Re: searching for a good IDE
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ilya Kazakevich kazakevichi...@gmail.com wrote: If you use VI, be sure to install http://insenvim.sourceforge.net/ :))) Intellisense is the difference between IDE and text editor Isn't that the same than Omni Completion[1] already present in Vim = 7? [1] http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Omni_completion On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.netwrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: Quoth Charlie Kester on Sunday, 27 March 2011: Personally, I prefer vim. ;) +1 Someone will object that the OP asked for an IDE. IMO, vim Integrates quite well with the shell, make, etc. vim is all one needs ... once I sat down and learned the basics of vim/vi I stopped installing nano, I feel much more comfortable in vim now then any other editor, even notepad. gvim on my *one* windows machine and vim everywhere else makes me very happy. -- Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:41:28 +0200 Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: I'm searching for a good IDE for my development stuff - c, c++, python, rails, php Can someone advise one? And I don't wanna use eclipse. :-) KDevelop (http://www.kdevelop.org/) 4 is quite good. -- Bruce Cran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
On 03/27/11 15:49, Bruce Cran wrote: On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:41:28 +0200 Alokatmail...@alokat.org wrote: I'm searching for a good IDE for my development stuff - c, c++, python, rails, php Can someone advise one? And I don't wanna use eclipse. :-) KDevelop (http://www.kdevelop.org/) 4 is quite good. Maybe ... but it's QT! :( ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
AFAIK intellij has several IDEs (for python, ruby, php) but not sure about c and c++ Their java ide is very good and popular, and other based on the same platform, so they may be good too. On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: Hi, I'm searching for a good IDE for my development stuff - c, c++, python, rails, php Can someone advise one? And I don't wanna use eclipse. :-) Regards, alokat ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
Hi, On Sunday 27 March 2011 20:41:28 Alokat wrote: I'm searching for a good IDE for my development stuff - c, c++, python, rails, php Can someone advise one? And I don't wanna use eclipse. :-) I am pretty happy with Kate from the KDE package. Erich ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
Alokat wrote: Hi, I'm searching for a good IDE for my development stuff - c, c++, python, rails, php Can someone advise one? And I don't wanna use eclipse. :-) Try to google and test for yourself. stuff isn't very specific - Is this casual code hacking and you need only syntax highlighting or you want intelligent code completion and other things.. Netbeans likely covers all those languages to some extent Qtcreator - QT based, but probably does syntax highlighting just as well as Kate vim / emacs - etc... There's no panacea to this question.. What editor may work really well for one language may not be the best for another.. Good luck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
On Sun 27 Mar 2011 at 07:02:33 PDT Alokat wrote: On 03/27/11 15:49, Bruce Cran wrote: On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:41:28 +0200 Alokatmail...@alokat.org wrote: I'm searching for a good IDE for my development stuff - c, c++, python, rails, php Can someone advise one? And I don't wanna use eclipse. :-) KDevelop (http://www.kdevelop.org/) 4 is quite good. Maybe ... but it's QT! :( Is gtk OK? Try anjuta, or geany. Personally, I prefer vim. ;) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:41:28 +0200 Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: I'm searching for a good IDE for my development stuff - c, c++, python, rails, php Can someone advise one? And I don't wanna use eclipse. :-) Personally I use Emacs, but you may try Code::Blocks (http://www.codeblocks.org/)...Even Cmake generates project files for it. Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: CDBF17CA signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: searching for a good IDE
Quoth Charlie Kester on Sunday, 27 March 2011: Personally, I prefer vim. ;) +1 Someone will object that the OP asked for an IDE. IMO, vim Integrates quite well with the shell, make, etc. -- .o. | Sterling (Chip) Camden | http://camdensoftware.com ..o | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | http://chipsquips.com ooo | 2048R/D6DBAF91 | http://chipstips.com pgp4AOrL7ttVD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: searching for a good IDE
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: Quoth Charlie Kester on Sunday, 27 March 2011: Personally, I prefer vim. ;) +1 Someone will object that the OP asked for an IDE. IMO, vim Integrates quite well with the shell, make, etc. vim is all one needs ... once I sat down and learned the basics of vim/vi I stopped installing nano, I feel much more comfortable in vim now then any other editor, even notepad. gvim on my *one* windows machine and vim everywhere else makes me very happy. -- Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
