1141739 You realize they are just trying to build SPAM lists and pretend that by getting some sort of permission, they aren't really spamming. jerry Thats what i use yahoo for. If i need to sign up for something where i know im going to get spammed, i just use my yahoo address. Theres sites that offer mails just for this reason but i forgot the URL. But still the only spam I like is the monty python spam skit -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
duel booting with 2x *nix
I know duel booting is really easy to setup these days, but just a thought, I've never duel booted with two *nix OS's so i do not know this. Is it possible to use a single swap partition for multiple distro's on one machine? If so would it impair stability or stuff? And would it be possible to do so with BSD and linux? Im just curious. All my Ix86 dekstops have atleast 160gb HDD space (over 1.5Tb in total at present), so i may give it a try later on tonight. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: topposting (was: colourization in ls command)
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:20:19 -0400, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 12, 2004, at 6:44 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: On Tuesday, 12 October 2004 at 8:42:39 -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote: It gets to a point where I solve it by doing this or just no reply at all. Problem solved. I don't see a problem. What are you talking about? :-) Exactly! It may also help if you put the good ole hyphen hyphen space enter' decent e-mail clients should see this as the start of a sig an will remove anything below it, i know thunderbird and even gmail does, so it tidys up the default sig at the end of each post. -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
