Web or X GUI for pf / isc-dchp3-server
Hi, Would anyone know if there is any kind of X-style (or web) GUI for FreeBSD applications like pf and isc-dhcp3-server ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
SiS 180 and SATA Hard drives
Hi, I already sent a message to hardware@, I'm hoping I might find a response here I have an Asus P4S-800D motherboard with SATA hard drives running from a SiS 180/181 RAID Controller (VEN_1039 DEV_0180, according to Windows XP). They are not set to RAID mode however, it is merely a RAID controllor taking charge of the SATA hard drives. My problem is the following: when I enter 'sysinstall' and do a Standard Install, freebsd does not detect any hard disks. According to the 'ata(4)' man page, the SiS 180 controller is supported and I see the controller detected/being loaded at boot time. I have links to other people experiencing similar problems too: http://monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-bugs/200510/msg00208.html http://monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-bugs/200707/msg00265.html And a few others of which I lost the urls. I have also tried this on both RELEASE of 6.3 and 7.0. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, much appreciated ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SiS 180 and SATA Hard drives
Ah if I had been around that time, I would have tested it with pleasure. Unfortunately I only started using FreeBSD little more than a month ago. I will try and do as you said, Thanks for the help. On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yuri Pankov Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:04 AM To: Jaco le Roux Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SiS 180 and SATA Hard drives On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 09:50:23AM +0200, Jaco le Roux wrote: Hi, I already sent a message to hardware@, I'm hoping I might find a response here I have an Asus P4S-800D motherboard with SATA hard drives running from a SiS 180/181 RAID Controller (VEN_1039 DEV_0180, according to Windows XP). They are not set to RAID mode however, it is merely a RAID controllor taking charge of the SATA hard drives. My problem is the following: when I enter 'sysinstall' and do a Standard Install, freebsd does not detect any hard disks. According to the 'ata(4)' man page, the SiS 180 controller is supported and I see the controller detected/being loaded at boot time. I have links to other people experiencing similar problems too: http://monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-bugs/200510/msg00208.html http://monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-bugs/200707/msg00265.html And a few others of which I lost the urls. I have also tried this on both RELEASE of 6.3 and 7.0. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, much appreciated Just a me too. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/03 8203.html To both of you: Soren posted a patch here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87585cat= and neither of you apparently tested, thus Soren put the fix in and closed the PR One of you needs to file a new PR, and reference the old one kern/87585, and then the other one of you needs to submit followup - that way, both of you will have your e-mail addresses tied to the new PR, and this time, when the maintainer writes a patch, you need to test it. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SiS 180 and SATA Hard drives
Ok I submitted a PR (Yuri): It has the internal identification `misc/121461'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: freebsd-bugs. You can access the state of your problem report at any time via this link: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=121461 On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your welcome. Just remember that the developers rarely work on problems discussed on the mailing list. They pretty much concentrate on what's in the PR system. Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jaco le Roux Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:50 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SiS 180 and SATA Hard drives Ah if I had been around that time, I would have tested it with pleasure. Unfortunately I only started using FreeBSD little more than a month ago. I will try and do as you said, Thanks for the help. On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yuri Pankov Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 1:04 AM To: Jaco le Roux Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SiS 180 and SATA Hard drives On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 09:50:23AM +0200, Jaco le Roux wrote: Hi, I already sent a message to hardware@, I'm hoping I might find a response here I have an Asus P4S-800D motherboard with SATA hard drives running from a SiS 180/181 RAID Controller (VEN_1039 DEV_0180, according to Windows XP). They are not set to RAID mode however, it is merely a RAID controllor taking charge of the SATA hard drives. My problem is the following: when I enter 'sysinstall' and do a Standard Install, freebsd does not detect any hard disks. According to the 'ata(4)' man page, the SiS 180 controller is supported and I see the controller detected/being loaded at boot time. I have links to other people experiencing similar problems too: http://monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-bugs/200510/msg00208.html http://monkey.org/freebsd/archive/freebsd-bugs/200707/msg00265.html And a few others of which I lost the urls. I have also tried this on both RELEASE of 6.3 and 7.0. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, much appreciated Just a me too. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-November/03 8203.html To both of you: Soren posted a patch here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87585cat= and neither of you apparently tested, thus Soren put the fix in and closed the PR One of you needs to file a new PR, and reference the old one kern/87585, and then the other one of you needs to submit followup - that way, both of you will have your e-mail addresses tied to the new PR, and this time, when the maintainer writes a patch, you need to test it. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DHCP Server
Hi,
I am running dhcpd on my FreeBSD machine and have 2 clients that requests an
IP address. The one client is connected directly to the same network as the
BSD box, the other client is connected via a bridge on the first client. I
have a section in my /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf to assign a specific IP to
client #1:
host myhost {
hardware ethernet xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx;
fixed address 192.168.1.16;
}
The problem is, both client #1 and #2 get assigned the same IP address which
results in a conflict (I'm guessing because they appear to be behind the
same MAC address). How do I work around this so that I can uniquely setup a
predetermined IP for both clients?
