Heimdal 1.1
I asked this question a while ago, but got no answers. I'm trying again Is there any possibility that heimdal 1.1 that works beautifully in Current will be backported to FreeBSD-7.x? Gunnar Flygt Sveriges Radio Teknik/IT ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Possibility of backporting of Heimdal 1.1
Is there any possibility that heimdal 1.1 that works beautifully in Current will be backported to FreeBSD-7.x? Gunnar Flygt Sveriges Radio Teknik/IT ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal
In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf In 7.0 there is no detection of such a flag. How should I continue to NOT build the 0.6.3 heimdal that is deliverd with 7.0? I want to use the distribution heimdal-1.1 that I find in KTH Stockholm, since that's the version we are running on our KDC's and all the servers using Kerberos for authentication. If I compile the port openssh-portable with KERBEROS-support on a 6.3 with heimdal 1.1 everything works OK. If I install pointing out the same heimdal installed on 7.0, ssh cannot autheticate to the kerberized servers. So I want to get rid of all dependencies of heimdal 0.6.3 in FreeBSD 7.0 Gunnar Flygt Sveriges Radio AB ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 7.0 WITHOUT Heimdal
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:56:12PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2008-04-10 13:24, Gunnar Flygt wrote: In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf In 7.0 there is no detection of such a flag. All the NO_XXX flags have been obsoleted, use WITHOUT_KERBEROS=yes instead. See src.conf(5) for more information. Much better place than /etc/make.conf Thanks for the info. Gunnar ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt-
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:17:43AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 10:22, Fred Clift wrote: On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: As for non-i386 -Server: I have an almost finished set of diffs for ia64 to build and See the alpha list for patches I posted today to make -Server build for alpha - these are not 'ports ready' patches, but are against the stock source... Okay, I added that to the port. Could you try the updated ports? Also, anyone else who's listening, the ports need much more widespread testing in order for it to make it into 4.8-RELEASE. Is it OK to present result directly to you or should it be to STABLE? The current diffs are at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DRI errors with the XFree86 4.3.0 installation
I found when reading the /var/log/XFree86.0.log (WW) RADEON(0): [dri] Some DRI features disabled because of version mismatch. [dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but 1.3.1 or later is preferred. -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 4.3.0
I just want to report one more good thing. I recompiled mozilla from scratch right out of the ports directory, and it runs fine now with Xft support and all. -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 4.3.0
I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT box. I've had big problems for some weeks getting 4.2 to work. I gave up the other day, but 4.3.0 worked straight out of the box, if you can say so after a portupgrade XFree86 What didn't work was the installation of XFree86-FontServer but I can live without that, I hope. -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFree86 4.3.0
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote: I just want to report one more good thing. I recompiled mozilla from scratch right out of the ports directory, and it runs fine now with Xft support and all. Again I have to reply to my own answer. The good thing is still good, but only on one of the 3 systems I test 4.3.0 on. The system working OK is a newly installed laptop which runs 5.0-CURRENT. The second system is an ordinary desktop 1.4GHz Dell, which runs 4.7-STABLE. Here mozilla behaves as earlier described. The info No Windows found is shown and then I get the prompt back again. No mozilla started. I'm trying a recompile of Xft using `portupgrade -r -f Xft` to see if this makes any difference. But at least XFree86 4.3.0 runs fine. -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFree86 4.3.0
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote: On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote: I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT box. I've had big problems for some weeks getting 4.2 to work. I gave up the other day, but 4.3.0 worked straight out of the box, if you can say so after a portupgrade XFree86 What didn't work was the installation of XFree86-FontServer but I can live without that, I hope. Okay, got that fixed, it'll be in the -8 diff. (got to run to class). Thanks! Is this working with the nvidia driver? I gotta track down that PCI TNT2 card for my -current machine... Are you talking about the binary driver? If it's a proper XFree86 module and XFree86 didn't screw up compatibility (I don't think they did), it should continue working, but it could do things that would prevent it from working in a new server. I haven't tested cards besides the radeon due to lack of time so far. The -9 diff is up (http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html) and I haven't had any reports of problems with it so far. If you get X 4.3.0 working with it in the next couple of days, it would be great if people could mail me and mention what card, if they had to change anything from a 4.2.0 installation to get it to work, and briefly how they've tested it (i.e. started up gnome2 and did something, not just it built or startx works) I did a dirty thing and just ran the new patch on top of the already patched system. Got some complaints that the patch was there already, and was it OK. So I answered yes to all of it and the patch applied on the missing parts. And since the system was updated yesterday with the -7 patch, it was a few parts left. XFree86-FontServer was one of them, and when I run `portupgrade XFree86-FontServer` it does nothing, no upgrade. Answering to my own question. It was much better to re-cvsup the ports and apply the patch again. So that thing is working and the system is updating the XFree86-FontServer now. Sorry for the noise. But the next thing still applies! Any suggestions? All the other parts are working though, except for xdpyinfo which gives a lot of output but gives this strange output: # xdpyinfo name of display::0.0 version number:11.0 vendor string:The XFree86 Project, Inc vendor release number:0 XFree86 version: 0.0.0 -- cut -- This is a 4.7-STABLE machine or should I say 4.8-RC which it is. By the way /var/log/Xfree86.0.log says: XFree86 Version 4.3.0 Release Date: 27 February 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.8-RC i386 [ELF] Build Date: 05 March 2003 -- Gunnar Flygt, SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFree86 4.3.0
