Re: office apps

2010-06-09 Thread James Phillips




 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:44:17 -0600
 From: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
 Subject: Re: office apps
 To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Message-ID: 20100609004417.gc37...@guilt.hydra
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 

I don't really like Oo.org either. It is a little better than MS-Office, be 
seems to follow the same general design philosophy.

 
 I wish I'd find a foolproof, simple, transparent way for me
 to see and
 edit well-formatted plain text no matter what nonsense
 bloated featuritis
 infected office suite anyone else wanted to use.

Well, I heard RTF is useful for interoperability between MS word versions, but 
I am not sure how well interoperability between different vendors works in 
practice.
The Wikipedia page says RTF is a proprietary standard:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rich_Text_Format

You may also want to use an SGML variant like HTML or XML, but those can be 
tedious to manually edit. For quick messages, Plain ASCII text is much better 
unless you need a different character set. In that case, Unicode text will 
probably work.

Regards,

James Phillips

 
 -- 
 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-09 Thread parv
in message 20100609005847.gf37...@guilt.hydra, wrote Chad Perrin
thusly...

 On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:43:42AM -1000, p...@pair.com wrote:
...
  It took about 15 seconds of manual count to see an empty
  window after typing openoffice.org-3.0.0 -nologo.
...
 I'm not sure what you mean by this.  Empty window?

Sorry, by empty window I meant the open office swriter window
showing an empty, spanking new document (to start writing in).


  - parv


-- 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-09 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:58:47 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 With my old OO.o install (from package, not port), I haven't had any
 problems.  The thing even exports to PDF without Java.

Same here - I still have a v2 installation on another system that
has been installed by package, and it just works. It was the last
OpenOffice I could install via packages (localized, with dictio-
naries included, without unneeded stuff like KDE, Gnome, CUPS and
Java).



 Since then, however, I haven't been able to find a working OO.o binary
 package for FreeBSD, so I haven't upgraded my OO.o version.

I have found packages, but they don't work for me. I do always
get ** (soffice:579): WARNING **: unable to get gail version number,
but well, other things like Java in Firefox, or Acrobat Reader,
also don't work, so I put those aside and will try again in
some weeks. :-)



  It took about 15 seconds of manual count to see an empty window
  after typing openoffice.org-3.0.0 -nologo.  Hardware is ...
 
 I'm not sure what you mean by this.  Empty window?

It doesn't show the splash screen. After 27 seconds, I get an
empty word processing document window (Intel P4 2 GHz, 768 MB).

If you need information about command line options, they can
be obtained this way:

% /usr/local/bin/openoffice.org-3.0.0-swriter -help

The -nologo option is explained as don't show startup screen.

In the usual unpolite way, there doesn't seem to be a man page.
Documentation is stored arbitrarily on the Web. :-)


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-08 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:28:04 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 I've never had a client who wouldn't take either PDF or plain text. 

And five minutes later, they call you by phone and ask how they can
edit the PDF file... :-)


Just a friendly sidenote:

 On
 the other hand, clients who prefer Word DOC(X) but will take plain text
 if they must have a tendency to immediately open it in Word, save as
 DOC(X), then send the friggin' thing back to me in that format after
 making some changes.

You are aware that there is not the DOC format? The many
various Word programs use slightly different formats, and
rendering a document heavily depends on the current environment
Word is running in, e. g. which fonts are installed, even
which printer is installed - all this can have influence on
how the document is opened.

Furthermore, the DOCX format isn't really an open format. It
*claims* to be standardized, but it's not; even MICROS~1 didn't
implement it properly, and there are still blobs inside the
XML, which can lead to problems.

There are many problems you can encounter in import/export
settings. So the only way to be sure is to use a standardized
format.

I've worked in a setting where interoperability was the main
goal, because there were BSD, Linux, Solaris, Mac OS X and
even Windows machines, and our choice was OpenOffice, which
worked excellently across the platforms. It wouldn't have been
possible with MICROS~1 binary garbage in between. :-)



 I keep hoping the day will come when people who prefer MS Word are the
 rarity, rather than me being the odd man out.

It *will* happen, just consider the costs and the growing
uncomfortability of those programs (not counting those who
regularly use pirated copies to have the same pictures at
home as they know them from work). :-)




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-08 Thread parv
in message
aanlktil2gpibf2n2bir_eewmbqxru5l8wln0ebqru...@mail.gmail.com,
wrote Alejandro Imass thusly...

 On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Chip Camden
 sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
  On Jun 07 2010 11:21, Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
  On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700 Chip Camden
  sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
...
   Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office
   suite?  OOo is such a pig. It takes a good minute to start it
   up and open a spreadsheet.
 
  There are some tips to speed up your Ooo. But if your Ooo took
  minute to start, I guess that your system has a low hardware?
 
  I wouldn't have thought that an Intel Core i3 M350 (2.27Ghz)
  with 4GB would be considered lo (sic) hardware. Everything
  else runs very quickly, even Windows 7 in VirtualBox. OOo is the
  only time I find myself waiting impatiently.
...
 Anyway, chack to see if you may have a broken Java implementation,
 and check to see if it's possible to get OO to work with Sun's JRE
 6, and give that a go and see. I have a gut feeling your problem
 is related to a broken Java VM somewhere in your machine.

Am I the only one who has (force) installed open office from package
without java dependency and has yet to see a problem with MS Word 
simple Excel files?

It took about 15 seconds of manual count to see an empty window
after typing openoffice.org-3.0.0 -nologo.  Hardware is ...

  Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7100  @ 1.80GHz (1795.52-MHz 686-class CPU)
  ...
  avail memory = 3119153152 (2974 MB)
  ...
  ad4: 305245MB Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 PB3OC60G at ata2-master UDMA100 SATA 
1.5Gb/s
  (5400 rpm)


pkg_info -rx openoffice | sort -fu shows ...

