Re: linux_base-c6 Skype 4.2
On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:09:35 +0200 Matthias Apitz articulated: M$ has Linux Skype 4.2 for some Linux distributions, for example for F16; would it be possible to run one of these distributions on top of linux_base-c6? Is there any work in progress I could support? I have enough systems at home running some 10-CURRENT and could use one of them for additional tests/work According to the web site, these are the minimum requirements for a Linux version of Skype 4.2.0.11 Skype for Linux 1 GHz processor or faster. 256 MB RAM. 100 MB free disk space on your hard drive. Video card driver with Xv support. Either a built-in or external microphone is required for voice calls. An internet connection – broadband is best (GPRS is not supported for voice calls). Qt 4.7 • D-Bus 1.0.0 libasound2 1.0.18 PulseAudio 1.0 (optional) BlueZ 4.0.0 (optional) I saw a post, I think it was SlashDot, that the FreeBSD kernel was not robust enough to handle Skype. You might want to talk to the developers. You can always download a clean distribution of Skype from the web site and experiment with it. http://www.skype.com/en/download-skype/skype-for-computer/ -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote: I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some rpm-based applications. Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd rpm binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But there's no such rpm binary under /compat/linux tree. What am I doing wrong? XD FreeBSD has it's own package manager and it is used to track all ports (linux ports as well). So we don't use linux rpm database (it is not supported). Said that I might add that it doesn't mean that this won't work if you try. But you'll be at your own here. If you need to install a linux rpm archieve you should do as root: # cd /compat/linux # rpm2cpio -q linux.rpm.archieve | cpio -id Then brandelf any binary executable (not libraries!). Sure you won't be able to do a clean uninstall. But that may help you to do your tests. The best way is to create an apropriate port and use it. Creating a linux port is not hard task. Please take a look at the ports tree (audio ports may be a good starting points as examples). HTH I'm running vanilla FreeBSD-7.2-RELEASE, fresh ports tree. BTW, I'm sure you have read /usr/ports/UPDATING and do have an apropriate variables at /etc/make.conf. ;-) -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary
On Fri,28-08-2009 [14:57:04], Boris Samorodov wrote: On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote: I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some rpm-based applications. Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd rpm binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But there's no such rpm binary under /compat/linux tree. What am I doing wrong? XD FreeBSD has it's own package manager and it is used to track all ports (linux ports as well). So we don't use linux rpm database (it is not supported). Said that I might add that it doesn't mean that this won't work if you try. But you'll be at your own here. If you need to install a linux rpm archieve you should do as root: # cd /compat/linux # rpm2cpio -q linux.rpm.archieve | cpio -id Then brandelf any binary executable (not libraries!). Sure you won't be able to do a clean uninstall. But that may help you to do your tests. The best way is to create an apropriate port and use it. Creating a linux port is not hard task. Please take a look at the ports tree (audio ports may be a good starting points as examples). HTH I'm running vanilla FreeBSD-7.2-RELEASE, fresh ports tree. BTW, I'm sure you have read /usr/ports/UPDATING and do have an apropriate variables at /etc/make.conf. ;-) Sure, I did. ;) Thanks for the answer, I've used cpio to unpack my rpms. And another related question if you don't mind. I've unpacked my apps under /compat/linux tree but my binary requires shared X libraries: nsdexec: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory error while loading shared libraries: libXt.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I've tried to install x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs port but brandelf tells me they are BSD-binaries incompatible with my linux stuff. And thus my app can't start complaining on incompatibilities if I tune lib paths. Any hints? TIA. -- Best regards, Jeff | Nobody wants to say how this works. | | Maybe nobody knows ... | | Xorg.conf(5)| ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:54:05 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote: I've unpacked my apps under /compat/linux tree but my binary requires shared X libraries: nsdexec: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory This library is a part of x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2 port. error while loading shared libraries: libXt.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I've tried to install x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs port Good. but brandelf tells me As I've wrote at my previuos email, brandelf should be used only with binary executives. Don't use it for libraries. You have been warned! ;-) they are BSD-binaries incompatible with my linux stuff. And thus my app can't start complaining on incompatibilities if I tune lib paths. You should not tweak paths untill absolutely needed (and if you really understand what you do). Lunuxulator should DRT if a needed library is present. In case of errors submit them here (or better even to freebsd-emulation@ ML, since more people may help there). -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base question
