Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 This discussion seems very strange, since I don't really understand how
 anyone could effectively use FreeBSD (or any flavor of UNIX) without
 understanding English in the first place.  I've never heard of any
 localized versions of UNIX (?).

There's an amazing amount of material that has been localized into quite
a number of languages. I believe Gnome and KDE are pretty much fully
localized to most languages you can think of these days. 

I tend to run a Norwegian (Nynorsk or Bokmål, whatever I fancy that day)
KDE desktop myself. An ordinary user would get along fine on a typical
desktop system in their local language, IME. On the other hand your
friendly sysadmin would likely be at a great disadvantage with little or
no English.

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
First, we kill all the spammers The Usenet Bard, Twice-forwarded tales

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Peter N. M. Hansteen writes:

 There's an amazing amount of material that has been localized into quite
 a number of languages. I believe Gnome and KDE are pretty much fully
 localized to most languages you can think of these days. 

I was thinking of UNIX itself, not X servers or related products.

I doubt that even Apple has bothered to localize any of the UNIX
software for OS X.  Unless one treats UNIX as a black-box desktop server
(with a localized GUI), it's going to be hard to work with the system
without knowing English.  And if it's ever necessary to go outside the
desktop GUI environment, there again, English is required.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread cpghost
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 01:52:16PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
 I doubt that even Apple has bothered to localize any of the UNIX
 software for OS X.  Unless one treats UNIX as a black-box desktop server
 (with a localized GUI), it's going to be hard to work with the system
 without knowing English.  And if it's ever necessary to go outside the
 desktop GUI environment, there again, English is required.

I've seen a fully localized german version of Unix called SINIX
(Siemens' Unix?).

Well, not *fully* localized, since the commands were still the usual
bunch of 'ls' 'cp', 'mv' etc... (is that really English? ;-)), but
everthing else, including error messages and man pages were in german.
That was really weird looking, yet cute.

I don't know if SINIX is still alive or defunct by now.

Oh yeah, I also remember a french version of PASCAL (with french
keywords!) from the early eighties. That was even weirder than
a localized Unix!

 Anthony

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Well, not *fully* localized, since the commands were still the usual
 bunch of 'ls' 'cp', 'mv' etc... (is that really English? ;-)), but
 everthing else, including error messages and man pages were in german.
 That was really weird looking, yet cute.

Localizing software destabilizes it; localized versions always contain
more bugs (often very hard-to-find bugs) than original versions.

If I speak the language of the original authors of a software product, I
always use the product in its original language.  Localized versions are
a constant source of trouble.  Even Windows, which makes special
provisions for localization, is still far more bug-prone in non-English
versions, and I always try to install U.S.-English versions if I can get
them.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Josh Ockert
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:26:27 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Well, not *fully* localized, since the commands were still the usual
  bunch of 'ls' 'cp', 'mv' etc... (is that really English? ;-)), but
  everthing else, including error messages and man pages were in german.
  That was really weird looking, yet cute.
 
 Localizing software destabilizes it; localized versions always contain
 more bugs (often very hard-to-find bugs) than original versions.
 
 If I speak the language of the original authors of a software product, I
 always use the product in its original language.  Localized versions are
 a constant source of trouble.  Even Windows, which makes special
 provisions for localization, is still far more bug-prone in non-English
 versions, and I always try to install U.S.-English versions if I can get
 them.
 
 --
 Anthony
 
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

To be honest I've never used a localized version of *NIX, though I
imagine that the German version of SuSE (or whatever this weeks
capitalization practice is) and the French version of Mandrake would
be quite good. I also imagine there's probably also a good Canadian
French version of OpenBSD. Then again, it could just be my
imagination.

On the other hand, I use the localized French versions of Windows XP
Pro on the computer labs at school and they don't seem to have any
problems -- with the exception that Japanese students always install
this dumbass shareware IME program that sets the character set to
SHIFT-JIS and Firefox's menus are fscked until you task manager and
kill the blasted thing. There's no reason to think that string
replacement would cause more bugs in the technical sense; however, a
bad translation might contribute to a higher frequency of user error.

