Re: disk recovery problem(s)

2010-11-19 Thread perryh
Thomas Exner thomas.ex...@uni-konstanz.de wrote:

 when running fsck the first error message is ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED
 ...
 Is there a chance to get the data back?

Dunno about current versions, but IIRC some earlier versions of
dump(8) could handle even a badly-corrupted FS.  No harm in trying,
since it will not try to write anything to the FS being dumped.  Of
course, you need to find a place to dump it to (and I would _not_
advise piping the output into restore(8) in this kind of situation
-- save the dumpfile itself somewhere in case you find yourself
needing to hack on restore(8) to extract files from it).
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


disk recovery problem(s)

2010-11-18 Thread Thomas Exner

Dear all:

I have a very similar problem as Roland Smith almost two years ago. My 
hard drive got corrupted (I do not really know why) and when running 
fsck the first error message is ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED (the full 
output of fsck is given below. I can then type y and it looks like 
that fsck is doing something. But in phase 3, when it tries to reconnect 
the inodes and put them in the lost+found directory, this directory 
cannot be created. If I mount the file system, there is still no root 
directory on the drive (no . and .. or anything else) and if I run 
fsck again, the exact same error massages occur again. If I only perform 
the ALLOCATE? and answer all the other questions with no, I get a 
. and .. in the root directory but nothing more. Running again fsck 
destroys everything again. Does anyone have an idea why fsck is not able 
to perform the recovery or why the changes are undone at one point? Is 
there a chance to get the data back? I do not know if it is important 
but the file system is on a raid5.


Any help would be highly appreciated.
Best,
Thomas



Full fsck output:
nas1:/mnt# /sbin/fsck -t ufs -f /dev/raid5/nasraid1p1
** /dev/raid5/nasraid1p1
** Last Mounted on /mnt/nasraid1
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED
UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY

ALLOCATE? [yn] y

BAD TYPE VALUE  I=2  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=2048 MTIME=Nov 16 17:21 2010
DIR=/

UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY

FIX? [yn] y

BAD TYPE VALUE  I=2  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=2048 MTIME=Nov 16 17:21 2010
DIR=/

UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY

FIX? [yn] y

BAD TYPE VALUE FOR '..'  I=151745536  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=512 MTIME=Oct 19 17:19 2010
DIR=?

UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY

FIX? [yn] y

BAD TYPE VALUE  I=2  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=2048 MTIME=Nov 16 17:21 2010
DIR=

UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY

FIX? [yn] y

BAD TYPE VALUE FOR '..'  I=301465600  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=19968 MTIME=Nov 12 09:16 2010
DIR=?

UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY

FIX? [yn] y

BAD TYPE VALUE  I=2  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=2048 MTIME=Nov 16 17:21 2010
DIR=

UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY

FIX? [yn] y

** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
UNREF DIR  I=151745536  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=512 MTIME=Oct 19 17:19 2010
RECONNECT? [yn] y

NO lost+found DIRECTORY
CREATE? [yn] y

SORRY. CANNOT CREATE lost+found DIRECTORY
UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY


UNREF DIR  I=301465600  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=19968 MTIME=Nov 12 09:16 2010
RECONNECT? [yn] y

NO lost+found DIRECTORY
CREATE? [yn] y

SORRY. CANNOT CREATE lost+found DIRECTORY
UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY


UNREF DIR  I=151745536  OWNER=root MODE=40755
SIZE=512 MTIME=Oct 19 17:19 2010
RECONNECT? [yn] y

NO lost+found DIRECTORY
CREATE? [yn] y

SORRY. CANNOT CREATE lost+found DIRECTORY
UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY


** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD
SALVAGE? [yn] y

BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS
SALVAGE? [yn] y

35257960 files, 1247115068 used, 171932417 free (5559497 frags, 20796615 
blocks, 0.4% fragmentation)


* FILE SYSTEM MARKED CLEAN *

* FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *
--


Dr. Thomas E. Exner
Juniorprofessur Theoretische Chemische Dynamik
Fachbereich Chemie
Universität Konstanz
78457 Konstanz

Tel.: +49-(0)7531-882015
Fax:  +49-(0)7531-883587
Email: thomas.ex...@uni-konstanz.de


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: disk recovery problem II

2009-02-07 Thread perryh
 huff@ newfs /dev/da3a
 /dev/da3a: 78167.2MB (160086512 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048
 using 426 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes.
 super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at:
  160, 376512, 752864, 1129216, 1505568, 1881920, 2258272, 2634624, 3010976,
...
  159949760
 cg 0: bad magic number

Bad drive, perhaps?  What do sysutils/smartmontools say?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


disk recovery problem(s)

2009-02-06 Thread Robert Huff

Had a power outage recently; when trying to fsck several
external hard drives I'm getting unexpected errors.
For example:

huff@ fsck /dev/da3a
** /dev/da3a
** Last Mounted on /backup
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED
ALLOCATE? [yn] 

a) what's probably happened?
b) is there a way to recover the data?  I can scrub the disk
and restore, but would like to avoid that if at all possible.