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:03:45 -0800 Chris wrote: I just updated ports and have the following shown linux_base-f7 linux_base-f8 I'd use this one if you cat't use linux_base-fc4. AFAIC this port has a fixed libc which works better with linuxulator. Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING for more information about non-default linux base ports (linux_base-6,7,8). You can't use FreeBSD-6.x though. linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 (and several Gentoo) WBR -- bsam ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base question
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:43:22 +1000 Da Rock wrote: If this is the case, what is the difference between the ports? Well, just what they are: ports for Fedora Core 6, Fedora 7 and Fedora 8. Do the libraries change? Sure, some libraries changes did occure. At least minor versions were. A more detailed information you may discover the differencies looking at makefiles and pkg-plist files. Supporting software? Hw, compat.linux.osrelease should be set to 2.6.16. Can freebsd effectively emulate any kernel version? No, the default is 2.4.2 and a planned one (not default and not fully supported, but in a good shape so far) is 2.6.16. WBR -- bsam ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base question
On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote: I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux. It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out: CentOS 5 Debian (Lenny) Fedora 6 / 7 / 8 Mandriva OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3 Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0 Here are the components needed. Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to attempt to run these two daemons. I just updated ports and have the following shown linux_base-f7 linux_base-f8 linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 (and several Gentoo) On 6.x, use fc4. On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know). You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems and testing by the emulation team. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base question
On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Mel wrote: On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote: I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux. It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out: CentOS 5 Debian (Lenny) Fedora 6 / 7 / 8 Mandriva OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3 Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0 Here are the components needed. Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to attempt to run these two daemons. I just updated ports and have the following shown linux_base-f7 linux_base-f8 linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 (and several Gentoo) On 6.x, use fc4. On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know). You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems and testing by the emulation team. Great, thanks! Just to make sure, did you mean compat.linux.osrelease without the underscore. Didn't find the other sysctl. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions- unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base question
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 09:07 +0100, Mel wrote: On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote: I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux. It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out: CentOS 5 Debian (Lenny) Fedora 6 / 7 / 8 Mandriva OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3 Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0 Here are the components needed. Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to attempt to run these two daemons. I just updated ports and have the following shown linux_base-f7 linux_base-f8 linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 (and several Gentoo) On 6.x, use fc4. On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know). You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems and testing by the emulation team. Sorry to butt in here, but I've suffered similar confusion. In some blogs or wikis it mentions setting the sysctl compat.linux.osrelease to either 2.4.2 or 2.6.16, and (in some of my fiddling during tests) I've found I can actually set the kernel settings to suit pretty much any software that needs to run. If this is the case, what is the difference between the ports? Do the libraries change? Supporting software? Can freebsd effectively emulate any kernel version? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: linux_base and SMP support ?
