Re: ldap + nss_ldap

2005-11-03 Thread cristi tauber
On 03 Nov 2005 07:20:13 -0500, Lowell Gilbert <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> cristi tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > i had a nice-working ldap server (2.2) and i decided to upgraded to 2.3(i
> > couldn't make it work with sasl). openldap-server-23 is working great,
> but i
> > want to install nss_ldap and it's complaining about this new ldap
> version.
> > nss_ldap wants openldap-client-2.2.29 but now i have
> > openldap-sasl-client-2.3.9. How do i trick nss_ldap to play with this
> > version ?
>
> Install nss_ldap from ports instead of whatever package you're trying
> to use. [Or provide more details about *exactly* what you did.]
>
> --


well,

i made a back-up of ldap-22. i deinstall it and then i issued a

make install (chose sasl)

in /usr/ports/net/openldap23-server

and then the installation went well. next i went to

/usr/ports/net/nss_ldap

and make install

and the error is :

goliath# make install
===> nss_ldap-1.239 depends on executable: gmake - found
===> nss_ldap-1.239 depends on shared library: ldap-2.2.7 - not found
===> Verifying install for ldap-2.2.7 in /usr/ports/net/openldap22-client
===> Installing for openldap-client-2.2.29

===> openldap-client-2.2.29 conflicts with installed package(s):
openldap-sasl-client-2.3.9

They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/net/openldap22-client.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/net/nss_ldap.



that's it.

cristi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


ldap + nss_ldap

2005-11-03 Thread cristi tauber
 hello,

i had a nice-working ldap server (2.2) and i decided to upgraded to 2.3 (i
couldn't make it work with sasl). openldap-server-23 is working great, but i
want to install nss_ldap and it's complaining about this new ldap version.
nss_ldap wants openldap-client-2.2.29 but now i have
openldap-sasl-client-2.3.9. How do i trick nss_ldap to play with this
version ?

TIA

cristi

--
Human knowledge belongs to the world
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Incremental backup!

2005-10-08 Thread Cristi Tauber

Ian Moore wrote:


On Saturday 08 October 2005 16:07, Carstea Catalin wrote:
 


i want to back-up  on cd my www -directory. i want to use for this, cd
-media. At some intervals i want to make incremental backup and put the
result on cd. .
i use kde and i want a grafical tool for write cd.
   



K3B (/usr/ports/sysutils/k3b) is a great gui CD burning app for KDE.
Dump will do incremental backups for you which you can then burn to CD with 
K3B.


Cheers,
 


hello,

  have you tried konserve ?

cristi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


pdflib for php

2005-01-20 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Hello,
 i'm trying to install php extensions for pdf and i encounter the 
following error :

=> pdflib-2.0.4.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/PECL.
=> Attempting to fetch from http://pecl.php.net/get/.
pdflib-2.0.4.tgz  100% of   35 kB   22 kBps
===>  Extracting for pecl-pdflib-2.0.4
=> Checksum OK for PECL/pdflib-2.0.4.tgz.
===>  Patching for pecl-pdflib-2.0.4
===>   pecl-pdflib-2.0.4 depends on file: 
/usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found
===>   pecl-pdflib-2.0.4 depends on executable: phpize - found
===>   pecl-pdflib-2.0.4 depends on file: 
/usr/local/lib/php/20020429/gd.so - found
===>   pecl-pdflib-2.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake15 - found
===>   pecl-pdflib-2.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf253 - found
===>   pecl-pdflib-2.0.4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool13 - found
===>   pecl-pdflib-2.0.4 depends on shared library: pdf.7 - not found
===>Verifying install for pdf.7 in /usr/ports/print/pdflib
===>  pdflib-6.0.1 is forbidden: 
http://vuxml.freebsd.org/fc7e6a42-6012-11d9-a9e7-0001020eed82.html.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/pdflib.
*** Error code 1

I even try to manually install the port ... no luck.
  
www2# cd /usr/ports/print/pdflib
www2# make install
===>  pdflib-6.0.1 is forbidden: 
http://vuxml.freebsd.org/fc7e6a42-6012-11d9-a9e7-0001020eed82.html.
www2#

 Forbidden ? Why ? anyone ...
 Cristi
---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: fBSD on Duron

2004-12-27 Thread Cristi Tauber
Vadim Maksimenko wrote:

> Do you get kind of these messages at boot time?:

 I got just the first line 

npx0: [FAST]

  then it stops . Setup hangs with no other error. the CPU in at 1600Mhz 
and is not overclocked !

