Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-29 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 06:58:51PM -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
 In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this
 will be MFC'd to 7.x.  This query has been studiously ignored as other
 chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.
 
 So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract us,
 when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?

I can't give you the date yet, simply because its too early to judge how
stable the new ZFS is. The amount of code changes is really huge.
The ZFS functionality is also huge (which is good for the users, not so
good for me) and I'm simply unable to test entire thing. While I was
working on ZFSv13 port I started working on regression tests as well
(you can find some in tools/regression/zfs/) so I could have more
automated testing. Eventhough I implemented 2850 tests, it not even
covers entire zpool(8) functionality.

All in all. People are using ZFS in production, but not only them won't
be happy to lose their data, so I'm not going to MFC ZFS until I'm
convinced the new one is at least not worse than the old one. To speed
up this process everyone is very welcome to try ZFS on HEAD and report
results (both bad and good).

The current plan is to have new ZFS in 7.2. For this to happen, some
other changes have to be MFCed too, like *at() syscalls, etc.

I hope this helps to understand what's going on.

-- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek   http://www.wheel.pl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!


pgpsEI5ugytRN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-28 Thread Lorenzo Perone


On 22.11.2008, at 00:58, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:

In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when  
this

will be MFC'd to 7.x.  This query has been studiously ignored as other
chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.

So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to  
distract us,

when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?


While I'd seconded update info a month ago, I think it is no more
inappropriate. Work is actively ongoing (if you follow -current)
and now it's time to take out that old (or new) box and help
debugging all possible scenarios on CURRENT before crying after
the next kmap_too_small or panic. If I understand correctly,
the issues arising with large de/allocations of memory in
kernel space is a tricky buisiness which needs careful and
thorough testing, tuning and thinking...
Afaik, even solaris hasn't ironed out all the potential problems,
e.g. if you read this article and the linked bugdatabase entries...:
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Limiting_the_ARC_Cache

So let's really rather help (if possible) with
a -current install, or at least not take time with
tedious requests :)

Sincere regards to PJD and the whole development
core team, as FreeBSD is really keeping up with the
fast tech hype - but with style.


Lorenzo


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
2008/11/21 Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Once no new bugs appear any more, and old one are fixed.


 That's a pretty cop-out answer.  Considering the the version of ZFS in 7.x
 has significant issues and the ZFS patches havn't shown any propensity to
 affect non-ZFS systems when ZFS is not running or loaded, the benefit of
 importing the new code seems to outweigh any caution you might feel.  I can
 understand an answer such as not in 7.1, but immediately after ... given
 the standards we apply to release branches ... but a vague when no bugs
 seem to appear applies much less to a system like ZFS (still in flux) than,
 say, the new USB stack.

Pawel will probably not say no to any offers of help by people who
would like to help port and maintain the FreeBSD-7 ZFS support.




Adrian
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-28 Thread Kris Kennaway

Andrew Snow wrote:


The problem appears to be that the latest ZFS commit in 8-CURRENT relies 
on too many other new features that aren't in 7.1.


After 7.1 is released, then perhaps ZFS and the other new code it 
requires can be moved into 7-STABLE?


That is certainly the intention, but I trust that everyone will 
appreciate the need to watch and wait before dumping an enormous and 
potentially risky filesystem change into the laps of all 7-STABLE users.


Kris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-28 Thread Kris Kennaway

Wes Morgan wrote:

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dillon Kass wrote:

I'm very excited and can't wait! I have this clone I need to promote 
but I'm encountering this bug

http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6738349

Hopefully it gets mfc before the diff between the real fs and the 
clone becomes so large that my pool fills up :-)

I should have a few months before that happens though.


Is it possible you could boot a -current system and promote the clone 
without upgrading your pools/filesystems, then reboot to -stable?


The promotion is not backwards compatible.

Kris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-25 Thread Dillon Kass
I'm very excited and can't wait! I have this clone I need to promote but 
I'm encountering this bug

http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6738349

Hopefully it gets mfc before the diff between the real fs and the clone 
becomes so large that my pool fills up :-)

I should have a few months before that happens though.

On 11/24/08 6:21 PM, Andrew Snow wrote:


The problem appears to be that the latest ZFS commit in 8-CURRENT 
relies on too many other new features that aren't in 7.1.