P.Moulin wrote: Hi there. I recently added linux_base-fc4 on a host, to run linux setiathome enhanced versions (aka crunchers). The problem is that on multicore engines (core 2 duo, pentium D, etc...) where before there was 2 freebsd-crunchers on 2 differents core, now, with linux-crunchers, the 2 crunchers are sharing only 1 core. Can someone tell me what's wrong with this ? Have I missed something ? Is it an incompatibility from linux_base with smp hardware ? This problem seems to affects only freebsd 6.x, not the 7 branch. My kernels are all compiled with SMP support. I'm working for years with freebsd, but consider I'm really a newbee with linux. How do you know they are sharing one core, and what do you mean by 2 crunchers? Are they separate processes, or a single threaded process? Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4_9 install problem
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:24:46 +0300 Adrian Vraciu wrote: === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for linux_base-fc-4_9 === linux_base-fc-4_9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/rpm2cpio - found error reading header from package /usr/bin/cpio: premature end of archive *** Error code 1 how can i fix that? How did you install the port? What if you do a make checksum at the port (you didn't show that output): - # cd /usr/ports/emulation/linux_base-fc4 # make checksum - WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
Hi forks, someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi forks, someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% On a quick try, no. I'll look into it thing night. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #85: Never let the competition know what you're thinking. -- ST: Legends of the Ferengi signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
Hi forks, someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi forks, someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% On a quick try, no. I'll look into it thing night. Ok thx, it does not work correctly under current. Martin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200 Martin Wilke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi forks, someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% On a quick try, no. I'll look into it thing night. Ok thx, it does not work correctly under current. Hmm, I have no current to test on. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect You are an excellent tactician, Captain. You let your second in command attack while you sit and watch for weakness. -- Khan Noonian Singh, Space Seed, stardate 3141.9 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote: someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? And, please, show your: $ ldd `which skype_bin` WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% On a quick try, no. I'll look into it thing night. it does not work correctly under current. Just tested on amd64-current (aprox. 10 days ago), works fine. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? And, please, show your: $ ldd `which skype_bin` hi Boris, thx you solved :) Martin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200 Martin Wilke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? And, please, show your: $ ldd `which skype_bin` hi Boris, thx you solved :) So can I consider that it works OK and skip tonight's testing session ? -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect BOFH excuse #177: signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On 6/21/06, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200 Martin Wilke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? And, please, show your: $ ldd `which skype_bin` hi Boris, thx you solved :) So can I consider that it works OK and skip tonight's testing session ? No please: ldd `which skype_bin` /usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: /usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid /usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: exit status 127 Exit 1 -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect BOFH excuse #177: -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:42:54 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:15:42 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: (Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a [EMAIL PROTECTED]) On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote: After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this? ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost, linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the port. Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it and see if it fixes the dependency problem? Adi, you did the right thing -- that library is missing at the port. There are two hints. 1. The plist file is not full (one llibrary missing). I'd recommend you to test the patches (on probably fresh machine). Then on deinstalling you'll notice those files that remain undeletted. You may consider reading http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html to create a good (i.e. ready-to-commit) patches. /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect BOFH excuse #141: disks spinning backwards - toggle the hemisphere jumper signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote:
/me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
Here it is.
WBR
--
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone Internet Service Provider
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile 10 Jun 2006 13:35:52 - 1.7
+++ Makefile 19 Jun 2006 10:39:12 -
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
PORTNAME= fc
PORTVERSION= 4
-PORTREVISION= 1
+PORTREVISION= 2
CATEGORIES= emulators linux
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTVERSION}/${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}/os/Fedora/RPMS \
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
bzip2-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
bzip2-libs-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
+ compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
Index: distinfo.i386
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 distinfo.i386
--- distinfo.i386 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.6
+++ distinfo.i386 19 Jun 2006 10:39:12 -
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 4351cbd58365904bc2a21c946b624837