Maybe I'll have to try installing French FreeBSD and seeing how well it goes :-D
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Josh Ockert writes:

 There's no reason to think that string replacement would cause more
 bugs in the technical sense; however, a bad translation might
 contribute to a higher frequency of user error.

Windows is better adapted to localization than most operating systems,
because it isolates resources like strings in a way that facilitates
keeping them independent of code. Nevertheless, problems arise. Strings
often grow much longer when translated. Unicode poses special problems.
Buffer overflows are more likely. Formatting messages with variable
fields gets more complex and difficult and harder to debug.  And patches
and fixes take longer to get for localized versions; dumps generated in
localized versions are harder to debug, since everything has moved.  The
list goes on and on.

All of these problems are multipled a thousandfold in UNIX and most
other operating systems, where almost all language information is
hard-coded directly into the software.

Localization makes sense for ordinary end users, but not for IT
professionals.  They are vastly better off working in English.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Josh Ockert
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:10:30 +0100, Anthony Atkielski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Josh Ockert writes:
 
  There's no reason to think that string replacement would cause more
  bugs in the technical sense; however, a bad translation might
  contribute to a higher frequency of user error.
 
 Windows is better adapted to localization than most operating systems,
 because it isolates resources like strings in a way that facilitates
 keeping them independent of code. Nevertheless, problems arise. Strings
 often grow much longer when translated. Unicode poses special problems.
 Buffer overflows are more likely. Formatting messages with variable
 fields gets more complex and difficult and harder to debug.  And patches
 and fixes take longer to get for localized versions; dumps generated in
 localized versions are harder to debug, since everything has moved.  The
 list goes on and on.
 
 All of these problems are multipled a thousandfold in UNIX and most
 other operating systems, where almost all language information is
 hard-coded directly into the software.
 
 Localization makes sense for ordinary end users, but not for IT
 professionals.  They are vastly better off working in English.
 
 --
 Anthony
 
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Oh I agree. Actually, my partner in my duo linguistique at the Centre
de Linguistique Appliquée (in Besançon) is an IT guy who wants to
improve his English.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Localizing software destabilizes it; localized versions always contain
 more bugs (often very hard-to-find bugs) than original versions.

I fail to see how switching from one set of message strings files in a
correctly written application would destabilize it.

 Localized versions are a constant source of trouble.  Even Windows,
 which makes special provisions for localization, is still far more
 bug-prone in non-English versions, and I always try to install
 U.S.-English versions if I can get them.

Oh, you're talking about Windows.  Yes, there's been a lot of
localization related trouble there.  But then we're relatively safe from
the secret brainfarts of Microsoft developers here.
-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
First, we kill all the spammers The Usenet Bard, Twice-forwarded tales

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Peter N. M. Hansteen writes:

 I fail to see how switching from one set of message strings files in a
 correctly written application would destabilize it.

As I've explained, changing string lengths can be a source of trouble;
string copies that worked before are suddenly overflowing buffers.
Inserting variable data into messages is also difficult with localized
software, as the order and format of the variables must often change,
and sometimes a lot of extra code is required to accommodate this.
Special characters can cause code to fail if it is not prepared to
handle 8-bit data--setting the high-order bit is especially likely to
make trouble.  There are lots of potential problems.

And that's just with software that facilitates localization, such as
Windows executables.  In other environments, it gets a lot worse.

 Oh, you're talking about Windows. Yes, there's been a lot of
 localization related trouble there. But then we're relatively safe
 from the secret brainfarts of Microsoft developers here.

As I've already pointed out, localization is actually cleaner and safer
in Windows programs than in most other types of software.  Windows
allows you to isolate strings and similar data in resource files built
separately from the executable code.  In many other environments, you
have to either hard code all language data directly into the program, or
you have to write your own code to allow broad localization.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I was thinking of UNIX itself, not X servers or related products.

Take a peek in /usr/share/locale and /usr/local/share/locale next time
you're at a FreeBSD or Linux system.

 I doubt that even Apple has bothered to localize any of the UNIX
 software for OS X.

You haven't checked, then.  

Unless the company's been taken over by the beancounters again, I'd
imagine localized messages are at least available for roughly the same
languates available for the GUI parts.  The thing is, as long as you
stay away from command line options and scripting/programming language
keywords (yes, I have more than 15 years' experience in the localization
industry, I've seen quite a bit of such foolishness) and the software is
sanely written, messages are fairly straightforward and risk-free to
translate.  .

