[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4096] Mapimg orientation
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #4096 (project freeciv): Hmm.. closed as WontFix and not a bug. But this is definitely a usability issue (esp. now that minimap shows map correctly oriented). It should not be left to processing power of the viewer's brain to rotate mapimg animation to match the game world they get used to during the play. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?4096 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4077] action enablers + move the Spy unit flag requirement for the spy actions Poison city and Sabotage unit
Follow-up Comment #10, patch #4077 (project freeciv): Update to compile on top of current SVN. (file #18719) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: action_enablers_base.patch Size:28 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?4077 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4098] Rename Xaw's actions.(c|h)
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #4098 (project freeciv): You should change also multiple-inclusion-guard on xaw_actions.h. Thank you. Fixed. (file #18720) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: xawActionsRename.patch Size:1 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?4098 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20886] Fortresses can be used to take over territory within peaceful neighbour's city radius
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #20886 (project freeciv): Attached patch is 100% rule set based. It is primarily intended as a contribution to the discussion. * Transfer of ownership to border owner isn't addressed. (It may be possible to create an effect or requirement vector on the extra to trigger the transfer. Creating that should probably wait until extras have settled down) * The patch will only work on trunk. It adds requirements about the diplomatic relationship between terrain owner and the builder as build requirements of border claiming bases. The patch forbids building terrain claiming bases on the terrain of players you have peace or armistice with. Others are still allowed. I don't have strong feelings about what relations should prevent base building. My reasoning for the requirements I added: Building on the terrain of an ally may be needed to defend him. Cease-fire expires to war so some stealing is expected. Armistice expires to peace so stealing isn't expected. (file #18721) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: banBorderStealingWhenPeace.patch Size:1 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?20886 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #20886] Fortresses can be used to take over territory within peaceful neighbour's city radius
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #20886 (project freeciv): There's also the question if whatever limitations we implement should apply to beginning of the building, finishing of the building, or both. That is: what if diplomatic relation between players change while building is in progress? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?20886 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #4100] Move the war requirement for spy actions to rule set
URL: http://gna.org/patch/?4100 Summary: Move the war requirement for spy actions to rule set Project: Freeciv Submitted by: sveinung Submitted on: Tue 20 Aug 2013 09:11:54 PM GMT Category: None Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Planned Release: ___ Details: Applies on top of patch #4079. Poison city is free of any hard coded diplomatic requirements. Sabotage unit won't work against allied units. Letting rule set authors permit sabotage of allied units could be done with a lot of extra effort. ___ File Attachments: --- Date: Tue 20 Aug 2013 09:11:54 PM GMT Name: spy_actions_diplrel.patch Size: 12kB By: sveinung http://gna.org/patch/download.php?file_id=18723 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?4100 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