After 7.1 is released, then perhaps ZFS and the other new code it 
requires can be moved into 7-STABLE?


- Andrew

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-25 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Dillon Kass wrote:
 I'm very excited and can't wait! I have this clone I need to promote but
 I'm encountering this bug
 http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6738349
 
 Hopefully it gets mfc before the diff between the real fs and the clone
 becomes so large that my pool fills up :-)
 I should have a few months before that happens though.

As 8-CURRENT got ZFS version 13 with the last commit and this bug was
fixed in opensolaris snv_98 which introduced ZFS version 13, chances are
high that this bug is already solved in FreeBSD.

Or are you already using 8-CURRENT?

See http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/version/13/

greetings,
philipp

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-25 Thread Wes Morgan

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dillon Kass wrote:

I'm very excited and can't wait! I have this clone I need to promote but I'm 
encountering this bug

http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6738349

Hopefully it gets mfc before the diff between the real fs and the clone 
becomes so large that my pool fills up :-)

I should have a few months before that happens though.


Is it possible you could boot a -current system and promote the clone 
without upgrading your pools/filesystems, then reboot to -stable?





On 11/24/08 6:21 PM, Andrew Snow wrote:


The problem appears to be that the latest ZFS commit in 8-CURRENT relies on 
too many other new features that aren't in 7.1.


After 7.1 is released, then perhaps ZFS and the other new code it requires 
can be moved into 7-STABLE?


- Andrew

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-24 Thread Robert Watson

On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:

In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this 
will be MFC'd to 7.x.  This query has been studiously ignored as other 
chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.


Presumably the MFC schedule is largely up to Pawel, who did the work. 
However, Pawel was on travel last weekend and week attending MeetBSD and the 
FreeBSD developer summit in the bay area, and hasn't been seen on stable@ 
since the 17th.  I think it's likely not so much that anyone is being 
studiously ignored, it's that the person who can best answer he question 
hasn't been keeping up with the list for a bit.


Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge



So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract us,
when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-24 Thread Andrew Snow


The problem appears to be that the latest ZFS commit in 8-CURRENT relies 
on too many other new features that aren't in 7.1.


After 7.1 is released, then perhaps ZFS and the other new code it 
requires can be moved into 7-STABLE?


- Andrew

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-22 Thread Ruben van Staveren

Hi,

On 22 Nov 2008, at 1:20, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:

That's a pretty cop-out answer.  Considering the the version of ZFS  
in 7.x
has significant issues and the ZFS patches havn't shown any  
propensity to
affect non-ZFS systems when ZFS is not running or loaded, the  
benefit of


Please, give them some time zfs v13 has just ended up in -current  
after a long time and hard workmanship. I think everyone likes to see  
it up in RELENG_7 someday, but until that happens I'll be just  
patient. It definitely needs the time to settle before people can even  
think about mfc'ing it, which is not a trivial task either.


Regards,
Ruben



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-21 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 11/22/08, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this
 will be MFC'd to 7.x.  This query has been studiously ignored as other
 chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.

 So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract us,
 when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?

Once no new bugs appear any more, and old one are fixed.

-- 
Paul
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MFC ZFS: when?

2008-11-21 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Paul B. Mahol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 11/22/08, Zaphod Beeblebrox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  In several of the recent ZFS posts, multiple people have asked when this
  will be MFC'd to 7.x.  This query has been studiously ignored as other
  chatter about whatever ZFS issue is discussed.
 
  So in a post with no other bug report or discussion content to distract
 us,
  when is it intended that ZFS be MFC'd to 7.x?

 Once no new bugs appear any more, and old one are fixed.


That's a pretty cop-out answer.  Considering the the version of ZFS in 7.x
has significant issues and the ZFS patches havn't shown any propensity to
affect non-ZFS systems when ZFS is not running or loaded, the benefit of
importing the new code seems to outweigh any caution you might feel.  I can
understand an answer such as not in 7.1, but immediately after ... given
the standards we apply to release branches ... but a vague when no bugs
seem to appear applies much less to a system like ZFS (still in flux) than,
say, the new USB stack.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]