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
First, we kill all the spammers The Usenet Bard, Twice-forwarded tales

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-26 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Peter N. M. Hansteen writes:

 Take a peek in /usr/share/locale and /usr/local/share/locale next time
 you're at a FreeBSD or Linux system.

No need.  I can look at the source of almost any UNIX program and see
that there is no provision for localization at all, short of brute
modification of the source code itself.  But this is not unreasonable
for a server operating system, although it's much harder to defend for
software visible to potentially unsophisticated end users.  However,
back in the days when UNIX was written, localization was not a high
priority, and when it was undertaken at all, it was done the hard way,
by rewriting.

 You haven't checked, then.

No, I have not, but I should be _extremely_ surprised if Apple has gone
through all the UNIX source code and modified it to permit easy
localization.  That would come perilously close to a rewrite.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-25 Thread Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 16:42 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:
 Peter Risdon wrote:

 
 I have no idea why you're trying to misrepresent what I was saying.
It's
 starting to feel mildly bizarre.
 
 Peter.
 
 I am not trying to misrepresent anything, and I don't believe that I
am.
 
  From your initial posting:
 
  Perhaps, though I'm not sure myself what is said in Russian to them
  whereas I can read the French. But the reply in, I think, Swedish to
  this question in French was a very good indication of what an
impossible
  babel this or any other list would be if a single language were not
  declared and respected.

Reading this again, it seems completely reasonable and obvious. I'm very
happy to stand by it.

  
  Peter
 
 If you were not saying that -questions should be an English-only list,
then
 which single language were you referring to?

The single language I referred to is of course English. But, my obtuse
friend, that's not the point at issue. It's the words *should be* and
*English-only* in your question. These are not my words but that doesn't
stop you trying to put them into my mouth. The simple fact is that
-questions _is_ an English language, as opposed to an English-only, list
(see below). You haven't noticed that? Hmmm... 

Try reading the etiquette guide I quoted, from the FreeBSD website
(-questions is English in theory), and count the percentage of postings
in English, which is well above 99% (and English in practice). This is
pretty obvious stuff, Bob.

But people sometimes post in other languages and then other people try
to help them, including me if I feel competent. And that's great.


 How can I interpret your statement above to mean anything other than
 that you believe this should be an English-only list? 

By reading it in a straightforward way and not trying to distort it for
your own, unfathomable, purposes.

  Are you arguing
 that declaring and respecting a single language is not the same as
 prohibiting other languages?

At last! That's right. This has absolutely nothing to do with
prohibition. Prohibition is imposed , respect is self-imposed. Again,
pretty obvious stuff.

People _are_ asked, politely, (declaring) by FreeBSD.org, on their
website, in the bit about mailing lists, to use an appropriate language
for lists and it's entirely clear they mean English unless otherwise
stated. 

I've quoted this to you since and I echoed it when someone seemed to be
calling for a _CHANGE_ in policy. I've already made that perfectly clear
[1]. I think the guidance on the website should be borne in mind by list
subscribers (respecting).

That's why I say you are trying to misrepresent what I said. A list
moderator might prohibit non-English posts and that would create an
*English-only* list. I am absolutely not calling for that. 

By contrast, individual posters might respect guidelines and in this
context that would make for an *English language* list. Nothing
authoritarian, just a guideline that people respect of their own
volition. There's nothing new about this idea - respecting guidelines is
a normal part of netiquette.

Now, remember that declare and respect were the words I used in my
initial posting, and you have demonstrated this by quoting them for me,
above. They have been there all along, clearly, and have nothing
whatsoever to do with the sort of authoritarianism you seem determined
to try to contrive from my words.

To repeat myself one last time, I was DISAGREEING with SOMEBODY ELSE who
seemed to be CALLING FOR A CHANGE. You are stating, falsely, that I
called for a change, then disagreeing with the change you are falsely
claiming I advocate. How pointless can you get?

This is already repetitious and must be deeply tedious to other
subscribers by now. I attempted, in my last post, to agree to disagree
in a friendly way with you. After all, we've both said our piece and
they are in the archives if anyone ever gives a damn. You have chosen to
ignore that amicable overture. 

