Recomended 1000BaseFX card with SC connectors
Hello, which 1000BaseFX (optics) card with SC connector is _best_ for FreeBSD 5-STABLE in SMP environment? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: audio (acdt01) dump broken? (BETA4 (5))
Emanuel Strobl wrote this message on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:44 +0200: tonight I wanted to consolidate (for an upcoming trekstor i.beat organix) my oggs and therefore eval the difference between reencoded [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] and the original reread wavs(tracks)-[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately I couldn't grab my CDs anymore. I can remember I had used 'dd if=/dev/acd0txx of=/tmp/track.xx bs=2352' but this doesn't work anymore. I can't replay the bits and with oggenc I get: ERROR: Input file track15.wav is not a supported format [...] What am I missing? That the raw audio data on a cd is raw, and not a wav file... WAV files have a bit of information that contains what the sampling rate is, the channels and the bits per sample: hydrogen,ttyp4,/home/johng,504$file /tmp/quarter.wav /tmp/quarter.wav: RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE audio, Microsoft PCM, 8 bit, mono 22254 Hz so, if you want, you can use sox to convert the raw audio data into wav: sox -t cdr rawcddata.cdr somefile.wav -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PANIC: upon disconnecting UMASS device ...
Hi all,
Without a doubt I can reproduce this panic every single time.
1. Insert UMASS USB Stick
2. mount as msdos
3. umount USB stick
4. remove USB stick
4. some time laster [hours/days] *panic*: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs
OS-Version: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jul 14 12:32:30 CST 2005
[/var/log/messages before panic'd. Interestingly it takes
a few hours or days before the panic actually occurs].
Sep 9 17:03:11 hostname kernel: umass0: at uhub1 port 1 (addr 2)
disconnected
Sep 9 17:03:11 hostname kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device
Sep 9 17:03:11 hostname kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device
entry
Sep 9 17:03:11 hostname kernel: umass0: detached
Sep 12 08:15:21 hostname kernel: panic: vinvalbuf: dirty bufs
Sep 12 08:15:21 hostname kernel: KDB: enter: panic
Sep 12 08:15:21 hostname kernel: Dumping 767 MB
backrace:
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:160
#1 0xc0469db5 in db_fncall (dummy1=0, dummy2=0, dummy3=7919,
dummy4=0xde1619f4 \200\237\226À)
at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:531
#2 0xc0469b64 in db_command (last_cmdp=0xc0969684, cmd_table=0x0,
aux_cmd_tablep=0xc08ea080, aux_cmd_tablep_end=0xc08ea09c)
at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:349
#3 0xc0469c55 in db_command_loop () at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:455
#4 0xc046bb0d in db_trap (type=3, code=0) at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_main.c:221
#5 0xc0686dd3 in kdb_trap (type=0, code=0, tf=0xde161b40) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c:470
#6 0xc0860273 in trap (frame=
{tf_fs = -1064566760, tf_es = 16, tf_ds = -568983536, tf_edi = 1,
tf_esi = -1064505670, tf_ebp = -568976504, tf_isp = -568976532, tf_ebx =
-568976448, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = -1056878592, tf_eax = 18, tf_trapno = 3,
tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1066898615, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 646, tf_esp =
-1064519392, tf_ss = -1064525103}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:584
#7 0xc084dfaa in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:140
#8 0xc08c0018 in ?? ()
#9 0x0010 in ?? ()
#10 0xde160010 in ?? ()
#11 0x0001 in ?? ()
#12 0xc08ceeba in ?? ()
#13 0xde161b88 in ?? ()
#14 0xde161b6c in ?? ()
#15 0xde161bc0 in ?? ()
#16 0x in ?? ()
#17 0xc1015000 in ?? ()
#18 0x0012 in ?? ()
#19 0x0003 in ?? ()
#20 0x in ?? ()
#21 0xc0686b49 in kdb_enter (msg=0x0) at cpufunc.h:56
#22 0xc066c309 in panic (fmt=0xc08ceeba vinvalbuf: dirty bufs) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:550
#23 0xc06cbbfe in vinvalbuf (vp=0xc4a2d318, flags=1, cred=0x0, td=0x0,
slpflag=0, slptimeo=0)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:972
#24 0xc06cf4b1 in vclean (vp=0xc4a2d318, flags=8, td=0xc1f0f480) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2478
#25 0xc06cfcb6 in vgonel (vp=0xc4a2d318, td=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2697
#26 0xc06ca94f in vlrureclaim (mp=0xc2107000) at pcpu.h:157
#27 0xc06cac7b in vnlru_proc () at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:598
#28 0xc065325e in fork_exit (callout=0xc06caa29 vnlru_proc, arg=0x0,
frame=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:791
#29 0xc084e00c in fork_trampoline () at
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:209
(kgdb)
USB Code in kernel:
# USB support
device uhci# UHCI PCI-USB interface
device ohci# OHCI PCI-USB interface