  Dependency: atk-1.28.0
  Dependency: bitstream-vera-1.10_4
  Dependency: cairo-1.8.8_1,1
  Dependency: compositeproto-0.4
  Dependency: damageproto-1.1.0_2
  Dependency: desktop-file-utils-0.15_1
  Dependency: encodings-1.0.2,1
  Dependency: expat-2.0.1_1
  Dependency: fixesproto-4.0
  Dependency: font-bh-ttf-1.0.0
  Dependency: font-misc-ethiopic-1.0.0
  Dependency: font-misc-meltho-1.0.0_1
  Dependency: font-util-1.0.1
  Dependency: fontconfig-2.8.0,1
  Dependency: freetype2-2.3.11
  Dependency: gamin-0.1.10_3
  Dependency: gdbm-1.8.3_3
  Dependency: gettext-0.17_1
  Dependency: gio-fam-backend-2.22.4
  Dependency: glib-2.22.4
  Dependency: gnome-mime-data-2.18.0_3
  Dependency: gnome_subr-1.0
  Dependency: gtk-2.18.7_1
  Dependency: hicolor-icon-theme-0.12
  Dependency: icu-3.8.1_3
  Dependency: inputproto-1.5.0
  Dependency: jpeg-8_1
  Dependency: kbproto-1.0.3
  Dependency: libart_lgpl-2.3.20,1
  Dependency: libfontenc-1.0.4
  Dependency: libICE-1.0.4_1,1
  Dependency: libiconv-1.13.1_1
  Dependency: libpthread-stubs-0.3_3
  Dependency: libSM-1.1.0_1,1
  Dependency: libX11-1.2.1_1,1
  Dependency: libXau-1.0.4
  Dependency: libXaw-1.0.5_1,1
  Dependency: libxcb-1.5
  Dependency: libXcomposite-0.4.0,1
  Dependency: libXcursor-1.1.9_1
  Dependency: libXdamage-1.1.1
  Dependency: libXdmcp-1.0.2_1
  Dependency: libXext-1.0.5,1
  Dependency: libXfixes-4.0.3_1
  Dependency: libXft-2.1.14
  Dependency: libXi-1.2.1,1
  Dependency: libXinerama-1.0.3,1
  Dependency: libxml2-2.7.6_2
  Dependency: libXmu-1.0.4,1
  Dependency: libXp-1.0.0,1
  Dependency: libXpm-3.5.7
  Dependency: libXrandr-1.3.0
  Dependency: libXrender-0.9.4_1
  Dependency: libXt-1.0.5_1
  Dependency: mkfontdir-1.0.4
  Dependency: mkfontscale-1.0.6
  Dependency: pango-1.26.2_2
  Dependency: pcre-8.00
  Dependency: pixman-0.16.6
  Dependency: pkg-config-0.23_1
  Dependency: png-1.4.1_1
  Dependency: printproto-1.0.4
  Dependency: randrproto-1.3.0
  Dependency: renderproto-0.9.3
  Dependency: shared-mime-info-0.71
  Dependency: tiff-3.9.2_1
  Dependency: xcb-util-0.3.6_1
  Dependency: xextproto-7.0.5
  Dependency: xf86vidmodeproto-2.2.2
  Dependency: xineramaproto-1.1.2
  Dependency: xorg-fonts-truetype-7.4
  Dependency: xproto-7.0.15
  Depends on:
  Information for en-openoffice.org-US-3.0.0:


  - parv


-- 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-08 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 07 2010 22:12, Chris Hill wrote:
 On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
 
 [...] I do have clients who send me Word docs, and one who requires that 
 I send them specs in Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using 
 some behemoth office tool, if only for converting from a different 
 format.  I'm currently doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd 
 like to limit my involvement with Windows to only developing for it when 
 I must.
 
 I have clients like that too. What I've done - only once or twice, and 
 really just to be a dick - is to do my writeup in ASCII text, then `mv foo 
 foo.doc`. There, it's in word format! And Word really can open the file, 
 so...
 
That's great -- I'll have to remember that one.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-08 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 08/06/2010 15:43:42, p...@pair.com wrote:
 Am I the only one who has (force) installed open office from package
 without java dependency and has yet to see a problem with MS Word 
 simple Excel files?
 
 It took about 15 seconds of manual count to see an empty window
 after typing openoffice.org-3.0.0 -nologo.  Hardware is ...
 
   Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7100  @ 1.80GHz (1795.52-MHz 686-class CPU)
   ...
   avail memory = 3119153152 (2974 MB)
   ...
   ad4: 305245MB Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 PB3OC60G at ata2-master UDMA100 
 SATA 1.5Gb/s
   (5400 rpm)

I wonder about that.  I'm sure there are quite a few pkgs where some of
the registered dependencies are really optional, and the same pkg would
work either with or without them.  I know that databases/phpMyAdmin,
which I maintain is like that.

I did spend some time reading up on 'pkg_add -M' and 'pkg_add -S' -- in
theory it should be possible to use pkg_add -M to extract the pkg
contents, feed that into the stdin of a script, which pops up a dialogue
allowing you to make those choices, edits the pkg on the way past and
then feeds it to 'pkg_add -S' for final installation.  Can't see how to
force something like that to happen from a normal invocation of
pkg_add(1) though.

Would be a nice addition -- you could also emulate NOPORTDOCS and
NOPORTEXAMPLES, except entirely with pkgs that way.

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwOZC0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxSRQCfV1yFrs2zzeI2RRC6qg4EJdzT
BYAAnRbLFM6VWVb6dhY4G6NAWAvoFn2G
=Oms2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-08 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
 On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:28:04 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
  I've never had a client who wouldn't take either PDF or plain text. 
 
 And five minutes later, they call you by phone and ask how they can
 edit the PDF file... :-)

Hah.  Good point.

. . . though in cases where they'll take PDF, it's usually for something
like an invoice, so this doesn't come up much in practice.


 
 Just a friendly sidenote:
 
  On
  the other hand, clients who prefer Word DOC(X) but will take plain text
  if they must have a tendency to immediately open it in Word, save as
  DOC(X), then send the friggin' thing back to me in that format after
  making some changes.
 
 You are aware that there is not the DOC format? The many
 various Word programs use slightly different formats, and
 rendering a document heavily depends on the current environment
 Word is running in, e. g. which fonts are installed, even
 which printer is installed - all this can have influence on
 how the document is opened.

Yeah, I'm fully aware.  That's why I said DOC(X) -- because it's DOC (any
version) or DOCX.  It's easier to say DOC(X) than some variation of DOC
or DOCX.


 
 Furthermore, the DOCX format isn't really an open format. It
 *claims* to be standardized, but it's not; even MICROS~1 didn't
 implement it properly, and there are still blobs inside the
 XML, which can lead to problems.

I think Microsoft's mis-implementation (according to the standard) was
quite intentional.


 
 There are many problems you can encounter in import/export
 settings. So the only way to be sure is to use a standardized
 format.

My preference is plaintext.  It doesn't get much more standard than
that.


 
 I've worked in a setting where interoperability was the main
 goal, because there were BSD, Linux, Solaris, Mac OS X and
 even Windows machines, and our choice was OpenOffice, which
 worked excellently across the platforms. It wouldn't have been
 possible with MICROS~1 binary garbage in between. :-)

OpenOffice.org is a heinous snarl of cat hair and feces, from my
perspective.  It's little better than MS Office, frankly.

Your mileage obviously varies.


 
 
 
  I keep hoping the day will come when people who prefer MS Word are the
  rarity, rather than me being the odd man out.
 
 It *will* happen, just consider the costs and the growing
 uncomfortability of those programs (not counting those who
 regularly use pirated copies to have the same pictures at
 home as they know them from work). :-)

Actually, pirating is one of the main reasons MS Office is the dominant
office suite in general use -- just as it is with MS Windows, too.
There's not as much reason to switch to something free when the Microsoft
option is free too.  This might seem like kind of a foreign concept to
many users of open source software, but I've discovered that even when
they don't *respect* copyright law, open source software users and
developers tend to *follow* copyright law a lot more diligently than the
general run of computer-using humanity.

From what I've seen, people who use nothing but Microsoft, Adobe, and
similar relentlessly closed-source consumer software are much more likely
to think *nothing* of downloading cracked versions of commercial software
than open source software users.  That includes people like me, who
simply don't use pirated software and believe that copyright law as a
whole is a suppurating pustule on the face of modern civilization.  Then,
of course, if I get into a discussion of the ethicality of copyright law
with one of those hypocrites, he almost invariably ends up accusing me of
rejecting the ethicality of copyright law for no deeper reason other than
trying to justify stealing.

Ironic -- don't you think?

I'm a bit off-topic.  Here's the on-topic:

I wish I'd find a foolproof, simple, transparent way for me to see and
edit well-formatted plain text no matter what nonsense bloated featuritis
infected office suite anyone else wanted to use.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgp8wDeyLMArT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: office apps

2010-06-08 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 08:16:03AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
 On Jun 07 2010 22:12, Chris Hill wrote:
  On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
  
  [...] I do have clients who send me Word docs, and one who requires that 
  I send them specs in Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using 
  some behemoth office tool, if only for converting from a different 
  format.  I'm currently doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd 
  like to limit my involvement with Windows to only developing for it when 
  I must.
  
  I have clients like that too. What I've done - only once or twice, and 
  really just to be a dick - is to do my writeup in ASCII text, then `mv foo 
  foo.doc`. There, it's in word format! And Word really can open the file, 
  so...
  
 That's great -- I'll have to remember that one.

I sorta did that once.  I sent someone a plaintext file.  He double
clicked the file, causing it to automatically open in Notepad, which
puked on my Unix-style linebreaks.  He asked me to give it to him in DOC
format.  I said he should just open it in another application, at which
point he gave me his pathetic sob story about how he always double
clicked a file to open it and if it doesn't work that way he can't open
the file et cetera, et alii, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.

To make a long story short (too late), I changed the filename from
filename.txt to filename.doc and sent it to him again.  He
double-clicked, and it automatically opened the file in Word.  I still
find the gall of the man kind of surprising, demanding that I find some
way to save the file in DOC format and re-email it to him when he could
just open MS Word and use File  Open to browse to the file.  I seem to
recall he didn't want to be bothered figuring out how to Save As to
change it into DOC format himself, either, even if he did get it open in
MS Word, which makes the whole situation even more bizarre and
aggravating for me.

It was just the once that I did that, though.  Aside from 1) requests for
resumes and 2) files that I originally got from someone else in MS Office
file formats, I haven't really had any need to deal with the DOC(X) and
other MS Office formats.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpe9RB87YOA8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: office apps

2010-06-08 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 04:43:42AM -1000, p...@pair.com wrote:
 in message
 aanlktil2gpibf2n2bir_eewmbqxru5l8wln0ebqru...@mail.gmail.com,
 wrote Alejandro Imass thusly...
 
  Anyway, chack to see if you may have a broken Java implementation,
  and check to see if it's possible to get OO to work with Sun's JRE
  6, and give that a go and see. I have a gut feeling your problem
  is related to a broken Java VM somewhere in your machine.
 
 Am I the only one who has (force) installed open office from package
 without java dependency and has yet to see a problem with MS Word 
 simple Excel files?

With my old OO.o install (from package, not port), I haven't had any
problems.  The thing even exports to PDF without Java.

Since then, however, I haven't been able to find a working OO.o binary
package for FreeBSD, so I haven't upgraded my OO.o version.


 
 It took about 15 seconds of manual count to see an empty window
 after typing openoffice.org-3.0.0 -nologo.  Hardware is ...

I'm not sure what you mean by this.  Empty window?

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpTnuiBSPWfD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread perryh
Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:

 Can PowerPoint save to PDF, which is what almost
 everyone else seems to be using for presentations?