So I am going to spare subscribers the tedium of any further posts to
this thread.

Peter.

[1] From an earlier post:

On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 12:49 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:

  
 
 There is no call to splinter into many languages. 

*sigh*

The starting point for this was a post which seemed to me to be doing
just that. If you interpret that posting differently, and you haven't
said whether you do, then that's our point of difference. Perhaps I
misread the OP, in which case there's nothing to discuss and
everything's fine and dandy. 







___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-25 Thread Josh Ockert
Good God this is all non-sensical. Peter, there is absolutely nothing
to give the impression that questions is meant to be entirely,
exclusively, or even primarily English-language list. Consider the
following:

1) FreeBSD is a US project, and the US has no official
language, so there is no implied language for the project. In
addition, many people in the US speak languages (natively) other than
English. I should know. I'm from Northern Michigan and if you want to
try explaining to a big burly fur-trader descendant named Reuben who
lives on Bois Blanc island that he is not supposed to speak French,
you're likely to get the crap beaten out of you. In short, even if you
look at freebsd.org as being country-specific (I disagree with this in
the first place, but anyway) that still doesn't mean English should
necessarily dominate on its lists.

2) There are NO official french-language lists. There is a
French-language list, but it is not official. I am subscribed to it,
and as such I can assure you that, per day, more francophones read the
official list than they do the unofficial french-language list. This
makes it quite unreasonable to expect francophones to use the
unofficial list, knowing they won't receive support.

If you would like to continue with this connerie, you may do so; but
if you do, don't expect thereafter that your messages will continue to
show up in my inbox. By the way, I assume you are indeed a native
anglophone, so even according to the guidelines there is no excuse for
your spelling of xenophobic with a z.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-25 Thread Peter Risdon
Josh,

On the grounds that this a new front, I'll post on this thread one last
time, but I have been suggesting for several posts now that we've all
expressed our views and other people can make up their minds without
constant repetition from us.

On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 13:18 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
 Good God this is all non-sensical. 

If you really want to pick up my spelling mistake, which I happily
acknowledge I made, it's ironic to see you make one yourself (nonsense
is not hyphenated). But English is perhaps not your langue de naissance?
If not, I compliment you on your facility with it. J'essaye de utiliser
la francaise mais je ne suis pas du tout pres de votre niveau en
anglais.

 Peter, there is absolutely nothing
 to give the impression that questions is meant to be entirely,
 exclusively, or even primarily English-language list.

True enough for the first two (entirely, exclusively), but people _are_
encouraged to use English and I quoted from the FreeBSD website to
demonstrate that. I don't know why you haven't accepted this, even if
you disagree with it, or explained why you do not.

I have never responded to anyone who posted in a language other than
English that they should not have done so - and lots of other people
have. I think the list should be, and generally is, welcoming for
everyone, regardless of whether or not they have sufficient competence
in English to use it to ask a question.

But I do disagree with you about the idea that the list should be
officially linguistically agnostic. I think people should be encouraged
to use one language if possible, and that for a variety of reasons
English is the obvious choice. In this, I seem to be closer to the
guidelines expressed on the FreeBSD website than you are. But that
doesn't mean I'm right, or that a majority would agree. However, it is a
valid, genuine opinion and it's a shame you choose to respond to it with
insults, even in French, and mail filtering.

I guess I should have realised that there's a fairly bitter
philosophical divide underlying this sort of debate. It's similar to
multiculturalism vs. integration, or the occasional battles within the
European Union over language. FWIW, I also think the EU should adopt one
language primarily, but that for historical reasons this should be
French.

And that really is it. I subscribed to this list for technical
questions, not for this sort of circular and needlessly personal sort of
debate.


Peter.

  Consider the
 following:
 
 1) FreeBSD is a US project, and the US has no official
 language, so there is no implied language for the project. In
 addition, many people in the US speak languages (natively) other than
 English. I should know. I'm from Northern Michigan and if you want to
 try explaining to a big burly fur-trader descendant named Reuben who
 lives on Bois Blanc island that he is not supposed to speak French,
 you're likely to get the crap beaten out of you. In short, even if you
 look at freebsd.org as being country-specific (I disagree with this in
 the first place, but anyway) that still doesn't mean English should
 necessarily dominate on its lists.
 
