Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers

2012-08-12 Thread Dennis Glatting
I have a number of HP servers and on two of them (so far) I am getting
similar panics on every reboot. I've enclosed a screen shot of one of
the panics. 

A common denominator, so far, is both are compiled using the 4.2+ C
compiler and both are CVSUP mirrors. My other HP machines have not yet
shown the same problem on reboot.


Other data:


Granny# uname -a
FreeBSD Granny 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #35: Sun Aug 12
13:08:52 MDT 2012 root@Granny:/sys/amd64/compile/PENFORD-amd64
amd64


Granny# tunefs -p /dev/da0p3
tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a)disabled
tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N)   disabled
tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l)   disabled
tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled
tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j)   enabled
tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled
tunefs: trim: (-t) disabled
tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e)  4096
tunefs: average file size: (-f)16384
tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s)   64
tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8%
tunefs: optimization preference: (-o)  time
tunefs: volume label: (-L) 



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers

2012-08-12 Thread Dennis Glatting
Looks like my screen shot was stripped. You can find it here:

http://www.pki2.com/hp.JPG


Also:

Granny cc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]



On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 13:21 -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote:
 I have a number of HP servers and on two of them (so far) I am getting
 similar panics on every reboot. I've enclosed a screen shot of one of
 the panics. 
 
 A common denominator, so far, is both are compiled using the 4.2+ C
 compiler and both are CVSUP mirrors. My other HP machines have not yet
 shown the same problem on reboot.
 
 
 Other data:
 
 
 Granny# uname -a
 FreeBSD Granny 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #35: Sun Aug 12
 13:08:52 MDT 2012 root@Granny:/sys/amd64/compile/PENFORD-amd64
 amd64
 
 
 Granny# tunefs -p /dev/da0p3
 tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a)disabled
 tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N)   disabled
 tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l)   disabled
 tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled
 tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j)   enabled
 tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled
 tunefs: trim: (-t) disabled
 tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e)  4096
 tunefs: average file size: (-f)16384
 tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s)   64
 tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8%
 tunefs: optimization preference: (-o)  time
 tunefs: volume label: (-L) 
 
 
 
 ___
 freebsd...@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-fs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers

2012-08-12 Thread Dennis Glatting
Looks like my screen shot was stripped. You can find it here:

http://www.pki2.com/hp.JPG


Also:

Granny cc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]



On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 13:21 -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote:
 I have a number of HP servers and on two of them (so far) I am getting
 similar panics on every reboot. I've enclosed a screen shot of one of
 the panics. 
 
 A common denominator, so far, is both are compiled using the 4.2+ C
 compiler and both are CVSUP mirrors. My other HP machines have not yet
 shown the same problem on reboot.
 
 
 Other data:
 
 
 Granny# uname -a
 FreeBSD Granny 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #35: Sun Aug 12
 13:08:52 MDT 2012 root@Granny:/sys/amd64/compile/PENFORD-amd64
 amd64
 
 
 Granny# tunefs -p /dev/da0p3
 tunefs: POSIX.1e ACLs: (-a)disabled
 tunefs: NFSv4 ACLs: (-N)   disabled
 tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l)   disabled
 tunefs: soft updates: (-n) enabled
 tunefs: soft update journaling: (-j)   enabled
 tunefs: gjournal: (-J) disabled
 tunefs: trim: (-t) disabled
 tunefs: maximum blocks per file in a cylinder group: (-e)  4096
 tunefs: average file size: (-f)16384
 tunefs: average number of files in a directory: (-s)   64
 tunefs: minimum percentage of free space: (-m) 8%
 tunefs: optimization preference: (-o)  time
 tunefs: volume label: (-L) 
 
 
 
 ___
 freebsd...@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-fs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Panic 9 .1-PRERELEASE on HP Servers

2012-08-12 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Dennis Glatting free...@penx.com wrote:
 Looks like my screen shot was stripped. You can find it here:

 http://www.pki2.com/hp.JPG


 Also:

 Granny cc -v
 Using built-in specs.
 Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
 Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
 Thread model: posix
 gcc version 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]

What was the actual panic message/assert that was hit?
Thanks,
-Garrett

PS Please don't cross-post.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: HP Servers (Blade SAN)

2005-08-30 Thread Danny Howard
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:34:25PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
 
 I've been starting to investigate migrating from individual servers to a 
 more infrastructure approach to our servers ... namely, blade servers to 
 run the applications on, with a SAN backend for the data ...
 