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: disk recovery problem(s)

2009-02-06 Thread Roland Smith
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:48:41PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
 
   Had a power outage recently; when trying to fsck several
 external hard drives I'm getting unexpected errors.
   For example:
 
 huff@ fsck /dev/da3a
 ** /dev/da3a
 ** Last Mounted on /backup
 ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
 ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
 ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED
 ALLOCATE? [yn] 
 
   a) what's probably happened?

Error messages are explained in Appendix A of
/usr/share/doc/smm/03.fsck/paper.ascii.gz

Unfortunately it says that this error should never happen. :-/

Is the drive connected by USB? Some USB disk interface chips are quite quirky.

   b) is there a way to recover the data?

Answer y, and all directorys and files found in the root will appear in
lost+found, unless the attempt to allocate the root inode fails.. 

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpBz44yeGud9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: disk recovery problem(s)

2009-02-06 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:48:41 -0500, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
 
   Had a power outage recently; when trying to fsck several
 external hard drives I'm getting unexpected errors.
   For example:
 
 huff@ fsck /dev/da3a
 ** /dev/da3a
 ** Last Mounted on /backup
 ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
 ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
 ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED
 ALLOCATE? [yn] 
 
   a) what's probably happened?
   b) is there a way to recover the data?  I can scrub the disk
 and restore, but would like to avoid that if at all possible.

I really hope you don't get into the trouble that I have (allthough
you mentioned that you've got backups)...

Your fsck output seems to indicate that fsck can handle the damage.
You could now let it continue. If a parent inode has disappeared,
its child inodes (orphaned ones) - or, to be correct, the files or
directories they represent - get restored in the lost+found/ directory
where their name (probably lost) gets replaced by the inode number.
If it's a directory, it content will usually be present with the
file names, only the topmost part of a hierarchy will be affected.




-- 
Polytropon
From Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: disk recovery problem(s)

2009-02-06 Thread Robert Huff

Roland Smith writes:

   huff@ fsck /dev/da3a
   ** /dev/da3a
   ** Last Mounted on /backup
   ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
   ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
   ROOT INODE UNALLOCATED
   ALLOCATE? [yn] 
   
  a) what's probably happened?
  
  Error messages are explained in Appendix A of
  /usr/share/doc/smm/03.fsck/paper.ascii.gz
  
  Unfortunately it says that this error should never happen. :-/
  
  Answer y, and all directorys and files found in the root will
  appear in lost+found, unless the attempt to allocate the root
  inode fails..

Thank you.
That worked ... sort of.


Robert Huff

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


disk recovery problem II

2009-02-06 Thread Robert Huff

One of the disks mentioned in part one was not recoverable.
So: newfs.
However, something else is broken.  Results of newfs is appended.
What?