  Cristi



>
>
> npx0: [FAST]
> npx0:  on motherboard
> npx0: INT 16 interface
>
> If yes, ACPI is next that may be cause of a problem.
> If no, Duron is not compatible with FreeBSD or vice versa. I hope, it is not
> overclocked in your box.
>
> Yours faithfully, Vadim Maksimenko.
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Cristi Tauber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "FreeBSD Question" 
> Cc: "Vadim Maksimenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: fBSD on Duron
>
> >If i don't make a mistake npx0 is maht (co)processor. My NIC is a
> > 3COM
> > SOHO and i don't have problems with it. Before i try to install BSD, that
> > machine was running winXP smoothly.
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: fBSD on Duron

2004-12-27 Thread Cristi Tauber
If i don't make a mistake npx0 is maht (co)processor. My NIC is a 3COM
SOHO and i don't have problems with it. Before i try to install BSD, that
machine was running winXP smoothly.

  Cristi

Vadim Maksimenko wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I guess, you have to remove (disable) that network adapter for a while
> and try to perform installation without it. When the system is on and
> running, install it via sysinstall or whatever. To great sorrow FreeBSD
> decides that this is much more user-friendly to die than to write that some
> device is malfunctioning...
>
> Yours faithfully, Vadim Maksimenko.
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Cristi Tauber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "FreeBSD Question" 
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:12 AM
> Subject: fBSD on Duron
>
> >   Hello ppl,
> >
> > i'm trying to install 5.3 in a Duron 1600Mhz with 512 Mb Ram and 2x
> > 40gb HDD. I boot from cd but the setup hangs at :
> >
> > npx0: [FAST]
> >
> >
> >I try to boot without ACPI, safe mode ... etc ... but with the same
> > result. What seems to be the problem ???
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


fBSD on Duron

2004-12-27 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Hello ppl,

 i'm trying to install 5.3 in a Duron 1600Mhz with 512 Mb Ram and 2x
40gb HDD. I boot from cd but the setup hangs at :

npx0: [FAST]


I try to boot without ACPI, safe mode ... etc ... but with the same
result. What seems to be the problem ???

   Thanks ,

 Cristi



---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


postfix & mysql 4.0.22

2004-12-16 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Hello people,

  I have a little problem setting up postfix with mysql. My ports.cvs
looks like this :

madalina# cat /root/ports.cvs
*default host=cvsup7.freebsd.org

*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=.
*default compress

*default delete use-rel-suffix

ports-all

-

  I cvsup'ed to get the latest ports. I installed mysql server
4.0.22. Now i try to install postfix with mysql backend. So :


cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix

  make install


and i get this error :

===>  Installing for mysql-client-3.23.58_3

===>  mysql-client-3.23.58_3 conflicts with installed package(s):
  mysql-client-4.0.22

  They install files into the same place.
  Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
*** Error code 1


  but i got mysql 4.0.22 not 3.xx so i try with this :

make install WITH_MYSQL_VER=4.0.22


but i get ...

===>  postfix-2.1.5_1,1 is marked as broken: unknown MySQL version:
4.0.22.


the same happens with postfix-current .  What's wrong with my
installation ?

 Thank you,

  Cristi


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


ppp on 5.3

2004-12-16 Thread Cristi Tauber
Hello folks ,

   i installed poptop to make a pptp server . I'm trying to connect from
a win2k workstation but with no luck ... and i get this messages ..

Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: Using interface: tun0
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: Created in closed
state
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: loop: set device
localhost:pptp
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: loop: set dial
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: loop: set login
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: loop: set ifaddr
192.168.13.1 192.168.13.100-192.168.13.200 255.255.255.255
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: IPCP: Selected IP address
192.168.13.189
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: loop: set server /tmp/loop
 0177
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: Listening at local socket
/tmp/loop.
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: pptp: enable chap
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: pptp: disable pap
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: pptp: accept dns
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: pptp: set dns 192.168.13.1
212.93.139.1
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Command: pptp: set device
!/etc/ppp/secure
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: PPP Started (direct mode).
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: bundle: Establish
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: closed -> opening
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: Connected!
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: opening -> carrier
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: carrier -> lcp
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: FSM: Using "deflink" as a
transport
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: State change Initial
--> Closed
Dec 16 13:41:57 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: State change Closed -->
Stopped
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: LayerStart
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(1) state
= Stopped

... [snip]

Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  AUTHPROTO[5] 0xc223 (CHAP 0x05)

Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: RecvConfigRej(14) state
= Req-Sent
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  AUTHPROTO[5] 0xc223 (CHAP 0x05)

Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: SendConfigReq(15) state
= Req-Sent
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  ACFCOMP[2]
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  PROTOCOMP[2]
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  ACCMAP[6] 0x
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  MRU[4] 1500
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  MAGICNUM[6] 0xd8d20f22
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  AUTHPROTO[5] 0xc223 (CHAP 0x05)

Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: RecvConfigRej(15) state
= Req-Sent
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP:  AUTHPROTO[5] 0xc223 (CHAP 0x05)

Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: Too many LCP REQs
sent - abandoning negotiation
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: SendTerminateReq(16)
state = Req-Sent
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: State change Req-Sent
--> Closing
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: RecvTerminateAck(16)
state = Closing
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: LayerFinish
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: State change Closing
--> Closed
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: LCP: deflink: State change Closed -->
Initial
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: Disconnected!
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 1 secs:
384 octets in, 937 octets out
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: 16 packets in, 16
packets out
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase:  total 1321 bytes/sec, peak 0
bytes/sec on Thu Dec 16 13:41:57 2004
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: deflink: lcp -> closed
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: bundle: Dead
Dec 16 13:41:58 madalina ppp[960]: Phase: PPP Terminated (normal).


 Why i get disconnected ??

 Thanks,

  Cristi


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


php4-cli or mod_php4

2004-12-03 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Hello list,

  i want to install apache+php+mysql. If i install mod_php i cannot
install php4-extension (mysql, etc ...). If i try to install php4-cli
and extensions apache doesn't know how to handle .php files . What's the
they to go to make apache work with mysql and php ? fBSD is 5.3.

 Thanks,

  Cristi

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: php4-extensions

2004-11-24 Thread Cristi Tauber
It works  Thanks a lot Uwe ..
 Cristi

Uwe Laverenz wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:12:48AM +0200, Cristi Tauber wrote:
>
> > I searched the google and i found something about libmagic
> > and to reinstall it. But i cannot find such a package/port . Anyone bump
>
> IIRC libmagic is included in /usr/ports/sysutils/file .
>
> cu,
> Uwe
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


php4-extensions

2004-11-23 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Hello everybody,

  i have a brand new 5.3 installation on a machine that will act as a
web server. I installed php4-cli ... good .. but when i try to install
php4-extension (mysql, mssql, etc ...) an get an error. I tried to
install php4-extension on another machine ... that is also 5.3 and i get
the same result :

===>  PHPizing for pecl-fileinfo-0.2
autoheader253: `config.h.in' is unchanged
Configuring for:
  PHP Api Version:   20020918
  Zend Module Api No:   20020429
  Zend Extension Api No:   20021010
===>  Configuring for pecl-fileinfo-0.2
configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target
checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.3
checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.3
checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-gcc... cc
checking for C compiler default output... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes
checking if compiler supports -R... yes
checking for PHP prefix... /usr/local
checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/local/include/php
-I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend
-I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM
checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/local/lib/php/20020429
checking for re2c... exit 0;
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
checking for nawk... nawk
checking for fileinfo support... yes, shared
checking for magic files in default path... not found
configure: error: Please reinstall the libmagic distribution
===>  Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [maintainer] and attach the

"/usr/ports/sysutils/pecl-fileinfo/work/Fileinfo-0.2/config.log"
including
the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good
idea
to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an
`ls
/var/db/pkg`).
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/pecl-fileinfo.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions.

