Re: devel/anjuta: creating project does not offer project's dialog.
01.07.2011, 11:49, "O. Hartmann" : > On 07/01/11 09:35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > >> 01.07.2011, 11:06, "O. Hartmann" >>> And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to >>> Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks, >>> Oliver >> Depending on what you need you can try: >> Geany >> Vim >> Eclipse >> Qt Creator >> >> Actually, KDevelop does not require you to run KDE, it just needs KDE >> libraries. > > Thanks for your fast response. > My target is mostly C, not C++, so I had my difficulties with QTCreator. If so, vim (with proper .vimrc + bunch of plugins) can be ideal IDE for you. -- Regards, Konstantin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/anjuta: creating project does not offer project's dialog.
01.07.2011, 11:06, "O. Hartmann" > And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to > Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks, > Oliver Depending on what you need you can try: Geany Vim Eclipse Qt Creator Actually, KDevelop does not require you to run KDE, it just needs KDE libraries. -- Regards, Konstantin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Driver for orinoco classic from turbocell.
Hello, I`m tech ingeneer from isp Leader Plus Lugansk,Ukraine. Support driver from turbocell karlnet is expected? Pls Reply. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Conexant modem HCF
In next 4.x,5.x reliases included Conexant HCF,HSF modem drivers??? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Conexant modem HCF
In next 4.x,5.x reliases included Conexant HCF,HSF modem drivers??? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 In Problem Report bin/53201: The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report 53201? I would appreciate. Many thanks! It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cvsup freebsd 5.1 fail
Hello all. cvsup problem 4.8->5.1 make bildworld building shared library libkse.so.1 thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask': thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask' thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here *** Error code 1 Does anyone know someting about this? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