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = c1ec3e21db3d4ef616ce78dcf2913508fdea6b70b674267af0f0d180428fda8b
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 859566
+MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 3f002b614c92079a32a30eaa721aba58
+SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 0f4d0394c4f746bfc6418e8fd6b46a496f742a16d4bb96589cbe56b4975f94fd
+SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 178657
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = dab411528a710a5f61e1981f173beddc
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 1b07f3d0c61b5a4737ac7d007485d04b7d51a00476924d5dc399a1fa347376ac
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 233643
Index: pkg-plist
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/pkg-plist,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist
--- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4
+++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 -
@@ -598,6 +598,10 @@
usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7
+usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so
+usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
+usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
+usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
usr/lib/libttf.so.2
usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0
usr/lib/libz.so.1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist --- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4 +++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 - @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@ usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7 +usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so +usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 Ah, this was missing from my pkg-plist. I did not test the port's uninstall. Thanks Boris! +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 usr/lib/libttf.so.2 usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0 usr/lib/libz.so.1 -- Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:14:43 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist --- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4 +++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 - @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@ usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7 +usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so +usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 Ah, this was missing from my pkg-plist. I did not test the port's uninstall. Yep, this file is not located at rpm-file. Maybe it is created as a link, say, when running linux ldconfig. +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 usr/lib/libttf.so.2 usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0 usr/lib/libz.so.1 WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect BOFH excuse #28: CPU radiator broken signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 Great, thanks! WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 Should I commit ? -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect BOFH excuse #253: We've run out of licenses ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
Hi Guys, sorry for top-posting, but I don't really know where to add this: I still have problems with acroread7, even after the update to linux_base-fc-4_2 and linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_4: /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libm.so.6: ELF file OS ABI invalid Any ideas? Thank you! On 6/20/06, Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
Quoting Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 +0400): On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-) Bye, Alexander. P.S.: I see Boris as one of currently two people which can be described as maintainers of the emulation@ owned ports. And I'm nagging portmgr to get a commit bit for him. Additionally there's no lock on emulation@ owned ports (except the usual hands of if you do not really know what you are doing, and the linux infrastructure has a lot of pitfalls...). -- Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~130 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 +0400): On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-) OK. Ion-Mihai, will you please be so kind to commit the patch? Thanks. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:11:33 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 +0400): On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_portid=781 Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-) OK. Ion-Mihai, will you please be so kind to commit the patch? Thanks. Commited. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as Intellect BOFH excuse #60: system has been recalled ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
Jeff Molofee wrote: After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this? ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Try to recompile the programs that aren't running anymore. HTH; Frank ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
(Cc-ed to freebsd-ports@, sorry if anyone's affected by cross-posting) On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote: After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this? ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost, linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the port. -- Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-fc4
(Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of
applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is
HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does
anyone know how to fix this?
./HoH: error while loading shared libraries:
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory
Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux
libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3.
Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost,
linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the
port.
Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it
and see if it fixes the dependency problem?
Cheers
--
Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E)
diff -urN /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile Sat Jun 10 16:35:52 2006
+++ /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/Makefile Mon Jun 19 19:04:57 2006