I searched the google and i found something about libmagic
and to reinstall it. But i cannot find such a package/port . Anyone bump
into this ???

Thanks

Cristi


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


l2tpd on 5.2.1

2004-10-11 Thread Cristi Tauber
   hello there,
   on a 5.2.1 fBSD i installed l2tpd from ports (ports were cvsuped a
hour ago). The compilation process went without errors, i edited the
conf file to suit my needs but  when i tried to run the daemon i get
this error :

 This binary does not support kernel L2TP.

 google didn't help much  Anyone ???

 Cristi


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: Starting apache at boot with SSL.

2004-10-04 Thread Cristi Tauber
Remko Lodder wrote:

> > I chose to protect my SSL cert with a passphrase. This makes automatic
> > startup at boot impossible. I use FBSD 4.10, and apache would normally
> > start via a script in /usr/local/etc/rc.conf. I just made sure there
> > was
>
> ehm this is not totally true, you can startup automatically by
> havnig a little script that does the following
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> echo ''
>
> Then there is thingy with the phrase 'builtin' into it. You can change
> that so that the previous bin sh script gets invoked and the server
> will startup at that point.
>
> For the correct syntax i would need to look into my own configuration
> which i cannot access at this moment.
>
> > no .sh script for apache, and start it myself using apachectl startssl.
> > The problem with this setup is that if the server reboots in the middle
> > of the night the web server does not come on, but this almost never
> > happens anyway. You have to balance security with convenience to fit
> > your situation, and I chose security.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> Remko Lodder   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reporter DSINet|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Projectleader Mostly-Harmless  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Founder Tienervaders   |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

For a same question here was my response from  Josh Hansen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

Hello Cristi,

This is from the apache site:

How can I get rid of the pass-phrase dialog at Apache startup time?

The reason why this dialog pops up at startup and every re-start is that
the RSA private key inside your server.key file is stored in encrypted
format for security reasons. The pass-phrase is needed to be able to
read and parse this file. When you can be sure that your server is
secure enough you perform two steps:

   1. Remove the encryption from the RSA private key (while preserving
the original file):

  $ cp server.key server.key.org
  $ openssl rsa -in server.key.org -out server.key

   2. Make sure the server.key file is now only readable by root:

  $ chmod 400 server.key

Now server.key will contain an unencrypted copy of the key. If you point
your server at this file it will not prompt you for a pass-phrase.
HOWEVER, if anyone gets this key they will be able to impersonate you on
the net. PLEASE make sure that the permissions on that file are really
such that only root or the web server user can read it (preferably get
your web server to start as root but run as another server, and have the
key readable only by root).

As an alternative approach you can use the ``SSLPassPhraseDialog
exec:/path/to/program'' facility. But keep in mind that this is neither
more nor less secure, of course.







>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: openssh upgrade

2004-09-30 Thread Cristi Tauber
I believe that openssh is openBSD's while portable is meant to be
installed on other OSes. Portable is your choice here.