Just about any app, including PPT, can print to PDF if Acrobat
is installed.  Without Acrobat, print-to-file specifying a
PostScript printer (e.g. an Apple LaserWriter) will produce a
PostScript file, which you can make into a PDF using ps2pdf.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Eduardo
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:

 This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please
 slap me over to the right one.
 
 Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
 OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
 spreadsheet.
 
 Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that
 supports complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used
 without X11 when charting isn't needed, that would make my day.
 

You can use Softmaker products. They are not free but are MS-OO
compatible, fast and linux version works fine under FreeBSD. Demo
version works for a month.

http://www.softmaker.com/english/

(Note that i'm not a Softmaker worker, only a user)

HTH
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Mike Jeays mike.je...@rogers.com wrote:
 Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
 complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
 charting isn't needed, that would make my day.

 Gnumeric provides a good spreadsheet, although it does need X11. It supports
 charting, with a good variety of options. It installed very quickly on a Linux
 system, seems much lighter than OpenOffice Calc, and it starts much more
 quickly than Calc.

math/sc is a text-only (ncurses-based) version of VisiCalc.

It could use some improvements though, but it's fine
for small quick-n-dirty jobs.

 pkg_add -r gnumeric should install it for you.

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 06 2010 21:56, Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
  
  Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
  OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
  spreadsheet.
  
  Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
  complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
  charting isn't needed, that would make my day.
 
 It may be a little late to ask -- but I notice nobody else addressed the
 matter:
 
 Does your OO.o replacement have to be somewhat compatible with MS Office?
 
 If so . . . does it have to be two-way compatible?
 
 There are options for one-way compatibility (e.g., catdoc for turning MS
 Word files into plain text), but for being able to interoperate to
 roughly arbitrary degrees with users of MS Office I'm not aware of
 anything other than OO.o, KOffice, and whatever GNOME's using, that would
 work for the purposes you described.  Maybe someone else can comment on
 the suitability of recent versions of Abiword and Gnumeric (for
 instance).
 
 Ever since it essentially stopped being possible to install OO.o from a
 binary package on FreeBSD for me (at least without also installing Java),
 I've dreaded the day I will no longer have the venerable OO.o install
 from way back when and some jackass expects me to talk back and forth via
 MS Excel.  I loathe applications written in VBA, to put it mildly, and
 only my loathing for MS Windows and MS Office has kept that ancient OO.o
 install on one of my computers for so long.
 
 -- 
 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

That's a very good point.

For most of what I need to do, it's not an issue.  But I do have clients
who send me Word docs, and one who requires that I send them specs in
Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using some behemoth office
tool, if only for converting from a different format.  I'm currently
doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd like to limit my
involvement with Windows to only developing for it when I must.


-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 07 2010 11:21, Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
 On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700
 Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
 
  This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please
  slap me over to the right one.
  
  Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
  OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
  spreadsheet.
 
 There are some tips to speed up your Ooo. But if your Ooo took minute to 
 start, I guess that your system has a low hardware?

I wouldn't have thought that an Intel Core i3 M350 (2.27Ghz) with 4GB would be
considered lo (sic) hardware.  Everything else runs very quickly, even
Windows 7 in VirtualBox.  OOo is the only time I find myself waiting
impatiently.
 
 For short/unstructure documents, I suggest you to use Ooo (it slows but you 
 can type the document quickly:D) For long/structure documents, LaTeX is a 
 good choice. It is said that ConTeXt is good replacement of LaTeX but I have 
 never tried it.
 
  Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that
  supports complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used
  without X11 when charting isn't needed, that would make my day.
 
 Have you ever tried Google Spreadsheet or something like that?

I'm not quite ready to hand all my confidential documents over to
Google's servers.
 

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
 On Jun 07 2010 11:21, Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
 On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700
 Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:

  This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please
  slap me over to the right one.
 
  Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
  OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
  spreadsheet.

 There are some tips to speed up your Ooo. But if your Ooo took minute to 
 start, I guess that your system has a low hardware?

 I wouldn't have thought that an Intel Core i3 M350 (2.27Ghz) with 4GB would be
 considered lo (sic) hardware.  Everything else runs very quickly, even
 Windows 7 in VirtualBox.  OOo is the only time I find myself waiting
 impatiently.


Well, now that I recall I had a similar issue with the Android SDK
under Linux, and it's related to your problem because OO uses gjc (the
GNU Java implementation) as a pre-requisite and Eclipse was using
_that_ instead of the Sun jdk I had installed. Well the issue is that
Eclipse _took FOREVER_ to start, much like what you are describiong
right now with OO (albeit I use FBSD with OO in older hw w/ no
problems). Anyway, chack to see if you may have a broken Java
implementation, and check to see if it's possible to get OO to work
with Sun's JRE 6, and give that a go and see. I have a gut feeling
your problem is related to a broken Java VM somewhere in your machine.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07/06/2010 17:34:56, Chip Camden wrote:
 For most of what I need to do, it's not an issue.  But I do have clients
 who send me Word docs, and one who requires that I send them specs in
 Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using some behemoth office
 tool, if only for converting from a different format.  I'm currently
 doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd like to limit my
 involvement with Windows to only developing for it when I must.

Heh.  Do you always remember to save your MS Office documents in such a
way that it clears the history before you e-mail them out?  Many times
taking a document and hitting 'Undo' a few times can reveal all sorts of
stuff that you probably wouldn't have wanted to be made public.

Lots of places refuse to permit sending out MS Office documents for that
specific reason: PDF is generally acceptable even to the most
unenlightened Windows users.  Ideally though it should be possible to
use an open standard, like XHTML or SVG, so the recipients could edit it
themselves if needed.

