Difference between CPUTYPE= in /etc/make.conf

2005-01-18 Thread Gerard Seibert
I have tried googling for this information, but without any concrete results. 
In the '/etc/make.conf' file, what are the advantages between using the 
following declaration?

CPUTYPE=i686

Versus

CPUTYPE=p4

In the above scenario, the number following the letter 'p' could be between one 
and four. Does it make a discernable difference? 

Thanks!

Gerard E. Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I take my wife everywhere, but she keeps finding her way back.'

-- Anonymous

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Difference between CPUTYPE= in /etc/make.conf

2005-01-18 Thread Jason Henson
On 01/18/05 11:01:32, Gerard Seibert wrote:
I have tried googling for this information, but without any concrete
results. In the '/etc/make.conf' file, what are the advantages  
between
using the following declaration?

CPUTYPE=i686
Versus
CPUTYPE=p4
In the above scenario, the number following the letter 'p' could be
between one and four. Does it make a discernable difference?
Thanks!
Gerard E. Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I take my wife everywhere, but she keeps finding her way back.'
-- Anonymous
The 686 covers a few processors including the athlon, p4, p3?, and  
maybe some others.  If you set p4 you should produce code that runs  
faster on a p4 than 686 would.  Also the code might run slower or not  
at all on the p3 and athlon.  SSE3 is an example of code used on a p4  
not found in other 686s(I think this is still the case) that would case  
the program not to run on other cpu types, but run faster on a p4.
BTW, iirc p4=pentium4 and it atleast used to be broken and droped back  
to some lower setting.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]