   Cristi

Petre Bandac wrote:

> as the default instalation of openssh becomes deprecated, I don't know
> which of the ports should I use, openssh or openssh-portable ?
>
> what are the differences between them (besides the version number,
> openssh-portable being the latest version, while openssh is only 3.6) ?
>
> thanks in advance,
>
> petre
>
> --
> Login: petreName: Petre Bandac
> Directory: /home/petre  Shell: /usr/local/bin/zsh
> On since Wed Sep 29 15:06 (EEST) on ttyv0, idle 3:53 (messages off)
> Last login Wed Sep 29 20:01 (EEST) on ttyp2 from lubyanka.kgb.ro
> New mail received Mon May 24 19:09 2004 (EEST)
>  Unread since Tue Feb 17 12:31 2004 (EET)
> No Plan.
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: pf for FreeBSD

2004-09-28 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Switching OSes is not a choice.
Now i done it !!! It seems that pf was allready installed with
the base system, although i can't seem to find the installed binaries. I issued
a pkg_delete to remove the old pf and than reinstall pf from sources with ALTQ.
Now it works smoothly ... and I am a happy man. Though I still wondering why the
installed pf wasn't working 
Cristi


"Michael E.Conlen" wrote:

> On Sep 28, 2004, at 8:33 AM, shane mullins wrote:
>
> >Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf?  I use both Free
> > and OpenBSD.  But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD.  Just
> > install OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are
> > done.
> >
>
> I can tell you in my case OpenBSD doesn't provide drivers for the
> hardware I have.
>
> --
> Michael Conlen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: pf for FreeBSD

2004-09-28 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Hello,
   it crossed my mind to run openBSD but i have to reinstall the server
and the applications (mysql, qmail,etc ...) and besides that ... i know
that openbsd can't take advantage of SMP servers. I don't know if newer
versions 'see' SMP but an older (i don't precisely know the version but
it was the lastest i got in january this year) one i was trying to
setup can't !
Cristi

> Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf?  I use both Free and
> OpenBSD.  But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD.  Just install
> OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are done.
>
> Shane
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Cristi Tauber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "FreeBSD Question" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:54 AM
> Subject: pf for FreeBSD
>
>
>>hello folks,
>>i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the
>> kernel with the options :
>>
>> device  bpf
>> options PFIL_HOOKS
>> options RANDOM_IP_ID
>>
>> and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to
>> get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i
>> have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after installing and
>> rebooting  the modules that I want to load are still in source
>> directory . I installed pf with
>>
>>   make  WITH_ALTQ=yes
>>   make install
>>
>>  after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install
>> crashes with the error that is allready installed !!
>>
>>   What can I do ??/
>>
>>Cristi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>.
> This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message,
> you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


RE: pf for FreeBSD

2004-09-28 Thread Cristi Tauber
  Hello,
   i'm using 5.2.1 and i want to recompile pf to take advantage of ALTQ.
This was the reason for reinstalling. What about that prefix in startup
script ... this is were i have no clues ... what's the path ...
And another thing ... if i want to install pf now it says that is
allready installed ... strange ... because i can't find it now, not
the binaries nor the modules .
   Cristi

> Hi,
>
>> hello folks,
>> i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the
>> kernel with the options :
>>
>> device  bpf
>> options PFIL_HOOKS
>> options RANDOM_IP_ID
>>
>>  and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to
>> get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i
>> have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after
>> installing and
>> rebooting  the modules that I want to load are still in source
>> directory . I installed pf with
>>
>>make  WITH_ALTQ=yes
>>make install
>>
>>   after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install
>> crashes with the error that is allready installed !!
>>
>>What can I do ??/
>
> I'm using pf without a problem. Not sure what exact version of FreeBSD 5.x
> you're using. According to /usr/src/UPDATING Since 08-Mar-2004 pf has been
> part of the base system and doesn't require the pf port to be installed.
> So,
> a way forward could be to ensure you've updated to latest 5.x version (cvs
> tag RELENG_5). Then I suggest you read /usr/src/UPDATING as it also
> contains
> some info on the pf groups & users required.
>
> I have the following devices in my kernel:
> devicePFIL_HOOKS
> devicepf
> devicepflog
>
> I have the following in /etc/rc.conf:
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflog_enable="YES"
> pf_rules=""
>
> You will also need the authpf group and the  _pflogd user & group. You can
> get the details by downloading the latest source and checking the passwd &
> group files under /usr/src/etc.
>
> in /etc/passwd:
> _pflogd:*:64:64:pflogd privesp user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin
>
> in /etc/group:
> authpf:*:63:
> _pflogd:*:64:
>
> I will leave it to you on how you generate a ruleset. Personally I use
> fwbuilder.org .
>
> Thanks,
> Phil.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
> transmission as being free from malicious code by <>.
> This
> message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
> information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
> addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message,
> you
> are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
> notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
>
>
>
>


---
This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for
transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This
message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected
information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the
addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you
are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please
notify the sender and return it.Thank you.
  