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwNKX8ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxuSACeNhy17dld4767KDvjkNMfvgYz
S80Aniw8Qzy6PN2tVRlQ1e0VHlDILsHs
=ewPz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 07 2010 12:54, Alejandro Imass wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Chip Camden
 sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
  On Jun 07 2010 11:21, Anh Ky Huynh wrote:
  On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700
  Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
 
   This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please
   slap me over to the right one.
  
   Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
   OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
   spreadsheet.
 
  There are some tips to speed up your Ooo. But if your Ooo took minute to 
  start, I guess that your system has a low hardware?
 
  I wouldn't have thought that an Intel Core i3 M350 (2.27Ghz) with 4GB would 
  be
  considered lo (sic) hardware.  Everything else runs very quickly, even
  Windows 7 in VirtualBox.  OOo is the only time I find myself waiting
  impatiently.
 
 
 Well, now that I recall I had a similar issue with the Android SDK
 under Linux, and it's related to your problem because OO uses gjc (the
 GNU Java implementation) as a pre-requisite and Eclipse was using
 _that_ instead of the Sun jdk I had installed. Well the issue is that
 Eclipse _took FOREVER_ to start, much like what you are describiong
 right now with OO (albeit I use FBSD with OO in older hw w/ no
 problems). Anyway, chack to see if you may have a broken Java
 implementation, and check to see if it's possible to get OO to work
 with Sun's JRE 6, and give that a go and see. I have a gut feeling
 your problem is related to a broken Java VM somewhere in your machine.

That's a good clue -- I'll let you know what I find out.
-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 07 2010 18:16, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 On 07/06/2010 17:34:56, Chip Camden wrote:
  For most of what I need to do, it's not an issue.  But I do have clients
  who send me Word docs, and one who requires that I send them specs in
  Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using some behemoth office
  tool, if only for converting from a different format.  I'm currently
  doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd like to limit my
  involvement with Windows to only developing for it when I must.
 
 Heh.  Do you always remember to save your MS Office documents in such a
 way that it clears the history before you e-mail them out?  Many times
 taking a document and hitting 'Undo' a few times can reveal all sorts of
 stuff that you probably wouldn't have wanted to be made public.
 
 Lots of places refuse to permit sending out MS Office documents for that
 specific reason: PDF is generally acceptable even to the most
 unenlightened Windows users.  Ideally though it should be possible to
 use an open standard, like XHTML or SVG, so the recipients could edit it
 themselves if needed.
 
I'm not fond of Word format in the least.  I've mentioned these kinds of
vulnerabilities and others, but some clients are stubbornly clinging to
old ways.  That said, one of the clients I'm thinking about is exploring
the idea of using a wiki instead of trading documents -- a move that I am
encouraging vehemently.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Warren Block

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Chip Camden wrote:


For most of what I need to do, it's not an issue.  But I do have clients
who send me Word docs, and one who requires that I send them specs in
Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using some behemoth office
tool, if only for converting from a different format.  I'm currently
doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd like to limit my
involvement with Windows to only developing for it when I must.


The genuine Office runs in most of its appalling glory on Wine.  Starts 
up far quicker than OO.o, too.


-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 21:56:50 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 There are options for one-way compatibility (e.g., catdoc for turning MS
 Word files into plain text), but for being able to interoperate to
 roughly arbitrary degrees with users of MS Office I'm not aware of
 anything other than OO.o, KOffice, and whatever GNOME's using, that would
 work for the purposes you described. 

And don't forget there's also StarOffice, the program it all began
with. :-)



 Ever since it essentially stopped being possible to install OO.o from a
 binary package on FreeBSD for me (at least without also installing Java),
 I've dreaded the day I will no longer have the venerable OO.o install
 from way back when and some jackass expects me to talk back and forth via
 MS Excel. 

In the past, OpenOffice provided localized binary packages, and
you could e. g. pkg_add -r de-openoffice to install the german
version of OpenOffice, including dictionary. Thanks to today's
modern software this isn't possible anymore, simply due to the
many options you NEED to set at compile-time, and things like a
dictionary need to be added afterwards manually. So compiling
OpenOffice is your only chance to get it, except there is someone
who did compile it for you with the correct options (e. g. regarding
the use of Java, CUPS, Gnome, KDE, and so on).





-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 07 2010 12:14, Warren Block wrote:
 On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
 
 For most of what I need to do, it's not an issue.  But I do have clients
 who send me Word docs, and one who requires that I send them specs in
 Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using some behemoth office
 tool, if only for converting from a different format.  I'm currently
 doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd like to limit my
 involvement with Windows to only developing for it when I must.
 
 The genuine Office runs in most of its appalling glory on Wine.  Starts 
 up far quicker than OO.o, too.
 
 -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA

Thanks, but no thanks.  I can't type and drive a stake at the same time.

Seriously, I'd like to avoid polluting my precious FreeBSD system with
Microsoft bits, unless it's within a VM.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:44:45 -0400, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
 Latex Beamer rules!

In LaTeX, use foils class. Use the final product with

% xpdf -fullscreen filename

It just works, and additionally rules. :-)


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Robert Bonomi
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Sun Jun  6 23:47:34 2010
 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:44:45 -0400
 From: Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: office apps

 On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wro=
 te:
  On Sun 06 Jun 2010 at 20:56:50 PDT Chad Perrin wrote:
 

 [...]

  I'm not sure what to do with PPT's. =A0Can PowerPoint save to PDF, which
  is what almost everyone else seems to be using for presentations?

 Latex Beamer rules!


But, that's such an -upscale- solution!

For the proletariat, how about a good oil-based VolksWriter?


{{ taking bets with my self on (a) how many recognize the pun, and (b) how
many people even -remember- VolksWriter :) }}



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Kurt Buff
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 13:34, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Sun Jun  6 23:47:34 2010
 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:44:45 -0400
 From: Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: office apps

 On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wro=
 te:
  On Sun 06 Jun 2010 at 20:56:50 PDT Chad Perrin wrote:
 

 [...]

  I'm not sure what to do with PPT's. =A0Can PowerPoint save to PDF, which
  is what almost everyone else seems to be using for presentations?