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote: I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT box. I've had big problems for some weeks getting 4.2 to work. I gave up the other day, but 4.3.0 worked straight out of the box, if you can say so after a portupgrade XFree86 What didn't work was the installation of XFree86-FontServer but I can live without that, I hope. Okay, got that fixed, it'll be in the -8 diff. (got to run to class). Thanks! Is this working with the nvidia driver? I gotta track down that PCI TNT2 card for my -current machine... Are you talking about the binary driver? If it's a proper XFree86 module and XFree86 didn't screw up compatibility (I don't think they did), it should continue working, but it could do things that would prevent it from working in a new server. I haven't tested cards besides the radeon due to lack of time so far. The -9 diff is up (http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html) and I haven't had any reports of problems with it so far. If you get X 4.3.0 working with it in the next couple of days, it would be great if people could mail me and mention what card, if they had to change anything from a 4.2.0 installation to get it to work, and briefly how they've tested it (i.e. started up gnome2 and did something, not just it built or startx works) I did a dirty thing and just ran the new patch on top of the already patched system. Got some complaints that the patch was there already, and was it OK. So I answered yes to all of it and the patch applied on the missing parts. And since the system was updated yesterday with the -7 patch, it was a few parts left. XFree86-FontServer was one of them, and when I run `portupgrade XFree86-FontServer` it does nothing, no upgrade. Any suggestions? All the other parts are working though, except for xdpyinfo which gives a lot of output but gives this strange output: # xdpyinfo name of display::0.0 version number:11.0 vendor string:The XFree86 Project, Inc vendor release number:0 XFree86 version: 0.0.0 -- cut -- This is a 4.7-STABLE machine or should I say 4.8-RC which it is. By the way /var/log/Xfree86.0.log says: XFree86 Version 4.3.0 Release Date: 27 February 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.8-RC i386 [ELF] Build Date: 05 March 2003 -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XFree86 4.3.0
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote: I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT box. I've had big problems for some weeks getting 4.2 to work. I gave up the other day, but 4.3.0 worked straight out of the box, if you can say so after a portupgrade XFree86 What didn't work was the installation of XFree86-FontServer but I can live without that, I hope. Okay, got that fixed, it'll be in the -8 diff. (got to run to class). Thanks! Is this working with the nvidia driver? I gotta track down that PCI TNT2 card for my -current machine... Are you talking about the binary driver? If it's a proper XFree86 module and XFree86 didn't screw up compatibility (I don't think they did), it should continue working, but it could do things that would prevent it from working in a new server. I haven't tested cards besides the radeon due to lack of time so far. The -9 diff is up (http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html) and I haven't had any reports of problems with it so far. If you get X 4.3.0 working with it in the next couple of days, it would be great if people could mail me and mention what card, if they had to change anything from a 4.2.0 installation to get it to work, and briefly how they've tested it (i.e. started up gnome2 and did something, not just it built or startx works) I was a bit optimistic about the compilation of XFree86-FontServer. This happens: 19$ sudo portupgrade -R XFree86-FontServer --- Upgrading 'XFree86-FontServer-4.2.0_1' to 'XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0' (x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer) --- Building '/usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer' === Cleaning for libiconv-1.8_2 === Cleaning for gettext-0.11.5_1 === Cleaning for gmake-3.80 === Cleaning for imake-4.3.0 === Cleaning for libtool-1.3.4_4 === Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.15.0 === Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.3_1 === Cleaning for expat-1.95.6_1 === Cleaning for fontconfig-2.1_5 === Cleaning for XFree86-libraries-4.3.0 === Cleaning for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 === Extracting for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 Checksum OK for xc/X430src-1.tgz. Checksum OK for xc/X430src-2.tgz. Checksum OK for xc/X430src-3.tgz. === Patching for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 === Applying FreeBSD patches for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. === Ignoring patchfile /extra/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer/../../x11/XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-2.orig I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. === Ignoring patchfile /extra/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer/../../x11/XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-DRI.orig Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to config/cf/FreeBSD.cf.rej Patch patch-FreeBSD.cf failed to apply cleanly. Patch(es) patch-2 patch-DRI applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /extra/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade88018.3 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer (XFree86-FontServer-4.2.0_1) (patch error) -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comment to the XFree86 4.3.0§
cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore patches don't apply clean. Used the ver -11 of the pacthes leading to 4.3.0 -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compaq Evo N800c and FreeBSD
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:38AM -0800, Greg Smith wrote: Gunnar, Did you have pccardd running? With pccard_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf or wherever it might go in 5.0. It won't be automatically started with NEWCARD. Yes, it was activated. i.e it says pccard_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf but it isn't running when I look closer after a boot, so I added pccardd_flags=-z which used to help. But not this time. When I put a card in the port it says: end () sc-memlimit (803f) pccard0: Card has no functions! cbb0: PC Card card activation failed And that's it. So I put in the pccardd_flags=-z But that makes no difference. The machine doesn't like pccard when running CURRENT. Greg -Original Message- OK! So now I've also tested with OLDCARD. It isn't any better. Result: pccard: card inserted, slot 0 And that's it. It doesn't detect the card or inform anything more. So should I say that this brand new Compaq Laptop is NO GO for FreeBSD CURRENT? Just to inform you, I've tried Linux RedHat 8 and Mandrake of some brand (8.x probably) with even worse result. They don't even boot. So it seems Compaq has done it. Being totally dedicated to M$ Boring. I won't ever buy a Compaq laptop again. Pity I didn't stay with Toshiba. Had only good things to say about my Tecra 9100. Until it died electrically for me. -- Gunnar Flygt, SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-mobile in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compaq Evo N800c and FreeBSD
