Re: Witch database do you recommend?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It sound like sun microsystem and solaris 8, the binary is free (but for how long ?) and the support cost. It isn't what I am looking for. -TIA maps a better URL is http://www.sybase.com/linux/ase/ -Mensaje original- De: Tadimeti Keshav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 23 de Septiembre de 2003 09:08 a.m. Para: Paredes Sánchez Martín A. Asunto: RE: Witch database do you recommend? It is free both for hobby and commercial use. --- Paredes_Sánchez_Martín_A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It isn't Free or Does it?. -Mensaje original- De: Tadimeti Keshav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Jueves, 18 de Septiembre de 2003 06:13 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: Witch database do you recommend? what about sybase? linux.sybase.com/ase THey have a native version for FreeBSD. bye Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I use postgresql (http://www.postgresql.org) for our in-house database containing millions of records, and Mysql (http://www.mysql.com) for web development. Postgresql has great support for Triggers, rules, schemas, transactions, and stored procdures that can return result sets. Good Luck, Jason ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Witch database do you recommend?
It sound like sun microsystem and solaris 8, the binary is free (but for how long ?) and the support cost. It isn't what I am looking for. -TIA maps a better URL is http://www.sybase.com/linux/ase/ -Mensaje original- De: Tadimeti Keshav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Martes, 23 de Septiembre de 2003 09:08 a.m. Para: Paredes Sánchez Martín A. Asunto: RE: Witch database do you recommend? It is free both for hobby and commercial use. --- Paredes_Sánchez_Martín_A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It isn't Free or Does it?. -Mensaje original- De: Tadimeti Keshav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Jueves, 18 de Septiembre de 2003 06:13 p.m. Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: RE: Witch database do you recommend? what about sybase? linux.sybase.com/ase THey have a native version for FreeBSD. bye Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Witch database do you recommend?
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 14:54, Paredes Sánchez Martín A. wrote: Hi: I want to begin to explore the SQL world in FreeBSD. I read somewhere that PostgreSQL has more in the enterprise than MySQL, so my first choice is PostgreSQL. But I like to hear some advise an reasons on why should I use -SQL?. If I going to spend some time in learning a SQL, I like that this be a good one. I'd recommend reading this (and the referenced pages): http://freebsdforums.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=6714 Note that PostgreSQL now supports replication (it didn't at the time of this post). -- Adam McLaurin [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
RE: Witch database do you recommend?
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jeff MacDonald wrote: Hi, You've opened quite a can of worms ;) I would recommend PostgreSQL, I've always found it's documentation to be great, the mailing lists great, and just getting it working easier. Indeed that's exactly the same thing you could say about mysql . Especially you can use all LAMP (Linux-Apache-Mysql-PHP) documentation you'll find in google, which makes it a very interesting learning enviroment. Regards, Uli. Then again I have likely have not given MySQL enough time.. This is indeed a topic, that with a bit of google and archive searching you can probably answer your self. jeff. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paredes Sánchez Martín A. Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:54 PM To: BSD. Subject: Witch database do you recommend? Hi: I want to begin to explore the SQL world in FreeBSD. I read somewhere that PostgreSQL has more in the enterprise than MySQL, so my first choice is PostgreSQL. But I like to hear some advise an reasons on why should I use -SQL?. If I going to spend some time in learning a SQL, I like that this be a good one. maps ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs d-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] +---+ |Peter Ulrich Kruppa| | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---+ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Witch database do you recommend?
On Thursday 18 September 2003 04:06 pm, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jeff MacDonald wrote: Hi, You've opened quite a can of worms ;) I would recommend PostgreSQL, I've always found it's documentation to be great, the mailing lists great, and just getting it working easier. Indeed that's exactly the same thing you could say about mysql . Especially you can use all LAMP (Linux-Apache-Mysql-PHP) documentation you'll find in google, which makes it a very interesting learning enviroment. It has begun.. Oh, what the heck -- I like FAPP (FreeBSD, Apache, PostgreSQL, Python). Now let's see if a Zope user can come up with a pronouncable acronym! ;-) Regards, Uli. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Witch database do you recommend?
Are you aware that this question is almost like 'What's better, Linux or FreeBSD?' ;-) To give some hints in reply to your question: If you want to learn SQL, then you should probably use PostgreSQL as it's SQL functionality fully implements the ANSI SQL-92 standard. If you just want to set up a little home database to play around with you should probably use mySQL as you will find more information on google/the internet. Long story short: There are long essays on this question (you can find those on google) and there is no general answer to your question. Phil | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew L. Gould | Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:14 PM | To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa; Jeff MacDonald | Cc: 'BSD.' | Subject: Re: Witch database do you recommend? | | | On Thursday 18 September 2003 04:06 pm, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: | On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Jeff MacDonald wrote: |Hi, | |You've opened quite a can of worms ;) | |I would recommend PostgreSQL, I've always found it's documentation |to be great, the mailing lists great, and just getting it working |easier. | | Indeed that's exactly the same thing you could say about mysql . | Especially you can use all LAMP (Linux-Apache-Mysql-PHP) | documentation you'll find in google, which makes it a very | interesting learning enviroment. | | It has begun.. | | Oh, what the heck -- I like FAPP (FreeBSD, Apache, PostgreSQL, Python). | | Now let's see if a Zope user can come up with a pronouncable acronym! | | ;-) | | | Regards, | | Uli. | | | ___ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Witch database do you recommend?
what about sybase? linux.sybase.com/ase THey have a native version for FreeBSD. bye Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://mail.messenger.yahoo.co.uk ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Witch database do you recommend?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:13:22AM +0100, Tadimeti Keshav wrote: what about sybase? linux.sybase.com/ase THey have a native version for FreeBSD. Where? All I see downloads for Linux, not FreeBSD. -- Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesus saves. Allah forgives. Cthulu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Witch database do you recommend?
On Thursday 18 September 2003 09:49 pm, Jonathan Chen wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:13:22AM +0100, Tadimeti Keshav wrote: what about sybase? linux.sybase.com/ase THey have a native version for FreeBSD. Where? All I see downloads for Linux, not FreeBSD. FreeBSD-Intel is below Linux-Intel at the website referenced above. As it requires Linux ABI 6.1, I'm not sure we can call it a native port; but it's there. Andrew Gould ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Witch database do you recommend?
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:01:08PM -0500, Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Thursday 18 September 2003 09:49 pm, Jonathan Chen wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:13:22AM +0100, Tadimeti Keshav wrote: what about sybase? linux.sybase.com/ase THey have a native version for FreeBSD. Where? All I see downloads for Linux, not FreeBSD. FreeBSD-Intel is below Linux-Intel at the website referenced above. As it requires Linux ABI 6.1, I'm not sure we can call it a native port; but it's there. Anything that requires Linux is not a native port. -- Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If everything's under control, you're going too slow - Mario Andretti ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