 Specifically, I've been looking at the HP Blade / SAN hardware ... but, of 
 course, like everyone else, HP doesn't support (or plan to support) 
 FreeBSD ...
 
 So, I'm curious as to what experiences ppl have had with HP ...

I have no personal experience, but http://people.freebsd.org/~jcagle/
looked promising.

-danny

-- 
http://dannyman.toldme.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


HP Servers (Blade SAN)

2005-08-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier


I've been starting to investigate migrating from individual servers to a 
more infrastructure approach to our servers ... namely, blade servers to 
run the applications on, with a SAN backend for the data ...


Specifically, I've been looking at the HP Blade / SAN hardware ... but, of 
course, like everyone else, HP doesn't support (or plan to support) 
FreeBSD ...


So, I'm curious as to what experiences ppl have had with HP ...

We're looking at the BL35 Blade server(s) with the MSA1500/MSA30 SAN 
backend ...


Thanks ...


Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Yahoo!: yscrappy  ICQ: 7615664
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HP Servers

2004-10-22 Thread Olaf Hoyer
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, dev web wrote:
Hi,
The company I work for use mainly FreeBSD servers, we are currently 
investigating investing in a new server with the following specs:

HP ProLiant DL380 G3 - Xeon 3.06 GHz
snip
Has anyone had any experiance running FreeBSD on a system such as this, My 
main concerns are really the Raid Array, ILo and Insight Manager, I know that 
FreeBSD has the Smart Array 5i supported through ciss, but we dont currently 
use either HP or Raid, The reseller has been as helpful as possible (bar 
giving us a server to play with) but support for FreeBSD at HP is obviously 
limited at best.
Hi!
Have some of them here, that are deployed with Win2003, and I had some 
time to make some short tests.

results: Hardware is supported quite nicely, a tape drive (which we 
don't need because of central tape library) should always be hooked up 
to a different non-RAID card IMHO, iLO also is working nice, but:
For some management functions those boxes rely on SNMP, and AFAIK there 
are no FreeBSD agents avaiable for FreeBSD. WIth them (Insight Manager) 
installed, I do hardware monitoring for defective HDD, fans, etc. with a 
nagios box.

I had a short glance at the RedHat SNMP agents, but even unpacking them 
on FreeBSD was a major pain, so I assume you have to live without deeper 
insight in what your box does. IIRC the iLO in its event log relies upon 
those information, so it might occur that not every information (when 
ECC errors occur etc.) might end up in the iLO log.

Otherwise, they are in the process in integrating ssh access in the iLO 
(have 1.62 running here), so that you can remote powercycle/light the 
uid LED remotely via ssh, and may forward a text console via ssh and 
there is no need to use the java applet in a webbrowser for that.

I used FreeBSD 4.8 on a 360G2 some time for netsaint monitoring, and 
there the ciss was quite stable, no hassle at all (ok, it was quite slow 
with lots of small files, because the writeback enabler was not 
installed)

HTH
Olaf
--
Olaf Hoyer[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten,
ob der, welcher sie erlebt, nicht etwas Fuerchterliches ist.
(Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Boese)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


HP Servers

2004-10-20 Thread dev web
Hi,
The company I work for use mainly FreeBSD servers, we are currently 
investigating investing in a new server with the following specs:

