Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-06-01 Thread Stacy Cockrum
I made a few contributions to the wiki and agree to the changes. My 
username is StacyCockrum.



On 6/1/2016 5:00 AM, freedombox-discuss-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org 
wrote:

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th



___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss


Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-06-01 Thread Bob Mottram

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 06:29:51PM +0200, Philippe Baret wrote:

  CONTENT REMOVAL
  Many major contributors to the wiki have already agreed to the relicense
  their contributions during the last progress call and following a blog
  post published on May 23rd[4]. If you are a contributor to the FreedomBox
  wiki and agree to the new license, please reply to this mail on the
  mailing list. If you have concerns or don't wish to relicense your
  contributions, please specify so that we can remove the content if
  necessary.


I think I added the Cubieboard2 page, and might have made other minor
edits. I agree to the new license.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-06-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Philippe Baret]
> Dear Contributors,
>
> As discussed on March 27th and May 22nd[1], the FreedomBox project is
> (re)licensing our wiki content under the Create Commons Attribution
> Share-Alike 4.0 International license[2].
[...]
> If you are a contributor to the FreedomBox wiki and agree to the new
> license, please reply to this mail on the mailing list.

I'm fine with licensing my contributions to the wiki as CC-BY-SA 4.0
International.  My username on the wiki is PetterReinholdtsen.

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss


Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-06-01 Thread Matthias Weiler

On 2016-05-31 18:29, Philippe Baret wrote:

If you are a contributor to the FreedomBox wiki and agree to the new license, 
please reply to this mail on the mailing list.

My username in the Wiki is MatthiasWeiler and I agree to the license change.

Have a good day!

___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss


Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-05-31 Thread Michael
I, Michael Pimmer, hereby agree to relicense my contribution to the
FreedomBox wiki under CC-by-SA 4.0.


On 2016-05-31 18:29, Philippe Baret wrote:
> Dear Contributors,
> 
> As discussed on March 27th and May 22nd[1], the FreedomBox project is
> (re)licensing our wiki content under the Create Commons Attribution
> Share-Alike 4.0 International license[2].
> 
> While a free culture license has always been assumed, Debian wiki, of
> which FreedomBox wiki is a part of as "Pure Blend" project, does not
> have a clear license for all its content[3]. It is up to each page,
> portal or project to choose their license. It has been decided to make
> FreedomBox's wiki content license more explicit.
> 
> This new license applies to manual pages, regular pages for all
> languages and pages containing the FreedomBox portal banner at the
> bottom in the namespaces wiki.debian.org/[local-code]/FreedomBox/ and
> wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/. The project can accept anonymous contributions.
> 
> CONTENT REMOVAL
> Many major contributors to the wiki have already agreed to the relicense
> their contributions during the last progress call and following a blog
> post published on May 23rd[4]. If you are a contributor to the
> FreedomBox wiki and agree to the new license, please reply to this mail
> on the mailing list. If you have concerns or don't wish to relicense
> your contributions, please specify so that we can remove the content if
> necessary.
> 
> SWITCH: JUNE 13rd 
> The license will be changed on June 13rd 2016 (2 weeks from now). The
> new notice will be displayed to FreedomBox wiki footer so that the
> license automatically applies to all pages old and new. Such as "This
> page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 4.0
> International License [link]".
> 
> Links:
> 
> Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox
> 
> 1) https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls
> 
> 2) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
> 
> 3) https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/LicencingTerms
> 
> 4) https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/Blog
> 
> ===
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -- 
> Text: Sunil Mohan Adapa - Editing: Philippe Baret
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
> 


___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss


Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-05-31 Thread Dietmar
Am Dienstag, den 31.05.2016, 18:29 +0200 schrieb Philippe Baret:

> Dear Contributors,
> 
> As discussed on March 27th and May 22nd[1], the FreedomBox project is
> (re)licensing our wiki content under the Create Commons Attribution
> Share-Alike 4.0 International license[2].
> 
> While a free culture license has always been assumed, Debian wiki, of
> which FreedomBox wiki is a part of as "Pure Blend" project, does not
> have a clear license for all its content[3]. It is up to each page,
> portal or project to choose their license. It has been decided to make
> FreedomBox's wiki content license more explicit.
> 
> This new license applies to manual pages, regular pages for all
> languages and pages containing the FreedomBox portal banner at the
> bottom in the namespaces wiki.debian.org/[local-code]/FreedomBox/ and
> wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/. The project can accept anonymous
> contributions.
> 
> CONTENT REMOVAL
> Many major contributors to the wiki have already agreed to the
> relicense their contributions during the last progress call and
> following a blog post published on May 23rd[4]. If you are a
> contributor to the FreedomBox wiki and agree to the new license,
> please reply to this mail on the mailing list. If you have concerns or
> don't wish to relicense your contributions, please specify so that we
> can remove the content if necessary.

