Re: port sysutils/hal -> fixed_mountpoints - what does this mean?
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:37 +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > in port sysutils/hal there is an option > > fixed_mountpoints= > > which is "off" by default. > Is the meaning of this option documented somewhere? This option tells hal to use fixed names for /media mount points instead of volume labels. It should have no effect on being able to detect or mount media. Joe > > I've had lots of trouble with hal/dbus/X in the past > I wonder if my options are to blame. > > many thanks > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
port sysutils/hal -> fixed_mountpoints - what does this mean?
in port sysutils/hal there is an option fixed_mountpoints= which is "off" by default. Is the meaning of this option documented somewhere? I've had lots of trouble with hal/dbus/X in the past I wonder if my options are to blame. many thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: What does this mean?: +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5
In response to Nikos Vassiliadis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 22 June 2007 15:45, Bill Moran wrote: > > Noticed the message in the subject in last night's security run. > > > > Is this a sign of impending drive failure? Some google searches turned > > up information about Areca drivers and lots of unanswered questions. > > This system doesn't have an Areca driver, and it's been rock-solid > > for about 2 months now. This is the first time I've seen these errors. > > > > The error (in case the subject gets mangled): > > internet.potentialtech.com kernel log messages: > > +++ /tmp/security.SIpHyxqO Fri Jun 22 03:01:14 2007 > > +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 > > +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 > > Maybe it is just the medium. You could try reproducing > the problem using dd. And then try another medium to see > what's going on. Whups ... never mind, just realized the cause. Must be working too hard ... I'd completely forgotten that I'd tried to mount a CD when there was nothing in the tray yesterday. Thanks for the quick response. Sorry for the noise. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What does this mean?: +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5
On Friday 22 June 2007 15:45, Bill Moran wrote: > Noticed the message in the subject in last night's security run. > > Is this a sign of impending drive failure? Some google searches turned > up information about Areca drivers and lots of unanswered questions. > This system doesn't have an Areca driver, and it's been rock-solid > for about 2 months now. This is the first time I've seen these errors. > > The error (in case the subject gets mangled): > internet.potentialtech.com kernel log messages: > +++ /tmp/security.SIpHyxqOFri Jun 22 03:01:14 2007 > +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 > +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 Maybe it is just the medium. You could try reproducing the problem using dd. And then try another medium to see what's going on. Nikos ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
What does this mean?: +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5
Noticed the message in the subject in last night's security run. Is this a sign of impending drive failure? Some google searches turned up information about Areca drivers and lots of unanswered questions. This system doesn't have an Areca driver, and it's been rock-solid for about 2 months now. This is the first time I've seen these errors. The error (in case the subject gets mangled): internet.potentialtech.com kernel log messages: +++ /tmp/security.SIpHyxqO Fri Jun 22 03:01:14 2007 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 +g_vfs_done():acd0[READ(offset=32768, length=2048)]error = 5 dmesg: Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #1: Tue Feb 27 07:24:58 UTC 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2800.12-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf64 Stepping = 4 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xe49d,> AMD Features=0x20100800 AMD Features2=0x1 Cores per package: 2 real memory = 1073479680 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1023991808 (976 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.17.2 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 28.4 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 bge0: mem 0xfe9f-0xfe9f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:15:c5:fb:aa:a4 pcib4: at device 28.5 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 bge1: mem 0xfe7f-0xfe7f irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci4 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:15:c5:fb:aa:a5 uhci0: port 0xbce0-0xbcff irq 20 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xbcc0-0xbcdf irq 21 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xbca0-0xbcbf irq 22 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfeb00400-0xfeb007ff irq 20 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: EHCI version 1.0 usb3: wrong number of companions (7 != 3) usb3: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3: on ehci0 usb3: USB revision 2.0 uhub3: Intel EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered uhub4: vendor 0x04b4 product 0x6560, class 9/0, rev 2.00/0.0b, addr 2 uhub4: multiple transaction translators uhub4: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib5: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pci5: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xbc98-0xbc9f,0xbc90-0xbc93,0xbc80-0xbc87,0xbc78-0xbc7b,0xbc60-0xbc6f mem 0xfeb0-0xfeb003ff irq 20 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: does not respond device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: does not respond device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6 orm0: at iomem 0xc-0xc8fff,0xc9000-0xc9fff,0xca000-0xcb7ff,0xec000-0xe on isa0 ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 m
Re: what does this mean
On Sunday 21 May 2006 05:19, Imran Imtiaz wrote: > i've seen the following log in my messages can any body tell me what does > it mean? > > May 21 02:50:29 darkstar sm-mta[55021]: k4KLoTeq055021: localhost > [127.0.0.1] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA It means that someone (probably you or a program you were running since it's from localhost) connected to sendmail (probably on TCP port 25) on your machine, but then disconnected before issuing any commands. You can generate the message again by doing "telnet localhost 25" and then typing ^] and quit without typing anything over the connection. Probably the result of a port scan or connectivity check. I wouldn't worry about it unduly. JN ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [freebsd-questions] what does this mean
Imran Imtiaz wrote: i've seen the following log in my messages can any body tell me what does it mean? May 21 02:50:29 darkstar sm-mta[55021]: k4KLoTeq055021: localhost [127.0.0.1] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA Do you run something like Nagios or BigBrother on your system? I see this in my logs when our network monitor connects to check port 25 is still responding. You would see it at regular intervals in that case. Of course, you or one of your users telnetting to port 25 manually would do the same thing. Best Regards, Howie ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
what does this mean
i've seen the following log in my messages can any body tell me what does it mean? May 21 02:50:29 darkstar sm-mta[55021]: k4KLoTeq055021: localhost [127.0.0.1] did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to MSA regards, Imran ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean?