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


pf for FreeBSD

2004-09-27 Thread Cristi Tauber
hello folks,
i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the
kernel with the options :

device  bpf
options PFIL_HOOKS
options RANDOM_IP_ID

 and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to
get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i
have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after installing and
rebooting  the modules that I want to load are still in source
directory . I installed pf with

   make  WITH_ALTQ=yes
   make install

  after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install
crashes with the error that is allready installed !!

   What can I do ??/

Cristi




___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: httpd with SSL

2004-09-06 Thread Cristi Tauber
 Yee ... thanks a lot.

   Cristi

On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 18:20, Josh Hansen wrote:
> Cristi Tauber wrote:
> 
> >Hello,
> >I installed from ports (switched from sources ... hope to learn :) )
> >apache 1.3.29 with mod-ssl. All good ... httpd works ... i issued a
> >certificate ... but now when my computer reboots and apache starts in
> >ssl mode it asks for pass phrase !!! So ... if computer reboots over
> >night someone have to write the pass phrase so the computer can start.
> >This is annoying ... how can i skip this ... can i enter the passphrase
> >in my boot script ? How ???
> >
> > Cristi
> >
> >___
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> >  
> >
> Hello Cristi,
> 
> This is from the apache site:
> 
> How can I get rid of the pass-phrase dialog at Apache startup time?
> 
> The reason why this dialog pops up at startup and every re-start is that 
> the RSA private key inside your server.key file is stored in encrypted 
> format for security reasons. The pass-phrase is needed to be able to 
> read and parse this file. When you can be sure that your server is 
> secure enough you perform two steps:
> 
>1. Remove the encryption from the RSA private key (while preserving 
> the original file):
> 
>   $ cp server.key server.key.org
>   $ openssl rsa -in server.key.org -out server.key
> 
>2. Make sure the server.key file is now only readable by root:
> 
>   $ chmod 400 server.key
> 
> Now server.key will contain an unencrypted copy of the key. If you point 
> your server at this file it will not prompt you for a pass-phrase. 
> HOWEVER, if anyone gets this key they will be able to impersonate you on 
> the net. PLEASE make sure that the permissions on that file are really 
> such that only root or the web server user can read it (preferably get 
> your web server to start as root but run as another server, and have the 
> key readable only by root).
> 
> As an alternative approach you can use the ``SSLPassPhraseDialog 
> exec:/path/to/program'' facility. But keep in mind that this is neither 
> more nor less secure, of course.
> 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


httpd with SSL

2004-09-06 Thread Cristi Tauber
Hello,
I installed from ports (switched from sources ... hope to learn :) )
apache 1.3.29 with mod-ssl. All good ... httpd works ... i issued a
certificate ... but now when my computer reboots and apache starts in
ssl mode it asks for pass phrase !!! So ... if computer reboots over
night someone have to write the pass phrase so the computer can start.
This is annoying ... how can i skip this ... can i enter the passphrase
in my boot script ? How ???

 Cristi

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ports vs source

2004-09-05 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Ok. thanks ... i got that ... but one problem remains . On
linux the command ./configure --help gives me the options to configure
the source for compile (eg suport for mysql/oracle/etc; other switches
not related to optimization, ... etc) How can i do this with ports ... i
mean ... make -DWITH="/path/to/mysql/" (just an example) to compile the
source with mysql support ... is there a way to find the options for a
port ?!? 