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:24:31PM -0800, Greg Smith wrote: Gunnar, Maybe running of pccardd along with the memory setting of Kevin will do the job. I just rebooted with the following setting: hw.cbb.start_memory=0x2000 And now my Netgear card is detected as wi0 Will try to configure the card to see if it is working properly :) So it seems I'm cosing up to a solution!? Good luck. Greg -Original Message- On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:38AM -0800, Greg Smith wrote: Gunnar, Did you have pccardd running? With pccard_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf or wherever it might go in 5.0. It won't be automatically started with NEWCARD. Yes, it was activated. i.e it says pccard_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf but it isn't running when I look closer after a boot, so I added pccardd_flags=-z which used to help. But not this time. When I put a card in the port it says: end () sc-memlimit (803f) pccard0: Card has no functions! cbb0: PC Card card activation failed And that's it. So I put in the pccardd_flags=-z But that makes no difference. The machine doesn't like pccard when running CURRENT. Greg -Original Message- OK! So now I've also tested with OLDCARD. It isn't any better. Result: pccard: card inserted, slot 0 And that's it. It doesn't detect the card or inform anything more. So should I say that this brand new Compaq Laptop is NO GO for FreeBSD CURRENT? Just to inform you, I've tried Linux RedHat 8 and Mandrake of some brand (8.x probably) with even worse result. They don't even boot. So it seems Compaq has done it. Being totally dedicated to M$ Boring. I won't ever buy a Compaq laptop again. Pity I didn't stay with Toshiba. Had only good things to say about my Tecra 9100. Until it died electrically for me. -- Gunnar Flygt, SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-mobile in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Comment to the XFree86 4.3.0§
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:55:53PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:52, Gunnar Flygt wrote: cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore patches don't apply clean. Used the ver -11 of the pacthes leading to 4.3.0 The -12 patches at the site now should fix that. http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html The patch applies fine, but I still have problem with: bash-2.05b# portupgrade -R -p XFree86-FontServer --- Upgrading 'XFree86-FontServer-4.2.0_1' to 'XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0' (x11- servers/XFree86-4-FontServer) --- Building '/usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer' === Cleaning for libiconv-1.8_2 === Cleaning for gettext-0.11.5_1 === Cleaning for gmake-3.80 === Cleaning for imake-4.3.0 === Cleaning for libtool-1.3.4_4 === Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.15.0 === Cleaning for perl-5.6.1_11 === Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.3_1 === Cleaning for expat-1.95.6_1 === Cleaning for fontconfig-2.1_5 === Cleaning for XFree86-libraries-4.3.0 === Cleaning for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 === Extracting for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 Checksum OK for xc/X430src-1.tgz. Checksum OK for xc/X430src-2.tgz. Checksum OK for xc/X430src-3.tgz. === Patching for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 === Applying FreeBSD patches for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. === Ignoring patchfile /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer/../../x11/ XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-2.orig I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. === Ignoring patchfile /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer/../../x11/ XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-DRI.orig Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to config/cf/FreeBSD.cf.rej Patch patch-FreeBSD.cf failed to apply cleanly. Patch(es) patch-2 patch-DRI applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade821.4 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer (XFree86-FontServer-4.2.0_1) (patch e rror) I cvsupped right before applying the patch -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HEADSUP: XFree86 4.3.0 update
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:16:28PM -0500, Mezz bsdforums.org wrote: Nice, thanks for the works! Do anyone know how it goes with the Nvidia driver? Yes works on my regular desktop at work. Running 4.7-STABLE with nvidia in it. Cheers, Mezz I've committed the update of XFree86 to 4.3.0 to ports. I think I've cleaned up after my mess at this point, but there may still be issues. Please report to me if you have any problems with the new ports or any issues with XFree86 that you didn't have in 4.2.0. I think the ports should build fine with a plain make install from x11/XFree86-4 even if 4.2.0 is already installed (they did last time I tried), but it doesn't guarantee an update. Please use portupgrade to ensure you update fully. graphics/drm-kmod isn't going to be updated for 4.3.0. I have a diff for the MFC of the drm up at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files.html I would appreciate testers for this because I don't have a -stable machine at the moment. _ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RE: sendmail_enable=NO ignored in 4.7+?
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:03:35AM -0500, Scott Renna wrote: Hello all, I had a question in regards to this post about sendmail. I noticed the same problem on my system: How come this is so hard. Just do a grep for sendmail in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and you get: 2$ grep sendmail /etc/defaults/rc.conf mta_start_script=/etc/rc.sendmail # Settings for /etc/rc.sendmail: sendmail_enable=YES # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO/NONE). # If NONE, don't start any sendmail processes. sendmail_flags=-L sm-mta -bd -q30m # Flags to sendmail (as a server) sendmail_submit_enable=YES# Start a localhost-only MTA for mail submission sendmail_submit_flags=-L sm-mta -bd -q30m -ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost sendmail_outbound_enable=YES # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). sendmail_outbound_flags=-L sm-queue -q30m # Flags to sendmail (outbound only) sendmail_msp_queue_enable=YES # Dequeue stuck clientmqueue mail (YES/NO). sendmail_msp_queue_flags=-L sm-msp-queue -Ac -q30m # Flags for sendmail_msp_queue daemon. And the read the lines about sendmail_enable! Due to my less than perfect memory I can't pinpoint exactly when, but after upgrading my 4.x-system it seems like the sendmail_enable=NO in /etc/rc.conf is being ignored and sendmail gets started anyway. Is there any reason why even if you put NO sendmail still starts up? It seems kind of weird that it would start. Scott Renna -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stacey Roberts Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 2:11 AM To: Joachim Strömbergson Cc: stable Subject: Re: sendmail_enable=NO ignored in 4.7+? Hello, On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 07:06, Joachim Strömbergson wrote: Aloha! Due to my less than perfect memory I can't pinpoint exactly when, but after upgrading my 4.x-system it seems like the sendmail_enable=NO in /etc/rc.conf is being ignored and sendmail gets started anyway. AFAIK, this happened after upgrading from 4.6 to 4.7. I'm currently at 4.8-RC and the same behaviour is present. Checking processes after boot I see: root 106 0,0 0,3 3196 1788 ?? Ss 11:04pm 0:00,97 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) smmsp109 0,0 0,3 3076 1404 ?? Is 11:04pm 0:00,01 sendmail: Queue [EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) What have I missed? Why is the setting in rc.conf being ignored. Where/what is starting sendmail? To completely disable sendmail on startup, use: sendmail_enable=NONE Regards, Stacey Any pointers and help greatly appreciated. -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