On Sun 27 Mar 2011 at 11:57:46 PDT Chris Brennan wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: Quoth Charlie Kester on Sunday, 27 March 2011: Personally, I prefer vim. ;) +1 Someone will object that the OP asked for an IDE. IMO, vim Integrates quite well with the shell, make, etc. vim is all one needs ... once I sat down and learned the basics of vim/vi I stopped installing nano, I feel much more comfortable in vim now then any other editor, even notepad. gvim on my *one* windows machine and vim everywhere else makes me very happy. As Chip said, vi/vim integrates nicely with the shell and other development tools. Along with those tools, it provides a flexible and powerful development environment. It just doesn't do it in the way most people think of when they talk about IDEs. If the OP is looking for something more like Visual Studio or Xcode, however, then I would repeat my suggestion to look at anjuta and geany. Codelite and Code::Blocks might also be worth considering. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:57:46 -0400, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: Quoth Charlie Kester on Sunday, 27 March 2011: Personally, I prefer vim. ;) +1 Someone will object that the OP asked for an IDE. IMO, vim Integrates quite well with the shell, make, etc. vim is all one needs ... once I sat down and learned the basics of vim/vi I stopped installing nano, I feel much more comfortable in vim now then any other editor, even notepad. gvim on my *one* windows machine and vim everywhere else makes me very happy. You can use vi/vim (or any other favourite editor) together with good Makefiles, a bunch of nicely arranged terminals and some command aliases to get a good IDE (which maybe doesn't even deserve the name, but can be a tool for a similar purpose). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching for a good IDE
If you use VI, be sure to install http://insenvim.sourceforge.net/ :))) Intellisense is the difference between IDE and text editor On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.netwrote: On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote: Quoth Charlie Kester on Sunday, 27 March 2011: Personally, I prefer vim. ;) +1 Someone will object that the OP asked for an IDE. IMO, vim Integrates quite well with the shell, make, etc. vim is all one needs ... once I sat down and learned the basics of vim/vi I stopped installing nano, I feel much more comfortable in vim now then any other editor, even notepad. gvim on my *one* windows machine and vim everywhere else makes me very happy. -- Did you know... If you play a Windows 2000 CD backwards, you hear satanic messages, but what's worse is when you play it forward ...it installs Windows 2000 -- Alfred Perlstein on chat at freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching INDEX in .sh
Aiza aiz...@comclark.com wrote: ... see a big inconsistence in how ports list build-deps and run-deps. Some ports list no build-deps just run-deps and vise-versa and some have same listed list in both. None of these is necessarily wrong. A port consisting solely of a Perl script would have no build-deps -- there's nothing to build -- but it would have a run-dep on perl. A port which uses no shared libs outside the base would have no run-deps, but it might have a build-dep on a compiler if written in a language whose compiler isn't part of the base. Thinking I will have to take both the build and run deps lists and sort them together and drop dups to create a good list of dependents to allow for the lax enforcement of standards in the Makefile about how to list the ports dependents. If you're only going to build the port (to create a package to be installed elsewhere) you don't need the run-deps. If you're only going to run it (having built it elsewhere) you don't need the build-deps. If you're going to build/install/run on the same system you need both the build-deps and the run-deps, but after the build has finished you can delete any build-deps that aren't also run-deps. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching INDEX in .sh
On 25/07/2010 03:58:29, Aiza wrote: I'm looking for a snippet of .sh type shell code that searches the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file for dependents. Just a pointer to a script in the ports system that has this would be helpful. grep 'dependency-name' /usr/ports/INDEX.8 | grep -v '^dependency-name' If you don't want the whole INDEX line, add something like this to the above to extract specific columns: | cut -d '|' -f 1 Note that you want the dependency package name, not the directory name in the ports tree -- although most of the time they are the same, there are some important packages where that isn't the case, eg. databases/mysql51-server vsmysql-server-5.1.48 Actually, all you want is sufficient leading prefix from the package name to identify it uniquely, which usually, but not always, means you don't need to include the version number part This will include build dependencies as well as run- or lib- dependencies: if that's not what you want, then use cut(1) to get rid of the last two columns before passing the INDEX through grep(1) Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: searching INDEX in .sh
On 7/25/10, Aiza aiz...@comclark.com wrote: b. f. wrote: I just found /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/postsearch which uses the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file as its source to search. This is a perl script but can be used from within in .sh script. Ah, ok. I thought you wanted to use the Bourne shell and base system utilities only. Been playing with it and see a big inconsistence in how ports list build-deps and run-deps. Some ports list no build-deps just run-deps and vise-versa and some have same listed list in both. Thinking I will have to take both the build and run deps lists and sort them together and drop dups to create a good list of dependents to allow for the lax enforcement of standards in the Makefile about how to list the ports dependents. As someone remarked, this is not necessarily inconsistent. The standards certainly aren't lax, although mistakes are occasionally made. And it is slightly complicated by the fact that the listing in the INDEX is recursive. b. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching INDEX in .sh
