RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff clearly lives elsewhere. Ok I'll do that. Here is new version of split 6 with new files and new function renamed. Cedric pan2.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 19:09 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: U1 stand for unit 1. As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within iwn_vap_create. As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when standard run will be ok. Right. But what's going on, per se? Is it two separate NICs that show up as separate PCI devices? Or is this a hack so the firmware can present two virtual NICs via the firmware API? Not a separate PCI device but yes ability to create 2 wlan NIC : iwn0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 2290 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:56 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng status: associated wlan0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:56 inet 192.168.1.20 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet MCS mode 11ng status: associated ssid WLenine channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) bssid 00:24:d4:97:80:20 country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit txpower 15 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode CTS ampdulimit 64k -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme roaming MANUAL bintval 96 wlan1: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:57 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) status: no carrier ssid channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 15 bmiss 10 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode CTS ampdulimit 8k -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme bintval 0 ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
On 12 August 2013 10:41, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: But again, as current version is not stable in normal operation, I haven't test it further. What could be interest of this ? Wifi relay, bridge or whatever usage of 2 wireless but only with 1 card. It's likely for STA on one VAP and P2P-GO on the other VAP. -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it up once the rest of this work is debugged. I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff clearly lives elsewhere. I wonder which NICs support PAN - ie, how I would even begin going about testing it out. Unfortunately our net80211 stack doesn't yet have P2P support - it would be nice if someone wrote up the basic infrastructure for that. Anyway. I'll test this out on the iwn(4) NICs I now have and I'll get back to you with any regressions that my light testing finds. As always, thanks! -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
-Message d'origine- De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 20:25 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it up once the rest of this work is debugged. I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff clearly lives elsewhere. Ok I'll do that. I wonder which NICs support PAN - ie, how I would even begin going about testing it out. Unfortunately our net80211 stack doesn't yet have P2P support - it would be nice if someone wrote up the basic infrastructure for that. PAN support is found within firmware: IWN_FW_TLV_PAN Anyway. I'll test this out on the iwn(4) NICs I now have and I'll get back to you with any regressions that my light testing finds. As always, thanks! Should be none I guess ;) -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent? -adrian On 11 August 2013 06:09, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello, Here is patch split 6. It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
-Message d'origine- De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 18:34 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent? U1 stand for unit 1. As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within iwn_vap_create. As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when standard run will be ok. -adrian It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: U1 stand for unit 1. As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within iwn_vap_create. As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when standard run will be ok. Right. But what's going on, per se? Is it two separate NICs that show up as separate PCI devices? Or is this a hack so the firmware can present two virtual NICs via the firmware API? -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