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
PORTNAME= fc
PORTVERSION= 4
-PORTREVISION= 1
+PORTREVISION= 2
CATEGORIES= emulators linux
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTVERSION}/${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}/os/Fedora/RPMS \
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
bzip2-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
bzip2-libs-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
+ compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
diff -urN /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386 /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386
--- /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386 Fri Jun 2 23:50:32 2006
+++ /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386 Mon Jun 19 19:04:57 2006
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 4351cbd58365904bc2a21c946b624837
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = c1ec3e21db3d4ef616ce78dcf2913508fdea6b70b674267af0f0d180428fda8b
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 859566
+MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 3f002b614c92079a32a30eaa721aba58
+SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 0f4d0394c4f746bfc6418e8fd6b46a496f742a16d4bb96589cbe56b4975f94fd
+SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 178657
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = dab411528a710a5f61e1981f173beddc
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 1b07f3d0c61b5a4737ac7d007485d04b7d51a00476924d5dc399a1fa347376ac
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 233643
@@ -100,87 +103,3 @@
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 7222e84cfa404931ff11e5e4b3edad5e
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 904382b92317044565f8951f67700db60c86bacad659f3e0050c1dffa401fe70
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 49500
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = d928e0cc1c629716aefc843ff150eec6
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = 9c809619bf56d59d6cad2620d40b0b5356e77aa0045b928ad2a6e977150a3b3b
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = 3638
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 691751a30e991d536b262a27784de212
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 996dd5ea6ddc997b2ff700b6f854a62355295f7ca9506e1cdc0c8004ecf12372
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 4479090
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = 4f35fd36a4977bea9985015bf0f1515e
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = cd5b82e1331bf7be636ce8ee3720de4261983ddd00bf51f9eb3048161169bcc4
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = 677935
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 6072a40a834c5d29f4d88454a234d52a
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 7c92a659930984682a6704ce40bff3919d1e87a5be3e9d534a42148761c1cb76
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 7176462
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 42624b59a9843f09184d017a2ce4f397
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 8aa024c536905da47fd580b99df4c80bd85107f151178665a18995cfcf0db277
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 4379037
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm) = 989c2696624adf5c06d794947c079589
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm) = ffc33b4429734eb9c7463d278296efdd176650bc4b12f0d7a0ed7ec5819cf64b
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm) = 6216986
-MD5
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:15:42 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: (Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a [EMAIL PROTECTED]) On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote: After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this? ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost, linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the port. Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it and see if it fixes the dependency problem? Adi, you did the right thing -- that library is missing at the port. There are two hints. 1. The plist file is not full (one llibrary missing). I'd recommend you to test the patches (on probably fresh machine). Then on deinstalling you'll notice those files that remain undeletted. You may consider reading http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html to create a good (i.e. ready-to-commit) patches. 2. To create a good distinfo file for a linux port try to use make PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES makesum. There are may source files (under GPL) which we must (at least) have while building linux (GPL) ports. PS. I've already sent Jeff a patch and he gave me a successful feedback. I hope this patch will be committed soon. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-8 fetch # of ports errors
Anthony M. Agelastos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello everyone, Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below. Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without problems and after the failed troubleshooting, I had the machine install Firefox and it fetched it and built it without problems. Does anyone have any suggestions? I checked the archives and did not find anything. I The servers don't seem to have that RPM, and the ones I checked (from my copy of the port, which doesn't seem to match yours) had, if anything, an older version. I don't know the right place or version; I'm having a little trouble wandering around the various FTP servers... CVSup'd from cvsup13.us if that has anything to do with it. While on the topic, I noticed earlier today that when I first issued the portupgrade command, it rebuilt the package database and it mentioned that there were 13,3xx packages... last time I checked the website it listed over 14,000 and I have my cvsup file set to d/l all groups. Any ideas? Thank you all for your continued assistance. I've got a hair over 14000 entries in the ports db this morning. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base install error