device usb # USB Bus (required)
USB Controllers:
uhci0: Intel 82801BA/BAM (ICH2) USB controller USB-A port 0xa400-0xa41f
irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
usb0: Intel 82801BA/BAM (ICH2) USB controller USB-A on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhci1: Intel 82801BA/BAM (ICH2) USB controller USB-B port 0xa000-0xa01f
irq 23 at device 31.4 on pci0
usb1: Intel 82801BA/BAM (ICH2) USB controller USB-B on uhci1
usb1: USB revision 1.0
Offending USB UMASS Stick:
Sep 9 15:46:46 hostname kernel: umass0: USB Flash Disk, rev 2.00/2.00,
addr 2
Sep 9 15:46:47 hostname kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
Sep 9 15:46:47 hostname kernel: da0: JetFlash TS1GJF2B 2.00 Removable
Direct Access SCSI-2 device
Sep 9 15:46:47 hostname kernel: da0: 1.000MB/s transfers
Sep 9 15:46:47 hostname kernel: da0: 1000MB (2048000 512 byte sectors: 64H
32S/T 1000C)
- aW
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BETA4: Panic and can't cleanup filesystem
Hi, [ please avoid cross-posting, RELENG_6 is still in its beta stage, so -current@ should be use for now. ] When trying to unmount my flash drive with force (#umount -f /flash) machine hardlocked. After restart, when fsck-ing in background, computer panicked. Machine is SMP 2x500MHz PIII with Asus P2B-DS motherboard cvsuped and updated to RELENG_6 (BETA4) on 14 september with SHED_ULE and PREEMPTION panic is written on hand: panic: handle_written_inodeblock: live inodedep cpuid=0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid3 tid 100033] stopped atkdb_enter+0x2b:nop db where Tracing pid 3 tid 100033 td 0xc15d17d0 kdb_enter(c062b964) at kdb_enter+0x2b panic(c063a716,0,2,0,0) at panic+0x127 handle_written_inodeblock(c1809a00,cbc1a738) at handle_written_inodeblock+0x533 softdep_disk_write_complete(cbc1a738) at softdep_disk_write_complete+0xb6 bufdone(cbc1a738) at bufdone+0x160 g_vfs_done(c1825ad4) at g_vfs_done+0x8a biodone(c1825ad4,d42e8cc4,0,c062632c,1ea) at biodone+0x57 g_io_shedule_up(c15d17d0) at g_io_shedule_up+0xb5 g_up_procbody(0,d42e8d38,0,c04be5c0,0) at g_up_procbody+0x5a fork_exit(c04be5c0,0,d42e8d38 at fork_exit+0xa0 fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8 --- trap 0x1,eip=0,esp=0xd42e8d6c,ebp=0 --- dbshow alllocks Process 3 (g_up) thread 0xc15d17d0 (100033) exclusive sleep mutex SoftdepLock r=0 (0xc06dbda0) locked @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:4075 exclusive sleep mutex g_xup r=0 (0xd42e8cc4) locked @ /usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:490 Process 31 (irq20:acpi0) thread 0xc15cd320 (100021) exclusive sleep mutex acpica subsystem lock r=0 (0xc15c0280) locked @ /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/Osd/Osdynch.c:361 db panic Dump... This panic should certainly be studied by a kernel hacker. You should keep the kernel dump. I'm not enough experienced to help you here, maybe jeff, tegge or truckman could help you here. after restart, system stoped and entered in single mode with inconsistency in /var after fsck, there was message: BAD SUPERBLOCK: VALUES IN SUPERBLOCK DISAGREE WITH THOSE IN FIRST ALTERNATE then search for SUPERBLOCK failed, and fsck don't have option -b... tried to mount all filesystems and got another panic: # /var: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir cpuid=0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 133 tid 100063] stoped at kdb_enter+0x2b: nop dbwhere Tracing pid 133 tid 100063 td 0xc18554000 kdb_enter(c062b964) at kdb_enter+0x2b panic(c063b64c,c1829800,da96c904,c059eb66,c18866b4) at panic+0x127 ufs_dirbad(c18866b4,0,c063b606,c1854000,0) at ufs_dirbad+0x3a ufs_lookup(da96c92c) at ufs_lookup+0x36a VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP_APV(c066fd80,da96c92c) at VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP_APV+0x87 lookup(da96cbcc,c0515064,0,c1854000,c06bc7c0) at lookup+0x3d6 namei(da96cbcc,c062cf75,267,c1854000,da96ca68) at namei+0x35a vn_open_cred(da96cbcc,da96,0,c15c9a80,3) at vn_open_cred+0x277 vn_open(da96cbcc,da96,0,3,c062cf75) at vn_open+0x1e kern_open(c185400,28065e40,0,1,0) at kern_open+0xb6 open(c185400,da96cd04,3,1,296) at open+0x1a syscall(3b,3b,3b,2807,80486b1) at syscall+0x27f xint0x80_syscall() at xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall(5,FreeBSD ELF32,open), eip=0x28054e67,esp=0xbfbfebcc,ebp=0xbfbfec78 --- With every restart, system going in single mode. What can i do to clean /var filesystem and to debug these panics? Any help are welcome... Did you try the -b flag from fsck_ffs(8) ? You can get the location of other superblocks with the dumpfs(8) utility. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen jeremie at le-hen dot org ttz at chchile dot org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NEC 1300A DVD-R writing
AAron could you please email the site for the firmware update? thank you in advance, Jon ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Jail to jail network performance?