 2) There are NO official french-language lists. There is a
 French-language list, but it is not official. I am subscribed to it,
 and as such I can assure you that, per day, more francophones read the
 official list than they do the unofficial french-language list. This
 makes it quite unreasonable to expect francophones to use the
 unofficial list, knowing they won't receive support.
 
 If you would like to continue with this connerie, you may do so; but
 if you do, don't expect thereafter that your messages will continue to
 show up in my inbox. By the way, I assume you are indeed a native
 anglophone, so even according to the guidelines there is no excuse for
 your spelling of xenophobic with a z.
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-25 Thread Anthony Atkielski
This discussion seems very strange, since I don't really understand how
anyone could effectively use FreeBSD (or any flavor of UNIX) without
understanding English in the first place.  I've never heard of any
localized versions of UNIX (?).

More generally, it's virtually impossible to work in the IT field
anywhere today without having some reasonable command of English,
although I suppose there are a few desert islands somewhere where it
isn't absolutely necessary.

-- 
Anthony


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:54 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
 I've noticed that nobody responds negatively to questions by Russian
 speakers, but that French speakers are told not to ask questions here.
 I don't believe this is a fair response.

Perhaps, though I'm not sure myself what is said in Russian to them
whereas I can read the French. But the reply in, I think, Swedish to
this question in French was a very good indication of what an impossible
babel this or any other list would be if a single language were not
declared and respected.

Peter.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Josh Ockert
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:51:51 +, Peter Risdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:54 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
  I've noticed that nobody responds negatively to questions by Russian
  speakers, but that French speakers are told not to ask questions here.
  I don't believe this is a fair response.
 
 Perhaps, though I'm not sure myself what is said in Russian to them
 whereas I can read the French. But the reply in, I think, Swedish to
 this question in French was a very good indication of what an impossible
 babel this or any other list would be if a single language were not
 declared and respected.
 
 Peter.
 
 

You could equally argue that this place is already a babel; mentally
disregarding messages in foreign languages should be just as easy as
ignoring the questions about particular hardware you know nothing
about. We're all Internet literate here (at any rate, most of us ;) ),
which suggests that we've the ability to pick out the important and/or
applicable bits from masses of information.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:05 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
 On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:51:51 +, Peter Risdon
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:54 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
   I've noticed that nobody responds negatively to questions by Russian
   speakers, but that French speakers are told not to ask questions here.
   I don't believe this is a fair response.
  
  Perhaps, though I'm not sure myself what is said in Russian to them
  whereas I can read the French. But the reply in, I think, Swedish to
  this question in French was a very good indication of what an impossible
  babel this or any other list would be if a single language were not
  declared and respected.
  
  Peter.
  
  
 
 You could equally argue that this place is already a babel; mentally
 disregarding messages in foreign languages should be just as easy as
 ignoring the questions about particular hardware you know nothing
 about. We're all Internet literate here (at any rate, most of us ;) ),
 which suggests that we've the ability to pick out the important and/or
 applicable bits from masses of information.

No, I'm sorry but that seems to me to be a non sequitur. We can
understand questions we are not competent to answer if they are in
English, learn from the replies and if we hit the same issues ourselves
we can google and get a reply we can understand. You are suggesting this
incredibly useful situation be broken, if I understand you right. And
this applies to French and Russian speakers equally: this is an English
list, there are also French and Russian lists. I'd argue just as
strongly that postings to the French list should be in French.

Peter.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Bob Johnson
Peter Risdon wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:54 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
 

I've noticed that nobody responds negatively to questions by Russian
speakers, but that French speakers are told not to ask questions here.
I don't believe this is a fair response.
   

Perhaps, though I'm not sure myself what is said in Russian to them
whereas I can read the French. But the reply in, I think, Swedish to
this question in French was a very good indication of what an impossible
babel this or any other list would be if a single language were not
declared and respected.
Peter.
 

When did this become an English-only list? 