On Jul 29, 2005, at 2:23 AM, Glenn Dawson wrote: At 12:51 AM 7/29/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: Hi Now when it boots it comes up and real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! panic y/n? [y] What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? That basically means that the kernel failed to start the second CPU. Ok, thanks. Googling showed that absent other signs of a true HW problem, others have powercycled and the problem has gone away. That seems to have worked for me as well. Will monitor the situation. Thanks Chad -Glenn --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean?
At 12:51 AM 7/29/2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: Hi Sorry for the URGENT line. I have a critical server running 5.4- RELEASE-p1. It is a dual AMD MP 2800+ (Gigabyte board) with 4GB RAM and an Adaptec 2100S raid controller. Running (obviously) an SMP kernel. I recompiled the kernel this afternoon and changed one line -- the options HZ line from HZ=1100 to HZ=400 as a test of PHP performance. That was the only thing changed (the machine had been up since I installed 5.4 on it June 1). I built and installed the kernel and tonight I rebooted the machine. Now when it boots it comes up and real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! panic y/n? [y] What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? That basically means that the kernel failed to start the second CPU. -Glenn I am off to Google but as I am in a real tight spot I thought I would ask for some help asap before I go and try and figure this out. Thanks Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
URGENT -- AP #1 (PHY #1) failed -- what does this mean?
Hi Sorry for the URGENT line. I have a critical server running 5.4- RELEASE-p1. It is a dual AMD MP 2800+ (Gigabyte board) with 4GB RAM and an Adaptec 2100S raid controller. Running (obviously) an SMP kernel. I recompiled the kernel this afternoon and changed one line -- the options HZ line from HZ=1100 to HZ=400 as a test of PHP performance. That was the only thing changed (the machine had been up since I installed 5.4 on it June 1). I built and installed the kernel and tonight I rebooted the machine. Now when it boots it comes up and real memory = 3758030848 (3583 MB) avail memory = 3678240768 (3507 MB) ACPI APIC Table: AP #1 (PHY# 1) failed! panic y/n? [y] What does this mean (and what do I do about it)? I am off to Google but as I am in a real tight spot I thought I would ask for some help asap before I go and try and figure this out. Thanks Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: postfix, what does this mean?
Henry wrote: > Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions... > What the heck is going on here? > > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=<>, size=2716, > nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=<>, size=2712, > nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 5C36533C23: from=<>, size=2994, > nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: B9A8E33C21: from=<>, size=2950, > nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to > smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to > smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to > smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to > smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to > smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to > smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: 8B46133C3E: > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=182913, status=deferred > (connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: D956C33C39: > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=190298, status=deferred > (connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: connect to > rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted (port 25) > Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: 5C36533C23: > to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=60736, > status=deferred (connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: > Operation not permitted) > > There from<> is not an omitted address... What is paypal trying to do? > The last log is someone on nswebhost trying to use my smtp to send their > mail correct? Is that what paypal is trying to do? But why? > Subscribe to the Postfix users list. -- Best regards, Chris The first bug to hit a clean windshield lands directly in front of your eyes. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: postfix, what does this mean?
But how come I can't see what IP the person is connecting from? So I can block him through my firewall since he is getting annoying :( ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: postfix, what does this mean?
Henry wrote: Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions... What the heck is going on here? Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=<>, size=2716, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=<>, size=2712, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 5C36533C23: from=<>, size=2994, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: B9A8E33C21: from=<>, size=2950, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: 8B46133C3E: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=182913, status=deferred (connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: D956C33C39: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=190298, status=deferred (connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: 5C36533C23: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=60736, status=deferred (connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted) There from<> is not an omitted address... What is paypal trying to do? Paypal is not trying to do anything. Some lamer is trying to use your SMTP host to send out fraud emails for malicious purposses. Regards S. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
postfix, what does this mean?