Robert Huff



huff@ newfs /dev/da3a
/dev/da3a: 78167.2MB (160086512 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048
using 426 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes.
super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at:
 160, 376512, 752864, 1129216, 1505568, 1881920, 2258272, 2634624, 3010976,
 3387328, 3763680, 4140032, 4516384, 4892736, 5269088, 5645440, 6021792,
 6398144, 6774496, 7150848, 7527200, 7903552, 8279904, 8656256, 9032608,
 9408960, 9785312, 10161664, 10538016, 10914368, 11290720, 11667072, 12043424,
 12419776, 12796128, 13172480, 13548832, 13925184, 14301536, 14677888,
 15054240, 15430592, 15806944, 16183296, 16559648, 16936000, 17312352,
 17688704, 18065056, 18441408, 18817760, 19194112, 19570464, 19946816,
 20323168, 20699520, 21075872, 21452224, 21828576, 22204928, 22581280,
 22957632, 2984, 23710336, 24086688, 24463040, 24839392, 25215744,
 25592096, 25968448, 26344800, 26721152, 27097504, 27473856, 27850208,
 28226560, 28602912, 28979264, 29355616, 29731968, 30108320, 30484672,
 30861024, 31237376, 31613728, 31990080, 32366432, 32742784, 33119136,
 33495488, 33871840, 34248192, 34624544, 35000896, 35377248, 35753600,
 36129952, 36506304, 36882656, 37259008, 37635360, 38011712, 38388064,
 38764416, 39140768, 39517120, 39893472, 40269824, 40646176, 41022528,
 41398880, 41775232, 42151584, 42527936, 42904288, 43280640, 43656992,
 44033344, 44409696, 44786048, 45162400, 45538752, 45915104, 46291456,
 46667808, 47044160, 47420512, 47796864, 48173216, 48549568, 48925920,
 49302272, 49678624, 50054976, 50431328, 50807680, 51184032, 51560384,
 51936736, 52313088, 52689440, 53065792, 53442144, 53818496, 54194848,
 54571200, 54947552, 55323904, 55700256, 56076608, 56452960, 56829312,
 57205664, 57582016, 57958368, 58334720, 58711072, 59087424, 59463776,
 59840128, 60216480, 60592832, 60969184, 61345536, 61721888, 62098240,
 62474592, 62850944, 63227296, 63603648, 6398, 64356352, 64732704,
 65109056, 65485408, 65861760, 66238112, 66614464, 66990816, 67367168,
 67743520, 68119872, 68496224, 68872576, 69248928, 69625280, 70001632,
 70377984, 70754336, 71130688, 71507040, 71883392, 72259744, 72636096,
 73012448, 73388800, 73765152, 74141504, 74517856, 74894208, 75270560,
 75646912, 76023264, 76399616, 76775968, 77152320, 77528672, 77905024,
 78281376, 78657728, 79034080, 79410432, 79786784, 80163136, 80539488,
 80915840, 81292192, 81668544, 82044896, 82421248, 82797600, 83173952,
 83550304, 83926656, 84303008, 84679360, 85055712, 85432064, 85808416,
 86184768, 86561120, 86937472, 87313824, 87690176, 88066528, 88442880,
 88819232, 89195584, 89571936, 89948288, 90324640, 90700992, 91077344,
 91453696, 91830048, 92206400, 92582752, 92959104, 93335456, 93711808,
 94088160, 94464512, 94840864, 95217216, 95593568, 95969920, 96346272,
 96722624, 97098976, 97475328, 97851680, 98228032, 98604384, 98980736,
 99357088, 99733440, 100109792, 100486144, 100862496, 101238848, 101615200,
 101991552, 102367904, 102744256, 103120608, 103496960, 103873312, 104249664,
 104626016, 105002368, 105378720, 105755072, 106131424, 106507776, 106884128,
 107260480, 107636832, 108013184, 108389536, 108765888, 109142240, 109518592,
 109894944, 110271296, 110647648, 111024000, 111400352, 111776704, 112153056,
 112529408, 112905760, 113282112, 113658464, 114034816, 114411168, 114787520,
 115163872, 115540224, 115916576, 116292928, 116669280, 117045632, 117421984,
 117798336, 118174688, 118551040, 118927392, 119303744, 119680096, 120056448,
 120432800, 120809152, 121185504, 121561856, 121938208, 122314560, 122690912,
 123067264, 123443616, 123819968, 124196320, 124572672, 124949024, 125325376,
 125701728, 126078080, 126454432, 126830784, 127207136, 127583488, 127959840,
 128336192, 128712544, 129088896, 129465248, 129841600, 130217952, 130594304,
 130970656, 131347008, 131723360, 132099712, 132476064, 132852416, 133228768,
 133605120, 133981472, 134357824, 134734176, 135110528, 135486880, 135863232,
 136239584, 136615936, 136992288, 137368640, 137744992, 138121344, 138497696,
 138874048, 139250400, 139626752, 140003104, 140379456, 140755808, 141132160,
 141508512, 141884864, 142261216, 142637568, 143013920, 143390272, 143766624,
 144142976, 144519328, 144895680, 145272032, 145648384, 146024736, 146401088,
 146777440, 147153792, 147530144, 147906496, 148282848, 148659200, 149035552,
 149411904, 149788256, 150164608, 150540960, 150917312, 151293664, 151670016,
 152046368, 152422720, 152799072, 153175424, 153551776, 153928128, 154304480,
 154680832, 155057184, 155433536, 155809888, 156186240, 156562592, 156938944,
 157315296, 157691648, 158068000, 158444352, 158820704, 159197056, 159573408,
 159949760
cg 0: bad magic number
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 

Re: disk recovery tools...