I'm looking for a snippet of .sh type shell code that searches the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file for dependents. Just a pointer to a script in the ports system that has this would be helpful Do you mean that, given port A, you want to find all ports that need port A in order to be fetched, extracted, patched, built or installed? Or do you want to find all ports that are needed to fetch, extract, patch, build or install port A? If the former, you could look at the parts of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk that are used by running `make -C $PORTSDIR search bdeps=insert PKGNAME of port A here display=name,path`, and `make -C $PORTSDIR search rdeps=insert PKGNAME of port A here display=name,path`. If the latter, look at the parts of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk that are used by running `make -C insert PKGORIGIN of port A here pretty-print-run-depends pretty-print-build-depends`. Also, parts of the ports-mgmt/portmaster script used with --index-only may have similar functionality. And do you mean to only use the INDEX? Or are you able to use parts of the port tree? Or the pkg_info utility? b. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching INDEX in .sh
On 7/25/10, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote: the parts of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk that are used by running `make -C insert PKGORIGIN of port A here pretty-print-run-depends pretty-print-build-depends`. Sorry, it's actually 'pretty-print-build-depends-list' and 'pretty-print-run-depends-list'. b. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: searching INDEX in .sh
b. f. wrote: I'm looking for a snippet of .sh type shell code that searches the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file for dependents. Just a pointer to a script in the ports system that has this would be helpful Do you mean that, given port A, you want to find all ports that need port A in order to be fetched, extracted, patched, built or installed? Or do you want to find all ports that are needed to fetch, extract, patch, build or install port A? If the former, you could look at the parts of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk that are used by running `make -C $PORTSDIR search bdeps=insert PKGNAME of port A here display=name,path`, and `make -C $PORTSDIR search rdeps=insert PKGNAME of port A here display=name,path`. If the latter, look at the parts of ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk that are used by running `make -C insert PKGORIGIN of port A here pretty-print-run-depends pretty-print-build-depends`. Also, parts of the ports-mgmt/portmaster script used with --index-only may have similar functionality. And do you mean to only use the INDEX? Or are you able to use parts of the port tree? Or the pkg_info utility? I just found /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/postsearch which uses the /usr/ports/INDEX-8 file as its source to search. This is a perl script but can be used from within in .sh script. Been playing with it and see a big inconsistence in how ports list build-deps and run-deps. Some ports list no build-deps just run-deps and vise-versa and some have same listed list in both. Thinking I will have to take both the build and run deps lists and sort them together and drop dups to create a good list of dependents to allow for the lax enforcement of standards in the Makefile about how to list the ports dependents. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Searching for functions in Perl code
Steve == Steve Bertrand st...@ipv6canada.com writes: Steve This is how I produce the list of all sub-routines within all module Steve files, which includes the module name and sub. See perldoc B::Xref. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Searching for functions in Perl code
On 2010.05.19 22:05, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Steve == Steve Bertrand st...@ipv6canada.com writes: Steve This is how I produce the list of all sub-routines within all module Steve files, which includes the module name and sub. See perldoc B::Xref. ...that *might* just work, for what I want, and for far more detail later... Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Searching for development project [was: Hello]
Vince Hoffman wrote: Chance Hoggan wrote: Even if you do not have any projects if you could give me some tasks that would equally be great. I believe http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ is a good place to start. Also try asking on the -current or -hackers mailing lists. I've noticed that if you find something that seems interesting and start work on it then ask specific questions you are more likely to get useful replies than if you ask more general questions. That said i'm not a developer so don't feel you need to pay too much attention to my suggestions as they are purely based on observation not instruction/experience :) Might I also kindly suggest that you take a look at the following link, courtesy of Greg Lehey, in order for you to make the best of your endeavors?: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/freebsd-questions/ Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching archives broken?
Ed Zwart wrote: Jon, where are you searching from? The link I gave in my initial question does not have the 'recent' limiter you mentioned. thanks e. On 3/10/07, Jon Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed Zwart wrote: Hi there, I'm new to the list, and have been trying to search the archives at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/. No matter what I search for, I get no results (even one-word searches that should definitely have hits; eg, 'mail', 'hostname', etc). I want to search the archives before asking the group, but the archive is way too large to make browsing feasible. Is search broken, or am I missing something? e. I have noticed this too. The fix I found is changing the search field from all to recent. For example, if I search for mount, and search all, nothing is displayed. However, searching for mount with recent selected, returns results. I think it has to do with how many results it finds. Hope this helps, Jon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am searching from the page http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists I can't get to the page linked in your first message right now for some reason. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching archives broken?
