Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?
Hi! I see the same: uname says: 10.1p10 What does the following say when run from your source directory: grep BRANCH sys/conf/newvers.sh BRANCH=RELEASE-p11 -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?
On 06/10/15 12:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. Yes, but normally, freebsd-update provides me with an updated kernel. The update provides (among other stuff): /boot/kernel/zfs.ko /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols /lib/libzpool.so.2 so it does not touch the value uname reports until a new kernel is built. It's surprising, but I can live with that. It's always been like this with binary updates AFAIK. The kernel binary gets updated only if needed. There is the freebsd-version(1) command to get information about the userland version, which should always be equal or bigger than the kernel version. -- Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?
You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. On 10/06/2015 11:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I see the same: uname says: 10.1p10 What does the following say when run from your source directory: grep BRANCH sys/conf/newvers.sh BRANCH=RELEASE-p11 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?
Hi! You kernel hasn't been rebuilt then. Yes, but normally, freebsd-update provides me with an updated kernel. The update provides (among other stuff): /boot/kernel/zfs.ko /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols /lib/libzpool.so.2 so it does not touch the value uname reports until a new kernel is built. It's surprising, but I can live with that. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?
What does the following say when run from your source directory: grep BRANCH sys/conf/newvers.sh Regards Steve On 10/06/2015 10:20, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Also # uname -a FreeBSD pingpongdb 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # uptime 2:18am up 36 mins, 4 users, load averages: 0,08 0,14 0,10 # ls -lrt /boot/kernel/kernel /boot/kernel/*zfs* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 21160449 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/kernel -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2320144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19103144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols # strings /boot/kernel/kernel|grep 10.1-RELEASE @(#)FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 10.1-RELEASE-p10 It seems to me the verions numbering is not correct, but the patch *is* there, it should be 10.1-p11, right? 10 jun 2015 kl. 11:01 skrev Palle Girgensohn gir...@freebsd.org: Hi, It seems the patch level in the UPDATING document is bad in releng/10.1, it is p29 which is the patch level for 8.4? Palle r284193 | delphij | 2015-06-10 00:13:25 +0200 (Ons, 10 Jun 2015) | 8 lines Update base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial of service issues. [EN-15:06] Improve reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. [EN-15:07] Approved by:so But the UPDATING says: 20150609: p29 FreeBSD-EN-15:06.file FreeBSD-EN-15:07.zfs Updated base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial of service issues. [EN-15:06] Improved reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. [EN-15:07] 20150513: p10 FreeBSD-EN-15:04.freebsd-update FreeBSD-EN-15:05.ufs Fix bug with freebsd-update(8) that does not ensure the previous upgrade was completed. [EN-15:04] Fix deadlock on reboot with UFS tuned with SU+J. [EN-15:05] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?
