possbility of a port for older versions of libintl?

2012-06-11 Thread Dan Mahoney, System Admin

Hey there,

I recently discovered that the vmware-tools package is compiled against 
libintl.so.8 -- yes, this is probably something that should be fixed at 
the vmware level, but VMware's love for FreeBSD isn't there.


As a workaround, it might be useful to have a port which compiles an older 
version of libintl (potential security issues notwithstanding, since it's 
assumed it will only be used by this one tool).


This seems to me to be somewhat *less* destabilizing than the 
commonly-suggested (and perhaps, oft-used) suggestion of symlinking 
/usr/lib/libintl.so.8 -- libintl.so.9


Thoughts?

--

Dan Mahoney
Techie,  Sysadmin,  WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144   AIM: LarpGM
Site:  http://www.gushi.org
---

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: possbility of a port for older versions of libintl?

2012-06-11 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:11:43 -0400 (EDT), Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
 As a workaround, it might be useful to have a port which compiles an older 
 version of libintl (potential security issues notwithstanding, since it's 
 assumed it will only be used by this one tool).

Maybe using the port compatverx-arch-x.y (which has
the required lib version you need) in combination with the
ld.so library mapping (see man libmap.conf) will work?



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Older versions of FreeBSD

2004-12-19 Thread Al Bincarousky
Hello:

I am looking for older versions of FreeBSD. Any version 3.5.1 to 4.4. Is it 
possible to still download these versions? If not can it still be purchased on 
CD? Thank you for any information that you may be able to provide.

Regards,

Al
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Older versions of FreeBSD

2004-12-19 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]

Single line paragraph.

On Sunday, 19 December 2004 at 22:33:48 -0500, Al Bincarousky wrote:

 I am looking for older versions of FreeBSD. Any version 3.5.1 to
 4.4. Is it possible to still download these versions? If not can it
 still be purchased on CD? Thank you for any information that you may
 be able to provide.

A lot depends on why you want them.  If you're collecting CDs, then
only the CD will do.  If you want to run them, you should reconsider.
If you're interested in them for academic reasons, you can check out
any version back to 2.0 from CVS.  For reasons related to the USL
wars, the repository for release 1 of FreeBSD isn't available, though
Caldera (now called SCO) released the license a couple of years ago,
so if you find one, you're now allowed to use it.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the
original text.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.


pgpYLvHjlj5ZN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Older versions of FreeBSD

2004-12-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:33:48PM -0500, Al Bincarousky wrote:
 Hello:
 

 I am looking for older versions of FreeBSD. Any version 3.5.1 to
 4.4. Is it possible to still download these versions? If not can it
 still be purchased on CD? Thank you for any information that you may
 be able to provide.

http://mirrorlist.freebsd.org

Kris

P.S. Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so that your emails may
be easily read.


pgpYy1FCJsNGp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Aliasing Libraries or Installing Older Versions

2003-03-04 Thread John McClure
Thanks in advance for any help.

Trying to build mod_php4 (version 4.3.1) as a port,
basically not a big deal, BUT ... when I try to add
XSLT support via Sablotron, the Sablotron port builds
nicely from /usr/ports/textproc/sablotron but installs
a version of library that ldconfig -r lists as
lsablot.70.

The mod_php4 build complains (as pasted below) that is
can't find sablot.69. I rebuilt the library cache by
running ldconfig, but it appears that php is looking
specifically for sablot.69 and nothing else.

Can a library be aliased? Or should an older version
be installed? If so, how do I obtain that? Hints?
Suggestions?

* BEGIN ERROR PASTE *

===   mod_php4-4.3.1 depends on shared library:
sablot.69 - not found
===Verifying install for sablot.69 in
/usr/ports/textproc/sablotron
===   Returning to build of mod_php4-4.3.1
Error: shared library sablot.69 does not exist
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4.
*** Error code 1

* END ERROR PASTE 

uname -a *
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #0: Wed Oct  9
15:08:34 GMT 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
 i386

-GM

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: Aliasing Libraries or Installing Older Versions

2003-03-04 Thread Jeff Jirsa
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, John McClure wrote:

 Thanks in advance for any help.

 Trying to build mod_php4 (version 4.3.1) as a port,
 basically not a big deal, BUT ... when I try to add
 XSLT support via Sablotron, the Sablotron port builds
 nicely from /usr/ports/textproc/sablotron but installs
 a version of library that ldconfig -r lists as
 lsablot.70.

 The mod_php4 build complains (as pasted below) that is
 can't find sablot.69. I rebuilt the library cache by
 running ldconfig, but it appears that php is looking
 specifically for sablot.69 and nothing else.