[Sorry, this is a late reply, but might be helpful.] Daniel Gerzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Brandon, Thursday, September 15, 2005, 5:17:57 AM, you wrote: [...] nullfs looks interesting. I was thinking about sharing files between jails using NFS, but it looks like nullfs would do the trick with better performance. Although the bugs section of the man page for mount_nullfs is rather scary. Does anyone have any experience with it? Does it actually work? btw unionfs is interesting as well, but the BUGS section is pretty the same :) Another possibility is to use union mounts (i.e. using the -o union mount flag with a regular mount). This works without problems and is very stable, but it is a little less flexible than UNIONFS (or NULLFS) because it merges only the directory entries at the mount point. If the point here is to make /tmp/mysql.sock show up in another jail's file space, can I use a symlink instead? Can a jailed process see the target of the symlink? I read that using such a symlinks has security impacts. Symlinks within a jail cannot point to targets outside of that jail. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. When your hammer is C++, everything begins to look like a thumb. -- Steve Haflich, in comp.lang.c++ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with PPPoE STABLE and ADSL 3Com HomeConnect
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:37:03AM +0200, ComteZero _ wrote: C Hello, C C it's been two weeks I try to find out what's wrong. Clean install from cvsup C STABLE (5). C my ADSL account works fine with REL. 4.4+rp_pppoe but not with my new STABLE C (5) (without using rp_pppoe). C could someone help me on this issue (logs provided here)... two PADI are C emitted but nothing happens after. C (i saw that someone had a similar problem, but with previous netgraph C revisions). C C thank you. C C Since my ADSL modem is 3Com HomeConnect, I've set the C net.graph.nonstandard_pppoe=1 In modern FreeBSD versions 3Com mode for ng_pppoe is switched per-node, not via sysctl. You should use ppp(8) option to enable 3Com mode: set pppoe 3Com -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any ideas when 5.5 will be out
I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
On 9/19/05, Eriq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 Most likely a month after 6.0 is released, as they are busy getting 6.0 ready for the release. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:21:31PM -0500, Eriq wrote: I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 A few months after 6.0 is released. Kris pgpEpLEt0UP6H.pgp Description: PGP signature
Gratuitous ARP
Hi all, I am using UCARP on two FreeBS= D 4.10-RELEASE-p16 nodes to offer highly available apache virtual hosts.nb= sp; Everything seems to work very well except that occasionally one webserv= er will become inaccessable from outside it's subnet. I have narrowed= this down to an arp issue. When a UCARP IP becomes unavailable. = ; I normally start a constant ping to it from my machine which lives on a d ifferent subnet, all requests timeout. I log into the cisco router th= at has an interfaces living on the webserver's subnet. I then view th= e arp table of the cisco router an see that the MAC that is listed for that= UCARP IP is the MAC of the inactive node. I then clear the arp cache= on the cisco router, this makes the routers arp table update correctly aft= er that my ping requests get replied and the webserver is again accessible = from the outside. So, I have come up with a few = solutions to this problem, which include: 1.nbs= p; Set the arp cache timeout of the cisco router very low so that outages a= re minimal. I would rather not do this as it will problably stress th= e router too much. Unfortunately I know little about cisco devices so= I really cant figure this one out, does anyone think that this is a bad th= ing? Can you tell a cisco device not to cache arp entries on just the= internal interface? The subnet currently consists of about 25 hosts = so this may not be so bad after all? 2. Run an ANT task to = clear the cache on the cisco device, this task can become part of the UCARP= scripts. This may be a good solution but security is a concern. 3. Find a way to make the FreeBSD nodes produce more than usual gratuitous arp packets or add a line to do only that in the UCARP scripts.= Anyone have any thoughts on this or suggestions on how I may be able= to do this? I have tried by re adding the alias but this sometimes d= oesn't work until I again remove and readd the alias. Could it be a p= roblem with the alias addition not functioning properly? = nbsp; Any input at all is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Colin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gratuitous ARP