On Sunday 31 July 2005 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: installing linux_base and get error: /=== linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found Linux mode is not enabled. Loading linux kernel module now... kldload: can't load linux: Exec format error The linux kernel module could not be loaded. Please enable linux mode manually and retry. / I have already added an entry in rc.conf and am running generic kernel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe your linux.ko module isn't matched with your kernel, do you always rebuild the modules when you rebuild the kernel? -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:27:14 +0300, roma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, At me the same problem as at you, whether was possible to you to solve it? [Paste from other thread] I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source with freebsd 4.9 Illegal instruction (core dumped) cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader. /lib/libm.so.6: No such file or directory. debug.cmds:1: Error in sourced command file: email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did you ever figure out a resolu8tion to the problem or is the only fix to upgrade to 5.3 ? Any help would be appreciated! First, make sure you are using linux_compat8 not 7. If that alone works, then wonderful. If not, then the next part depends on what processor you have. If you can support MMX/SSE, the enable SSE in your kernel (off by default in 4.x I believe) and try again. When CS:S first came out, I had to do the SSE/compat8 thing to get it working on an Athlon XP box under 4.x, my Athlon XP box that was running 5.x had no problem once I install compat. For a long time, I couldn't run it on my test server (K6-2 350, no SSE possible), but sometime recently Valve must have fixed it to use old CPUs as well as it did work the last time I tried. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike
I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source with freebsd 4.9 Illegal instruction (core dumped) cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader. /lib/libm.so.6: No such file or directory. debug.cmds:1: Error in sourced command file: email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did you ever figure out a resolu8tion to the problem or is the only fix to upgrade to 5.3 ? Any help would be appreciated! First, make sure you are using linux_compat8 not 7. If that alone works, then wonderful. If not, then the next part depends on what processor you have. If you can support MMX/SSE, the enable SSE in your kernel (off by default in 4.x I believe) and try again. When CS:S first came out, I had to do the SSE/compat8 thing to get it working on an Athlon XP box under 4.x, my Athlon XP box that was running 5.x had no problem once I install compat. For a long time, I couldn't run it on my test server (K6-2 350, no SSE possible), but sometime recently Valve must have fixed it to use old CPUs as well as it did work the last time I tried. Hope this helps, let me know if it doesn't. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux_Base
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:54:51AM -0300, E. J. Cerejo wrote: How can you make linux_base-8 the default for FreeBSD 5.3? It is the default for all versions of FreeBSD, as of a few weeks ago. Kris pgp4d2yVQFwOZ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:44:39PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote: Hi, I'm running 4.8-RELEASE-p27 and had a question regarding my current install of linux_base #portupgrade -l doesn't reveal this package needs upgrading but portaudit -a says: Affected package: linux_base-6.1_6 Type of problem: xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities. Reference: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/ef253f8b-0727-11d9-b45d-000c41e2cdad .html I've followed that url, googled and searched the -questions archive but can't find any information regarding how to correct this. Can anyone point me in the right direction? linux_base-6 will never have the security vulnerability fixed because it's not supported by redhat. linux_base contains redhat 8.x which is also out of support, but does not currently have security problems. It will be updated to something more modern after 4.11-RELEASE. Kris pgplwleXjssTm.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: linux_base
Thanks Kris, unless I've misunderstood...am I at risk by using linux_base-6 and if so how can I correct this? #portupgrade -rR linux_base doesn't do anything and because of hardware limitations I can't upgrade to a major release. -Joe #-Original Message- #From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] #Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:53 PM #To: Warner Joseph #Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' #Subject: Re: linux_base # # #On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:44:39PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote: # # Hi, # # I'm running 4.8-RELEASE-p27 and had a question # regarding my current install of linux_base # # #portupgrade -l doesn't reveal this package needs upgrading # but portaudit -a says: # # Affected package: linux_base-6.1_6 # Type of problem: xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities. # Reference: # #http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/ef253f8b#-0727-11d9-b45d #-000c41e2cdad # .html # # I've followed that url, googled and searched the -questions archive # but can't find any information regarding how to correct this. # # Can anyone point me in the right direction? # #linux_base-6 will never have the security vulnerability fixed because #it's not supported by redhat. linux_base contains redhat 8.x which is #also out of support, but does not currently have security problems. #It will be updated to something more modern after 4.11-RELEASE. # #Kris # # --- This message and any included attachments are from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender by e-mail with a copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:03:54PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote: Thanks Kris, unless I've misunderstood...am I at risk by using linux_base-6 and if so how can I correct this? See the URL you gave me. You have to switch to linux_base-8. See /usr/ports/UPDATING. #portupgrade -rR linux_base doesn't do anything and because of hardware limitations I can't upgrade to a major release. You don't have to do anything to your FreeBSD release. Kris pgpnPDscU0TAQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-8 mystery