Also # uname -a FreeBSD pingpongdb 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # uptime 2:18am up 36 mins, 4 users, load averages: 0,08 0,14 0,10 # ls -lrt /boot/kernel/kernel /boot/kernel/*zfs* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 21160449 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/kernel -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2320144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19103144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols # strings /boot/kernel/kernel|grep 10.1-RELEASE @(#)FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 10.1-RELEASE-p10 It seems to me the verions numbering is not correct, but the patch *is* there, it should be 10.1-p11, right? 10 jun 2015 kl. 11:01 skrev Palle Girgensohn gir...@freebsd.org: Hi, It seems the patch level in the UPDATING document is bad in releng/10.1, it is p29 which is the patch level for 8.4? Palle r284193 | delphij | 2015-06-10 00:13:25 +0200 (Ons, 10 Jun 2015) | 8 lines Update base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial of service issues. [EN-15:06] Improve reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. [EN-15:07] Approved by:so But the UPDATING says: 20150609: p29 FreeBSD-EN-15:06.file FreeBSD-EN-15:07.zfs Updated base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial of service issues. [EN-15:06] Improved reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. [EN-15:07] 20150513: p10 FreeBSD-EN-15:04.freebsd-update FreeBSD-EN-15:05.ufs Fix bug with freebsd-update(8) that does not ensure the previous upgrade was completed. [EN-15:04] Fix deadlock on reboot with UFS tuned with SU+J. [EN-15:05] signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: wrong patch number in releng/10.1?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/10/15 02:20, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Also # uname -a FreeBSD pingpongdb 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # uptime 2:18am up 36 mins, 4 users, load averages: 0,08 0,14 0,10 # ls -lrt /boot/kernel/kernel /boot/kernel/*zfs* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 21160449 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/kernel -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2320144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19103144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols # strings /boot/kernel/kernel|grep 10.1-RELEASE @(#)FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 10.1-RELEASE-p10 It seems to me the verions numbering is not correct, but the patch *is* there, it should be 10.1-p11, right? Assuming you are using freebsd-update, kernel version is only updated when there is actual change in the kernel *itself*. In this case we have made a few changes to ZFS but that only affected the module, so kernel version is not changed. This is expected behavior . The canonical way of determining system version is 'freebsd-version - -ku' for 10.0 onwards. Hope this helps. Cheers, 10 jun 2015 kl. 11:01 skrev Palle Girgensohn gir...@freebsd.org: Hi, It seems the patch level in the UPDATING document is bad in releng/10.1, it is p29 which is the patch level for 8.4? Palle - - --- r284193 | delphij | 2015-06-10 00:13:25 +0200 (Ons, 10 Jun 2015) | 8 lin es Update base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial of service issues. [EN-15:06] Improve reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. [EN-15:07] Approved by:so - - --- But the UPDATING says: 20150609: p29 FreeBSD-EN-15:06.file FreeBSD-EN-15:07.zfs Updated base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial of service issues. [EN-15:06] Improved reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. [EN-15:07] 20150513: p10 FreeBSD-EN-15:04.freebsd-update FreeBSD-EN-15:05.ufs Fix bug with freebsd-update(8) that does not ensure the previous upgrade was completed. [EN-15:04] Fix deadlock on reboot with UFS tuned with SU+J. [EN-15:05] - -- Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttps://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.1.4 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVeIT1AAoJEJW2GBstM+nswC0QAJM5I6A52Lp9vAbMJTwauHGn z8wKzR+P4CyNDgWCpBpyPO+CsRRZgpBEYVTIuj61cTgoK5r2PLoUIGpEwfGX+1L8 izTd25MitSi721+Toy5dFe/ndBb4D7dz8+naFp59TmJtO7ZuLNRCxYLPoou4bcOg ZeX4af7alcEl93ADBE0T8gNDkcFmwxSNcciYxtMiad33TjqWkekNRN78ndpRi/5h raAt9UD6//iT7V+/w7PcdwvXugUgoQMxdaivXA4SV1xXX2MlnaDAU67nrWlPhXDM YbhS11SP1gptNWDlIz016oOblu4AV3dUIbPVjWbJ6KnLEiHg0KVn/PlsBpJ0wIcl WseRSdCNeqMTE7ik1qjfiEzE/Y6A/BTVVQsL5jQ4idRPfRyKGtG9vHxtfyV8itls kKCibaWVaBtUidRQHIyxpSHvSRp614iK3SO0ZR+yecDN0lUZvxCraYXgEXo+Ov4O YQ3/nBTReBFYRtF7PEnk6qtcbJ3UL2EgwOFMkODbkvACdFK/XxByMW4f3H5A4TFm nzDKXb+fmrtmf5e0XE6kZgOEFKBFZmLt4QbnPrAoa7WO/Eu43HE7/skYWNpJVLoz 3lZ16XTK39UKUA+/sniiHRW8m9SFxXv1E9GsLl/xO1HQDXuhiYN1nPkEx/PXYUjp GRGXVDw84qS1kbYHifzu =DXmN -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