On Monday 19 September 2005 19:31, Colin Farley wrote: 1.nbs=p; Set the arp cache timeout of the cisco router very low so that outages a=re minimal. I would rather not do this as it will problably stress th=e router too much. Unfortunately I know little about cisco devices so=I really cant figure this one out, does anyone think that this is a bad th=ing? Can you tell a cisco device not to cache arp entries on just the=internal interface? The subnet currently consists of about 25 hosts =so this may not be so bad after all? Depending on your Cisco router model you will not have any issues whatsoever lowering the timeout to really low, in the region of a few seconds. even an old 25xx device would be to handle that without problems. 2. Run an ANT task to =clear the cache on the cisco device, this task can become part of the UCARP=scripts. This may be a good solution but security is a concern. This would be very very bad, cause no matter how you do it the security concern would be severe. -- Matt Douhan www.fruitsalad.org (remember, amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the Titanic) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gratuitous ARP
Hi Matt, Thanks for your reply. = The model of the Cisco router is 2811. Do you think that lowering the= timeout to 5 seconds would be ok? I have seen that Cisco does not recommen= d a timeout below 30 seconds but after reading your reply and seeing as the= re are only a couple dozen hosts on this subnet I would think that thi= s would be fine. Please confirm. Thanks again. Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] .org wrote: - To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Matt Douhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] itsalad.org Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 09/19= /2005 01:54PM cc: Colin Farley [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Subject: Re: Gratuitous ARP On Monday 19 September 2005 19:31, Colin = Farley wrote: 1.nbs=p; Set the arp cache timeou= t of the cisco router very low so that outages a=re = minimal. I would rather not do this as it will p= roblably stress th=e router too much. Unfortunately I know littleabout cisco devices so=I really cant figure this one = out, does anyone think that this is a bad th=ing? n= bsp;Can you tell a cisco device not to cache arp entri= es on just the=internal interface? The subnet = currently consists of about 25 hosts =so this may not be so bad after = all? Depending on your Cisco router model you will= not have any issues whatsoever lowering the timeout to really low, in = the region of a few seconds. even an old 25xx device would be to han= dle that without problems. 2. Ru= n an ANT task to =clear the cache on the cisco device, this = ; task can become part of the UCARP=scripts. This may be a go= od solution but security is a concern. This wou= ld be very very bad, cause no matter how you do it the security concern= would be severe. -- Matt Douhan www.fruitsalad.org (remem= ber, amateurs built the Ark, professionals built the Titanic) ___ __ 5F__= ___ freebsd-stable= @freebsd.org mailing list [1]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li= stinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stab [EMAIL PROTECTED] References 1. 3Dhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
Thanks for that info. The release engineering page should be updated to reflect this. The last time I looked (yesterday), it read that 5.5 will be out in September 2005. Dan On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 12:21:31PM -0500, Eriq wrote: I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 A few months after 6.0 is released. Kris ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
Why would 5.5 come out after 6.0, what's the use ? just upgrade to 6.0 ,.,, no? Sandro On 9/19/05, Eriq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 Most likely a month after 6.0 is released, as they are busy getting 6.0 ready for the release. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---BeginMessage--- On 9/19/05, Eriq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 Most likely a month after 6.0 is released, as they are busy getting 6.0 ready for the release. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---End Message--- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gratuitous ARP
On Sep 19, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Colin Farley wrote: Thanks for your reply. The model of the Cisco router is 2811. Do you think that lowering the timeout to 5 seconds would be ok? I have seen that Cisco does not recommend a timeout below 30 seconds but after reading your reply and seeing as the re are only a couple dozen hosts on this subnet I would think that thi s would be fine. Please confirm. Thanks again. Remember that the router is going to have to re-ARP for these hosts whenever something external sends traffic to them, unless the router already has another active connection going. The thing is, ARPOP_REQUESTS use a broadcast MAC address which gets sent to all of the machines on the network, which adds processing