2008-01-18 Thread Wojciech Puchar

From professional experience as a data recovery technician, I can tell

you that ufs2 drives are among the hardest to recover from after a


there is a little change as UFS2 use lazy inode initialization. so 
possibly lots can be recovered. but i don't know any soft that does it.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: disk recovery tools...

2008-01-18 Thread Wojciech Puchar

moving disks from an old server to a new one I suffered from a moment of
brain fade last night and newfs'ed a drive I shouldn't have. One of that
new crop that is so large you won't have an adequate backup for it... :(


no rescue. newfs overwrote inodes that contained your files metadata.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: disk recovery tools...

2008-01-18 Thread fbsdq
with a subject this time...

I've  used /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk to recover my BSD partitions, but
it was just a HD failure/MBR nukage, no newfs was run on it - Try that.


]Peter[

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


disk recovery tools...

2008-01-17 Thread Enno Davids
Guys,

moving disks from an old server to a new one I suffered from a moment of
brain fade last night and newfs'ed a drive I shouldn't have. One of that
new crop that is so large you won't have an adequate backup for it... :(

So, just wondering if there are any disk recovery tools that might be able
to find whats left of the files or some portion thereof. My guess is that
things like the indirect blocks live on in the data area and some portion
of what was there might be recoverable to a greater or lesser degree...


Thanks in advance,

Enno.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: disk recovery tools...

2008-01-17 Thread Michael Hawkins
From professional experience as a data recovery technician, I can tell
you that ufs2 drives are among the hardest to recover from after a
format.  So far the best applications that I have found for recovering
data in a situation like this are testdisk and Easy Recovery
Professional (by Kroll Ontrack).  Obviously the ideal situation would
be to get your data back in its original form, so I would try testdisk
first.  If that fails, however, you are going to have to use ERP
(which cost money) to do a RAW recovery.  Please note, however, that
if you perform a RAW recovery,you will NOT recover the intact
filestructure, but instead, a set of folders with your files, and the
files will be renamed 'Fil001' followed by the extension.

I hope this helps,
Cypheros



On 1/17/08, Enno Davids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Guys,

 moving disks from an old server to a new one I suffered from a moment of
 brain fade last night and newfs'ed a drive I shouldn't have. One of that
 new crop that is so large you won't have an adequate backup for it... :(

 So, just wondering if there are any disk recovery tools that might be able
 to find whats left of the files or some portion thereof. My guess is that
 things like the indirect blocks live on in the data area and some portion
 of what was there might be recoverable to a greater or lesser degree...


 Thanks in advance,

 Enno.

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


disk recovery

2004-05-24 Thread John Oxley
Hi,

I have a personal server with 400Gb of hard disks in various shapes and
sizes.  I don't have enough money for redundant disks, and I would like
to know what the most efficient way of making sure my data doesn't get
lost, in case of a hard drive failure.  The best would be for some sort
of recovery if a disk goes south for the winter.

On this note, what's the best way of recovering data when a disk does go
bad.

-- 
/~\ The ASCII   ASCII stupid question, get a EBCDIC ANSI.
\ / Ribbon Campaign John Oxley
 X  Against HTMLhttp://oxo.rucus.net/
/ \ Email!  oxo at rucus.ru.ac.za
Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped, 
pop-up-happy dungeon like NT.
-- Thomas Scoville
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: disk recovery

2004-05-24 Thread Bill Moran
John Oxley wrote:
Hi,
I have a personal server with 400Gb of hard disks in various shapes and
sizes.  I don't have enough money for redundant disks, and I would like
to know what the most efficient way of making sure my data doesn't get
lost, in case of a hard drive failure.  The best would be for some sort
of recovery if a disk goes south for the winter.
On this note, what's the best way of recovering data when a disk does go
bad.
You need to make backups to some other media, whether it be CD, or tape or
a second set of disk drives.
Doesn't sound easy.  If you assume an average of 2:1 compression, you're
still going to need 200G to back everything up.  That'll take 50 DVDs ...
If all of this data is important to you, then you need to come up with
some cash.  You might want to consider which of the data is _really_
important, and what you can survive losing and only back up the truely
critical stuff.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: disk recovery

2004-05-24 Thread JJB
Even considering repairing an damaged HD as an method to replace
backups is an stupid thought. People who do not backup critical data
are fools. There is no price tag one can put on critical data. You
find some way to backup to flat compressed file format and write to
an removable HD or CDROM or some free web hosting site, BUT backup
your data now. There is no substitute.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Oxley
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 4:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: disk recovery

Hi,

I have a personal server with 400Gb of hard disks in various shapes
and
sizes.  I don't have enough money for redundant disks, and I would
like
to know what the most efficient way of making sure my data doesn't
get
lost, in case of a hard drive failure.  The best would be for some
sort
of recovery if a disk goes south for the winter.