 Latex Beamer rules!


 But, that's such an -upscale- solution!

 For the proletariat, how about a good oil-based VolksWriter?


 {{ taking bets with my self on (a) how many recognize the pun, and (b) how
 many people even -remember- VolksWriter :) }}

Never played with VolksWriter, but recognize the name. Of course, I'm
very unhappy about the pun - because you came up with it a-hood of me!

Heh.


Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 06 2010 19:56, Mike Jeays wrote:
 On June 6, 2010 04:34:16 pm Chip Camden wrote:
  This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please slap
  me over to the right one.
 
  Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
  OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
  spreadsheet.
 
  Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
  complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
  charting isn't needed, that would make my day.
 
 Gnumeric provides a good spreadsheet, although it does need X11. It supports 
 charting, with a good variety of options. It installed very quickly on a 
 Linux 
 system, seems much lighter than OpenOffice Calc, and it starts much more 
 quickly than Calc.
 
 pkg_add -r gnumeric should install it for you.
 
Gnumeric *is* nice and quick.  I'll use that for SS until I find
something better.

Thanks!

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Sun Jun  6 23:47:34 2010
 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 00:44:45 -0400
 From: Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: office apps

 On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wro=
 te:
  On Sun 06 Jun 2010 at 20:56:50 PDT Chad Perrin wrote:
 

 [...]

  I'm not sure what to do with PPT's. =A0Can PowerPoint save to PDF, which
  is what almost everyone else seems to be using for presentations?

 Latex Beamer rules!


 But, that's such an -upscale- solution!

 For the proletariat, how about a good oil-based VolksWriter?


Nahh, man. Beamer is easy as 123, once everything is installed. All
you need is a decent text editor and voilá, beatifulk, meaninful,
well-structred presentations! and in PDF, plus it's easy to make
hand-outs and other advanced stuff. The Beamer book is ver extensive,
but I would be happy to post an example beamer presentation here if
you want.


 {{ taking bets with my self on (a) how many recognize the pun, and (b) how
 many people even -remember- VolksWriter :) }}



 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:49:37AM +0200, Eduardo wrote:
 
 You can use Softmaker products. They are not free but are MS-OO
 compatible, fast and linux version works fine under FreeBSD. Demo
 version works for a month.
 
 http://www.softmaker.com/english/

Interesting.  It looks like SoftMaker Office is in the ports tree, at:

/usr/ports/editors/softmaker-office

I'll have to consider whether it's worth investigating as an alternative
to OO.o for my own purposes.  I'd rather not spend money on something
that I never use except when someone else forces me to do so, against
my better judgment and preferences, but it might be worth a few dollars
to avoid the annoyance of dealing with OO.o on the rare occasion that I
do need something MS Office compatible.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpcI4JtLyvC0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Antonio Olivares
Just an FYI here folks.

If one has gmail, we can Preview these Documents via the web browsers :)

But I believe that we are ok with the office apps that we have :)
koffice(kword,kspread, kpresenter, ...)
goffice(abiword, gnumeric, ..., )
OO(openoffice-writer,... )
There is GO OO which is a smaller version of OpenOffice, don't know if
it is in the ports or not?

Several persons have named TeX/LaTeX , but I *wonder* when TeXLive
will replace TeTEX on FreeBSD?  NetBSD/OpenBSD already have it, what
is taking them too long to include them officially?

I know about the builds, and google-code, but it is still not the same
:(, like you would get from other systems .

Regards,

Antonio

On 6/8/10, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 11:49:37AM +0200, Eduardo wrote:

 You can use Softmaker products. They are not free but are MS-OO
 compatible, fast and linux version works fine under FreeBSD. Demo
 version works for a month.

 http://www.softmaker.com/english/

 Interesting.  It looks like SoftMaker Office is in the ports tree, at:

 /usr/ports/editors/softmaker-office

 I'll have to consider whether it's worth investigating as an alternative
 to OO.o for my own purposes.  I'd rather not spend money on something
 that I never use except when someone else forces me to do so, against
 my better judgment and preferences, but it might be worth a few dollars
 to avoid the annoyance of dealing with OO.o on the rare occasion that I
 do need something MS Office compatible.

 --
 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chris Hill

On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Chip Camden wrote:

[...] I do have clients who send me Word docs, and one who requires that 
I send them specs in Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using 
some behemoth office tool, if only for converting from a different 
format.  I'm currently doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd 
like to limit my involvement with Windows to only developing for it when 
I must.


I have clients like that too. What I've done - only once or twice, and 
really just to be a dick - is to do my writeup in ASCII text, then `mv foo 
foo.doc`. There, it's in word format! And Word really can open the file, 
so...


--
Chris Hill   ch...@monochrome.org
** [ Busy Expunging | ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 12:29:08AM +, Antonio Olivares wrote:
 
 But I believe that we are ok with the office apps that we have :)
 koffice(kword,kspread, kpresenter, ...)
 goffice(abiword, gnumeric, ..., )
 OO(openoffice-writer,... )
 There is GO OO which is a smaller version of OpenOffice, don't know if
 it is in the ports or not?

I'm not any kind of fan of OO.o, thanks to its weight, slowness,
Java-dependent build process, lack of binary availability, obtuse
interface (much like MS Office's), and so on.  I don't feel the need to
install all of KDE or GNOME just to get a word processor and spreadsheet
program I might use a couple times a year.

I don't think Go-oo is smaller than OO.o, though it is reportedly a lot
faster.  Of course, it's not in ports, and I'm not keen on building
something roughly the size of OO.o just to find out if it runs a little
faster, so I don't know personally whether that's true.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpRCOIiQyafA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: office apps

2010-06-07 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:12:44PM -0400, Chris Hill wrote:
 On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
 
 [...] I do have clients who send me Word docs, and one who requires that 
 I send them specs in Word format.  For that, I guess I'm stuck using 
 some behemoth office tool, if only for converting from a different 
 format.  I'm currently doing that work on a Windows workstation, but I'd 
 like to limit my involvement with Windows to only developing for it when 
 I must.
 