overhead not just on the router itself but also on all of these machines. Fortunately, you can see what this overhead is quite easily in order to tune things: Run tcpdump -nt arp and see how often your Cisco is making requests with a 5-second ARP cache timeout. So long as your network is only getting, say, a single-digit number of ARP requests per second, this amount of overhead is not going to matter significantly. Adjust as needed. -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous not the production oriented. I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely. I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July. 6.x is probably still 9-12 months away from prime time. But that's just a guess on my part. I do know that they are pushing on it harder than they did for 5.0. Sandro Noel. wrote: Why would 5.5 come out after 6.0, what's the use ? just upgrade to 6.0 ,.,, no? Sandro On 9/19/05, Eriq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 Most likely a month after 6.0 is released, as they are busy getting 6.0 ready for the release. Subject: Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out From: Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:22:00 + To: Eriq [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Eriq [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 20917 invoked by uid 78); 19 Sep 2005 17:47:44 - Received: from unknown (HELO ns-mr8.netsolmail.com) (205.178.149.7) by mail.networksolutionsemail.com with SMTP; 19 Sep 2005 17:47:44 - Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by ns-mr8.netsolmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8JHlgES024686 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:47:42 -0400 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3E05C29D; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:22:39 + (GMT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA19A16A43A; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:22:35 + (GMT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7FB16A41F for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:22:28 + (GMT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BF543D45 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:22:27 + (GMT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i31so467787wxd for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:22:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=POP0UXXTEqg0LwMP1mR+0Vi8Sc9aIFO0f2nUS4lDSZrR8I/qW+fs1vXxtCkSetluK8cRoGHUfP39ecYTcQNGjCLdI/wfk8WOGSjHL7RbopvLftKgwPNEB5Rdx62N8dN5mgxCKIk42u7lsSlUcTa+GzbtUSGR9eVdjPlUg3TDuD0= Received: by 10.70.111.2 with SMTP id j2mr1418789wxc; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.53.4 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:22:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code freebsd-stable.freebsd.org List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable List-Post: mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/19/05, Eriq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I haven't noticed any word on this release, just 6.0 Most likely a month after 6.0 is released, as they are busy getting 6.0 ready for the release. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Paul T. Root /_ \ 1977 MGB / /|| \\ ||\/ || _ | || || || \ ||__// \__/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
Thank you for the explaination paul. Sandro. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gratuitous ARP
Colin Farley wrote: Hi Matt, Thanks for your reply. =he model of the Cisco router is 2811. Do you think that lowering the=imeout to 5 seconds would be ok? I have seen that Cisco does not recommen= a timeout below 30 seconds but after reading your reply and seeing as the=e are only a couple dozen hosts on this subnet I would think that thi= would be fine. Please confirm. Thanks again. It should be fine, but some experimentation will be in order, as the amount of traffic each node generates could be a factor as well. Set it to what you want, then keep an eye on CPU utilization on the router. The command you want is: show proc cpu -jav ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:36:10PM -0500, Paul T. Root wrote: In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous not the production oriented. I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely. I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July. 6.x is probably still 9-12 months away from prime time. But that's just a guess on my part. I do know that they are pushing on it harder than they did for 5.0. It's not nearly as big a gap as between other (n-1).x - n.0 releases, so I'd say this time expectation is extremely pessimistic. However, time will tell, and if you're not able to deal with the possibility of bugs in 6.0 then you should at least wait a while until after the release to see what bugs are reported. Kris pgprgdw0PFfD0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