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:51:03 -0800 Ed Zwart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I'm new to the list, and have been trying to search the archives at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/. No matter what I search for, I get no results (even one-word searches that should definitely have hits; eg, 'mail', 'hostname', etc). I want to search the archives before asking the group, but the archive is way too large to make browsing feasible. Is search broken, or am I missing something? I use google to search the FreeBSD site. Do your google search as usual but add site:freebsd.org at the end and it limits the searches to freebsd.org. Other operators can be used for google also: http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/operators.html HTH some, Randy -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching archives broken?
Thanks Randy, I use google's advanced search all the time! The trouble with limiting to freebsd.org is that it's a bigger search space than just this list's archive. I've been reading the freebsd handbook for quite some time, and have learned a lot there. But I've got a few dots left that need connecting that I think you all will be able to set me straight on very quickly. So, I'm off to start another thread on what I really came here for... (but making the archive search work would be great still!) e. On 3/10/07, Randy Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:51:03 -0800 Ed Zwart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, I'm new to the list, and have been trying to search the archives at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/. No matter what I search for, I get no results (even one-word searches that should definitely have hits; eg, 'mail', 'hostname', etc). I want to search the archives before asking the group, but the archive is way too large to make browsing feasible. Is search broken, or am I missing something? I use google to search the FreeBSD site. Do your google search as usual but add site:freebsd.org at the end and it limits the searches to freebsd.org. Other operators can be used for google also: http://www.google.com/intl/en/help/operators.html HTH some, Randy -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching archives broken?
Ed Zwart wrote: Hi there, I'm new to the list, and have been trying to search the archives at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/. No matter what I search for, I get no results (even one-word searches that should definitely have hits; eg, 'mail', 'hostname', etc). I want to search the archives before asking the group, but the archive is way too large to make browsing feasible. Is search broken, or am I missing something? e. I have noticed this too. The fix I found is changing the search field from all to recent. For example, if I search for mount, and search all, nothing is displayed. However, searching for mount with recent selected, returns results. I think it has to do with how many results it finds. Hope this helps, Jon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching archives broken?
Jon, where are you searching from? The link I gave in my initial question does not have the 'recent' limiter you mentioned. thanks e. On 3/10/07, Jon Wolfgang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed Zwart wrote: Hi there, I'm new to the list, and have been trying to search the archives at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/. No matter what I search for, I get no results (even one-word searches that should definitely have hits; eg, 'mail', 'hostname', etc). I want to search the archives before asking the group, but the archive is way too large to make browsing feasible. Is search broken, or am I missing something? e. I have noticed this too. The fix I found is changing the search field from all to recent. For example, if I search for mount, and search all, nothing is displayed. However, searching for mount with recent selected, returns results. I think it has to do with how many results it finds. Hope this helps, Jon ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching Ports - possible problem
Kevin Monceaux wrote: Fellow FreeBSD Enthusiasts, While researching a couple of Searching For Ports tips to send to a fellow new FreeBSD user I noticed an anomaly. The port in question was mod_php5. One would expect searching for mod_php via the search form on the ports web page or make search name='mod_php' in /usr/ports to list mod_php4 and mod_php5. Neither show up. Where do the name and keywords for ports come from? Kevin http://www.RawFedDogs.net http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org Bruceville, TX See /usr/ports/UPDATING, specifically the entry for 20060801. Seems mod_php is part of php now. Do a make config in lang/phpX to see it. HTH, Micah ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching a drive and copying files
Many of the images will have the same name. I somehow managed to copy the same files several times when trying to do backup and restores. At this point in time they are going from my Apple laptop to my FreeBSD server. I am going to start looking for a inexpensive Tape drive to back up my data. I have been using iPhoto to manage my images. Sincerely, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jul 23, 2006, at 3:41 AM, Michael Hughes wrote: Joshua, On the dups, will the names of the files be the same or different? Do you have plans on how you will be storing the images after you get rid of the dups? Have the images be edited and if they have, did you edit them with a EXIF aware program? I use a program called epinfo to rename my images, it is part of the photopc utility. I have just a little over 10,000 digital images and store them by year, month, day and time. epinfo uses the EXIF data to rename the files and set the time stamps for the files. I have written some php programs to allow me to display the images thru a web browser. It uses a MySQL database to manage the images into categories. I also store a checksum of the picture in the database so I can check to see if the images have become damaged. I have a script that I wrote check the check sum in the database to the image. I do backups whenever I add new images to the hard drive. This is still a work in progress. If you can send me a little more data on your files and how you want to store the images, I could help you in you task. On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 10:47:13 -0400 Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello List, I have a two part question for anyone who may be able to help. I need to search my drive for all pictures on my system and copy them to a networked system using sftp or ssh or what not. There will be duplicate names on the drive so I was hoping to have dups placed in a separate folder. Due to my for lack of a better term stupidity when I first got my camera I will probably have instances when there will be three or four duplicates. If anyone can help me out with that it would be great. Second is there a resource online I can use to learn how to do my own shell scripting? My goal is to find all my pictures and compare them then delete the dups that don't look that good. A daunting task as I have 20 GB of data. I bet 10 GB are dups. Thanks for any help. Sincerely, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Michael Hughes Log Home living is the best [EMAIL PROTECTED] Temperatures: Outside: 60.6 House: 70.9 Computer room: 69.5 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching a drive and copying files
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Joshua Lewis thusly...