I'll appreciate any help, thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DHCP Server
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2008 08:56 PM
To: Jaco le Roux
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DHCP Server
BSD box, the other client is connected via a bridge on the first client.
I
have a section in my /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf to assign a specific IP
to
client #1:
host myhost {
hardware ethernet xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx;
fixed address 192.168.1.16;
}
The problem is, both client #1 and #2 get assigned the same IP address
which
results in a conflict (I'm guessing because they appear to be behind the
it means that the first client's bridge is not a bridge.
Hm. Well it's a bridge made by windows xp from one interface to another.
You're telling me that it won't work like that?
If I use 'arp ip-address' on the two clients, it resolves to the same MAC
address :/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support for Asus P4S800D-E
Hi, I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.3 on a system with a Asus P4S800D-E motherboard. I believe it uses the SiS 955TX chipset to control the hard disks. When I enter the sysinstall utility to do a Standard Install, sysinstall does not recognise my hard disk. This is because the SATA hard drive runs off its SATA controller and is not normally seen by OS's unless 3rd party software/drivers is loaded. There is no FreeBSD support on the SiS website, however I found another thread: http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2004-06/2737.html in which the guy clearly states he got the same motherboard working in FreeBSD. Does anyone have any suggestions? I'll appreciate any help, thanks. PS: I'm using MS outlook to write this message, and tried to format everything as plain text. If it still comes out whack on UNIX systems, please advise me and I'll try something better next time. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status of support for HP Proliant DL380
Hello all, For you guys that are using Proplian DL380's, how stable is 5.4-STABLE on this hardware? Are there any pitfalls that I must watch out for? What will work better on this hardware, 5.4 or 4.x? Thank you! ---Jaco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Jail] Setting default route in Jail?
Hello All, My setup looks like this: The FreeBSD machine have a public range IP address, and I set up a couple of jails with private range IP addresses (192.168.x.x) on the same box. The private range ip adresses are set up as aliases, using the procedure as described in the jail(8) man page. All works fine, except for the fact that from within the jails I do not have internet connectivity as the default route is the same as my jail hosts default route. For this to work I would have to be able to set my default route in the jail environment to the IP address of my jail host and enable the jail host as a gateway. The problem is that you are not allowed to set the default route inside of the jail, and currently this default route is the default route of the jail host. I am sure other people must have had this problem before and found a solution. :) Anybody know any workrounds? Or maybe a better way to set this up? Thank you in advance! ---Jaco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Jail] Setting default route in Jail?