You should be able to just change the scripts/configure.php appropriately
(Just change the .69 to .70 in ports/www/mod_php4/scripts/configure.php.
diff below for clarity, watch the wrap):

# diff -u scripts/configure.php.orig scripts/configure.php
--- scripts/configure.php.orig  Tue Mar  4 13:45:11 2003
+++ scripts/configure.php   Tue Mar  4 13:45:19 2003
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
fi
;;
\XSLT\)
-   echo LIB_DEPENDS+= 
sablot.69:\${PORTSDIR}/textproc/sablotron
+   echo LIB_DEPENDS+= 
sablot.70:\${PORTSDIR}/textproc/sablotron
echo CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--enable-xslt 
--with-xslt-sablot=\${LOCALBASE}
if [ -z $XML ]; then
set $* \XML\




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: Older versions

2003-01-09 Thread Shantanu Mahajan
+++ Nathan Kinkade [freebsd] [07-01-03 14:54 -0800]:
| - --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM
| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
| Content-Disposition: inline
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
| 
| On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:30:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|  I have a VERY, VERY old laptop (1.9 Megs of memory IBM), and I was=20
|  wondering if I could get FreeBSD 1 for it. If so, where? Thanks!=20
| =20
|  lattera
| =20
|  To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
| 
| What type of processor does it have?  1.9MB of RAM is not very much.
| Even PicoBSD, the single floppy version of FreeBSD, would like to have
| 8MB of memory.  I have serious doubts that you will be able to get
| virtually anything to run in 1.9MB of memory.  I could be wrong, and if
| someone knows of a tiny OS that will run under these conditions I'd be
| curious to know about it.  I have recently been looking around at some
| tiny Linux installations, but even those absolutely require at least 4MB
| of memory.
| 
| Nathan
| 
maybe any version of DOS?

Regards,
Shantanu
-- 
Everyone is a genius.  It's just that
some people are too stupid to realize it. 




msg14866/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Older versions

2003-01-07 Thread lattera
I have a VERY, VERY old laptop (1.9 Megs of memory IBM), and I was wondering 
if I could get FreeBSD 1 for it. If so, where? Thanks! 

lattera

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: Older versions

2003-01-07 Thread Andrew Prewett
Today Nathan Kinkade wrote:

 On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:30:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have a VERY, VERY old laptop (1.9 Megs of memory IBM), and I was
  wondering if I could get FreeBSD 1 for it. If so, where? Thanks!
 
  lattera
 
  To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message

 What type of processor does it have?  1.9MB of RAM is not very much.
 Even PicoBSD, the single floppy version of FreeBSD, would like to have
 8MB of memory.  I have serious doubts that you will be able to get
 virtually anything to run in 1.9MB of memory.  I could be wrong, and if
 someone knows of a tiny OS that will run under these conditions I'd be
 curious to know about it.  I have recently been looking around at some
 tiny Linux installations, but even those absolutely require at least 4MB
 of memory.

minix?

from the minix install.txt:
...
1. REQUIREMENTS
   The minimum system MINIX can be installed on comfortably  is
   an  IBM PC/AT or PS/2 with a 286 processor, 640 KB memory, a
   720 kb diskette drive, and 25-30 MB free  space  on  an  AT,
   ESDI, or SCSI hard disk (the latter controlled by an Adaptec
   1540.)  MINIX for the  386  (MINIX-386  for  short)  can  be
   installed on a machine with at least a 386sx processor, 3 MB
   memory and at least 25-30 MB of disk space.
...

-andrew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Older versions

2003-01-07 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:00:02AM +0100, Andrew Prewett wrote:
 Today Nathan Kinkade wrote:
 
  On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:30:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I have a VERY, VERY old laptop (1.9 Megs of memory IBM), and I was
   wondering if I could get FreeBSD 1 for it. If so, where? Thanks!
  
   lattera
  
   To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
 
  What type of processor does it have?  1.9MB of RAM is not very much.
  Even PicoBSD, the single floppy version of FreeBSD, would like to have
  8MB of memory.  I have serious doubts that you will be able to get
  virtually anything to run in 1.9MB of memory.  I could be wrong, and if
  someone knows of a tiny OS that will run under these conditions I'd be
  curious to know about it.  I have recently been looking around at some
  tiny Linux installations, but even those absolutely require at least 4MB
  of memory.
 
 minix?
 
 from the minix install.txt:
 ...
 1. REQUIREMENTS
The minimum system MINIX can be installed on comfortably  is
an  IBM PC/AT or PS/2 with a 286 processor, 640 KB memory, a
720 kb diskette drive, and 25-30 MB free  space  on  an  AT,
ESDI, or SCSI hard disk (the latter controlled by an Adaptec
1540.)  MINIX for the  386  (MINIX-386  for  short)  can  be
installed on a machine with at least a 386sx processor, 3 MB
memory and at least 25-30 MB of disk space.
 ...
 
   -andrew

Right, this is why I asked what type of processor he had.  Minix for
i386 wants 3MB - more than he apparently has...unless 1.9 was a type or
I misunderstood.  Thanks for the tip, though.  Although I have questions
about the utility of Minix on a 286 with 640KB RAM, I will nevertheless
take a look a it to see what can be done with such a system.