HP ProLiant DL380 G3 - Xeon 3.06 GHz
Type: Server
Form Factor: Rack-mountable - 2 U
Dimensions (WxDxH): 44.5 cm x 67.3 cm x 8.6 cm
Weight:27.2 kg
Localisation:Europe
Processor:1 x Intel Xeon 3.06 GHz
Cache Memory:512 KB L2 Cache
Cache Per Processor:512 KB
RAM:1 GB (installed) / 12 GB (max) - DDR SDRAM - ECC Chipkill - 266 MHz - 
PC2100
Storage Controller:RAID ( Ultra160 SCSI ) - PCI-X / 100 MHz ( Smart Array 5i 
Plus Controller )
Floppy Drive:3.5 1.44 MB floppy
Hard Drive:None.
Optical Storage:CD-ROM
Monitor:None.
Graphics Controller:PCI - ATI RAGE XL - 8 MB
Networking:Network adapter - PCI-X - Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit 
Ethernet
Power:AC 110/230 V ( 50/60 Hz )
Manufacturer Warranty:3 years warranty

Has anyone had any experiance running FreeBSD on a system such as this, My 
main concerns are really the Raid Array, ILo and Insight Manager, I know 
that FreeBSD has the Smart Array 5i supported through ciss, but we dont 
currently use either HP or Raid, The reseller has been as helpful as 
possible (bar giving us a server to play with) but support for FreeBSD at HP 
is obviously limited at best.

Any help would be appreciated, our only other alternative is to run RedHat 
or MS which are both supported by HP, We are preared to do that, but would 
much rather continue to use FreeBSD, it has served us extremely well and has 
proved to be a solid enviroment for our requirements.

Thanks for any help in advance
Alex
_
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HP Servers

2004-10-20 Thread R. Zoontjens
dev web wrote:
Hi,
The company I work for use mainly FreeBSD servers, we are currently 
investigating investing in a new server with the following specs:

HP ProLiant DL380 G3 - Xeon 3.06 GHz
[SNIP SPECS]
Has anyone had any experiance running FreeBSD on a system such as this, 
My main concerns are really the Raid Array, ILo and Insight Manager, I 
know that FreeBSD has the Smart Array 5i supported through ciss, but we 
dont currently use either HP or Raid, The reseller has been as helpful 
as possible (bar giving us a server to play with) but support for 
FreeBSD at HP is obviously limited at best.

Any help would be appreciated, our only other alternative is to run 
RedHat or MS which are both supported by HP, We are preared to do that, 
but would much rather continue to use FreeBSD, it has served us 
extremely well and has proved to be a solid enviroment for our 
requirements.
Hi Alex,
We recently installed freeBSD 5.2.1 on such a system to test several 
things, including RAID-1 (2 disks). It was a HP DL380 G3 with the 5i 
controller.

The Ilo functions are working nicely (use the trial period for the 
advanced features). I configured almost everything trough Ilo remotely. 
Only after having a ssh shell available, I changed to the shell. Always 
being able te reboot the server is nice (even with severely damaged or 
no OS).

I pulled out one of the drives, then started the server. This was 
immediately noticed and the ciss0 started recovering the array (interim 
recovery mode). After a while the status changed to recovering-OK.

Everything worked just fine, except for the Tape drive. You need a 
special Hot plug tapedrive for the 5i controller bay, but I could not 
get it to work properly.

I found in Google: SCSI passthrough is not supported by the CISS 
driver. Are you trying to hook the tape device to the CISS controller? I 
believe that will never work as the CISS driver only supports logical 
arrays (of disks). I do realize that you see output from the CISS BIOS 
that a device has taken a certain ID, but I'm pretty sure it will not 
allow the OS to recognize it. My advice would be to stick in another 
controller!

Be aware that the server does not have normal power-connectors (ours 
didn't). So trying another -internal- scsi tape drive will probably not 
work.

I somebody finds an answer to the HP Hot-plug tapedrive + ciss driver, 
I'd like to hear it!

Good luck!!!
with kind regards,
Richard Zoontjens
---
 Radécom B.V.
 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 I: www.radecom.nl
---
Dit bericht kan vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten. Indien u niet de 
geadresseerde van dit bericht bent, verzoeken wij u dit bericht te 
vernietigen zonder van de inhoud kennis te nemen en de inhoud ervan niet 
te gebruiken, niet te kopiëren en niet onder derden te verspreiden.

This message may contain information which is privileged or 
confidential. If you are not the named addressee of this message please 
destroy it without reading, using, copying or disclosing its contents to 
any other person.



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]