Re: building custom kernel on -current: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
On Saturday, February 09, 2013 10:01:25 pm ill...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 February 2013 20:26, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: I removed COMPAT_LINUX, and only left options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX32 From /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES (9.1-RELEASE): # Enable Linux ABI emulation #XXX#optionsCOMPAT_LINUX # Enable 32-bit Linux ABI emulation (requires COMPAT_43 and COMPAT_FREEBSD32) options COMPAT_LINUX32 I think I first ran up against this when I moved to 9.0 some time ago, but yes, amd64 uses a different kernel config option than i386 for linux compat. I tend to leave it as a module load it if I perchance need it. This also allows rebuilding reloading the modules without a reboot, should it need it. The modules seems to build fine without having to fiddle about with kernel config jiggerypokey. COMPAT_LINUX will work on amd64 eventually and will be used for 64-bit Linux binaries (COMPAT_LINUX32 is to run Linux/i386 binaries on FreeBSD/amd64). -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
building custom kernel on -current: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
This is on amd64 r246552 I added options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX options COMPAT_LINUX32 to the kernel config, following sys/amd64/conf/NOTES On buildkernel I get: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX What am I missing? Thanks Anton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: building custom kernel on -current: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:18:06 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: This is on amd64 r246552 I added options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX options COMPAT_LINUX32 to the kernel config, following sys/amd64/conf/NOTES On buildkernel I get: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX What am I missing? Do you also have those (from a working i386 system): # Linux support options COMPAT_LINUX# Enable Linux ABI emulation options LINPROCFS # Enable the linux-like proc filesystemsupport (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) options LINSYSFS# Enable the linux-like sys filesystem support (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) device lindev options COMPAT_AOUT # Enable i386 a.out binary support (note PSEUDOFS is also needed) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: building custom kernel on -current: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
From free...@edvax.de Sun Feb 10 00:29:36 2013 On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:18:06 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: This is on amd64 r246552 I added options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX options COMPAT_LINUX32 to the kernel config, following sys/amd64/conf/NOTES On buildkernel I get: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX What am I missing? Do you also have those (from a working i386 system): # Linux support options COMPAT_LINUX# Enable Linux ABI emulation options LINPROCFS # Enable the linux-like proc filesystemsupport (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) options LINSYSFS# Enable the linux-like sys filesystem support (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) device lindev options COMPAT_AOUT # Enable i386 a.out binary support (note PSEUDOFS is also needed) No, I haven't added those. Are these necessary to have the linux binary compatibility? The handbook only mentions COMPAT_LINUX. Thanks Anton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: building custom kernel on -current: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:31:44 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: From free...@edvax.de Sun Feb 10 00:29:36 2013 On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:18:06 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: This is on amd64 r246552 I added options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX options COMPAT_LINUX32 to the kernel config, following sys/amd64/conf/NOTES On buildkernel I get: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX What am I missing? Do you also have those (from a working i386 system): # Linux support options COMPAT_LINUX# Enable Linux ABI emulation options LINPROCFS # Enable the linux-like proc filesystemsupport (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) options LINSYSFS# Enable the linux-like sys filesystem support (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) device lindev options COMPAT_AOUT # Enable i386 a.out binary support (note PSEUDOFS is also needed) No, I haven't added those. Are these necessary to have the linux binary compatibility? The handbook only mentions COMPAT_LINUX. I think I had the same question some time ago and found out that if those options are present, the Linux functionality will build properly in the kernel. So I assume they are required. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: building custom kernel on -current: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
From free...@edvax.de Sun Feb 10 00:42:11 2013 On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:31:44 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: From free...@edvax.de Sun Feb 10 00:29:36 2013 On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:18:06 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: This is on amd64 r246552 I added options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX options COMPAT_LINUX32 to the kernel config, following sys/amd64/conf/NOTES On buildkernel I get: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX What am I missing? Do you also have those (from a working i386 system): # Linux support options COMPAT_LINUX# Enable Linux ABI emulation options LINPROCFS # Enable the linux-like proc filesystemsupport (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) options LINSYSFS# Enable the linux-like sys filesystem support (requires COMPAT_LINUX and PSEUDOFS) device lindev options COMPAT_AOUT # Enable i386 a.out binary support (note PSEUDOFS is also needed) No, I haven't added those. Are these necessary to have the linux binary compatibility? The handbook only mentions COMPAT_LINUX. I think I had the same question some time ago and found out that if those options are present, the Linux functionality will build properly in the kernel. So I assume they are required. I removed COMPAT_LINUX, and only left options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX32 This seems enough to get flash working with firefox, exactly as per the handbook instructions. Anton ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: building custom kernel on -current: unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
On 9 February 2013 20:26, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: I removed COMPAT_LINUX, and only left options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX32 From /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES (9.1-RELEASE): # Enable Linux ABI emulation #XXX#optionsCOMPAT_LINUX # Enable 32-bit Linux ABI emulation (requires COMPAT_43 and COMPAT_FREEBSD32) options COMPAT_LINUX32 I think I first ran up against this when I moved to 9.0 some time ago, but yes, amd64 uses a different kernel config option than i386 for linux compat. I tend to leave it as a module load it if I perchance need it. This also allows rebuilding reloading the modules without a reboot, should it need it. The modules seems to build fine without having to fiddle about with kernel config jiggerypokey. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