Paul T. Root wrote: In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous not the production oriented. I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely. I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July. 6.x is probably still 9-12 months away from prime time. But that's just a guess on my part. I do know that they are pushing on it harder than they did for 5.0. Sandro Noel. wrote: 6.0 is indeed receiving quite a bit of testing and bugfixing. It's a bit presumptuous to make public claims that it's 9-12 months away, though. I can appreciate the conventional wisdom of staying away from N.0 releases, but we are putting quite a bit of effort into this one. 6.1 is not going to be 9-12 months away either, nor will 6.2. The 6.x line is generating quite a bit of excitement and will be a very good set of releases. Scott ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
That's what i thought ... :) On Sep 19, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Scott Long wrote: Paul T. Root wrote: In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous not the production oriented. I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely. I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July. 6.x is probably still 9-12 months away from prime time. But that's just a guess on my part. I do know that they are pushing on it harder than they did for 5.0. Sandro Noel. wrote: 6.0 is indeed receiving quite a bit of testing and bugfixing. It's a bit presumptuous to make public claims that it's 9-12 months away, though. I can appreciate the conventional wisdom of staying away from N.0 releases, but we are putting quite a bit of effort into this one. 6.1 is not going to be 9-12 months away either, nor will 6.2. The 6.x line is generating quite a bit of excitement and will be a very good set of releases. Scott ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sandro Noel [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thx all for your responses
though after looking at 6.0 beta I couldn't help but think why not just call it 5.5? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: thx all for your responses
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:48PM -0500, Eriq wrote: though after looking at 6.0 beta I couldn't help but think why not just call it 5.5? Because it's not a release from the 5.x branch. Read the handbook for detailed explanation of how FreeBSD releases work. Kris pgpqnjzjPR0ja.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: any ideas when 5.5 will be out
I'm just stating my observations and my decisions on when I upgraded to a major revision. I started this back in the early 2.x.x days. I believe 2.2.1 is my first set of CDs. And I still have most all of them. I also put in the caveot that a lot of work is being concentrated on 6.x so times could be shorter. Personally, I may put 6.0 on a test machine, but I won't put it in production. I don't work that way. I will go to 5.5, I'm sure, on my servers. I update from source fairly regularly. And that was the original question: Why would 5.5 come out after 6.0? Scott Long wrote: Paul T. Root wrote: In the past, x.0 releases are meant for the adventurous not the production oriented. I never go before x.1. And I skipped 3.x completely. I just got my final server from 4.11 to 5.4 in July. 6.x is probably still 9-12 months away from prime time. But that's just a guess on my part. I do know that they are pushing on it harder than they did for 5.0. Sandro Noel. wrote: 6.0 is indeed receiving quite a bit of testing and bugfixing. It's a bit presumptuous to make public claims that it's 9-12 months away, though. I can appreciate the conventional wisdom of staying away from N.0 releases, but we are putting quite a bit of effort into this one. 6.1 is not going to be 9-12 months away either, nor will 6.2. The 6.x line is generating quite a bit of excitement and will be a very good set of releases. Scott ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange case of root filesystem corruption
On 平成 17/09/19, at 5:32, Ulf Magnusson wrote: Some more info: Windows is installed on the same drive. When I launched Partition Magic it complained about the LBA and CHS parameters for a partition on the drive not being identical. Just in case it's helpful.. FWIW, I've had bad luck with using Partition Magic more than two or three times on a drive. I just don't even use it any more. Also, I've had bad luck using MSW-side software to do anything with the partitions after *BSD partitions are cut. MSWindows can't seem to obey its own rules. If you have to dual-boot, cut the primary (BIOS-level) partitions once with MSW (and PM, if you must), then leave the BIOS-level partitions alone. Better yet, use two drives. Joel Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] digitcom, inc. 株式会社デジコム Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 ** http://www.ddcom.co.jp ** ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