I need to search my drive for all pictures on my system and copy
them to a networked system using sftp or ssh or what not. There
will be duplicate names on the drive so I was hoping to have dups
placed in a separate folder.
Unison, net/unison port, should be able to handle the duplicates
based on file checksum. (I personally have not used it much, so i
cannot answer any other queried about it; refer to its fine man
page.)
Due to my for lack of a better term stupidity when I first got
my camera I will probably have instances when there will be three
or four duplicates. can help me out with that it would be great.
...
My goal is to find all my pictures and compare them then delete
the dups that don't look that good. A daunting task as I have 20
GB of data. I bet 10 GB are dups.
A checksum-based management of duplicates will help with the files
with identical contents, but not with files that differ even a bit.
Perl program below -- a modified version of Randal Schwartz's
version[0] -- uses md5(1) to identify duplicates (as in identical
files), failing that, Image::Magick based on fuzz factor. When it
finds duplicates, it asks to enter the item number from the file
list to be deleted.
[0] Article Finding similar images,
http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/LinuxMag/col50.html
To be able to run, it needs Image::Magick (graphics/ImageMagick
port), Cache::FileCache (devel/p5-Cache-Cache), List::Util
(lang/p5-Scalar-List-Utils), File::Copy File::Path.
Mind that it, rather Image::Magick, may consume all of your memory
and/or temporary fs if you run it on all the files at once.
If you are good in Perl, you could modify the program to move the
duplicates in a directory (instead of deleting), and possibly not to
ask to take the particular action (if as you say you would have a
boat load of duplicates).
Without further interruptions, program follows ...
#!perl
# This is a modified version of Randal Schwartz's ...
#
#http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/LinuxMag/col50.html
#
# ... as it uses checksum (MD5 for now) to detect identical files, failing
that
# uses Image::Magick.
use warnings; use strict;
$|++;
use Image::Magick;
use Cache::FileCache;
use File::Copy qw( move );
use File::Path qw( mkpath );
use List::Util qw( reduce );
use Carp qw(carp);
use Getopt::Long qw( :config gnu_compat no_ignore_case no_debug );
# User option; permitted average deviation in the vector elements.
my $fuzz = 15;
# User option; if defined, rename corrupt images into this dir.
my $corrupt_dir = CORRUPT;
{
my $usage;
GetOptions
(
'h|usage|help' = \$usage
, 'f|fuzz=i' = \$fuzz
, 'c|corrupt=s' = \$corrupt_dir
, 'nc|nocorrupt' = sub { undef $corrupt_dir; }
)
or usage( 1 );
usage( 0 ) if $usage;
# Check if any arguments remain which will be file names
usage( 1, No file(s) or directory(ies) given. ) unless scalar @ARGV;
}
sub warnif;
my $cache = Cache::FileCache-new
( {
namespace = 'image.cache'
, cache_root = ( glob( ~/log/misc ) )[ 0 ]
}
);
my @buckets;
FILE: while ( @ARGV )
{
my $file = shift;
next FILE if -l $file;
if ( -d $file )
{
opendir DIR, $file or next FILE;
unshift @ARGV, map { m/^\./ ? () : $file/$_; } sort readdir DIR;
next FILE;
}
next FILE unless -f _ or -d _;
my ( @stat ) = stat _ or die should not happen: $!;
# dev/ino/mtime
my $key = @stat[ 0, 1, 9 ];
my @vector;
#print $file ;
if ( my $data = $cache-get( $key ) )
{
#print ... is cached\n;
@vector = @$data;
}
else
{
my $image = Image::Magick-new;
if ( my $x = $image-Read( $file ) )
{
if ( defined $corrupt_dir and $x =~ m/corrupt|unexpected end-of-file/i )
{
print $file ;
print ... renaming into $corrupt_dir\n;
-d $corrupt_dir
or mkpath $corrupt_dir, 0, 0700
or die Cannot mkpath $corrupt_dir: $!;
move $file, $corrupt_dir or warn Cannot rename: $!;
}
else
{
print $file ;
print ... skipping ( $x )\n;
}
next FILE;
}
#print is , join( x, $image-Get( 'width', 'height' ) ), \n;
warnif $image-Normalize();
warnif $image-Resize( geometry = '4x4!' );
warnif $image-Set( magick = 'rgb' );
@vector = unpack C*, $image-ImageToBlob();
$cache-set( $key, [ @vector ] );
}
BUCKET: for my $bucket ( @buckets )
{
my $error = 0;
INDEX: for my $index ( 0 .. $#vector )
{
$error += abs( $bucket-[ 0 ][ $index ] - $vector[ $index ] );
next BUCKET if $error $fuzz * @vector;
}
push @$bucket, $file;
#print linked , join( , , @$bucket[ 1 .. $#$bucket ] ), \n;
next FILE;
}
push @buckets,
Re: Searching a drive and copying files
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 10:47 -0400, Joshua Lewis wrote: Hello List, I have a two part question for anyone who may be able to help. I need to search my drive for all pictures on my system and copy them to a networked system using sftp or ssh or what not. There will be duplicate names on the drive so I was hoping to have dups placed in a separate folder. Due to my for lack of a better term stupidity when I first got my camera I will probably have instances when there will be three or four duplicates. If anyone can help me out with that it would be great. Second is there a resource online I can use to learn how to do my own shell scripting? My goal is to find all my pictures and compare them then delete the dups that don't look that good. A daunting task as I have 20 GB of data. I bet 10 GB are dups. Thanks for any help. Sincerely, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a perl script that does part of this, using MD5 hashes to identify duplicates. I posted it at http://ca.geocities.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/treeprune.pl Use at your own risk! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching on the freebsd.org website