 I have clients like that too. What I've done - only once or twice, and 
 really just to be a dick - is to do my writeup in ASCII text, then `mv foo 
 foo.doc`. There, it's in word format! And Word really can open the file, 
 so...

I've never had a client who wouldn't take either PDF or plain text.  On
the other hand, clients who prefer Word DOC(X) but will take plain text
if they must have a tendency to immediately open it in Word, save as
DOC(X), then send the friggin' thing back to me in that format after
making some changes.

I keep hoping the day will come when people who prefer MS Word are the
rarity, rather than me being the odd man out.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpHL7WcOZkFm.pgp
Description: PGP signature


office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Chip Camden
This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please slap
me over to the right one.

Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
spreadsheet.

Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
charting isn't needed, that would make my day.

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com 
wrote:
 This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please slap
 me over to the right one.
 
 Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
 OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
 spreadsheet.

There are office conglomerates both for KDE and Gnome, KOffice and
GOffice. If you already have either of them installed, you may try
this.

An acceptable stand-alone word processor is Abiword.



 Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
 complex formulas and charting? 

Gnumeric.



 If it could also be used without X11 when
 charting isn't needed, that would make my day.

CVS for data, C or awk for processing, gnuplot for plotting. :-)





-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Alexander Best
personally i use editors/ted for word processing. it's simple and
efficient. if you decide to try it out be sure to comment out the
openmotif stuff in the makefile so it gets linked to gtk2.

cheers.
alex

-- 
Alexander Best
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Roland Smith
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:38:26PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
 On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com 
 wrote:
  This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please slap
  me over to the right one.
  
  Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
  OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
  spreadsheet.

Indeed.
 
 There are office conglomerates both for KDE and Gnome, KOffice and
 GOffice. If you already have either of them installed, you may try
 this.
 
 An acceptable stand-alone word processor is Abiword.
 
Don't forget LaTeX! Especially since it is quite easy for scripting languages
to generate LaTeX code (automation).

  Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
  complex formulas and charting? 
 
 Gnumeric.

Second that. Especially for quick  dirty jobs.

  If it could also be used without X11 when
  charting isn't needed, that would make my day.
 
 CVS for data, C or awk for processing, gnuplot for plotting. :-)

For real data munching, programming languages do a much better job indeed. May
I also suggest Perl, Lua and Python al alternatives to C and awk? And 'make'
to tie everything together. Unless your machine is severely underpowered or
your datasets are _huge_, scripting languages tend to be fast enough for data
processing, IMHO.

The general weakness of office suites is _automation_, something that programs
following the UNIX philosophy excel at. (pardon the pun). Quoting Doug McIlroy:

This is the Unix philosophy: Write programs that do one thing and do it
well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text 
streams,
because that is a universal interface.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpha4vcXIfxx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 23:03:11 +0200, Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
 Don't forget LaTeX! Especially since it is quite easy for scripting languages
 to generate LaTeX code (automation).

Oh, but *I* didn't forget LaTeX. The OP requested a word processor, 
not a typesetting system (which is the next evolutionary step). :-)

But you are right: LaTeX is excellent because it does all the things
right that word processors do get right after you invested several
hours configuring them, or don't get it right at all.

In this relation, LyX should also be mentioned, a kind of WYSIWYG
interface to LaTeX (inaccurately spoken).



   If it could also be used without X11 when
   charting isn't needed, that would make my day.
  
  CVS for data, C or awk for processing, gnuplot for plotting. :-)
 
 For real data munching, programming languages do a much better job indeed.

Especially if efficiency is a topic (number crunching), nothing
beats native binary code.



 May
 I also suggest Perl, Lua and Python al alternatives to C and awk?

Especially Perl is worth mentioning.



 And 'make'
 to tie everything together. 

Totally agreed; I also (ab)use it for controlling tasks (like making
web pages out of statistical data).



 Unless your machine is severely underpowered or
 your datasets are _huge_, scripting languages tend to be fast enough for data
 processing, IMHO.

And of course a bit more comfortable to use.



 The general weakness of office suites is _automation_, something that programs
 following the UNIX philosophy excel at. (pardon the pun). Quoting Doug 
 McIlroy:
 
 This is the Unix philosophy: Write programs that do one thing and do it
 well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text 
 streams,
 because that is a universal interface.

A nice summary. And true.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Mike Jeays
On June 6, 2010 04:34:16 pm Chip Camden wrote:
 This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please slap
 me over to the right one.

 Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
 OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
 spreadsheet.

 Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
 complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
 charting isn't needed, that would make my day.

Gnumeric provides a good spreadsheet, although it does need X11. It supports 
charting, with a good variety of options. It installed very quickly on a Linux 
system, seems much lighter than OpenOffice Calc, and it starts much more 
quickly than Calc.

pkg_add -r gnumeric should install it for you.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
 This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please slap
 me over to the right one.

 Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
 OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
 spreadsheet.

 Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
 complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
 charting isn't needed, that would make my day.


Use Abiword wor word processing or Emacs + PSGML + ispell for DocBook ;-)
Gnumeric for Spreadsheet
Latex Beamer for Presentations

I wish there would be a ban on integrated stuff ;-)

Best,
Alejandro Imass


 --
 Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
 
 Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
 OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
 spreadsheet.
 
 Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
 complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
 charting isn't needed, that would make my day.

It may be a little late to ask -- but I notice nobody else addressed the
matter:

Does your OO.o replacement have to be somewhat compatible with MS Office?

If so . . . does it have to be two-way compatible?

There are options for one-way compatibility (e.g., catdoc for turning MS
Word files into plain text), but for being able to interoperate to
roughly arbitrary degrees with users of MS Office I'm not aware of
anything other than OO.o, KOffice, and whatever GNOME's using, that would
work for the purposes you described.  Maybe someone else can comment on
the suitability of recent versions of Abiword and Gnumeric (for
instance).