I, Dietmar/Drahtseil agree to relicense my contribution to the
FreedomBox wiki under CC-by-SA 4.0

> 
> SWITCH: JUNE 13rd 
> The license will be changed on June 13rd 2016 (2 weeks from now). The
> new notice will be displayed to FreedomBox wiki footer so that the
> license automatically applies to all pages old and new. Such as "This
> page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike
> 4.0 International License [link]".
> 
> Links:
> 
> Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox
> 
> 1) https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/ProgressCalls
> 
> 2) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
> 
> 3) https://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/LicencingTerms
> 
> 4) https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/Blog
> 
> ===
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -- 
> Text: Sunil Mohan Adapa - Editing: Philippe Baret
> 
> 
> ___
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-05-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Sunil Mohan Adapa (2016-05-31 19:21:56)
> On 05/31/2016 10:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> [...]
>> Uhm, I do not like the "applies to all pages old and new" part of 
>> above: Only new pages makes sense: I believe the only possible ways 
>> to change license is for each wiki page either
>>
>>  a) _all_ page authors agree on a license (mojority is not enough)
>>  b) page is removed (and first author of replacement page license 
>> that)
>>
>> The only discussion I can imagine sensibly leading to imposing 
>> license on all _old_ content is a discussion where _all_ copyright 
>> holders were present and _all_ agreed unanimously to relicense.  If 
>> that was the case, I see no need for this kind of announcement, so am 
>> puzzled...
>>
>
> The idea is that we encourage as many people as possible to agree to 
> the new license.  Contacting everyone is not going to be possible, we 
> do our best to reach all contributors.  We remove content from people 
> who object.  I have been advised that this is sufficient.

Described like that the process makes good sense to me.

Summarizing as "applies to all pages old and new" is misleading IMO, as 
that indicates no action needs taking.

I'd instead summarize as "any page not relicensed by DD.MM. will be 
moved to FreedomBox/Attic" or whatever you plan to do with it - to help 
copyright holders a) realize that they do need to actively relicense 
themselves and b) know fate of pages if reading the message too late.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: signature
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-05-31 Thread Sunil Mohan Adapa
On 05/31/2016 10:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
> Uhm, I do not like the "applies to all pages old and new" part of above: 
> Only new pages makes sense: I believe the only possible ways to change 
> license is for each wiki page either
> 
>  a) _all_ page authors agree on a license (mojority is not enough)
>  b) page is removed (and first author of replacement page license that)
> 
> The only discussion I can imagine sensibly leading to imposing license 
> on all _old_ content is a discussion where _all_ copyright holders were 
> present and _all_ agreed unanimously to relicense.  If that was the 
> case, I see no need for this kind of announcement, so am puzzled...
> 

The idea is that we encourage as many people as possible to agree to the
new license.  Contacting everyone is not going to be possible, we do our
best to reach all contributors.  We remove content from people who
object.  I have been advised that this is sufficient.

-- 
Sunil



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Wiki: New CC Licence on June 13th

2016-05-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Philippe Baret (2016-05-31 18:29:51)
> As discussed on March 27th and May 22nd[1], the FreedomBox project is 
> (re)licensing our wiki content under the Create Commons Attribution 
> Share-Alike 4.0 International license[2].
[...]
> The license will be changed on June 13rd 2016 (2 weeks from now). The 
> new notice will be displayed to FreedomBox wiki footer so that the 
> license automatically applies to all pages old and new. Such as "This 
> page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 
> 4.0 International License [link]".

Uhm, I do not like the "applies to all pages old and new" part of above: 
Only new pages makes sense: I believe the only possible ways to change 
license is for each wiki page either

 a) _all_ page authors agree on a license (mojority is not enough)
 b) page is removed (and first author of replacement page license that)

The only discussion I can imagine sensibly leading to imposing license 
on all _old_ content is a discussion where _all_ copyright holders were 
present and _all_ agreed unanimously to relicense.  If that was the 
case, I see no need for this kind of announcement, so am puzzled...


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private


signature.asc
Description: signature
___
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss