Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--

2004-01-26 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:53:29PM -0500, Jud wrote:
 On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:57:38 -0500, nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Basically, the machine is overheating (I believe)
  because the cpu's aren't cycling down.
  Previously I was able to cycle the processors down
  with the following sysctl variables:
 
  machdep.apm_suspend_delay:
  machdep.apm_standby_delay:
 
  however, for some reason those variables currently,
  aren't any where to be found by the
  up_and_running system.  Please use the hyperlink
  above for details.

 You may want to have a look at /usr/ports/sysutils/fvcool.  (If you'd like 
 a script to run it on startup, Dr. Matthew Seaman posted one to the 
 mailing list some months ago - January?)

Indeed I did.  You can download it from

http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/fvcool.tgz

One of these days I must a) update the script to use the rcNG stuff
and b) submit it to the maintainer of the fvcool port.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   26 The Paddocks
  Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--

2003-11-05 Thread nw1
Page updated-- http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing  One 
(1)
question is still outstanding ... Yes=I'm still researching this.


-
All incoming attachments get deleted.
Have a nice day.
-

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--

2003-11-04 Thread nw1
Jud, (see below)
- Original Message - 
From: Jud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variablesnotavailable--



 On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:05:02 -0500, nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 [snip]
I'm interested in those missing sysctl variables I posted @
http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing.
Using a Third party
application/script to fix something that was natively working or under
control, I don't
think, is the way to go and causes another level of complexity.
 [snip]
  No problem, I am interested in any and all *sane/reasonable feedback.  I
  haven't been to
  much a fan of using third party applications to fix something the
  original code or
  hardware should be able to handle.

 FVCool isn't a third party application as I understand the term.
 Perhaps a portion of the README file will make things clearer:

I understand better now (FVCool).  Thanks for taking the time to explain that FVCool is
not a third party application.  I'm still questioning the difference in behavior 
--not
only between the two (2) OS's when idling, --overheating in FreeBSD, and *not 
overheating
in the non FreeBSD OS. whatsoever.


 As is well known AMD's Athlon/Duron is a 'hot' CPU.  It really produces
 a lot of heat.  This is mainly because it consumes a lot of electric
 power.  However, there is an another reason: Generally CPU goes into
 power-save mode when it is in the idle state, but in almost all the
 mother boards this is prohibited in the case of Athlon/Duron mother
 boards in their original BIOS settings.  This software changes the PCI
 configuration data of the chipset (north bridge), and allow Athlon/Duron
 to go into power-save mode.  The principle is very simple if you have
 information.  Actually, you can do exactly the same thing as this
 software
 manually by using the 'pciconf' command in FreeBSD.

   Why mother board vendors release their products with such BIOS
   settings?

What's the reason? nothing here

 Well, there is a reason: There is a possibility to get the system
 unstable
 and/or even to hang or crash the system.  Therefore, this software is
 somewhat dangerous in this respect, and I will not take any
 responsibilities for problems caused by using this software.  Please
 check the original Martin Peters's VCool web site for learning more of
 technical details:

  http://vcool.occludo.net/;

 So what FVCool does is utilize the 'pciconf' command to encourage AMD
 CPUs to go into power-save mode when idle, a function most motherboard
 manufacturers turn off for the stability reasons mentioned by FVCool's
 author.  As the documentation says, you can manually make these changes
 with the 'pciconf' command, but why not save typing by installing the
 port and running the 'fvcool' command, or run it automatically with a
 script?

 Based on the names of the sysctls you're after, I'd speculate they may
 operate in much (or even exactly) the same way.  That is why I wondered,
 in response to your advice to Paul Mather, whether those sysctl settings
 would work with Intel CPUs.

My suggestion to *Paul Mather was in fact a blind suggestion only based on the 
settings to
lower the usage of the cpu and not raise;  had it been the other way around, I'm not 
sure
I would have recommended he set those knobs to '1'.