Chad, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC typed on a keyboard not too far away, on 7/21/2005 5:19 PM: On Jul 21, 2005, at 9:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, My setup looks like this: The FreeBSD machine have a public range IP address, and I set up a couple of jails with private range IP addresses (192.168.x.x) on the same box. The private range ip adresses are set up as aliases, using the procedure as described in the jail(8) man page. All works fine, except for the fact that from within the jails I do not have internet connectivity as the default route is the same as my jail hosts default route. For this to work I would have to be able to set my default route in the jail environment to the IP address of my jail host and enable the jail host as a gateway. The problem is that you are not allowed to set the default route inside of the jail, and currently this default route is the default route of the jail host. I am sure other people must have had this problem before and found a solution. :) Anybody know any workrounds? Or maybe a better way to set this up? Hi I got it working though I don't remember exactly how. I set my host as a gateway and maybe played around with some ipfw rules. I did do some ipfw rules and set up natd but I don't remember exactly what it was I was doing with them (meaning why) as I had some other needs as well... The xxx out addresses are the public netblock we have. I am not an ipfw expert and came up with these through trial and error and reading web pages in the middle of the night waymoot# more rc.firewall #!/bin/sh # /sbin/ipfw -f flush /sbin/ipfw add pass all from x.x.x.0/24 to me /sbin/ipfw add pass all from me to x.x.x.0/24 via bge0 /sbin/ipfw add pass all from 192.168.2.0/24 to me /sbin/ipfw add pass all from 192.168.1.0/24 to me /sbin/ipfw add pass all from me to 192.168.2.0/24 via bge1 /sbin/ipfw add pass all from me to 192.168.1.0/24 via bge0 /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via bge0 /sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any waymoot# Thanks, Your post actually made me think a bit for a change and I COMPLETELY forgot about the NAT. :P After adding the following rule to my pf.conf, it started working: nat on em0 from 192.168.53.1 to any - 192.168.10.56 Thanks again! ---Jaco -- Jaco van Tonder Software Developer Direct: +27 11 312 2122 :: Fax: +27 11 312 2122 :: Mobile: +27 83 417 5424 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Web: http://www.coocoo.za.net/ Real Software Engineers don't debug programs; they verify correctness. This process doesn't necessarily involve execution of anything on a computer, except perhaps a Correctness Verification Aid package. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RAID] Using raid after install on single disk
Hello all, I have installed FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE on my newly purchased Intel SR1435VP2 platform that has an Intel SE7320VP2 Motherboard. During the install (and after upgrading to 5.4-STABLE) FreeBSD would not recognize my RAID controller (ESB6300). I saw recently that support for this RAID controller was added to 6-CURRENT, so I upgraded. After upgrading the controller is picked up as ar0 and FreeBSD sees my 2 RAID 1 drives. My problem now is that I am still mounting the drives as /dev/ad4s1a etc. I changed my /etc/fstab with the hopes that it would just boot and it would work as planned, but, it did not. :P Here is what I did: Changed all occurrences of /dev/ad4s1x (where x is a, d, e, f) with /dev/ar0s1x Rebooted. Here is what I did not do yet: Check consistency of the RAID array before booting FreeBSD again. I must maybe do this before I try again. :) Now, my question: What is the correct way to start using the controller now instead of the direct disk? Thank you in advance. ---Jaco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intel SE7320VP2 board + Marvell 88E8050 nic.