USB Memory Stick hangs 4.8-RC box immediately
Is this a known behavoiur that when you attach a USB Memory Stick, the machine freezes? If so, any clues on how to make it not to? Details: 4.8-RC a few days old. An all SCSI system. Can it have something to do with the USB stick trying to attach to already occupied devices or ? The same Stick works very well with 5.0-CURRENT. -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading sequence to 4.x from 3.3-R
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:19:41AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Dear colleagues, What is the correct way to upgrade FreeBSD from 3.3-R to 4.x? Wow ... that's a bit of a leap. I expect you're going to have problems going that far easily. using recommended (extended a bit) make -DNOCLEAN -DNOPERL -DNOPROFILE -DNOGAMES -DNOMAN buildworld I got === doc c++ -O -pipe -I/ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/lib -I/ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf -c /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc:80: warning: `catch', `throw', and `try' are all C++ reserved words /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc: In function `void operator delete(void *)': /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc:82: declaration of `operator delete(void *)' throws different exceptions... internal:82: ...from previous declaration here *** Error code 1 Currently I simply exclude gperf from bootstrap-tools from Makefile.inc, but it seems a bit hackish... I'm no expert on the source tree, but I would think that you might have an easier time of it if you backup up the system and reinstalled. If that seems terribly impractical, you might do better by stepping it. For example: 1) First upgrade to 3-STABLE. 2) Then upgrade to an early 4.x, such as 4.2-RELEASE 3) Then upgrade to 4-STABLE I do think you're going to have problems if you attempt the upgrade without upgrading perl as well. perl is used in many parts of the system in 4.x, if you don't upgrade it, you may not even be able to build 4.x, and if it does build and install, you may find many utilities don't work. Wouldn't it be easier to do a binary upgrade? -- Gunnar Flygt, SR ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uninstalled all X stuff, still no mozilla
How come it is so impossible to make mozilla work with Xft? I uninstalled everything that involves X on my home machine, running 4.8-RC, deleted what was left in /usr/X11R6 and remaining graphical stuff in /usr/local. Recompiled from scratch. But still mozilla dies after having worked on disk for almost a minute, leaving only one line saying killed. In /var/log/messages there is a message saying: Mar 24 05:53:39 kern.crit enigma /kernel: swap_pager: out of swap space Mar 24 05:53:41 kern.crit enigma /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed Mar 24 05:53:41 kern.err enigma /kernel: pid 6 (mozilla-bin), uid 1001, was killed: out of swap space but no other applications are running except for Windowmaker and swapinfo gives: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gunnar]$ swapinfo Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Type /dev/rad0s2b 130944310209992424%Interleaved Anyone having some kind of explanation? Graphic card is Matrox G200, so there's nothing new and exclusvive there. What more info do you need to draw any conclusions? -- Gunnar Flygt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Uninstalled all X stuff, still no mozilla
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 12:20:06AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 00:04, Gunnar Flygt wrote: How come it is so impossible to make mozilla work with Xft? I uninstalled everything that involves X on my home machine, running 4.8-RC, deleted what was left in /usr/X11R6 and remaining graphical stuff in /usr/local. Recompiled from scratch. But still mozilla dies after having worked on disk for almost a minute, leaving only one line saying killed. In /var/log/messages there is a message saying: Mar 24 05:53:39 kern.crit enigma /kernel: swap_pager: out of swap space Mar 24 05:53:41 kern.crit enigma /kernel: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed Mar 24 05:53:41 kern.err enigma /kernel: pid 6 (mozilla-bin), uid 1001, was killed: out of swap space Besides the FAQ I just sent you, do you have any user limits that could be limiting the amount of per-process swap? What does the output of limit say for the user you're with which you're trying to run Mozilla? Actually when uninstalling everything having to do with X, and reinstall it all, I forgot to install webfonts and mozillafonts. It is running now but with worse fonts than I've ever seen. It definitively is not anti-aliased even though it is compiled with Xft2 support now. And for all the things in the FAQ, I've followed this list since the mozilla Xft thing started and tried all things you suugest, except for the total de/reinstall of everything XFree86 related. I guess I'll have to live with the horrible fonts in mozilla. It WAS much better though before this Xft-thread started :( Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc -- Gunnar Flygt OPC Data Sveriges Radio ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 Resolver bug?
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:58:42AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: When doing: nslookup 85.236.100.78 nslookup: couldn't get address for '88~ë¿¿À': not found I tracked down the cause to this was the fact that resolv.conf had localhost in it which named wasn't binding to. But surely I shouldn't get back this corruption? This is what I get on a machine that also has 127.0.0.1 in the resolv.conf $ nslookup 85.236.100.78 Server: localhost.sr.se Address: 127.0.0.1 *** localhost.sr.se can't find 85.236.100.78: Non-existent host/domain Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gunnar Flygt SR Datadrift Sveriges Radio ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dell 2850 and keyboards
I have one of these boxes, and there is an issue with the keyboard. I googled for problems using the keyboard in multiuser mode. There was a description of why it behaves as it does. The usb keyboard takes precedence over the ps/2 when running in multiuser, AND usb keyboard 0 is of course the keyboard used, AND this is the DRAC remote management card. So it doesn't help to attach an external usb keyboard. I read the tip for commenting out the usb keyboard section from /etc/usbd.conf, so everything is working now with a local keyboard. Now to my question. Is there any work going on to be able to attach more than one keyboard at the time? Like having a ps/2 keyboard and the DRAC usb virtual keyboard attached and working at the same time. It is nice to have both a local keyboard and the drac remote, which works like a charm. The best DRAC software so far. -- Gunnar Flygt SR Datadrift Sveriges Radio ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.3-RELEASE kde 3.3 and pf
I've had problems with DKE 3.3 since I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE.
I compared the same machine (Dell Latitude D600) with a different HD
where Gentoo Linux (Sorry for that:) resides. Om the Gentto box KDE 3.3
starts promply from kdm, no extra delays, but with FreeBSD 5.3 it takes
about 2 minutes to get a running KDE environment.