The following fact/issue, i think, still remains outstanding; Using the setup I 
originally
posted, we can do somethings within the non FreeBSD OS that will rival a looping 'make
buildworld | buildkernel, utilizing both cpu's for encoding purposes while playing a
quake3, utII game and the like, never overheating or exhibit any instability.

Please don't take that above statement as a this OS is better than your OS.

What I've understood from this particular posting is this:
the motherboards used for the AMD Athlon/Duron(s) have a default BIOS setting --not
allowing the processors to go into 'Power Saving Mode' --while intel based --default 
BIOS
settings: *do allow 'Power Saving Mode' for the processor(s). y/n?

That seems to be just a bit disturbing.  If we could for the purposes of this paragraph
alone, suspend the notion of *over heating while idling*...  As someone stated earlier 
in
the thread, what about these cpu's under heavy load within FreeBSD? -- in our case,
without the air-conditioner on;-- will overheat and shutdown  I have put these cpu's
under heavy load in a non FreeBSD environment and the hardware refuses to break down,
overheat or shutdown

-- Unsuspend the notion of *over heating while idling*...  --

Should we turn our air-conditioner off and set:
machdep.apm_suspend_delay: 1
machdep.apm_standby_delay: 1
and let this dual AMD idle, the machine will overheat and shutdown in a matter of 
hours.
Once the room is at a tempurature warm enough to make the machine shutdown, the only 
way
to 

Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--

2003-11-04 Thread Jud
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:01:00 -0500, nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[snip]
  Why mother board vendors release their products with such BIOS
  settings?
What's the reason? nothing here
Not sure if this is what you were asking, but the reason is explained in 
the quoted lines just below:

Well, there is a reason: There is a possibility to get the system
unstable
and/or even to hang or crash the system.
[snip]

What I've understood from this particular posting is this:
the motherboards used for the AMD Athlon/Duron(s) have a default BIOS 
setting --not
allowing the processors to go into 'Power Saving Mode' --while intel 
based --default BIOS
settings: *do allow 'Power Saving Mode' for the processor(s). y/n?
I don't know enough to be able to tell you whether Intel-based mobos are 
configured by default to allow a power saving mode, or if the fact that 
Intel CPUs run cooler (I remember reading a memorable description of the 
Athlon Thunderbird as a blowtorch on the head of a pin) means power 
saving mode never becomes an issue.

That seems to be just a bit disturbing.  If we could for the purposes of 
this paragraph
alone, suspend the notion of *over heating while idling*...  As someone 
stated earlier in
the thread, what about these cpu's under heavy load within FreeBSD? -- 
in our case,
without the air-conditioner on;-- will overheat and shutdown  I have 
put these cpu's
under heavy load in a non FreeBSD environment and the hardware refuses 
to break down,
overheat or shutdown

-- Unsuspend the notion of *over heating while idling*...  --

Should we turn our air-conditioner off and set:
machdep.apm_suspend_delay: 1
machdep.apm_standby_delay: 1
and let this dual AMD idle, the machine will overheat and shutdown in a 
matter of hours.
Once the room is at a tempurature warm enough to make the machine 
shutdown, the only way
to keep that machine on for more than five (5) to Twenty (20) minutes is 
to turn the
air-conditioner on and leave it on.

Should we turn our air-conditioner off and set:
machdep.apm_suspend_delay: 0
machdep.apm_standby_delay: 0
Run a script to loop:
make buildworld  make buildkernel KERNCONF=MY_KERN
The machine seems to run like a champ without overheating/shutting down.
SUMMARY:

I hear all of what you're saying here, however, if we leave apm out of 
this altogether,
whether inTel, AMD or any other processor, shouldn't the processor(s), 
dual or not, be
able to run full-throttle or, idle without overheating/ shutting down?
Yes, but: Let's say for some reason (e.g., heat conducting cement/paste 
interface not quite so nicely done on this particular unit) that this unit 
runs hot in the first place.  I don't know if the Other OS is tuned to the 
CPU, or has hooks into low-level functions in the CPU, or the CPU is tuned 
by the manufacturer to the Other OS, so that it remains just *this* side 
of shutdown with the Other OS, and goes just *that* side of shutdown with 
FreeBSD.  (We're way beyond my level of knowledge here, so if any of this 
really is correct I just got lucky.:)

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--

2003-11-03 Thread nw1


 What version of FreeBSD are you using?
 Did you compile amp into the kernel?