  Cristi

On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 22:54, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 17:26:11 +0300
> Cristi Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >  Hello there,
> >   Can anyone tell me which are the avantages of installing from
> >   ports
> > rather than installing from tar balls ? I am kind of new to BSD, and
> > I'm familiar with linux install from tar & stuff. I know to give the
> > switches to configure to tune the source for installation ... but
> > how i can find the parameters for port install ? I mean ... let's
> > say i want to install php and i have to give the path to mysql,
> > apache and others graphical libraries ... how can I do that with
> > ports ? 
> 
> The ability to squeze the absolute max out using /etc/make.conf  is
> what I love about ports.
> 
> CPUTYPE?=athlon-xp
> CFLAGS= -O -m3dnow -msse -mmmx  -pipe
> CXXFLAGS+= -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized -m3dnow -msse -mmmx
> 
> or something like that ^_^
> 
> afaik all packages for 4x defualt to i386 and on 5x i486 so there is
> less optimizations... for something there is no noticeable
> differneces... for something there are...  my suggestion is to make
> sure stuff that eats cpu time is optimized... 
> 
> man ports
> man make.conf
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: ports vs source

2004-09-03 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Yes i know something ... like the avantages of rpm and another
linux package managers. But .. I want apache 1.3.31 with php-4.3.4 and
mysql 4.0.20 (let's say) ... from ports ... i understand that I can
%choose% what version i want to install ?? Is that correct ?
Cristi

On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 17:56, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 05:26:11PM +0300, Cristi Tauber wrote:
> 
> >   Can anyone tell me which are the avantages of installing from ports
> > rather than installing from tar balls ? I am kind of new to BSD, and I'm
> > familiar with linux install from tar & stuff. I know to give the
> > switches to configure to tune the source for installation ... but how i
> > can find the parameters for port install ? I mean ... let's say i want
> > to install php and i have to give the path to mysql, apache and others
> > graphical libraries ... how can I do that with ports ? 
> >Any link or explications about this subject is appreciated.
> 
> FreeBSD ports /is/ installing from source.  Except that all of the
> boring stuff like working out what dependencies you need, what flags
> are required to find the appropriate shlibs, even where to download
> the software from: all that stuff is handled automatically for you.
> 
> If you want to setup a webserver running PHP code against a MySQL
> back-end database, on a virgin FreeBSD system you can just:
> 
> # cd /usr/ports/www/mod_php4
> # make install
> # cd /usr/ports/databases/php4-mysql
> # make install 
> 
> And all of the PHP stuff, plus apache plus mysql will be installed for
> you.  Well, in practice you'ld want to set a few variables on the make
> command lines so that you got the right variant of apache (2.0.50 vs
> 1.3.31 vs 1.3.31+mod_ssl-2.8.19 amongst others) and the right version
> of MySQL (choose from 3.23.58, 4.0.20, 4.1.4 or 5.0.0).
> 
> The other massive advantage of installing via ports is the packaging
> system.  It keeps track of all of the files and directories
> etc. installed by each port so that you can do things like create a
> pkg tarball of the installed port as a backup or to install quickly
> onto another machine.  You can also de-install ports cleanly, and in
> conjunction with tools like portupgrade(1) the ports system makes
> tasks like managing software updates a breeze.
> 
>   Cheers,
> 
>   Matthew

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


ports vs source

2004-09-03 Thread Cristi Tauber
 Hello there,
  Can anyone tell me which are the avantages of installing from ports
rather than installing from tar balls ? I am kind of new to BSD, and I'm
familiar with linux install from tar & stuff. I know to give the
switches to configure to tune the source for installation ... but how i
can find the parameters for port install ? I mean ... let's say i want
to install php and i have to give the path to mysql, apache and others
graphical libraries ... how can I do that with ports ? 
   Any link or explications about this subject is appreciated.
   Thanks,
 
   Cristi

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: xf86config for Toshiba satellite pro laptop

2004-08-29 Thread Cristi Tauber
   Hello there,
i have the same problem with an older Toshiba Satellite version (4090 CDS). I
ignore the error, just like you said, i go to install a windows manager, i choose
GNOME, press enter to install but it does nothing, same thing happens with any
manager i choose. Since it was a fresh instalation of 5.2.1 i started again (i
thought i misseg someting) and after install base system i choose to install GNOME
and KDE ... and after install ... the X server failed like the previous attempts
with the error just like Vaughan Moore's. I mention that Slackware 10.0 with Gnome
2.6 runs smoothly.