For years the policy of this list was that you were free to post in any
language you were comfortable with, but with the caveat that you had
the best chance of getting help if you posted in English.  Postings in
other languages were often answered in that language, with an added
pointer to a local support list in that language.
So again, I ask: has that policy changed, or are the xenophobes just
trying to impose their biases on the rest of us?
- Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Bob Johnson
Peter Risdon wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:05 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
 

On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:51:51 +, Peter Risdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   

On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:54 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
 

I've noticed that nobody responds negatively to questions by Russian
speakers, but that French speakers are told not to ask questions here.
I don't believe this is a fair response.
   

Perhaps, though I'm not sure myself what is said in Russian to them
whereas I can read the French. But the reply in, I think, Swedish to
this question in French was a very good indication of what an impossible
babel this or any other list would be if a single language were not
declared and respected.
Peter.
 

You could equally argue that this place is already a babel; mentally
disregarding messages in foreign languages should be just as easy as
ignoring the questions about particular hardware you know nothing
about. We're all Internet literate here (at any rate, most of us ;) ),
which suggests that we've the ability to pick out the important and/or
applicable bits from masses of information.
   

No, I'm sorry but that seems to me to be a non sequitur. We can
understand questions we are not competent to answer if they are in
English, learn from the replies and if we hit the same issues ourselves
we can google and get a reply we can understand. You are suggesting this
incredibly useful situation be broken, if I understand you right. And
this applies to French and Russian speakers equally: this is an English
list, there are also French and Russian lists. I'd argue just as
strongly that postings to the French list should be in French.
Peter.
 

This is the default world-wide FreeBSD support list.  Postings in any 
language
have always been welcome (at least since I subscribed in 1997).  Who put 
you
in charge of deciding otherwise?

- Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Mar 24, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Bob Johnson wrote:
Peter Risdon wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:05 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:51:51 +, Peter Risdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 08:54 +0100, Josh Ockert wrote:
I've noticed that nobody responds negatively to questions by 
Russian
speakers, but that French speakers are told not to ask questions 
here.
I don't believe this is a fair response.

Perhaps, though I'm not sure myself what is said in Russian to them
whereas I can read the French. But the reply in, I think, Swedish to
this question in French was a very good indication of what an 
impossible
babel this or any other list would be if a single language were not
declared and respected.

Peter.

You could equally argue that this place is already a babel; mentally
disregarding messages in foreign languages should be just as easy as
ignoring the questions about particular hardware you know nothing
about. We're all Internet literate here (at any rate, most of us ;) 
),
which suggests that we've the ability to pick out the important 
and/or
applicable bits from masses of information.

No, I'm sorry but that seems to me to be a non sequitur. We can
understand questions we are not competent to answer if they are in
English, learn from the replies and if we hit the same issues 
ourselves
we can google and get a reply we can understand. You are suggesting 
this
incredibly useful situation be broken, if I understand you right. And
this applies to French and Russian speakers equally: this is an 
English
list, there are also French and Russian lists. I'd argue just as
strongly that postings to the French list should be in French.

Peter.
This is the default world-wide FreeBSD support list.  Postings in any 
language
have always been welcome (at least since I subscribed in 1997).  Who 
put you
in charge of deciding otherwise?
How about we all agree to only ask questions in C?  Or will people 
start arguing in C++ or Python after that? :-)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[Fwd: Re: mot de passe root]

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Risdon

---BeginMessage---
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:30 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:

 No, I'm sorry but that seems to me to be a non sequitur. We can
 understand questions we are not competent to answer if they are in
 English, learn from the replies and if we hit the same issues ourselves
 we can google and get a reply we can understand. You are suggesting this
 incredibly useful situation be broken, if I understand you right. And
 this applies to French and Russian speakers equally: this is an English
 list, there are also French and Russian lists. I'd argue just as
 strongly that postings to the French list should be in French.
 
 Peter.
   
 
 This is the default world-wide FreeBSD support list.  Postings in any 
 language
 have always been welcome (at least since I subscribed in 1997).  Who put 
 you
 in charge of deciding otherwise?

Crikey. Well, nobody, of course, and I'm not assuming that position. I
was responding to and not initiating a thread. However:

quote
Please use an appropriate human language for a particular mailing list.
Many non-English mailing lists are available.

