which apache-version ?
from the ports : apache20 or apache21 or apache22 which one is the stable one ? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which apache-version ?
albi wrote: from the ports : apache20 or apache21 or apache22 which one is the stable one ? I'm just guessing, but probably you could get an answer at apache.org. Kevin Kinsey -- No skis take rocks like rental skis! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which apache / php things to install?
I just installed FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE and am installing a few applications. I need apache with php, but I see many php-related packages (with portupgrade -v php5-\*). So then I tried portupgrade -v php5, but now it wants to know whether I want to use apache2 instead of apache 1.3. I've been using 1.3 on another machine with no problems. Is 2 now ok to use? I saw in /usr/ports that there is apache2, apache20, apache21. Which one of these should I install if I use apache2? What about the other php installation questions (debug and zend multibyte support)? thanks, bob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which apache / php things to install?
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, bob self wrote: I just installed FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE and am installing a few applications. I need apache with php, but I see many php-related packages (with portupgrade -v php5-\*). So then I tried portupgrade -v php5, but now it wants to know whether I want to use apache2 instead of apache 1.3. I've been using 1.3 on another machine with no problems. Is 2 now ok to use? I saw in /usr/ports that there is apache2, apache20, apache21. Which one of these should I install if I use apache2? What about the other php installation questions (debug and zend multibyte support)? From your questions I assume you want to run a small webserver for private/testing/experimenting purposes. apache21 is still beta but will do fine for you. You will have to enable apache2 support in php5 then. Everything else can be left with the default options. Don't forget to add apache2_enable=YES to your /etc/rc.conf :-) Regards, Uli. thanks, bob ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * * ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which Apache version to use?
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 04:39:37PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: My purpose: Learn FreeBSD, learn Apache, build simple web server. Hardware: Dedicated i386 machine, three big HDs (120GB, 120GB, 200GB) OS: FreeBSD 5.3. No X windows installed (maybe later?) If this is to be a dedicated server machine, you don't really need X11 installed. My opinion, others will surely differ. Apps: Also intend to use postfix, majordomo, samba LAN:Serve LAN with Windows machines, all LAN IPs are fixed. Internet: Fixed IPs available to be used later. Web pages: I have many web pages (no java) that I would like to copy from their present server to a local server. My new 5.3 installation includes these ports: apache-contrib apache-forrest apache-jserv apache13 apache13+ipv6 apache13-modperl apache13-modssl apache13-modssl+ipv6 apache13-ssl apache2 As I'm learning from scratch, am I correct in assuming that I would be better off to start with apache2, or should I use one of the flavors of apache13 (1.3) and perhaps upgrade later? There are fairly large differences between the two, but if you can learn how to use and look after one, then you can learn the other one without too much hassle, too. If I use 1.3, why would I use anything other than the apache13 port? Take a look in each port's pkg-descr file for a little more information. For example, apache13-modperl embeds a perl interpreter in Apache to cut out the startup overheads of running perl CGI scripts. Apache13-ssl includes support for encrypted session (https). Links to how to do it web pages would be appreciated. There's plenty out there - just ask Google for help. HTH Dan -- Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: 3B9D 8BBB EB03 BA83 5DB4 3B88 86FC F03A 90A1 BE8F _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ pgpzfPIreFU9x.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Which Apache version to use?
Tabor Kelly wrote: The apache13 port is just apache. The apache-x ports also include x. For example, I run apache-modssl, because I needed ssl support. mod_ssl isn't really a module since it (also) requires patching the base apache code. As for apache2, I think it is still marked as unstable (though some people successfully use it in production environments). The main advantage of apache2 over apache1.3 has to do with multi-threading vs. having multiple processes (apache 1.3 is not threaded). This isn't actually an advantage in FreeBSD because their is not much process overhead, this is mainly intended for the windows users. Also, some apache13 modules have not been ported to apache2 yet, notably mod_perl. In short, IMHO, install apache13 unless you need SSL support, then install apache13-modssl. Daniel Bye wrote: If this is to be a dedicated server machine, you don't really need X11 installed. My opinion, others will surely differ. As I'm learning from scratch, am I correct in assuming that I would be better off to start with apache2, or should I use one of the flavors of apache13 (1.3) and perhaps upgrade later? There are fairly large differences between the two, but if you can learn how to use and look after one, then you can learn the other one without too much hassle, too. If I use 1.3, why would I use anything other than the apache13 port? Take a look in each port's pkg-descr file for a little more information. For example, apache13-modperl embeds a perl interpreter in Apache to cut out the startup overheads of running perl CGI scripts. Apache13-ssl includes support for encrypted session (https). Thanks, folks! I'll use apache13 and see what happens. Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, California, USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which Apache version to use?
My purpose: Learn FreeBSD, learn Apache, build simple web server. Hardware: Dedicated i386 machine, three big HDs (120GB, 120GB, 200GB) OS: FreeBSD 5.3. No X windows installed (maybe later?) Apps: Also intend to use postfix, majordomo, samba LAN:Serve LAN with Windows machines, all LAN IPs are fixed. Internet: Fixed IPs available to be used later. Web pages: I have many web pages (no java) that I would like to copy from their present server to a local server. My new 5.3 installation includes these ports: apache-contrib apache-forrest apache-jserv apache13 apache13+ipv6 apache13-modperl apache13-modssl apache13-modssl+ipv6 apache13-ssl apache2 As I'm learning from scratch, am I correct in assuming that I would be better off to start with apache2, or should I use one of the flavors of apache13 (1.3) and perhaps upgrade later? If I use 1.3, why would I use anything other than the apache13 port? Links to how to do it web pages would be appreciated. Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, California, USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which apache
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 03:39:20PM -0700, David Bear wrote: well, since I will be running apache on freebsd I thought I ask which one will be the best to use, v1.3 series on v2.x series. Personally I use apache13 but I believe apache2 is now very stable (although some features like the perchild(?) mpm which would allow extra privacy for virtual domains/users are still experimental to say the least). Essentially if you want total stability, go for apache 1.3.x. If the server's not for production and you're just curious then go for apache 2. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which apache
* David Bear [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031113 09:30]: well, since I will be running apache on freebsd I thought I ask which one will be the best to use, v1.3 series on v2.x series. Hi, David! Apache 1.3 was originally designed for the Unix platform. Although it also runs with Windows and others, it's not optimized for them. The Apache 2.x was designed for multi-platform-usage and uses some portability libraries etc. (And I have the feeling, it's slower on FreeBSD, but that's only a personal impression). So, as a FreeBSD user, Version 1.3.x should be the right choice. Cheers, Martin. -- Martin Möller mm at bsdsi.com - ICQ # 82221572 GnuPG/PGP ID: 0xDD74108DFingerabdruck: 7D8D 3D10 CC46 0083 591C 6B84 A5CB 361A DD74 108D Bei Problemen: http://www.bsdsi.com/email.html pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
which apache
well, since I will be running apache on freebsd I thought I ask which one will be the best to use, v1.3 series on v2.x series. I will be doing ssl. I know the v2 series uses the thread model instead of the fork.. but I don't care. I just need an apache the 1) I don't have to patch frequently;-) 2) that works as well as apache ever did 3) that plays will with freebsd 5.x... going through the apache faq's now, but thought I'd get good insight here. thx. -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax:480-965-9189 College of Public Programs/ASU Wilson Hall 232 Tempe, AZ 85287-0803 Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