Paul Rice wrote: Hi, Is it possible to search for just English pages on the website? When I enter a query on the main page, I get other languages in the results. Thank you, Paul You might try google's advanced search (http://www.google.com/advanced_search?hl=en) feeding it english for language and freebsd.org or www.freebsd.org as the domain name (the former searches the list archives too). Later, Micah ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching ports doesn work
I think you did what I did. and it does take a while. There's a much easier and faster way to do this if you're online. I wasn't at the time, so I had to build it manually. When you do the make search keyblah and there isn't a /usr/ports/INDEX5 it builds one. I ~think~ it basically looks at all packages finds out info about it, and then builds the index. However if you download it, it's faster. make fetchindex Do that in /usr/ports and it will download the INDEX5, put it in /usr/ports and now when you type make seach key=blah it will have that to search. I think it took my PII 400 36 hours to build it's INDEX5. Poor machine. tdh | Hi folks, | | well, I have just installed freebsd 4.11 . Then, I read through the | freebsd handbook. | | http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-finding-applications.html | | the siete above explains how to search for ports. So, I went to | /usr/ports and did make search lsof | | I get a notcie that says something of generating INDEX, please | wait. | | And I waited, and waited..an well. After 3 cups of coffee I | had 2 problems. First, I was toxicated with coffee *G* and my little | bsd still said:...Pleas wait. | | running top showed me that the shell running make was waiting | ...but waiting for what? | | Well, I then kille the process and tried again, without any luck. | | Can anyone help me with this issue? I would like to know, why this | does not work or what I maybe did wrong. | | -- | Thank you | Marcel Lautenbach | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | ___ | freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] `--- -- +- \./ | Tim Holmes -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (0Y0) | UIN: 17021091 -- AIM: tdh004 -ooO--(_)--Ooo--+- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching ports doesn work
Marcel Lautenbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /usr/ports and did make search lsof Current handbook says make search name=lsof or make search name=lsof. I get a notcie that says something of generating INDEX, please wait. Looks like it just did make which is make index. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 03:43:43PM +0100, John Murphy wrote: P Stalidis wrote: hello, I'm trying to find one of the earliest versions of freeBSD... 1.0 would be fine! I'm trying to get an intel i386sx33 with only 1mb of ram, up and running again... so any help is welcome thanks in advance :) There's an ftp search engine at http://www.freewareweb.com/ftpsearch.shtml which shows some hits if you search for freebsd-1* The oldest version with release notes on the FreeBSD web site is 1.1 but it says the 386sx is not recommended so I wish you luck. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/1.1/RELNOTES.FreeBSD I thought FreeBSD 1.x was illegal (or at least a bad idea) to use because of the tainted BSD Lite code. And also, I'm wondering how much bloat does 5.x add that can't be removed with a custom kernel. I know linux 2.6 has a specific section for removing extra features like the new I/O schedulers for embedded devices that couldn't really use it anyways. Is 1.x/2.x really better to use for old hardware? -- John. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:417bc0b7219791736320828! -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C pgpVcEZnSzlTR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: searching
P Stalidis wrote: hello, I'm trying to find one of the earliest versions of freeBSD... 1.0 would be fine! I'm trying to get an intel i386sx33 with only 1mb of ram, up and running again... so any help is welcome thanks in advance :) There's an ftp search engine at http://www.freewareweb.com/ftpsearch.shtml which shows some hits if you search for freebsd-1* The oldest version with release notes on the FreeBSD web site is 1.1 but it says the 386sx is not recommended so I wish you luck. http://www.freebsd.org/releases/1.1/RELNOTES.FreeBSD -- John. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re : searching
P.Stalidis wrote: hello, I'm trying to find one of the earliest versions of freeBSD... 1.0 would be fine! I'm trying to get an intel i386sx33 with only 1mb of ram, up and running again... so any help is welcome thanks in advance :) Look through the FreeBSD FAQ. There's no mentions about FreeBSD 1.0, but 2.1.7 version requires at least 4 mb to run: After the installation, the system will run in 4 MB. Someone has even successfully booted with 2 MB, although the system was almost unusable. So i think that you can't get a working system on your platform. -- Best regards, baguio mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching CVS commits