For the ones that are not, we do appreciate that many people do not
speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for
that. It is considered particularly poor form to criticize non-native
speakers for spelling or grammatical errors. FreeBSD has an excellent
track record in this regard; please, help us to uphold that tradition.
/quote

comes from

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html

and it's clearly implicit that lists are in English unless otherwise
stated. This also seems implicit in statements such as:

quote
The newcomers accuse the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and
unhelpful, while the hackers accuse the newcomers of being stupid,
unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to
them on a silver platter.
/quote

from How to get best results from the FreeBSD-questions mailing list

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/

So it seems clear that:

- English is the language in use in lists unless otherwise stated

- there are non-English lists.

I responded because I do think it's important that the lists remain a
useful archive, and that a call, as I read it, to splinter into many
languages would break this. I argued as I did for the reasons I gave and
not out of zenophobia, as you suggested in another post. I think you
were out of line with that, but am not going to lose any sleep over it.

Peter.
---End Message---
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [Fwd: Re: mot de passe root]

2005-03-24 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Mar 24, 2005, at 12:34 PM, Peter Risdon wrote:

From: Peter Risdon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: March 24, 2005 12:31:36 PM EST
To: Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Josh Ockert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mot de passe root
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 10:30 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:
No, I'm sorry but that seems to me to be a non sequitur. We can
understand questions we are not competent to answer if they are in
English, learn from the replies and if we hit the same issues 
ourselves
we can google and get a reply we can understand. You are suggesting 
this
incredibly useful situation be broken, if I understand you right. And
this applies to French and Russian speakers equally: this is an 
English
list, there are also French and Russian lists. I'd argue just as
strongly that postings to the French list should be in French.

Peter.

This is the default world-wide FreeBSD support list.  Postings in any
language
have always been welcome (at least since I subscribed in 1997).  Who 
put
you
in charge of deciding otherwise?
Crikey. Well, nobody, of course, and I'm not assuming that position. I
was responding to and not initiating a thread. However:
quote
Please use an appropriate human language for a particular mailing list.
/quote
010011100111010101110100011100110011
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 12:49 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:

  
 
 There is no call to splinter into many languages. 

*sigh*

The starting point for this was a post which seemed to me to be doing
just that. If you interpret that posting differently, and you haven't
said whether you do, then that's our point of difference. Perhaps I
misread the OP, in which case there's nothing to discuss and
everything's fine and dandy. 


  This list has for at 
 least the past eight years been multilingual. 

Kind of... it's an English language list to which posts are sometimes
made in other languages. When that happens, generally one of the
poster's fellow nationals gently reminds them that it's an English
language list, and sometimes translates their questions so others can
try to help. Sometimes not. It's informal, as we both know. But to call
it multilingual is at best an exaggeration.

  It is your call to make
 it English-only that is new. 

I have no idea why you're trying to misrepresent what I was saying. It's
starting to feel mildly bizarre.

Peter.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Mar 24, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Peter Risdon wrote:
I have no idea why you're trying to misrepresent what I was saying. 
It's
starting to feel mildly bizarre.
You say this as if it is the first time, being a system admin, you have 
had this feeling...

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:45 -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
 On Mar 24, 2005, at 2:34 PM, Peter Risdon wrote:
 
  I have no idea why you're trying to misrepresent what I was saying. 
  It's
  starting to feel mildly bizarre.
 
 You say this as if it is the first time, being a system admin, you have 
 had this feeling...
 
 

You're right, it's not.

Peter.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Bob Johnson
Peter Risdon wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 12:49 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:

This list has for at 
least the past eight years been multilingual. 

Kind of... it's an English language list to which posts are sometimes
made in other languages. When that happens, generally one of the
poster's fellow nationals gently reminds them that it's an English
language list, and sometimes translates their questions so others can
try to help. Sometimes not. It's informal, as we both know. But to call
it multilingual is at best an exaggeration.
This is not historically accurate, at least not in my experience.
The attempt to make this an English-only list is a recent
phenomenon.
Posts in other languages were historically entirely welcome,
and the only reason people were sent to language-specific
lists was because they were likely to get better results there,
not because there was a rule requiring that they use English here.
As long as the domain name (freebsd.org) is not country-specific,
we should expect visits from new users who don't speak English
well or at all, and plan accordingly.  Prohibiting them from
posting here is not appropriate, unless the name of the list
is changed to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a previous message to me you stated:
 So it seems clear that:

 - English is the language in use in lists unless otherwise stated

 - there are non-English lists.