Err, I've got a bunch of mail questions... What the heck is going on here? Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 8B46133C3E: from=<>, size=2716, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: D956C33C39: from=<>, size=2712, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: 5C36533C23: from=<>, size=2994, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/qmgr[73146]: B9A8E33C21: from=<>, size=2950, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73236]: 8B46133C3E: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=182913, status=deferred (connect to smtp1.sc5.paypal.com[64.4.244.74]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73239]: D956C33C39: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=190298, status=deferred (connect to smtp2.nix.paypal.com[64.4.240.75]: Operation not permitted) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted (port 25) Apr 12 23:26:48 postfix/smtp[73240]: 5C36533C23: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=60736, status=deferred (connect to rsliberty.nswebhost.com[67.18.67.68]: Operation not permitted) There from<> is not an omitted address... What is paypal trying to do? The last log is someone on nswebhost trying to use my smtp to send their mail correct? Is that what paypal is trying to do? But why? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What does this mean
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 06:19, Frank wrote: > I have formatted my hard disk using the floppy that came with it. It is > now a 32bit FAT. I ran FIPS and everything seemed to go OK except that I > received a message at the end of FIPS that said it could not partition > FAT12, but I have no idea where it is getting the FAT12 from. > If you have a hard disk without any pre-existing operating systems and want to install FreeBSD why are messing with FIPS or FAT system. Just insert the installation CD and follow directions. If your trying to install some other system then you're in the wrong place. > Please note that FIPS reported OK after checking FAT while running. > > The message I get from the FIPS at the end of everything is that the > partition has been created and that I should run scandisk on the smaller > partition. Then beneath this it says: > > Memory allocation error > could not load command system halted. > > > The exact msg from trying to install from the image CD I created is: What sort of image? Some operating system? Or something else? If it is not an operating system on what and how are you trying to install it? > > 'Building the boot loader arguments > read error: 0x01 > could not find primary volume descriptor' > > Unlikely anyone can help without more informatiom. Best of luck, Malcolm Kay ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
What does this mean
I have formatted my hard disk using the floppy that came with it. It is now a 32bit FAT. I ran FIPS and everything seemed to go OK except that I received a message at the end of FIPS that said it could not partition FAT12, but I have no idea where it is getting the FAT12 from. Please note that FIPS reported OK after checking FAT while running. The message I get from the FIPS at the end of everything is that the partition has been created and that I should run scandisk on the smaller partition. Then beneath this it says: Memory allocation error could not load command system halted. The exact msg from trying to install from the image CD I created is: 'Building the boot loader arguments read error: 0x01 could not find primary volume descriptor' Thanks Frank ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What does this mean?
At 05:15 PM 7.23.2002 -0500, Tim wrote: >On Tuesday 23 July 2002 05:11 pm, Jack L. Stone wrote: >> Running FBSD 4.5-RELEASE >> >> Just looked at "dmesg" and noticed this at the end of the output: >> Limiting open port RST response from 261 to 200 packets per second >> Limiting open port RST response from 312 to 200 packets per second >> Limiting open port RST response from 282 to 200 packets per second >> Limiting open port RST response from 281 to 200 packets per second >> Limiting open port RST response from 264 to 200 packets per second >> Limiting open port RST response from 226 to 200 packets per second >> >> What is this Open port >> >> Best regards, >> Jack L. Stone, >> Administrator >> >> SageOne Net >> http://www.sage-one.net >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > >Your were being port scanned, probably by yourself too. :) Been there, done >that. > >There is a safety feature built in to limit the number of packets per second >handled by the system. > >Tim > Thanks, for the quick reply, Tim... whew! First time to see that Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: What does this mean?
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 05:11 pm, Jack L. Stone wrote: > Running FBSD 4.5-RELEASE > > Just looked at "dmesg" and noticed this at the end of the output: > Limiting open port RST response from 261 to 200 packets per second > Limiting open port RST response from 312 to 200 packets per second > Limiting open port RST response from 282 to 200 packets per second > Limiting open port RST response from 281 to 200 packets per second > Limiting open port RST response from 264 to 200 packets per second > Limiting open port RST response from 226 to 200 packets per second > > What is this Open port > > Best regards, > Jack L. Stone, > Administrator > > SageOne Net > http://www.sage-one.net > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message Your were being port scanned, probably by yourself too. :) Been there, done that. There is a safety feature built in to limit the number of packets per second handled by the system. Tim -- FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE 5:13PM up 10:33, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
What does this mean?
Running FBSD 4.5-RELEASE Just looked at "dmesg" and noticed this at the end of the output: Limiting open port RST response from 261 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 312 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 282 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 281 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 264 to 200 packets per second Limiting open port RST response from 226 to 200 packets per second What is this Open port Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
