Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-28 Thread Chris
On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Of course not :P  What are the PR references?

  Try this.
 
  Login to twice on ssh.
  If not root su both to root.
  using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
  on the first tty type 'killall watch'
  you have now crashed freebsd 7 and most probably a auto reboot timer
  is counting down.

 I can confirm this.

  Even typing reboot to reboot the server causes page faults.

 But not this.

 Kris


Hi Kris

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116719 is the watch report

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116720 for the reboot

The reboot stopped crashing when I recompiled world using -O I have
however seen it on other servers crashing on -O binaries its not
consistent like the watch problem but its on numerous servers I seen
the problem on.

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-28 Thread Kris Kennaway

Chris wrote:

On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Of course not :P  What are the PR references?


Try this.

Login to twice on ssh.
If not root su both to root.
using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
on the first tty type 'killall watch'
you have now crashed freebsd 7 and most probably a auto reboot timer
is counting down.

I can confirm this.


Even typing reboot to reboot the server causes page faults.

But not this.

Kris



Hi Kris

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116719 is the watch report

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116720 for the reboot

The reboot stopped crashing when I recompiled world using -O I have
however seen it on other servers crashing on -O binaries its not
consistent like the watch problem but its on numerous servers I seen
the problem on.


Unfortunately both of these are not high quality PR submissions, which 
is probably why no action has been taken yet.  At least in the first one 
you give a how to repeat that I was able to follow, but in general 
when you encounter a panic you should be providing the backtrace and/or 
other debugging information requested here:


http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html

The second PR is basically null as written since it cannot be reproduced 
and no debugging information was submitted.  If you are interested in 
proceeding with it, please reproduce and obtain the necessary kernel 
debugging.  Otherwise we should close it.


Does the patch I sent you solve the first problem?

Kris

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-28 Thread Chris
On 28/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Chris wrote:
  On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Of course not :P  What are the PR references?
 
  Try this.
 
  Login to twice on ssh.
  If not root su both to root.
  using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
  on the first tty type 'killall watch'
  you have now crashed freebsd 7 and most probably a auto reboot timer
  is counting down.
  I can confirm this.
 
  Even typing reboot to reboot the server causes page faults.
  But not this.
 
  Kris
 
 
  Hi Kris
 
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116719 is the watch report
 
  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=116720 for the reboot
 
  The reboot stopped crashing when I recompiled world using -O I have
  however seen it on other servers crashing on -O binaries its not
  consistent like the watch problem but its on numerous servers I seen
  the problem on.

 Unfortunately both of these are not high quality PR submissions, which
 is probably why no action has been taken yet.  At least in the first one
 you give a how to repeat that I was able to follow, but in general
 when you encounter a panic you should be providing the backtrace and/or
 other debugging information requested here:

 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html

 The second PR is basically null as written since it cannot be reproduced
 and no debugging information was submitted.  If you are interested in
 proceeding with it, please reproduce and obtain the necessary kernel
 debugging.  Otherwise we should close it.

 Does the patch I sent you solve the first problem?

 Kris


Ok first an apology there was feedback to 116720 which I didnt know
until now.   I did another crash on the watch but had foreground fsck
set in rc.conf and did another immediate reboot afterwards and as
expected because no bg fsck running it didnt crash.

Patching it now and will also enable full debugging on the kernel.

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-28 Thread Chris
On 28/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Unfortunately both of these are not high quality PR submissions, which
 is probably why no action has been taken yet.  At least in the first one
 you give a how to repeat that I was able to follow, but in general
 when you encounter a panic you should be providing the backtrace and/or
 other debugging information requested here:

 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html

 The second PR is basically null as written since it cannot be reproduced
 and no debugging information was submitted.  If you are interested in
 proceeding with it, please reproduce and obtain the necessary kernel
 debugging.  Otherwise we should close it.

 Does the patch I sent you solve the first problem?

 Kris


Ok the patch hasnt stopped the watch crashing in addition the reboot I
did after compiling the new kernel also caused a crash and there was
defenitly no fsck running in the background when I did the reboot.

Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in
kernel mode
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: fault virtual address= 0x24
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: fault code   = supervisor
read, page not present
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: instruction pointer  = 0x20:0xc3f84262
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: stack pointer=
0x28:0xde0c2b34
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: frame pointer=
0x28:0xde0c2b88
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: code segment = base 0x0,
limit 0xf, type 0x1b
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: processor eflags = interrupt
enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: current process  = 901 (sh)
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: trap number  = 12
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: panic: page fault
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: cpuid = 0
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: Uptime: 49m19s
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: Physical memory: 723 MB
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: Dumping 122 MB: 107 91 75 59 43 27 11
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: Dump complete
Nov 28 12:21:52 revolution kernel: Automatic reboot in 15 seconds -
press a key on the console to abort

I will post back later when I have more debug information for you.