Both of those statements are true.  Neither leads to the conclusion
that other languages are banned from this list.  The fact that
English is the default language for this list does not imply that
other languages are banned.
 I responded because I do think it's important that the lists remain a
 useful archive, and that a call, as I read it, to splinter into many
 languages would break this.
This is hogwash.  Postings in other languages are still a useful
archive.  I don't claim to be multilingual, and I have certainly
never made an effort to learn French, yet I can usually read
enough of a French posting to understand the problem and proposed
solution.
Historically, the number of non-English postings has been so low
as to be a non-issue.  Your conjecture about what might happen
was long ago demonstrated to be false.
The list is here to help people.  Creating an arbitrary
English-only rule helps no one, and serves no useful purpose.
As much as I would like to ban the French to their own list,
I can't think of any legitimate reason to do so other than
personal prejudice.
- Bob
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-24 Thread Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 16:02 -0500, Bob Johnson wrote:

 As much as I would like to ban the French to their own list,
 I can't think of any legitimate reason to do so other than
 personal prejudice.


Well, it's good to see you strike a light-hearted note. There are an
impressive number of straw men in your post but the earlier
correspondence speaks for itself, and makes it perfectly clear what I
was arguing, so perhaps that's a good point at which to end the thread.

Peter.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


impossible de configurer un mot de passe root

2005-03-23 Thread Dimitri GALAITSIS
Lorsque qu j'installe Free BSD 5.3 toout se passe bien par contre c a la 
fin de l'intallation que ca ce gate.
lorsque qui'i me demande de configurer le mot de passe root impossible 
de le rentrer .

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


mot de passe root

2005-03-23 Thread Dimitri GALAITSIS
A la fin de l'intallation de BSB 5.3 lors que le systéme me demande de 
définir un mot de passe root le systeme refuse

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-23 Thread Albert Shih
 Le 23/03/2005 à 22:13:17+0100, Dimitri GALAITSIS a écrit
 A la fin de l'intallation de BSB 5.3 lors que le systéme me demande de 
 définir un mot de passe root le systeme refuse

I think this is a english mailing list. Please use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
for french mailing list.

*

C'est à dire ? Vous dites qu'il ne veut pas de votre mot de passe. Mais
vous étès bien dans le menu d'install ?

De toute façon par défaut l'installateur ne met pas de mot de passe donc
suffit de rebooter et on se retrouve avce un compte root sans mot de passe.
On se logge et ensuite on fait un passwd.

Cordialement

--
Albert SHIH
Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
Heure local/Local time:
Wed Mar 23 22:38:25 CET 2005
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-23 Thread B H
Dimitri GALAITSIS skrev:
A la fin de l'intallation de BSB 5.3 lors que le systéme me demande de 
définir un mot de passe root le systeme refuse
Ni skåningar ska då pressa er inöver allt.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: mot de passe root

2005-03-23 Thread Josh Ockert
I've noticed that nobody responds negatively to questions by Russian
speakers, but that French speakers are told not to ask questions here.
I don't believe this is a fair response.

J'ai bien noté que personne ne répond d'une façon négative lorsqu'il y
a une question d'un russophone, mais que l'on dit aux francophone
qu'ils ne doivent pas démander ici. Je ne crois pas que ce réponse est
juste.

Si le système refuse un mot de passe, il est possible que vous n'avez
pas choisi l'option crypto (ou même que votre système ne la supporte
pas, comme des problèmes d'exportation existent avec les logiciels
d'origine Etats-Unisienne utilisés outre-mer) pendant l'installation;
si c'est le cas, vous ne pouvez pas utiliser un mot de passe trop
long. Sinon, il nous aiderait si vous nous disiez le message d'erreur
spécifique que le système vous présente. En tout cas, je vous
conseille d'essayer un mot de passe simple et court pendant
l'installation, et puis d'essayer de le changer après. Si vous voulez,
vous pouvez me contacter directement, et j'essayerai de vous aider.

Bonne chance.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]