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Andreas Kohn wrote: cvs can't provide you with that kind of information, because it doesn't remember it (cvs works on file-by-file base). But, it can tell you when the 1.337 commit to vfs_syscalls.c happened. ... You can then use the archive of the cvs-src mailing list at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-February to find the commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-February/018554.html That should tell you all modified files in this commit. That's EXACTLY what I was looking for! That's a HUGE help. I didn't even know the info in the cvs-src mailing list existed. Thanks a bunch. Kevin ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching CVS commits
On Friday 28 May 2004 01:01 pm, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote: On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 08:43:33PM +0200, Andreas Kohn wrote: cvs can't provide you with that kind of information, because it doesn't remember it (cvs works on file-by-file base). But, it can tell you when the 1.337 commit to vfs_syscalls.c happened. ... You can then use the archive of the cvs-src mailing list at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-February to find the commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-February/018554.htm l That should tell you all modified files in this commit. That's EXACTLY what I was looking for! That's a HUGE help. I didn't even know the info in the cvs-src mailing list existed. Thanks a bunch. The history is always available using cvsweb.cgi such as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c Back up to the top and bookmark it. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching CVS commits
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:20:45PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: The history is always available using cvsweb.cgi such as http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c Back up to the top and bookmark it. Also has the alias http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/ Kris pgp0UoKoB8oqw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Searching CVS commits
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 21:27, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote: I have a system running the latest sources via CVS in the RELENG_5_2 branch. I want to update sys/kernel/vfs_syscalls.c from version 1.333 (which is the latest available in this branch) to version 1.346 from HEAD. The problem is that the commit for version 1.337 modified more than one file--some function calls are added to the source such that when I compile my kernel, I get this: /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c: In function `getfsstat': /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:337: warning: implicit declaration of function `prison_check_mount' /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c: In function `kern_open': /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:996: warning: implicit declaration of function `fdunused' /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:1095: warning: redundant redeclaration of `fdunused' in same scope /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:996: warning: previous declaration of `fdunused' /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c: At top level: /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:3783: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c: In function `lgetfh': /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:3794: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:3806: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type *** Error code 1 Obviously my sources don't have the prison_check_mount function call, and I don't know how to determine which files were updated in this specific commit--only the one file I need to update. How do I find what files were modified when version 1.337 of sys/kernel/vfs_syscalls.c was committed so that I can update those files in my source tree as well? Thanks, Kevin Hi, cvs can't provide you with that kind of information, because it doesn't remember it (cvs works on file-by-file base). But, it can tell you when the 1.337 commit to vfs_syscalls.c happened. $ cvs log -r1.337 vfs_syscalls.c ... revision 1.337 date: 2004/02/14 18:31:11; author: rwatson; state: Exp; lines: +8 -0 ... You can then use the archive of the cvs-src mailing list at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-February to find the commit: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2004-February/018554.html That should tell you all modified files in this commit. HTH, Andreas PS: The log information for a single file can also be found via http://cvsweb.freebsd.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Searching contents of files
Here is the classical way to do a recursive grep.
For csh/tcsh, define the alias
alias rgrep 'find . -type f -print | xargs egrep -i \!* /dev/null'
For bash/zsh, define the shell function
rgrep() { find . -type f -print | xargs egrep -i $1 /dev/null}
There are several variations of these that will work. But these are
both fast and portable, and should work on virtually any flavor of unix.
Richard Coleman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jason dictos wrote:
Hi All,
I've always used grep text /*/*/* to recursivly search directories for
files with the specified text string in them, however this method doesn't
always work very well (sometimes it bails out halfway through with error
Argument list too long).