I think you're not understanding what I posted @
http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing

The first line has what version I'm running.  The entire document @
http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing implies; this was a
running system with no serious issues; meaning; the sysctl items I'm speaking of were 
in
fact available and working.

If i can figure out how to make these sysctl variables available, I can set them like 
they
were before, hence my overheating problem is solved.

See what I mean?


 --- nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The problem can be viewed @:
 
 http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing
 
  Basically, the machine is overheating (I believe)
  because the cpu's aren't cycling down.
  Previously I was able to cycle the processors down
  with the following sysctl variables:
 
  machdep.apm_suspend_delay:
  machdep.apm_standby_delay:
 
  however, for some reason those variables currently,
  aren't any where to be found by the
  up_and_running system.  Please use the hyperlink
  above for details.
 
  Thanks for reading.  All feedback is welcome.
  -
  All incoming attachments get deleted.
  Have a nice day.
  -
 
  ___
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
 http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--

2003-11-03 Thread C. Ulrich
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 17:38, nw1 wrote:
 The problem can be viewed @:
 http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing
 
 Basically, the machine is overheating (I believe) because the cpu's aren't cycling 
 down.
 Previously I was able to cycle the processors down with the following sysctl 
 variables:
 
 machdep.apm_suspend_delay:
 machdep.apm_standby_delay:
 
 however, for some reason those variables currently, aren't any where to be found by 
 the
 up_and_running system.  Please use the hyperlink above for details.
 
 Thanks for reading.  All feedback is welcome.

Okay, this piqued my curiosity enough that I took a look at the message
in the URL above. 

Conclusion: FreeBSD doesn't even enter into it. The ONLY good solution
to this is to get better physical cooling of the CPUs (or the entire box
if you have to). Otherwise, you're still going to run into problems
whenever there's a full system load. Chances are, they're still running
way too hot even if they're not crashing the system. This will only
result in premature failure of the processors. Take it from the close
friend of an overclocker. :) If the machine is crashing (you only say
overheating, which could mean either crashing or just getting
dangerously hot), then I would even go so far as to say that there's a
possibility that the stability of the processors is already decreasing,
leading to the more recent crashes.

Charles Ulrich
-- 
http://bityard.net

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--

2003-11-03 Thread Jud
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 19:57:38 -0500, nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



What version of FreeBSD are you using?
Did you compile amp into the kernel?
I think you're not understanding what I posted @
http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing
The first line has what version I'm running.  The entire document @
http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing 
implies; this was a
running system with no serious issues; meaning; the sysctl items I'm 
speaking of were in
fact available and working.

If i can figure out how to make these sysctl variables available, I can 
set them like they
were before, hence my overheating problem is solved.

See what I mean?

--- nw1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The problem can be viewed @:

http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/installation/sysctl_variables_missing

 Basically, the machine is overheating (I believe)
 because the cpu's aren't cycling down.
 Previously I was able to cycle the processors down
 with the following sysctl variables:

 machdep.apm_suspend_delay:
 machdep.apm_standby_delay:

 however, for some reason those variables currently,
 aren't any where to be found by the
 up_and_running system.  Please use the hyperlink
 above for details.

 Thanks for reading.  All feedback is welcome.
You may want to have a look at /usr/ports/sysutils/fvcool.  (If you'd like 
a script to run it on startup, Dr. Matthew Seaman posted one to the 
mailing list some months ago - January?)

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]