Got the briliant idea to stop pf before starting kdm AND alas KDE
starts as fast as on the Gentoo system. (Actually it is even faster than
login on the gentoo system:)
Here is my /etc/pf.conf:
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/pf.conf,v 1.1.2.1 2004/09/17 18:27:14 mlaier Exp $
# $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.21 2003/09/02 20:38:44 david Exp $
#
# See pf.conf(5) and /usr/share/examples/pf for syntax and examples.
# Required order: options, normalization, queueing, translation, filtering.
# Macros and tables may be defined and used anywhere.
# Note that translation rules are first match while filter rules are last match.
# Macros: define common values, so they can be referenced and changed easily.
ext_if=bge0 # replace with actual external interface name i.e., dc0
# Normalization: reassemble fragments and resolve or reduce traffic ambiguities.
scrub in all
# block all incoming packets but allow ssh, pass all outgoing tcp and udp
# connections and keep state, logging blocked packets.
block in log all
antispoof for { lo, $ext_if }
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 keep state
pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp } all keep state
pass out quick proto icmp from any to any keep state
pass in quick proto icmp from any to any
# drop without log
block in proto { tcp, udp } from any to any port 134 140
block in proto tcp from any to any port = 515
block in from any to 255.255.255.255
# my local network Class B
block in from any to yyy.xx.255.255
block in from any to 224.0.0.0/4
What is it that makes KDE so slow when using pf with these simple rules.
Have I missed something?
--
Gunnar Flygt
SR Datadrift
Sveriges Radio
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.3-RELEASE kde 3.3 and pf
I reply to my own question. Since I found out it was pf causing this I
started to use tcpdump on pflog0 and found that traffic from 127.0.0.1
to 127.0.0.1 was blocked. So I added as in the examples for ipf :
# allow localhost
pass in quick on lo0
pass out quick on lo0
after the antispoof rule in pf.conf, and now KDE is loading quick as
without pf. Is this something that should perhaps be in the example file
for pf? Or are there any security reasons for not having it?
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:48:54PM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
I've had problems with DKE 3.3 since I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE.
I compared the same machine (Dell Latitude D600) with a different HD
where Gentoo Linux (Sorry for that:) resides. Om the Gentto box KDE 3.3
starts promply from kdm, no extra delays, but with FreeBSD 5.3 it takes
about 2 minutes to get a running KDE environment.
Got the briliant idea to stop pf before starting kdm AND alas KDE
starts as fast as on the Gentoo system. (Actually it is even faster than
login on the gentoo system:)
Here is my /etc/pf.conf:
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/pf.conf,v 1.1.2.1 2004/09/17 18:27:14 mlaier Exp $
# $OpenBSD: pf.conf,v 1.21 2003/09/02 20:38:44 david Exp $
#
# See pf.conf(5) and /usr/share/examples/pf for syntax and examples.
# Required order: options, normalization, queueing, translation, filtering.
# Macros and tables may be defined and used anywhere.
# Note that translation rules are first match while filter rules are last
match.
# Macros: define common values, so they can be referenced and changed easily.
ext_if=bge0 # replace with actual external interface name i.e., dc0
# Normalization: reassemble fragments and resolve or reduce traffic
ambiguities.
scrub in all
# block all incoming packets but allow ssh, pass all outgoing tcp and udp
# connections and keep state, logging blocked packets.
block in log all
antispoof for { lo, $ext_if }
pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 keep state
pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp } all keep state
pass out quick proto icmp from any to any keep state
pass in quick proto icmp from any to any
# drop without log
block in proto { tcp, udp } from any to any port 134 140
block in proto tcp from any to any port = 515
block in from any to 255.255.255.255
# my local network Class B
block in from any to yyy.xx.255.255
block in from any to 224.0.0.0/4
What is it that makes KDE so slow when using pf with these simple rules.
Have I missed something?
--
Gunnar Flygt
SR Datadrift
Sveriges Radio
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Gunnar Flygt
SR Datadrift
Sveriges Radio
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
make search key= quite useless these days
What are we supposed to use for information on ports nowadays, since the port info has been taken away and more and more of the `make search key=anything` gives a result like: Port: xsmbrowser-3.3.0 Path: /usr/ports/net/xsmbrowser Info: ** No Description Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: net B-deps: R-deps: XFree86-libraries-4.2.1_7 cups-base-1.1.18.0_4 expect-5.38.0_1 freetype2 -2.1.3_1 imake-4.2.0_1 jpeg-6b_1 png-1.2.5_2 samba-2.2.7a tcl-8.3.5 tiff-3.5.7 t k-8.3.5 Port: smb2www-0.0.980804_1 Path: /usr/ports/www/smb2www Info: ** No Description Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: www B-deps: R-deps: apache-1.3.27_4 cups-base-1.1.18.0_4 expat-1.95.6_1 jpeg-6b_1 p5-MIME-Ba se64-2.16 png-1.2.5_2 samba-2.2.7a tiff-3.5.7 Not much help there! -- Gunnar Flygt OPC Data Sveriges Radio ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: make search key= quite useless these days
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 06:05:44AM -0600, Greg Panula wrote: Gunnar Flygt wrote: What are we supposed to use for information on ports nowadays, since the port info has been taken away and more and more of the `make search key=anything` gives a result like: Port: xsmbrowser-3.3.0 Path: /usr/ports/net/xsmbrowser Info: ** No Description Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: net B-deps: R-deps: XFree86-libraries-4.2.1_7 cups-base-1.1.18.0_4 expect-5.38.0_1 freetype2 -2.1.3_1 imake-4.2.0_1 jpeg-6b_1 png-1.2.5_2 samba-2.2.7a tcl-8.3.5 tiff-3.5.7 t k-8.3.5 Port: smb2www-0.0.980804_1 Path: /usr/ports/www/smb2www Info: ** No Description Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: www B-deps: R-deps: apache-1.3.27_4 cups-base-1.1.18.0_4 expat-1.95.6_1 jpeg-6b_1 p5-MIME-Ba se64-2.16 png-1.2.5_2 samba-2.2.7a tiff-3.5.7 Not much help there! H, maybe something is buggared on your end? I don't know what you mean with the word buggared but whatever it is, this system is one of a lot of FreeBSD mashines showing the same result after having done cvsup of the ports tree. It started a few weeks ago, when the pkg-message file disappeared from the ports directories. Any connection? Here are my results for the above searches [net-mgmt]:[/usr/ports]:make search key=xsmbrowser Port: xsmbrowser-3.3.0 Path: /usr/ports/net/xsmbrowser Info: Tcl/Tk port of Windows' Network Neighborhood Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: net B-deps: R-deps: XFree86-libraries-4.2.1_6 cups-base-1.1.18.0_4 expect-5.38.0_1 freetype2-2.1.3_1 imake-4.2.0_1 jpeg-6b_1 png-1.2.5_1 samba-2.2.7a tcl-8.3.5 tiff-3.5.7 tk-8.3.5 [net-mgmt]:[/usr/ports]:make search key=smb2www Port: smb2www-0.0.980804_1 Path: /usr/ports/www/smb2www Info: Windows Network client that is accessible through a web browser Maint: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: www B-deps: R-deps: apache-1.3.27_1 cups-base-1.1.18.0_4 jpeg-6b_1 p5-MIME-Base64-2.16 png-1.2.5_1 samba-2.2.7a tiff-3.5.7 Maybe try refreshing your ports tree? greg -- Gunnar Flygt OPC Data Sveriges Radio ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading sequence to 4.x from 3.3-R