Thanks,
Nathan


-- 
GPG Public Key ID: 0x4250A04C
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 4250A04C
http://63.105.21.156/gpg_nkinkade_4250A04C.asc



msg14647/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Older versions

2003-01-07 Thread Andrew Prewett
On Jan 7 Nathan Kinkade wrote:

 On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 12:00:02AM +0100, Andrew Prewett wrote:
  Today Nathan Kinkade wrote:
 
   On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:30:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a VERY, VERY old laptop (1.9 Megs of memory IBM), and I was
wondering if I could get FreeBSD 1 for it. If so, where? Thanks!
   
lattera
   
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
  
   What type of processor does it have?  1.9MB of RAM is not very much.
   Even PicoBSD, the single floppy version of FreeBSD, would like to have
   8MB of memory.  I have serious doubts that you will be able to get
   virtually anything to run in 1.9MB of memory.  I could be wrong, and if
   someone knows of a tiny OS that will run under these conditions I'd be
   curious to know about it.  I have recently been looking around at some
   tiny Linux installations, but even those absolutely require at least 4MB
   of memory.
 
  minix?
 
  from the minix install.txt:
  ...
  1. REQUIREMENTS
 The minimum system MINIX can be installed on comfortably  is
 an  IBM PC/AT or PS/2 with a 286 processor, 640 KB memory, a
 720 kb diskette drive, and 25-30 MB free  space  on  an  AT,
 ESDI, or SCSI hard disk (the latter controlled by an Adaptec
 1540.)  MINIX for the  386  (MINIX-386  for  short)  can  be
 installed on a machine with at least a 386sx processor, 3 MB
 memory and at least 25-30 MB of disk space.
  ...
 
  -andrew

 Right, this is why I asked what type of processor he had.  Minix for
 i386 wants 3MB - more than he apparently has...unless 1.9 was a type or
 I misunderstood.  Thanks for the tip, though.  Although I have questions
 about the utility of Minix on a 286 with 640KB RAM, I will nevertheless
 take a look a it to see what can be done with such a system.

I doesn't read the install.txt carefully, and didn't noticed the 3MB
memory requirements, but on the official minix homepage,
 (http://www.cs.vu.nl/~ast/minix.html)
the required ram for the 32bit version only 2MB, not 3MB - and 1.9 is
near 2 :-))

-andrew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Older versions

2003-01-07 Thread Nathan Kinkade
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:30:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a VERY, VERY old laptop (1.9 Megs of memory IBM), and I was 
 wondering if I could get FreeBSD 1 for it. If so, where? Thanks! 
 
 lattera
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message

What type of processor does it have?  1.9MB of RAM is not very much.
Even PicoBSD, the single floppy version of FreeBSD, would like to have
8MB of memory.  I have serious doubts that you will be able to get
virtually anything to run in 1.9MB of memory.  I could be wrong, and if
someone knows of a tiny OS that will run under these conditions I'd be
curious to know about it.  I have recently been looking around at some
tiny Linux installations, but even those absolutely require at least 4MB
of memory.

Nathan

-- 
GPG Public Key ID: 0x4250A04C
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 4250A04C
http://63.105.21.156/gpg_nkinkade_4250A04C.asc



msg14652/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Older versions

2003-01-07 Thread Adam Maas
Slackware 2.x is another possibility. It'll run with 2MB off a alternate set
of boot disks (Included in the install package.)

--Adam

- Original Message -
From: Andrew Prewett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: Older versions


 Today Nathan Kinkade wrote:

  On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:30:57PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I have a VERY, VERY old laptop (1.9 Megs of memory IBM), and I was
   wondering if I could get FreeBSD 1 for it. If so, where? Thanks!
  
   lattera
  
   To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
 
  What type of processor does it have?  1.9MB of RAM is not very much.
  Even PicoBSD, the single floppy version of FreeBSD, would like to have
  8MB of memory.  I have serious doubts that you will be able to get
  virtually anything to run in 1.9MB of memory.  I could be wrong, and if
  someone knows of a tiny OS that will run under these conditions I'd be
  curious to know about it.  I have recently been looking around at some
  tiny Linux installations, but even those absolutely require at least 4MB
  of memory.

 minix?

 from the minix install.txt:
 ...
 1. REQUIREMENTS
The minimum system MINIX can be installed on comfortably  is
an  IBM PC/AT or PS/2 with a 286 processor, 640 KB memory, a
720 kb diskette drive, and 25-30 MB free  space  on  an  AT,
ESDI, or SCSI hard disk (the latter controlled by an Adaptec
1540.)  MINIX for the  386  (MINIX-386  for  short)  can  be
installed on a machine with at least a 386sx processor, 3 MB
memory and at least 25-30 MB of disk space.
 ...

 -andrew


 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Older versions

2003-01-07 Thread Brian
1.9 is such an odd total as well, I do not know what to think of that..

Bri

- Original Message - 
From: Nathan Kinkade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: Older versions



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message