Ever since it essentially stopped being possible to install OO.o from a
binary package on FreeBSD for me (at least without also installing Java),
I've dreaded the day I will no longer have the venerable OO.o install
from way back when and some jackass expects me to talk back and forth via
MS Excel.  I loathe applications written in VBA, to put it mildly, and
only my loathing for MS Windows and MS Office has kept that ancient OO.o
install on one of my computers for so long.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgphl8gVuRlj3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Anh Ky Huynh
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:34:16 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:

 This might not be the right list for this question -- if so, please
 slap me over to the right one.
 
 Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
 OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
 spreadsheet.

There are some tips to speed up your Ooo. But if your Ooo took minute to start, 
I guess that your system has a low hardware?

For short/unstructure documents, I suggest you to use Ooo (it slows but you can 
type the document quickly:D) For long/structure documents, LaTeX is a good 
choice. It is said that ConTeXt is good replacement of LaTeX but I have never 
tried it.

 Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that
 supports complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used
 without X11 when charting isn't needed, that would make my day.

Have you ever tried Google Spreadsheet or something like that?

-- 
Anh Ky Huynh
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Charlie Kester

On Sun 06 Jun 2010 at 20:56:50 PDT Chad Perrin wrote:

On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 01:34:16PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:


Does anyone have a recommendation for a lighter-weight office suite?
OOo is such a pig.  It takes a good minute to start it up and open a
spreadsheet.

Short of the full suite, how about just a spreadsheet program that supports
complex formulas and charting?  If it could also be used without X11 when
charting isn't needed, that would make my day.


It may be a little late to ask -- but I notice nobody else addressed the
matter:

Does your OO.o replacement have to be somewhat compatible with MS Office?

If so . . . does it have to be two-way compatible?

There are options for one-way compatibility (e.g., catdoc for turning MS
Word files into plain text), but for being able to interoperate to
roughly arbitrary degrees with users of MS Office I'm not aware of
anything other than OO.o, KOffice, and whatever GNOME's using, that would
work for the purposes you described.  Maybe someone else can comment on
the suitability of recent versions of Abiword and Gnumeric (for
instance).

Ever since it essentially stopped being possible to install OO.o from a
binary package on FreeBSD for me (at least without also installing Java),
I've dreaded the day I will no longer have the venerable OO.o install
from way back when and some jackass expects me to talk back and forth via
MS Excel.  I loathe applications written in VBA, to put it mildly, and
only my loathing for MS Windows and MS Office has kept that ancient
OO.o install on one of my computers for so long.


Tell the jackasses that if they want to send you one of their Word
docs, they should save it as PDF, or RTF if they want you to edit it.  

If it's an Excel doc, CSV.  


Sure, it means some of the Microsoft bells and whistles will get lost in
the translation. Tough.  They're like American tourists overseas,
expecting everyone to speak their language and to be familiar with their
provincial customs.

I'm not sure what to do with PPT's.  Can PowerPoint save to PDF, which
is what almost everyone else seems to be using for presentations?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:
 On Sun 06 Jun 2010 at 20:56:50 PDT Chad Perrin wrote:


[...]

 I'm not sure what to do with PPT's.  Can PowerPoint save to PDF, which
 is what almost everyone else seems to be using for presentations?

Latex Beamer rules!

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: office apps

2010-06-06 Thread Charlie Kester

On Sun 06 Jun 2010 at 21:44:45 PDT Alejandro Imass wrote:

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net wrote:

On Sun 06 Jun 2010 at 20:56:50 PDT Chad Perrin wrote:




[...]


I'm not sure what to do with PPT's.  Can PowerPoint save to PDF, which
is what almost everyone else seems to be using for presentations?


Latex Beamer rules!


Maybe so, but can the guy with PowerPoint send you something you work
with in Beamer?  (I'm not familiar with Beamer myself.)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: GUI Email Clients || Office Apps

2002-09-24 Thread John Bleichert

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, MET wrote:

 Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:32:48 -0400
 From: MET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: GUI Email Clients || Office Apps
 
 1) I'm wondering what people's favorite GUI email clients are that will
 run under KDE 3.0.
 

Most KDE users I know who require a GUI mail client use KMail or Sylpheed. 
I'm ok with pine.

JB


#  John Bleichert 
#  http://vonbek.dhs.org/latest.jpg


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: GUI Email Clients || Office Apps

2002-09-24 Thread ScaryG

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:32:48 -0400
MET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 1) I'm wondering what people's favorite GUI email clients are that will
 run under KDE 3.0.

 I was pleased with Kmail, which is part of KDE but then switched to
Sylpheed (it's in the ports) but both are quite nice.

 2) What's the real difference between OpenOffice and StarOffice?

 I've only used StarOffice. Was even lucky enough to stumble across a bin
of old books on clearout at a large department store and bought myself
Sun StarOffice 5.1 for $19.99. A few hours with the book sure made my
use of StarOffice more exciting!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Scary Gerry -- Senior Systems Manager
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -For web-hosting, Perl, PHP  MySql 
  programming see http://www.interpool.ca
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



GUI Email Clients || Office Apps

2002-09-23 Thread MET

1) I'm wondering what people's favorite GUI email clients are that will
run under KDE 3.0.  

2) What's the real difference between OpenOffice and StarOffice?

~ MET


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: GUI Email Clients || Office Apps

2002-09-23 Thread Robin Damm

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:32:48PM -0400, MET wrote:
 1) I'm wondering what people's favorite GUI email clients are that will
 run under KDE 3.0.

No comment. Mutt really does suck less. :)

 2) What's the real difference between OpenOffice and StarOffice?

Not much, see http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/mostfaqs.html#7.

Certain items such as the spell checker are different due to third
party licensing but provide the same functionality. And Sun provides
support for StarOffice.

-- 
Robin Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message