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:19:41AM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Dear colleagues, What is the correct way to upgrade FreeBSD from 3.3-R to 4.x? Wow ... that's a bit of a leap. I expect you're going to have problems going that far easily. using recommended (extended a bit) make -DNOCLEAN -DNOPERL -DNOPROFILE -DNOGAMES -DNOMAN buildworld I got === doc c++ -O -pipe -I/ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/lib -I/ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf -c /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc:80: warning: `catch', `throw', and `try' are all C++ reserved words /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc: In function `void operator delete(void *)': /ar/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/src/new.cc:82: declaration of `operator delete(void *)' throws different exceptions... internal:82: ...from previous declaration here *** Error code 1 Currently I simply exclude gperf from bootstrap-tools from Makefile.inc, but it seems a bit hackish... I'm no expert on the source tree, but I would think that you might have an easier time of it if you backup up the system and reinstalled. If that seems terribly impractical, you might do better by stepping it. For example: 1) First upgrade to 3-STABLE. 2) Then upgrade to an early 4.x, such as 4.2-RELEASE 3) Then upgrade to 4-STABLE I do think you're going to have problems if you attempt the upgrade without upgrading perl as well. perl is used in many parts of the system in 4.x, if you don't upgrade it, you may not even be able to build 4.x, and if it does build and install, you may find many utilities don't work. Wouldn't it be easier to do a binary upgrade? -- Gunnar Flygt, SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt-
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:17:43AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 10:22, Fred Clift wrote: On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: As for non-i386 -Server: I have an almost finished set of diffs for ia64 to build and See the alpha list for patches I posted today to make -Server build for alpha - these are not 'ports ready' patches, but are against the stock source... Okay, I added that to the port. Could you try the updated ports? Also, anyone else who's listening, the ports need much more widespread testing in order for it to make it into 4.8-RELEASE. Is it OK to present result directly to you or should it be to STABLE? The current diffs are at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
A small annoyance
Since the latest update to OpenSSH there is a small thing that has appeared on my machines (STABLE as of 30 Jun) When I run scp from a box (it can be of any brand of OpenSSH) I get two lines saying: tput: tgetent failure: No such file or directory tput: tgetent failure: No such file or directory The copy goes fine, but what does this mean? -- Gunnar Flygt, Swedish Broadcasting corp. email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: A small annoyance
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:02:40PM -0500, Scott G. Akmentins-Taylor wrote: Since the latest update to OpenSSH there is a small thing that has appeared on my machines (STABLE as of 30 Jun) When I run scp from a box (it can be of any brand of OpenSSH) I get two lines saying: tput: tgetent failure: No such file or directory tput: tgetent failure: No such file or directory The copy goes fine, but what does this mean? Hi. The errors are a result of something in your .profile or .cshrc that is trying to modify the stdout as a tty device. stty is the usual cause of this. Your particular error messages indicate that some program being executed at the remote shell's startup of .profile or .cshrc (or via them) is trying to perform a tgetent() call upon the stdin or stdout, but since those won't be a tty(4) type path, the calls fail. Check your .profile or .cshrc and ensure that you're not attempting to modify the stdin/out via stty(1). If you have such code in there, use conditionals to only perform them when an interactive login is detected. Thanks! The tput thing came from a central bashrc, I installed a couple of weeks ago. I'll remove the stty thing in it. I hope this helps. -scott -- Scott G. Akmentins-Taylor InterNet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cray Inc, Minneapolis, MN - USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] SV2/UNICOS Distribution Engineering - Labak miris neka sarkans - Vienoti Latvijai! - -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: unable to alias more than 1 ip address in a subnet
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:11:47PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 12:14:20PM -0400, Michael Meltzer wrote: I know this might have come up, but is their any reason that the netmask on a alias would not be 255.255.255.255. ? Its very unintuitive right now. To the point of sentencing many to frustration. I would subject a message from ifconfig with -alias netmask !255.255.255.255 Warning: for an -alias most likely your netmask should be 255.255.255.255, see ifconfig(8), use -s to turn warning off. for instance, ifconfig(8) doesn't say anything about netmasking .255 for aliases. bash-2.05a$ uname -r 4.6-STABLE bash-2.05a$ man 8 ifconfig alias Establish an additional network address for this interface. This is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one wishes to accept packets addressed to the old interface. If the address is on the same subnet as the first network address for this interface, a non-conflicting netmask must be given. Usually 0x is most appropriate. i.e. Same here as in 4.3-STABLE in fact, I'm just noticing that .0 works 'til a few week (month?), but not anymore. so, the machine hung whenever I try to start netscape w/o touching anything. until yesterday, I guessed it was the fault to netscape (-linux) or linux_base while in fact, it's something else. in other words, this is anoying a lot. PS : could someone try netscape-linux (4.79) w/ a proxy to a wrong IP addr to see if the machine also hang ? Cyrille. -- Cyrille Lefevre mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Using ISO8859 and perl
When I start pkg_version I get the following startinfo: perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = sv_SE.ISO8859-1, LANG = sv_SE.ISO8859-1 are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). How can I make perl aware of local language settings. Maybe not a stable question, but since it's the only list I'm connected to :) But of course the system is -STABLE -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
ISO_8859-15 and Swedish Characters