Cristi.

Eric F Crist wrote:

> Vaughan Moore wrote:
>
> > I'm a complete newbie and I'm trying to set up X server on a Toshiba
> > Satellite pro 4620dvd laptop.  Everytime I run through xf86cfg or
> > xf86cfg -textmode I get the error message "The XFree86 configuration process
> > seems to have failed.  Would you like to try again?"  Obviously, this is a
> > bit frustrating.
> >
> > Here are what I think are the valid parts of the XF86Config file, but I may
> > be missing something - please let me know.
> >
> > InputDevice
> >   Driver = "mouse"
> >   Option = "Protocol" "Auto"
> >   Option = "Device" "/dev/sysmous"
> > InputDevice
> >   Driver "Keyboard"
> >   Option "Skbmode1" "pc101" (note: my laptop only has 85 keys"
> >   Option "XkbLayout "us"
> > Monitor
> >   HorizSync 31.5-31.5
> >   VertRefresh 50.0-70.0
> > Card
> >   Driver "s3"
> >   VendorName "S3 Inc."
> >   BoardName "86C270-294 Savage/IX-MV"
> >   ChipSet "SuperSavage/IX64"
> >   BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> > Screen
> >   Default Depth 8
> >   Display Depth 1
> >   Display Depth 4
> >   Display Depth 8
> >   Modes "640x480"
> >   Display Depth 15
> >   Display Depth 16
> >   Display Depth 24
> >
> > My main questions are:
> >
> > 1) The Toshiba documentation and Web site do not tell me what my internal
> > monitor's horizontal sync or vertical refresh rate is. (although it does
> > give me refresh rates for an external monitor - 60/75/85 @16M colors).  Is
> > there a place I can go to find this information?
> >
> > 2) Are there other obvious reasons the configuration would fail other than
> > the monitor?
> >
> > 3) Are there any sites I can visit for more info?
> >
> > Thanks so much!
> >
> > Vaughan Moore
> >
> > Also, did I post this to the right list?  If not, please let me know where
> > it should go.
> >
> > ___
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> >
> >
>
> This seems to be a bug in recent releases (4.x and 5.x).  Just skip it
> from there, and install KDE/Gnome from one of the other menus.
> Everything is fine.  I don't remember exactly, but sysinstall is looking
> for the config file in /etc/X11/xf86config or something, while it's
> actually being installed in /usr/local/X11 or some other thing.
>   the way to get around this is to either ignore it (which I do), or
> type in the above text (/etc/X11/xf86config) as I typed it (IIRC).  This
> is just a bug and things ARE getting installed correctly.  Just move
> down, later in the process and install a 'window manager.' KDE, Gnome,
> and a couple others will more than likely be listed.
>
> HTH
>
> Eric F Crist
>
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


kernel compile

2004-08-24 Thread Cristi Tauber
 hi all,
I compile a 5.2.1 release's kernel with IPFIREWALL and IPSEC (?
IPSEC_ESP). I compiled the kernel w/o errors i rebooted and everything
works great. I mention that I do not installed any IPSEC software at
that time. I downloaded qmail ? ucspi and try to install. After ucspi I
had to reboot the server in order to start svscan. Now is my problem ...
the server is not booting with the error :

 /etc/rc: WARNING : /etc/ipsec.conf not readable; ipsec start aborted

  (OK ... i dont want ipsec right now)

ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)!
/bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single mode

   A tried to recompile the kernel without IPSEC and even
without IPFIREWALL ... i get the same error . What's wrong ???

 thanks in advance

Cristi

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"