Ted Mittelstaedt typed on a keyboard not too far away, on 6/26/2005 11:29 AM: The 88E8050 is a PCI Express nic, the Marvel chip that Dmitry listed the 88E8001, is a regular PCI chip. Here are the spec sheets on these: [...] Thank you Ted. I will have a look at these now. The SE7320VP2 motherboard uses the E7320 chipset (Lindenhurst) Support for the memory-mapped PCI Express configuration mechanism was added to FreeBSD 5 in December 2004 for only the Grantsdale and Lindenhurst chipsets. You can see the complete comment for this here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/i386/pci/pci_cfgreg.c This first showed up in the FreeBSD 5.4 release. Brilliant. I am planning on using FreeBSD 5-STABLE on this machine. ;) Thank you for this confirmation. The first problem is that the sk0 driver most likely does not have the pci chip ID in it for the onboard Marvel 88E8050. It might be possible to get this with pciconf and add it to the if_sk code in usr/src/sys/pci to get the driver to attach. Hmm. I read on Bjoern A. Zeeb's pages that this card is not supported by the FreeBSD sk driver. Also, the method that you suggested was tried previously and unfortunately it does not work. :( Here is a link to the message containing some info and links to Bjoern's pages: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hardware/2005-April/002405.html If your really lucky then the sk driver will be able to set it up. If your not as lucky then the driver might need to use the configuration mechanism to setup the hardware, in which case you probably can e-mail Scott Long for some patches. If your really unlucky then the 2 chipsets are way too different and you would need to write in support to the sk device driver. I am not sure if anyone is actually working on this driver. But, I will e-mail Scott like you suggested. Maybe he knows about a way to make it work. I know that the other Intel NIC is supported. I saw it in the supported hardware list for FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE. ;) If the Marvell Card turns out to be really bad news, I will just slot in another one of these. :) Do you have 5.4 running on this motherboard at the current time? No, I wanted to hear from somebody that FreeBSD will actually support this hardware before I buy it. I am really not planning on running some mickey mouse linux version on this. :P Ted. Thanks a lot for your input. :) ---Jaco Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:10 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Intel SE7320VP2 board + Marvell 88E8050 nic. Hi all, I am not quite sure if this question belongs on freebsd-questions@ or freebsd-current@ , but I will try here first. Does anyone know the status of the support for Marvell gigabit nic's ? Escpecially the ones that is shipped with the Intel SE7320VP2 Server board which is Marvell 88E8050. I read in the archives that somebody is busy working on it, but I can not seem to locate any more info on this. Basically I do not care if there is support for 1000Mbit, I just want to use the card, even if it is in 100Mbit mode. :) I want to use this on 5.4-STABLE or maybe 6-CURRENT, seeing that 6-CURRENT is more or less stable (well, way more than 5-CURRENT was in the early days anyway :P ). Does anyone perhaps know if this is possible? Thank you in advance. --Jaco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jaco van Tonder Software Developer Direct: +27 11 312 2122 :: Fax: +27 11 312 2122 :: Mobile: +27 83 417 5424 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Web: http://www.coocoo.za.net/ Real Software Engineers don't debug programs; they verify correctness. This process doesn't necessarily involve execution of anything on a computer, except perhaps a Correctness Verification Aid package. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Intel SE7320VP2 board + Marvell 88E8050 nic.
Hello all, OK, I did not get any feedback on my previous post about this topic. Doesn't anyone know if FreeBSD supports this hardware, or ? I know now for a fact that the Marvell NIC is NOT supported, but what about the rest of the hardware, like the RAID controller, etc? Must I maybe post more information about this board? I mean, it's like an entry level Intel server board, I just want to hear from somebody that is using it that it actually works with FreeBSD (well, excluding the second NIC of course. ;)) Anyone? Even if it is just Do not buy that, it will not work. Thank you in advance. ---Jaco Hi all, I am not quite sure if this question belongs on freebsd-questions@ or freebsd-current@ , but I will try here first. Does anyone know the status of the support for Marvell gigabit nic's ? Escpecially the ones that is shipped with the Intel SE7320VP2 Server board which is Marvell 88E8050. I read in the archives that somebody is busy working on it, but I can not seem to locate any more info on this. Basically I do not care if there is support for 1000Mbit, I just want to use the card, even if it is in 100Mbit mode. :) I want to use this on 5.4-STABLE or maybe 6-CURRENT, seeing that 6-CURRENT is more or less stable (well, way more than 5-CURRENT was in the early days anyway :P ). Does anyone perhaps know if this is possible? Thank you in advance. --Jaco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Intel SE7320VP2 board + Marvell 88E8050 nic.