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-27 Thread Kris Kennaway

Kris Kennaway wrote:

Chris wrote:

On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Tore Lund wrote:

Ivan Voras wrote:

Dave wrote:

Hello,
   How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their 
any

outstanding issues?
Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you 
might as

well start using it now.

It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should 
throughly

test it for your own workload before using it in production.

Just curious, what is the official forum for pre-release discussions?
I notice there are some threads on the current list, but it seems to
me that this is really questions stuff, since it is an upcoming 
release.

freebsd-stable is probably best.

In any case, I tried the boot-only CD, and I was not able to install 
any

packages during the install process.  Sysinstall aborted with Signal 11
when trying to read INDEX from the ftp site.  Pkg_add from the command
line seems to work, however, so it looks like I may get online from
7.0-BETA3 tomorrow.

That is expected, packages are not available until later in the release
cycle.


Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of 
commands

than use the old, rickety sysinstall.

One is in early development, but not even complete let alone ready to
replace sysinstall.

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Kris can I ask what sort of importance bugs that cause crashes (page
faults) are?
I reported 2 bugs before BETA1 both these bugs involved 7.0 getting a
page fault and of course then stop responding requiring a reboot yet
both PRs have had no response and both bugs are still present in BETA3
I see minor issues been worked on such as responsiveness in desktop
use whilst issues that cause system crashes are left unattended.  Is
FreeBSD primarily a desktop os now and thats the new path?


Of course not :P  What are the PR references?


Try this.

Login to twice on ssh.
If not root su both to root.
using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
on the first tty type 'killall watch'
you have now crashed freebsd 7 and most probably a auto reboot timer
is counting down.


I can confirm this.


Try this patch from kib@

diff --git a/sys/dev/snp/snp.c b/sys/dev/snp/snp.c
index a84e90c..b8f3d63 100644
--- a/sys/dev/snp/snp.c
+++ b/sys/dev/snp/snp.c
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ snpioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t data, 
int flags,

 struct thread *td)
 {
struct snoop *snp;
-   struct tty *tp, *tpo;
+   struct tty *tp;
struct cdev *tdev;
struct file *fp;
int s;
@@ -502,6 +502,9 @@ snpioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t data, 
int flags,

s = *(int *)data;
if (s  0)
return (snp_down(snp));
+   if (snp-snp_tty != NULL)
+   return (EBUSY);
+
if (fget(td, s, fp) != 0)
return (EINVAL);
if (fp-f_type != DTYPE_VNODE ||
@@ -520,13 +523,6 @@ snpioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t 
data, int flags,

return (EBUSY);

s = spltty();
-
-   if (snp-snp_target == NULL) {
-   tpo = snp-snp_tty;
-   if (tpo)
-   tpo-t_state = ~TS_SNOOP;
-   }
-
tp-t_state |= TS_SNOOP;
snp-snp_olddisc = tp-t_line;
tp-t_line = snooplinedisc;

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-26 Thread Ivan Voras
Tore Lund wrote:
 Ivan Voras wrote:
 Dave wrote:
 Hello,
How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
 outstanding issues?
 Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
 well start using it now.

 It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should throughly
 test it for your own workload before using it in production.
 
 Just curious, what is the official forum for pre-release discussions?
 I notice there are some threads on the current list, but it seems to
 me that this is really questions stuff, since it is an upcoming release.

It depends. As I see it, current and stable lists are used more by
knowledgeable people who can more accurately pinpoint a problem and
possibly provide a solution, while questions is for everyone else.
Between current and stable it's a more complex choice. There's no
7-STABLE yet but there is RELENG_7 so people tend to post on both in
this intermediate period.

 In any case, I tried the boot-only CD, and I was not able to install any
 packages during the install process.  Sysinstall aborted with Signal 11
 when trying to read INDEX from the ftp site.  Pkg_add from the command
 line seems to work, however, so it looks like I may get online from
 7.0-BETA3 tomorrow.

I don't know if 7.0-BETA3 has packages on the CD - I think in the past
only release CDs had proper support for on-CD packages.

 Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
 read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
 7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of commands
 than use the old, rickety sysinstall.

