Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> I normally run the command >> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< >> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This >> time I got the following output: >> >> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has >> 1.5.0.07.00) >> >> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. > Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is > "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's > just plain bogus. > So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? >>> I don't know. How did you install it? >> # pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00.tbz > > It definitly installs correctly if you use the port instead of the > package. It looks like the package is incorrect. > Yes, that fixed it. So I guess the FreeBSD foundation is at fault. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I normally run the command > # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This > time I got the following output: > > diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has > 1.5.0.07.00) > > It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. > >>> Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is > >>> "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's > >>> just plain bogus. > >>> > >> So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? > > > > I don't know. How did you install it? > > # pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00.tbz It definitly installs correctly if you use the port instead of the package. It looks like the package is incorrect. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 pgpTC8REfeBKs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has 1.5.0.07.00) It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. >>> Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is >>> "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's >>> just plain bogus. >>> >> So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? > > I don't know. How did you install it? > # pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00.tbz ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> I normally run the command > >> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > >> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time > >> I got the following output: > >> > >> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has > >> 1.5.0.07.00) > >> > >> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. > > > > Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is > > "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's > > just plain bogus. > > > So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? I don't know. How did you install it? -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 pgpco8gCRUOhB.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> I normally run the command >> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< >> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I >> got the following output: >> >> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has >> 1.5.0.07.00) >> >> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. > > Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is > "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's > just plain bogus. > > -- Brooks > So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I normally run the command > # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I > got the following output: > > diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has > 1.5.0.07.00) > > It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's just plain bogus. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 pgpGOC8Lt7rr1.pgp Description: PGP signature
pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name
I normally run the command # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I got the following output: diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has 1.5.0.07.00) It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