Hi all, I am not quite sure if this question belongs on freebsd-questions@ or freebsd-current@ , but I will try here first. Does anyone know the status of the support for Marvell gigabit nic's ? Escpecially the ones that is shipped with the Intel SE7320VP2 Server board which is Marvell 88E8050. I read in the archives that somebody is busy working on it, but I can not seem to locate any more info on this. Basically I do not care if there is support for 1000Mbit, I just want to use the card, even if it is in 100Mbit mode. :) I want to use this on 5.4-STABLE or maybe 6-CURRENT, seeing that 6-CURRENT is more or less stable (well, way more than 5-CURRENT was in the early days anyway :P ). Does anyone perhaps know if this is possible? Thank you in advance. --Jaco ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[5.2.1-RC, IPFW] Traffic Shaping
Hi all, I am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC + IPFW2 + DUMMYNET to do traffic shaping. This works well for my setup. I have the following configuration: The machine has 2 NIC's, xl0, dc0. The kernel is configured to do bridging. The bridged packets is passed to IPFW (net.link.ether.bridge.ipfw=1). I shape traffic this way: The bridge is setup between a router and an internal mail server. I am limiting bandwith using the following rules: pipe 1 config bw 16KBytes/s pipe 2 config bw 12KBytes/s and then: add pipe 1 tcp from any to any 25 (limit incoming traffic towards smtp) add pipe 2 tcp from any 110 to any (limit outgoing traffic from pop3) Yesterday, while browsing through Absolute BSD by Michael Lucas I read an interesting part: You cannot shape incoming traffic the way that I do at the moment. Now, my question: How can I limit the incoming traffic towards my smtp server properly? Any advice would be apreciated. Thank you, Regards Jaco van Tonder ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ISDN-PCI] Supported Card?
Hi all, Can someone please tell me if the ISDN-PCI card from Aceex is supported under FreeBSD ? I want to buy a card like this, but have to make sure that it works first ;) I cannot figure out what chipset the card is using yet, but I sent a mail to the support department of the company. While waithing I might just give the list a shot I guess. ;) Card details here: http://www.aceex.com.tw/test1/product/catalog/isdn/catalog_isdnpci.pdf Thank you in advance. Regards Jaco van Tonder ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[4.9-R] Ip forwarding for internal VNC.
Hi everybody, I have the following setup: FreeBSD Server (4.9-R) 2 NIC's [xl0,Public Range IP, 196.xx.xx.xx] [xl1,Private Range IP, 192.168.0.1] Windows 2k server [Private IP, 192.168.0.2] The Windows 2000 server is running VNC and is serving as an application server for windows software that is not-so-stable on FreeBSD. :P (The windows machine is not connected directly to the Internet for obvious reasons ;) ) What I want: I want to be able to connect to the VNC service running on the Windows machine, via the Internet. Is it possible to set up port forwarding so that if I connect to the FreeBSD machine on port 5800, the request be forwarded to the Windows machine on port 5800? Do I need to set up the FreeBSD machine in any specific way to accomplish this setup? Thank you in advance. Please copy me in any replies, as I am only subscribed to the digest. Thank you. Regards Jaco van Tonder ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Linux emulation] linux: 'ipc' typ=17 not implemented
Hi all, I receive the following error when running Pervasive.SQL for linux (www.pervasive.com) on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE with both linux_base_6.1 and linux_base_7_1 and linux_base_7_4. linux: 'ipc' typ=17 not implemented snip SQLManager is being started in console mode, intended for debugging only. Please use the daemon mode startup scripts for routine execution of the database engine. Possible debug output follows below below this line. linux: 'ipc' typ=17 not implemented *** Assert in file lnasdbc.c at line 2373. *** /snip The program then freezes. Anyone got any ideas? I've googled for this, and found only _1_ result, also somebody struggling with the same error message. :( Thanks in advance. FreeBSD nosferatu.symphiano 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #2: Fri Aug 1 17:55:39 SAST 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NOSFERATU i386 Jaco van Tonder Magic Developer :: Premsoft Development (Pty) Ltd Direct: +27 11 312 2122 :: Fax: +27 11 312 2122 :: Mobile: +27 83 417 5424 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: Web: http://www.premsoft.co.za/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