If I define 8859-15 instead of 8859-1 to get Euro symbol, I loose the swedish characters Aring, Aumlaut and Oumlaut This happens for both console and xterms! -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: RE: cvsup-16-f issue
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:44PM +0100, Thomas Gravgaard wrote: I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly reasonable to *want* to run cvsup on a system that doesn't have X11. And presumably it'd also save a few bytes on the ISO. IMHO it would make sense to require WITH_X11 instead of WITHOUT_X11 in the Makefile because the default behaviour would run on systems with an without X11. Since I only run boxes without X11 it would conveniently make my life easier too But thats another story :) And to add to that, if I install a new system, the first thing I would like to do on it, is to run cvsup on both /usr/src and /usr/ports before I install anything more (include X). +-+ | Thomas Gravgaard | The Scarlet Pimpernel is the most (__) | | Software developer | overrated human being since Judas \\\'',) | | Infopaq ApS| Iscariot won the AD 31 best disciple\/ \ ^| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | competition. Black Adder .\._/_)| +-+ |FC København. Danske mestre 2000/2001! | +-+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Downgrading source
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 11:35:48AM +, Dominic Marks wrote: On Saturday 29 December 2001 11:24 am, Gunnar Flygt wrote: I have a machine that run 4.2-RELEASE. This one is also the webserver where I keep access to the latest documentation (i.e. FreeBSD) I've been lazy and always run make update from the /usr/src directory, when updating the /usr/doc sources. The tag for cvsup is RELENG_4, so the sources are stable. To upgrade the machine I want to `make buildworld` with 4.3 first and then to 4.4. Okay. Any particular reason? Just don't want to break something by taking a too big step. Is it safe to just change the tag for cvsup to the 4.3-RELEASE branch or should i delete the sources first? CVSup will deal with it for you. -- Dominic -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: png-port-upgrade gave med defunct kde
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:05:23AM +0700, Anto Prijosoesilo wrote: Upgraded png from 1.0.12 to 1.2.0 That was a catastrophy for kde! No more icons at all! Anyone else seen this? Fix? kde is 2.2.1 Recompile qt. I had the same problem and that's the only port I recompiled to get my KDE back. After having deinstalled, recompiled the whole stuff I realize that THAT was the proper fix, so I recompiled qt also. Now everything is running again. 3 days (and many compiling hours) later :) I saved the +REQUIRED_BY file from /var/db/pkg/qt-2.3.1 before doing make deinstall reinstall and restored that file back after the reinstall. Cheers, Anto. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Why does installing X require the compat3x and compat4x dists
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:35:14PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 12:14:49PM -0400, Jeff Lee wrote: | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | I've never understood that either, but I assumed that someone had a | good reason for it. Why is XFree86 3.3.6 installed by default | instead of 4.X? I *believe* for two reasons: When 4.x came out, it was considered less secure. 4.x didn't support as many chipsets as 3.x, so for maximum useability, they just go with 3.x. I've tried getting 4.x to work on my machine and it doesn't. I'll try again when I can install from CD, or at least install the latest port, which might work better. I've ran 4.x since 4.0.1 came out. On 7 different boxes including one laptop. No problems, except for the config utility xf86cfg that have worked on only one of the machines. -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Building x11/gnome from ports
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:15:40PM -0400, Erik Gault wrote: i was able to get it to build a few weeks ago by independently building the guile-gnome package and then installing x11/gnome. i may have done some other minor fiddling, i can't remember exactly, but i was able to get it to build. sorry i don't have more detailed information... erik While trying to install x11/gnome from the ports tree, one of its runtime dependancies is x11-toolkits/guile-gnome which fails to build. It dies with the following: - === Building for guile-gnome-0.20_3 make all-recursive Making all in guile-gnome Making all in zvt Making all in bonobo Making all in gtkhtml guile -l ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm -s ./../../guile-gtk/build-guile-gtk -I ../../guile-gtk glue ./gtkhtml.defs .tmpg mv .tmpg gtkhtml-glue.c ERROR: In procedure open-file: ERROR: No such file or directory: ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/guile-gnome/work/gnome-guile-0.20/guile-gno me/gtkhtml. I compiled gnome this night. It stopped at the same place. I went to that directory, did `make clean` `make` and everything was OK again. Gnome installed full way. *** Error code 1 - There is still an open PR ports/29463 but thats a compilation problem. This seems to be parsing a file called ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm which doesn't exist, ../../guile-gtk/gtk/config.scm.in exists though and if you try to use it, errors, ERROR: Unbound variable: @USING_LTDL_SCM@ appear. Any ideas? The ports tree is cvsupped off RELEASE_4_4_0 yesterday. TIA, Jarrod Sayers Information Technologist School of Communication, Information and New Media University of South Australia, Magill Campus. Phone: +61 8 83024045 Fax: +61 8 83024745 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Thanks to the documentation project
This has nothing to do with stable, but since this is the only list I subscribe to, I want to THANK the guys (and girls?) making the documentation nowadays. It's really great work done! -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Problems with building kernel in 4.3-STABLE cvsuped 15 min ago
Is anyone having trouble building GENERIC as of today? It stops when trying to build module ipfilter. Looks like this: === ip6fw cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DIPV6FIREWALL -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnest ed-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -W cast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../ include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/ip6fw/../../netine t6/ip6_fw.c ld -r -o ip6fw.kld ip6_fw.o gensetdefs ip6fw.kld cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DIPV6FIREWALL -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnest ed-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -W cast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../ include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c setdef0.c cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DIPV6FIREWALL -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnest ed-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -W cast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I. -I@ -I@/../ include -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -c setdef1.c ld -Bshareable -o ip6fw.ko setdef0.o ip6fw.kld setdef1.o === ipfilter make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../netinet/mlfk_ip l.c. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. It seems there is no mlfk_ipl.c in the directory desired. -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Re: Problems with building kernel in 4.3-STABLE cvsuped 15 min ago