On this note, what's the best way of recovering data when a disk
does go
bad.

--
/~\ The ASCII   ASCII stupid question, get a EBCDIC ANSI.
\ / Ribbon Campaign John Oxley
 X  Against HTMLhttp://oxo.rucus.net/
/ \ Email!  oxo at rucus.ru.ac.za
Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped,
pop-up-happy dungeon like NT.
-- Thomas Scoville
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: disk recovery

2004-05-24 Thread Joachim Dagerot
I used to think just like you. I thought I found the perfect balance
between being on a budget and still having some kind of data security
by using the Vinum software raid.

So I stored the first 10 hours of video and 4k of still shots of my
newly borned first child on the raid, and everything went well until
one day when the kid crawled upfront the server and started to switch
on switch of with a rate only a kid can achieve.

One disk broke and I never managed to get it up again. So all memories
from my sons first year where lost.

Also I got no support whatsoever from this list when I asked for help
to replace and recover the RAID system, so I was quite alone with
vinum at that point...

Today I have a hardware raid with a four disks volume and a fifth disk
as spare. Some of the directories are each night copied to another
machine for backup. Now and then (unfortunately mostly 'then') I burn
newly taken pictures and films to DVD and put them in a box on my
office (just in case of fire back home).

If you have 400Gb of data I assume it's not material produced by
yourself but perhaps downloaded films, music etc. If your'e on a
budget, don't backup that. But do backup everything you've created
yourself.

So, don't repeat my misstake!

//Joachim


| I have a personal server with 400Gb of hard disks in various shapes
and
| sizes.  I don't have enough money for redundant disks, and I would
like
| to know what the most efficient way of making sure my data doesn't
get
| lost, in case of a hard drive failure.  The best would be for some
sort
| of recovery if a disk goes south for the winter.
| 
| On this note, what's the best way of recovering data when a disk
does go
| bad.

 | I have a personal server with 400Gb of hard disks in various shapes
and
 | sizes.  I don't have enough money for redundant disks, and I would
like
 | to know what the most efficient way of making sure my data doesn't
get
 | lost, in case of a hard drive failure.  The best would be for some
sort
 | of recovery if a disk goes south for the winter.
 | 
 | On this note, what's the best way of recovering data when a disk
does go
 | bad.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: disk recovery

2004-05-24 Thread Jerry McAllister
Hi,

 Hi,
 
 I have a personal server with 400Gb of hard disks in various shapes and
 sizes.  I don't have enough money for redundant disks, and I would like
 to know what the most efficient way of making sure my data doesn't get
 lost, in case of a hard drive failure.  The best would be for some sort
 of recovery if a disk goes south for the winter.

If that data is important, then it is worth the cost of backing up.

 
 On this note, what's the best way of recovering data when a disk does go
 bad.

The only way is to restore it from a backup.   You could try one of those
emergency NSA type recovery services, but that would cost you far more
than buying a backup system.   

So, whatever media you choose, shell it out for some backup capacity.
In the short run, some additional disks might be the easiest and
cheapest.   Just add enough disk to hold everything and use dump(8) to
a file on the extra disk to make the backup.   Pull the disks and 
set them aside in a clean storage space.  Use a different set of disk
the next time and alternate/rotate them.   Then if you need something
or everything back, it is easy to get it using restore.
You could create a mirroring system, but that is not quite a backup
since it is left on the machine and is subject to the same environmental
conditions that might cause the main disks to fail.

In the longer run, it might actually still be cheaper to get a 
good tape system such as DLT.Then you can make a really good
media rotation of maybe 5 sets, plus an occasional archive set.
With that much data or more, don't bother with one of the cheapie
tape systems.  You will overload its duty cycle quickly and have
to replace it too often.

jerry

 
 -- 
 /~\ The ASCII   ASCII stupid question, get a EBCDIC ANSI.
 \ / Ribbon Campaign John Oxley
  X  Against HTMLhttp://oxo.rucus.net/
 / \ Email!  oxo at rucus.ru.ac.za
 Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live in a bitmapped, 
 pop-up-happy dungeon like NT.
   -- Thomas Scoville
 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]