Is there a more effective way to search the contents of files?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching contents of files
jason dictos wrote: Hi All, I've always used grep text /*/*/* to recursivly search directories for files with the specified text string in them, however this method doesn't always work very well (sometimes it bails out halfway through with error Argument list too long). Is there a more effective way to search the contents of files? Thanks, -Jason $grep -r text * Kevin Kinsey DaleCo, S.P. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Searching contents of files
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, jason dictos wrote: I've always used grep text /*/*/* to recursivly search directories for files with the specified text string in them, however this method doesn't always work very well (sometimes it bails out halfway through with error Argument list too long). Is there a more effective way to search the contents of files? Try: find /whateverdirectory -type f -print | xargs grep mysearchstring Cheers, Viktor ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: searching FBSD Questions News Group.
Scoot You should look closer at what google found. Not one of those hits is from the FreeBSD-Questions NG. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=FBSD_Userie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8hl=en; btnG=Google+Search Looks like all the hits come from lucky-freebsd.questions. This is not the official FBSD questions NG. I emailed google and asked them, and that is the answer they gave me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Mitchell Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:51 AM To: fbsd_user Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: Re: searching FBSD Questions News Group. On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:40:16AM -0400, fbsd_user wrote: The google search system stopped archiving FBSD news groups at the start of 2002, so google search is useless. Really? A Google Groups search for your email address brings up a bunch of posts to freebsd-questions, written this year, at the top of the list. The Rambler site looks pretty good though, and I agree that it would be nice if the 'official' search worked a bit better. I seem to recall that someone was working on a replacement for it, they even put up an early version for people to play with, probably about a year ago now. Whatever happened to that? Scott ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: searching FBSD Questions News Group.
Went back to http://www.freebsd.org/search/index.html And I see that the last entry ' Freebsd mail archives search' now points to http://freebsd.rambler.ru/ So it looks like the FBSD handbook has been updated to go to this new site. And it looks like the lucky.freebsd.questions NG is being populated with the questions mailing list archives. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of fbsd_user Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:09 AM To: Scott Mitchell Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: RE: searching FBSD Questions News Group. Scoot You should look closer at what google found. Not one of those hits is from the FreeBSD-Questions NG. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=FBSD_Userie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8hl=en; btnG=Google+Search Looks like all the hits come from lucky-freebsd.questions. This is not the official FBSD questions NG. I emailed google and asked them, and that is the answer they gave me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Mitchell Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:51 AM To: fbsd_user Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG Subject: Re: searching FBSD Questions News Group. On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 09:40:16AM -0400, fbsd_user wrote: The google search system stopped archiving FBSD news groups at the start of 2002, so google search is useless. Really? A Google Groups search for your email address brings up a bunch of posts to freebsd-questions, written this year, at the top of the list. The Rambler site looks pretty good though, and I agree that it would be nice if the 'official' search worked a bit better. I seem to recall that someone was working on a replacement for it, they even put up an early version for people to play with, probably about a year ago now. Whatever happened to that? Scott ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching FBSD Questions News Group.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:08:56AM -0400, fbsd_user wrote: Scoot You should look closer at what google found. Not one of those hits is from the FreeBSD-Questions NG. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=FBSD_Userie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8hl=en; btnG=Google+Search Looks like all the hits come from lucky-freebsd.questions. This is not the official FBSD questions NG. I emailed google and asked them, and that is the answer they gave me. OK, you got me :-) However, it's finding posts on newsgroups that mirror the freebsd-questions mailing list, which amounts to the same thing, right? Was there ever an 'official FBSD questions NG?'? comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc and comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.announce are still around and being archived, but I didn't know there was ever anything under comp.* that mirrored the questions mailing list. I could be wrong though... Scott ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: searching for documentation in english for mysql on freebsd 4.4
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:49:41 + (UTC) in lucky.freebsd.questions, frank amo wrote: Hello, I am looking for some documentation in english that can help me get mysql working on my freeBSD box. I am using FreeBSD 4.4 and I downloaded this file for FreeBSD, I am aware that it is written for 4.7, that may be the problem that I am having. http://www.mysql.de/downloads/mysql-3.23.html Here is their documentation, this is why Im emailing you guys.: http://www.mysql.de/documentation/mysql/bychapter/index.html Its the best Ihave found so far, but its not in english. Is there a site you know of that can help me with MySQL on FreeBSD? Why not to start with www.mysql.com, and find English version of MySQL documentation there? MySQL Reference Manual has information about building MySQL on FreeBSD. By the way, there is a port for MySQL in FreeBSD ports collection, may be this helps you more. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