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:30:36AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Check that you have this: $FreeBSD: src/sys/modules/ipfilter/Makefile,v 1.2.2.2 2001/06/07 05:11:44 jlemon Exp $ Geee, real quick answer there! :) This is what I've got: 2$ less /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/Makefile # $FreeBSD: src/sys/modules/ipfilter/Makefile,v 1.2.2.2 2001/06/07 05:11:44 jlem on Exp $ So it seems OK. I found the file under src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet instead. Did a dirty solution and linked it to the directory wanted in the Makefile. Will it work? On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:28:08AM +0200, Gunnar Flygt wrote: Is anyone having trouble building GENERIC as of today? It stops when trying to build module ipfilter. Looks like this: === ipfilter make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../netinet/mlfk_ip l.c. Stop *** Error code 2 -- Ruslan ErmilovOracle Developer/DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED]FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.orgThe Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Upgrading from 3.4-RELEASE to 3.5-STABLE
Is it painless to do this upgrade? The UPDATING file is very small and contains almost nothing. I've gotten so used to the `make build/installkernel` in 4.1-STABLE. This is not implemented in the 3-branch, or? -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) o _ _ _ _o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_) _ \_ _(_) (_)/_\_| \ _|/' \/ (_)(_) (_)(_) (_)(_)' _\o_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: agp_if.c
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 03:00:46PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 12:37:28PM +0200, Gunnar Flygt wrote: On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 10:49:24AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 10:44:45AM +0400, Dmitry Malov wrote: Hello, just cvsuped FreeBSD-4.x-STABLE and I've got make: don't know how to make agp_if.c. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 during make depend using the kernel config from 4.0 which worked for me fine before. Anyone has an idea what's the problem? It is the third time I receive such report. Well, here is the checklist: 1. Make sure that src/sys/conf/files is of version 1.340.2.13 or above 2. Make sure that you have src/sys/pci/agp_if.m 3. Please check whether generated src/sys/compile/KERNEL/Makefile has a rule for agp_if.c like this: agp_if.c: $S/kern/makedevops.pl $S/pci/agp_if.m perl5 $S/kern/makedevops.pl -c $S/pci/agp_if.m Done this, and the error is not the same but almost. Now the error looks like this: . . . . === splash === splash/bmp === splash/pcx === streams === svr4 === vesa === wi === accf_data === accf_http === agp make: don't know how to make agp_if.c. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/PLUTO. And then nothing more! You should use the buildkernel/installkernel targets as described in src/UPDATING file. The problem is that your bsd.kmod.mk is out of sync with Makefiles. OK! I tried that and it did compile while using: make buildkernel kernel=PLUTO but the `make installkernell` didn't work I saw some error message saying something about making: make kernel=PLUTO install so I did that and a lot of things happend, but no kernel was install. I then tried changing to /sys/compile/PLUTO and run `make depend make` on that thing. It worked and I did a `make install` from there. rebooted, ran make installworld and mergemaster, and everything seems to hav gone the right way. Maybe you can tell me why it worked this strange way? Before that I also tried just a `make bildkernel` which tries to make GENERIC as you know, but this failed on this machine but worked on my laptop?! As I almost said, strange things happen :) Up and running 4.1-STABLE on both machines now. -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) o _ _ _ _o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_) _ \_ _(_) (_)/_\_| \ _|/' \/ (_)(_) (_)(_) (_)(_)' _\o_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: SSH failed on 4.0-S
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 02:05:49PM +0200, Alessandro de Manzano wrote: On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:54:52 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: If you upgrade with the /usr/ports/security/rsaintl library, that argh! I have not that port! :-? I've only security/rsaref It is avtually named librsaref, but it doesn't compile! This is what I got: === Extracting for librsaintl-1.1 Checksum OK for librsaintl/rsa_eay.c. Checksum OK for librsaintl/rsa_err.c. Checksum OK for librsaintl/rsa_intlstubs.c. Checksum OK for librsaintl/cryptlib.h. === Patching for librsaintl-1.1 === Configuring for librsaintl-1.1 === Building for librsaintl-1.1 Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/ports/security/librsain tl/work cc -O -pipe -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_IDEA -DL_ENDIAN -DDEVRANDOM=\"/dev/uran dom\" -c rsa_err.c -o rsa_err.o rsa_err.c:77: `RSA_F_RSA_NULL' undeclared here (not in a function) rsa_err.c:77: initializer element is not constant rsa_err.c:77: (near initialization for `RSA_str_functs[8].error') rsa_err.c:115: `RSA_R_INVALID_MESSAGE_LENGTH' undeclared here (not in a function ) rsa_err.c:115: initializer element is not constant rsa_err.c:115: (near initialization for `RSA_str_reasons[16].error') rsa_err.c:124: `RSA_R_RSA_OPERATIONS_NOT_SUPPORTED' undeclared here (not in a fu nction) rsa_err.c:124: initializer element is not constant rsa_err.c:124: (near initialization for `RSA_str_reasons[25].error') *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/librsaintl/work. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/librsaintl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/librsaintl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/librsaintl. su-2.03# And then it stops there! note: just in case, in /etc/make.conf I _do_ have USA_RESIDENT=NO , so why I have not "supped" rsaintl ? tnx! Alessandro de Manzano Playstos - TIMA S.p.A. Corso Sempione 63 20149 Milano, Italy tel.: +39-023314153 fax: +39-02315678 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.playstos.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Problems with libtool
Am I the only one having problem with the port /usr/ports/devele/libtool? It was some application that needed libtool-1.3.4 Since then no port needing libtool works anymore, The old one I had was 1.3.3 Now all apps that I try to make as "imlib", "gdbm" and so on claims that libtool is of a too old version to be accepted. If I run libtool --version I get the right 1.3.4 Anyone had dimilar problems? And anyone. How do I back it out to 1.3.3, since the new port is for 1.3.4 -- __o regards, Gunnar ---_ \,_ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_)/ (_) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