Yes there was, and I'm working on it. Unfortunately, late in the
development cycle of 7 (BETA2) there was a bug introduced in the kernel
which collides with my work so far so the development of the installer
is essentially paused until the bug is fixed. More unfortunately, it
looks like the bug will not be fixed for 7.0-RELEASE so there will not
be a new installer for 7.0-RELEASE.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway

Tore Lund wrote:

Ivan Voras wrote:

Dave wrote:

Hello,
   How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
outstanding issues?

Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
well start using it now.

It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should throughly
test it for your own workload before using it in production.


Just curious, what is the official forum for pre-release discussions?
I notice there are some threads on the current list, but it seems to
me that this is really questions stuff, since it is an upcoming release.


freebsd-stable is probably best.


In any case, I tried the boot-only CD, and I was not able to install any
packages during the install process.  Sysinstall aborted with Signal 11
when trying to read INDEX from the ftp site.  Pkg_add from the command
line seems to work, however, so it looks like I may get online from
7.0-BETA3 tomorrow.


That is expected, packages are not available until later in the release 
cycle.



Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of commands
than use the old, rickety sysinstall.


One is in early development, but not even complete let alone ready to 
replace sysinstall.


Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-26 Thread Tore Lund
Ivan Voras wrote:
 Tore Lund wrote:
 Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
 read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
 7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of commands
 than use the old, rickety sysinstall.
 
 Yes there was, and I'm working on it. Unfortunately, late in the
 development cycle of 7 (BETA2) there was a bug introduced in the kernel
 which collides with my work so far so the development of the installer
 is essentially paused until the bug is fixed. More unfortunately, it
 looks like the bug will not be fixed for 7.0-RELEASE so there will not
 be a new installer for 7.0-RELEASE.

Thank you for the effort on the install system.  And thanks to you and
Kris for some answers.
-- 
Tore

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-26 Thread Chris
On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Tore Lund wrote:
  Ivan Voras wrote:
  Dave wrote:
  Hello,
 How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
  outstanding issues?
  Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
  well start using it now.
 
  It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should throughly
  test it for your own workload before using it in production.
 
  Just curious, what is the official forum for pre-release discussions?
  I notice there are some threads on the current list, but it seems to
  me that this is really questions stuff, since it is an upcoming release.

 freebsd-stable is probably best.

  In any case, I tried the boot-only CD, and I was not able to install any
  packages during the install process.  Sysinstall aborted with Signal 11
  when trying to read INDEX from the ftp site.  Pkg_add from the command
  line seems to work, however, so it looks like I may get online from
  7.0-BETA3 tomorrow.

 That is expected, packages are not available until later in the release
 cycle.

  Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
  read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
  7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of commands
  than use the old, rickety sysinstall.

 One is in early development, but not even complete let alone ready to
 replace sysinstall.

 Kris
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Kris can I ask what sort of importance bugs that cause crashes (page
faults) are?
I reported 2 bugs before BETA1 both these bugs involved 7.0 getting a
page fault and of course then stop responding requiring a reboot yet
both PRs have had no response and both bugs are still present in BETA3
I see minor issues been worked on such as responsiveness in desktop
use whilst issues that cause system crashes are left unattended.  Is
FreeBSD primarily a desktop os now and thats the new path?

Try this.

Login to twice on ssh.
If not root su both to root.
using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
on the first tty type 'killall watch'
you have now crashed freebsd 7 and most probably a auto reboot timer
is counting down.

Even typing reboot to reboot the server causes page faults.

This is nothing to do with hardware very repeatable behaviour happens
for me on at least 4 different freebsd 7 servers, if I compile world
with -O not -O2 the default it stops reboot causing page faults on
some of the servers.

Chris

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-26 Thread James Harrison
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 15:34 +, Chris wrote:
 On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Tore Lund wrote:
   Ivan Voras wrote:
   Dave wrote:
   Hello,
  How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
   outstanding issues?
   Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
   well start using it now.
  
   It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should throughly
   test it for your own workload before using it in production.
  
   Just curious, what is the official forum for pre-release discussions?
   I notice there are some threads on the current list, but it seems to
   me that this is really questions stuff, since it is an upcoming release.
 
  freebsd-stable is probably best.
 
   In any case, I tried the boot-only CD, and I was not able to install any
   packages during the install process.  Sysinstall aborted with Signal 11
   when trying to read INDEX from the ftp site.  Pkg_add from the command
   line seems to work, however, so it looks like I may get online from
   7.0-BETA3 tomorrow.
 
  That is expected, packages are not available until later in the release
  cycle.
 
   Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
   read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
   7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of commands
   than use the old, rickety sysinstall.
 
  One is in early development, but not even complete let alone ready to
  replace sysinstall.
 
  Kris
  ___
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
  http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
  To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 Kris can I ask what sort of importance bugs that cause crashes (page
 faults) are?
 I reported 2 bugs before BETA1 both these bugs involved 7.0 getting a
 page fault and of course then stop responding requiring a reboot yet
 both PRs have had no response and both bugs are still present in BETA3
 I see minor issues been worked on such as responsiveness in desktop
 use whilst issues that cause system crashes are left unattended.  Is
 FreeBSD primarily a desktop os now and thats the new path?
 
 Try this.
 
 Login to twice on ssh.
 If not root su both to root.
 using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
 on the first tty type 'killall watch'
 you have now crashed freebsd 7 and most probably a auto reboot timer
 is counting down.
 
 Even typing reboot to reboot the server causes page faults.
 
 This is nothing to do with hardware very repeatable behaviour happens
 for me on at least 4 different freebsd 7 servers, if I compile world
 with -O not -O2 the default it stops reboot causing page faults on
 some of the servers.
 
 Chris
 
 Chris
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This looks like your bug:

Description:
when using the command killall watch with at least 1 active watch process 
running the kernel gets a page fault and reboots.



Is the above the behaviour that's the problem, or is the behaviour you
describe in your email the issue? I can confirm the stuff in your email,
but haven't tried using killall watch when watch is using other options.

James

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway

Chris wrote:

On 26/11/2007, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Tore Lund wrote:

Ivan Voras wrote:

Dave wrote:

Hello,
   How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
outstanding issues?

Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
well start using it now.

It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should throughly
test it for your own workload before using it in production.

Just curious, what is the official forum for pre-release discussions?
I notice there are some threads on the current list, but it seems to
me that this is really questions stuff, since it is an upcoming release.

freebsd-stable is probably best.


In any case, I tried the boot-only CD, and I was not able to install any
packages during the install process.  Sysinstall aborted with Signal 11
when trying to read INDEX from the ftp site.  Pkg_add from the command
line seems to work, however, so it looks like I may get online from
7.0-BETA3 tomorrow.

That is expected, packages are not available until later in the release
cycle.


Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of commands
than use the old, rickety sysinstall.

One is in early development, but not even complete let alone ready to
replace sysinstall.

Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Kris can I ask what sort of importance bugs that cause crashes (page
faults) are?
I reported 2 bugs before BETA1 both these bugs involved 7.0 getting a
page fault and of course then stop responding requiring a reboot yet
both PRs have had no response and both bugs are still present in BETA3
I see minor issues been worked on such as responsiveness in desktop
use whilst issues that cause system crashes are left unattended.  Is
FreeBSD primarily a desktop os now and thats the new path?


Of course not :P  What are the PR references?


Try this.

Login to twice on ssh.
If not root su both to root.
using the 2nd tty do a watch -W on the first tty.
on the first tty type 'killall watch'
you have now crashed freebsd 7 and most probably a auto reboot timer
is counting down.


I can confirm this.


Even typing reboot to reboot the server causes page faults.


But not this.

Kris

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-25 Thread Ivan Voras
Dave wrote:
 Hello,
How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
 outstanding issues?

Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
well start using it now.

It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should throughly
test it for your own workload before using it in production.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: stability of FreeBSD 7 Beta 3?

2007-11-25 Thread Tore Lund
Ivan Voras wrote:
 Dave wrote:
 Hello,
How stable is FreeBSD 7 Beta 3? Is it near production are their any
 outstanding issues?
 
 Probably no major bugs will be fixed between now and 7.0 so you might as
 well start using it now.
 
 It's stable enough like all .0 releases, meaning you should throughly
 test it for your own workload before using it in production.

Just curious, what is the official forum for pre-release discussions?
I notice there are some threads on the current list, but it seems to
me that this is really questions stuff, since it is an upcoming release.

In any case, I tried the boot-only CD, and I was not able to install any
packages during the install process.  Sysinstall aborted with Signal 11
when trying to read INDEX from the ftp site.  Pkg_add from the command
line seems to work, however, so it looks like I may get online from
7.0-BETA3 tomorrow.

Moreover, wasn't there supposed to be a new install program?  I have
read some promising remarks about it, but it's certainly not part of
7.0-BETA3.  Personally, I would much rather type a long list of commands
than use the old, rickety sysinstall.
-- 
Tore

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]