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 19:32, Bsd B wrote: Hi, I have a question that has really stumped me. I have searched far and wide and have found no literature on it. My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from packages? I am running linux_base-7.1_7 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE and wish to upgrade to linux_base-8. As root I type pkg_add -r linux_base-8 and get the following Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/linux_base-8.tgz' by URL It installs perfectly from ports, but why not from packages? I am puzzled. Does any one know why or can point me to some reference or literature explaining this mystery? I'm VERY new to freebsd, but as i understand things, all packages are ports, but not all ports are packages (unless you build it yourself of course) Cheers Bob Aaron signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: linux_base-8 mystery
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:32:51PM +1100, Bsd B wrote: Hi, I have a question that has really stumped me. I have searched far and wide and have found no literature on it. My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from packages? The maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED] marked it RESTRICTED because he is under the impression that distributing the package would violate the GPL. You're invited to express to trevor your comments about the correctness of this. Kris pgpidRJDoEE1J.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-8 mystery
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 05:32, Bsd B wrote: Hi, I have a question that has really stumped me. I have searched far and wide and have found no literature on it. My question - Why can't i install linux_base-8 from packages? I am running linux_base-7.1_7 on FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE and wish to upgrade to linux_base-8. As root I type pkg_add -r linux_base-8 and get the following Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/l inux_base-8.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.10-release/Latest/ linux_base-8.tgz' by URL There's no linux_base-8 package there. In fact I don't see linux_base-8 packages built for any 4.x (-RELEASE, -STABLE or -CURRENT). It installs perfectly from ports, but why not from packages? I am puzzled. Does any one know why or can point me to some reference or literature explaining this mystery? Packages only exist if someone builds them. The packages in the release directory are, I believe, a shapshot of the ports tree at the time the release was made. I don't know how often the -STABLE and -CURRENT packages are updated or why linux-base-8 isn't in them. I don't see packages for 5.3-RELEASE or -CURRENT either. See the note in section 4.4.1 of the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html Cheers Bob -- We all enter this world in the same way: naked, screaming, and soaked in blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have to stop there. -- Dana Gould ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux_Base-8 install
Did anyone reply to this person with respect to the below? I've tried e-mailing him directly but am getting a failure in doing so. I have the exact same set up as he and am experiencing the same. Thursday, November 27, 2003, 12:04:43 PM, you wrote: MP I'm running 4.7 Release on one of my systems and am trying to install the MP linux_base-8 from ports. It's failing with the following error: === linux_base-8-8.0_1 depends on executable: rpm - found MP kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 - 3 MP glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6.i386.rpm MP /usr/sbin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Invalid argument MP execution of glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.6 script failed, exit status 1 MP *** Error code 1 MP Has anyone run into this before? MP -- MP Micheal Patterson MP Network Administration MP Cancer Care Network MP 405-917-0600 MP ___ MP [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list MP http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions MP To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Phillipmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Linux_Base 8
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:42:59AM -0800, E. J. Cerejo wrote: I'm running FBSD4.9 release and I'd like to use linux_base 8 instead of 7 but when you install a port that requires the linux emulator it automatically installs linux_base 7 what do I need to do to change this to linux_base 8? Generally all you need to do is delete the linux_base 7 stuff and install linux_base 8 before you attempt to install anything that would depend on the linux_base port. Ports don't fulfil their dependencies by checking that a particular other port has been installed. Rather they check for the presence of a particular file (often a shared library). Only if that file isn't found then they will attempt to install a port that provides what is required. However, in many cases there are several ports that could fulfil the dependency, and if one of those is already installed things should just work with that. If you're a portupgrade(1) user, you should run pkgdb(1) to fix up the dependencies recorded for the installed packages. That's just bookkeeping, and doesn't affect the day to day operation of the system, although it does make it simpler to upgrade ports later on. Also look at the ALT_PKGDEP array in pkgtools.conf as a way of automatically recording the modified dependency in newly installed ports. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base
Scott Ballantyne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If I'm running multi-user (as toor), the build stops when installing glibc. In linux_base, there's actually a coredump, in linux_base-8, it just stops. This happens even running the GENERIC kernel (I had previously thought it was perhaps related to a custom kernel). However, if I drop to single user mode, and make install, it completes, although I get many of the following error messages intended for syslogd: linux: syscall mmap2 (obsolete or not implemented (pid = ) What version of FreeBSD? Do you have linux(8) running when you try the install? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base
Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Scott Ballantyne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If I'm running multi-user (as toor), the build stops when installing glibc. In linux_base, there's actually a coredump, in linux_base-8, it just stops. This happens even running the GENERIC kernel (I had previously thought it was perhaps related to a custom kernel). However, if I drop to single user mode, and make install, it completes, although I get many of the following error messages intended for syslogd: linux: syscall mmap2 (obsolete or not implemented (pid = ) What version of FreeBSD? Do you have linux(8) running when you try the install? Sorry, I should have included this: FreeBSD 4.8-p3. Linux.ko isn't running. For various reasons, I needed to compile the kernel with it included. sdb -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base
Scott Ballantyne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Scott Ballantyne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If I'm running multi-user (as toor), the build stops when installing glibc. In linux_base, there's actually a coredump, in linux_base-8, it just stops. This happens even running the GENERIC kernel (I had previously thought it was perhaps related to a custom kernel). However, if I drop to single user mode, and make install, it completes, although I get many of the following error messages intended for syslogd: linux: syscall mmap2 (obsolete or not implemented (pid = ) What version of FreeBSD? Do you have linux(8) running when you try the install? Sorry, I should have included this: FreeBSD 4.8-p3. Linux.ko isn't running. For various reasons, I needed to compile the kernel with it included. linux.ko is the kernel module; you do need that, but for linux emulation you also need linux(8). Enabling it by default can be done by setting linux_enable in rc.conf(5). I'm not sure if you need the linux emulation running to install linux_base, and if you do need it the port should probably start it by itself, but it should be easy to check. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-7.1_5
On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 22:36, elliot sadlon wrote: hi..i recently installed version 4.2, and then i went and installed acroread-4.05 (from the website), and also linux_base-7.1_5 (since it said i needed this very linux emulator)..i went to xwindows (under the fvwm95 manager) and clicked the acrobat button, the problem arising when a bunch of lines came up saying /kernel: linux: syscall fstat64 is obsoleted or not implemented /kernel: linux: syscall stat64 is obsoleted or not implemented /kernel: linux: syscall setup is obsoleted or not implemented so, of course, id be incredibly thankful if you could help out..i guess the question is how to get the linux emulator going.. thanx :) _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Once you install it from the port it should work, you may need to also update the database. What version of acrobat you using because I know that some versions have some problems with the newer version of the linux emulator. -- David Loszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] BSDAdmins.net - Your #1 source for BSD Collaboration! ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linux_base-7.1_5
On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 03:36:12AM +, elliot sadlon wrote: hi..i recently installed version 4.2, and then i went and installed acroread-4.05 (from the website), and also linux_base-7.1_5 (since it said i needed this very linux emulator)..i went to xwindows (under the fvwm95 manager) and clicked the acrobat button, the problem arising when a bunch of lines came up saying /kernel: linux: syscall fstat64 is obsoleted or not implemented /kernel: linux: syscall stat64 is obsoleted or not implemented /kernel: linux: syscall setup is obsoleted or not implemented These advisory messages are harmless. glibc will fall back to using other syscalls. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?
AK == Alex Kiesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AK On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: Alex Kiesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7. You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5. AK I had, but I wanted to run acroread5. My experience was that to use linux-base-7 successfully with acroread4 or acroread5, I had to be running XFree86 4.x or newer. With XFree 3.x, acroread would drop core or fail in other ways. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 04:25, Gary W. Swearingen wrote: Alex Kiesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7. You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5. I had, but I wanted to run acroread5. Of those two, I find only acroread4 works on my linux-base-7.1, but from the error message, it looks like it didn't like my OS upgrade and re-making acroread5 would probably fix it. In any case, the main Re-making acroread5 did not help; the error message says anything about some incompatible FreeBSD stuff, so I suppose the start-script is broken. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 18:20, Fernan Aguero wrote: Now many ports have their dependencies listed as linux_base-7.1 or something similar. This means that my linux-compatibility tree got updated when I installed some of this ports? or should I do this manually by going to /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base and doing a 'make install'? Most ports can run with linux-base-6. Personally I have made better experience with linux-base-6. AFAIK linux-base-6 represents a RedHat 6.2 system, while linux-base-7 is RedHat 7.x. Now, what are the pros and cons of -7.1 and -6? I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7. With version 6 I've had no problems. Suggestions? I'd continue to run linux-base-6. Greets, Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: linux_base vs linux_base-6?
Alex Kiesel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've not been able to run acroread or sybase-11.0.3 with linux-base-7. You might have better luck with acroread4 or acroread5. Of those two, I find only acroread4 works on my linux-base-7.1, but from the error message, it looks like it didn't like my OS upgrade and re-making acroread5 would probably fix it. In any case, the main programs are scripts which one could probably debug if the problem is in the script like my problem seems to be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
