Re: devel/anjuta: creating project does not offer project's dialog.

2011-07-01 Thread Konstantin Tokarev


01.07.2011, 11:49, "O. Hartmann" :
> On 07/01/11 09:35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>>  01.07.2011, 11:06, "O. Hartmann"
>>>  And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to
>>>  Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks,
>>>  Oliver
>>  Depending on what you need you can try:
>>  Geany
>>  Vim
>>  Eclipse
>>  Qt Creator
>>
>>  Actually, KDevelop does not require you to run KDE, it just needs KDE 
>> libraries.
>
> Thanks for your fast response.
> My target is mostly C, not C++, so I had my difficulties with QTCreator.

If so, vim (with proper .vimrc + bunch of plugins) can be ideal IDE for you.

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: devel/anjuta: creating project does not offer project's dialog.

2011-07-01 Thread Konstantin Tokarev


01.07.2011, 11:06, "O. Hartmann" 
> And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to
> Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks,
> Oliver

Depending on what you need you can try:
Geany
Vim
Eclipse
Qt Creator

Actually, KDevelop does not require you to run KDE, it just needs KDE libraries.

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Driver for orinoco classic from turbocell.

2005-04-14 Thread Sergey Tokarev
Hello, I`m tech ingeneer from isp Leader Plus Lugansk,Ukraine.
Support driver from turbocell karlnet is expected?
Pls Reply.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Conexant modem HCF

2003-08-09 Thread Tokarev
In next 4.x,5.x reliases included Conexant HCF,HSF modem drivers???
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Conexant modem HCF

2003-08-09 Thread Tokarev
In next 4.x,5.x reliases included Conexant HCF,HSF modem drivers???
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-17 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-17 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-17 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail builworld

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 fail

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost use cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Cvsup FreeBSD 5.1 builworld failed

2003-07-14 Thread Tokarev
Hi all. I left the message earlier. But the answer was simple. 
Does not cost ¨áᯮ«ì§®¢ âì cvsup 4.x-> 5.x. But if there was a necessity? 


building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

In Problem Report bin/53201:
The problem still exists in RELENG_5_1, preventing me from building
 5.1 on a 4.7 machine. Could someone be so kind and provide
 the two required patches for src/Makefile.inc1
 and src/lib/libpthread/support/Makefile.inc _HERE_ in bug report
 53201? I would appreciate.
 Many thanks!

It is impossible to make cvsup 4.8,4.7-> 5.1? 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


cvsup freebsd 5.1 fail

2003-07-11 Thread Tokarev
Hello all. cvsup problem 4.8->5.1 
make bildworld

building shared library libkse.so.1
thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction'
thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
thr_libc.So: In function `sigprocmask':
thr_libc.So(.text+0x34): multiple definition of `_sigprocmask'
thr_sigprocmask.So(.text+0x0): first defined here
*** Error code 1

Does anyone know someting about this?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"