Re: [Freedos-user] adding executable file to FreeDOS 1.1 installation image

2012-06-28 Thread Geraldo Netto
Hi All,

So,

i think creating a bootable freedos iso with your files
and then devloading it may solve :P
Have you tried? :P

Kind Regards and Best Wishes,

Geraldo Netto
Non dvcor, dvco = Sapere Aude
São Paulo, Brasil, -3gmt
site: http://exdev.sf.net/

On 26 June 2012 14:55, Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl wrote:
 Op 26-6-2012 19:39, Martin T schreef:
 Geraldo,

 thanks, I'm fine. In case I boot the freedos.iso image with qemu
 -cdrom freedos.iso -boot d -m 128 and try to access any drive other
 than A:\, I get the Invalid drive error:

 @ECHO OFF
 echo Loading EL-TORITO ISO9660 non-emulation driver as FDCD0001
 DEVLOAD ELTORITO.SYS /D:FDCD0001
 echo Assigning driveletter X: to block device FDCD0001
 SHSUCDX /D:FDCD0001,X
 DIR X:

 or:
 echo Loading ISA/PCI IDE/EIDE/ATA/SATA optical drive device driver
 DEVLOAD UIDE.SYS /D:FDCD0001 /N3 /B
 echo Assigning drive X:
 SHSUCDX /D:FDCD0001,X

 --
 Live Security Virtual Conference
 Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
 threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
 will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
 threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] GRUB 2.00 Freedos support

2012-06-28 Thread escape
With release of the GNU GRUB version 2.00, Freedos is now supported
among other boot protocols. Besides technical improvements it is
important to know that Freedos is considered worth the efforts put in
development, not only by subscribers of freedos-* lists, but also by
developers from other projects. Full announce here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2012-06/msg00093.html

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] network printing

2012-06-28 Thread Michael B. Brutman

Hi David,

There are versions of DOS supplied with machines that have a mode 
command that can redirect the printer port.  It might even be a standard 
feature of the mode command.  But it is strictly a port change - instead 
of using the BIOS to send characters to the printer it uses the BIOS to 
send characters to the serial port.

A TSR that hooks the BIOS calls and sends the data elsewhere is 
possible.  There are existing TSRs that capture printer output and write 
it to a file.

Often it's not just a matter of shoving the output to the printer over 
the network.  In that one method discussed here that is exactly what 
happens.  But for a Unix style printer queue that doesn't work at all.



Mike


small rant

We really need more programmers.  I've done my part to create a 
framework for writing TCP/IP and UDP applications.  There are a lot of 
neat ideas floating around, but for one person it is like trying to boil 
the ocean.

Can write code but you are not a DOS programmer yet?  On the edge about 
how to get started?  I can help ...

/small rant



--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] network printing

2012-06-28 Thread mbbrutman
Quoting Michael B. Brutman mbbrut...@brutman.com:

 small rant

 We really need more programmers.  I've done my part to create a
 framework for writing TCP/IP and UDP applications.  There are a lot of
 neat ideas floating around, but for one person it is like trying to boil
 the ocean.

 Can write code but you are not a DOS programmer yet?  On the edge about
 how to get started?  I can help ...

 /small rant


And just a small clarification ...  That's an open invitation to  
anybody who wants to get started coding under DOS.

I've been thinking about setting up a Wiki or a FAQ to make it easier  
for people who code on more modern platforms; warnings about fun  
things like segments and pointer arithmetic can help get people up to  
speed faster.  Even just a good how-to on setting up a development  
environment would be helpful.


-Mike




--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] fdupdate

2012-06-28 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste-family.net wrote:

 I do agree with Rugxulo. Just adding my 2cts regarding FDUpdate (I'm the one 
 responsible for creating the monster).

BTW, I knew you'd read this, so no disrespect intended (obviously),
your work is always appreciated, but it's just a tough situation to
handle properly.   :-(

 The idea of FDUpdate was to provide some kind of semi-graphical
 manager that would allow the average joe to add/update whatever
 packages in its system.

 FDUpdate is, however, just a nifty frontend. In the background it
 calls wget or htget (the downloader backend is configurable) to
 download the *.zip files into a temp directory, and then it calls
 FDPKG to install these zip files.

 I quite quickly lost hope, as the whole packaging work was way
 more than what I could ever handle on my free time... and without
 packages, a packager is, well, useless.

 In other words - don't put any hope into using FDUPDATE for any
 serious update of your FreeDOS system. FDUPDATE will probably
 never be useable - unless suddenly there is an army of volunteers
 that starts massively populating the FDUPDATE repository (which
 is highly unlikely to ever happen anyway).

If only it were even that simple (and no, we don't have a lot of
relevant volunteers, sadly). Sometimes an upgrade changes, breaks,
or worsens things, whether unintentionally or otherwise. Sometimes
files get renamed or split into separate utils. What to do about
config files? Probably have to edit those manually anyways. And you'd
of course not want to change hardware or software requirements for the
worse, at least not without huge warnings. And then you need backups
(.EXEs only or whole .ZIPs?). And all of that is IF (doubtful) you
have a working packet driver and IF (doubtful) the repo is updated
with recent stuff.

DJGPP also has (had?) an experimental updater too (pakke), but again,
I've never tried it. I always end up manually installing and handling
things. Sure, it's more work, but there is no quick fix. Usually I
want latest and greatest too (for vanity??), but that's not always
appropriate, esp. with compilers or similar tools, so I keep lots of
.ZIP archives around in order to re-install or temporarily install for
a quick use or whatever. Half my HD usage is probably .ZIP backups
(original downloads, I mean, not manual installs compressed). And
sometimes I do have several different versions of something installed
with various names, e.g. NASM, CWSDPMI. Sometimes I customize them to
use a wrapper BLAH.BAT and rename the original .EXE to _blah.exe .

You just have to be kinda paranoid and very careful as sometimes
things break without realizing why, so you have to eliminate any
possible room for error. It's often said that if something works,
don't change it! because you're not guaranteed the same stability. In
other words, for example, don't upgrade WinXP to Win7 unless you know
what you're doing!!   :-)

These days, I do have write access to the FD iBiblio mirror, and I
have tried to keep a lot of little things updated, so it should be
okay, but of course I'm easily distracted, and there is always plenty
more that could (potentially) be done. Some things change so fast
anyways that it's almost pointless to upgrade for every minor point
release. But hey, I'm open to suggestions.

Perhaps a repo for BASE only would be a good compromise (though most
of it is frozen / stable). That's the core stuff that we really
need. Maybe UTIL too, but that's less critical. Though how would
you handle 3rd-party patches? I was wondering recently whether we need
a good place for things like that.

But it's easy for things to get lost in the shuffle, so I often want
to put things online somewhere so they don't disappear forever. Not
always easy.  :-/

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] fdupdate

2012-06-28 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Marco Achury marcoach...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think official freedos release must be just 2 or 3 floppies, as MSDOS
 was
  Boot system + basic drivers and tools (and both, cdrom and floppy image are
 required).

Well, depends on how simplistic you want to make it. I personally
would rather have a liveCD than install only, but then again, it's a
lot more work, much much more.

Just deciding what to put on the floppies is half the job, then
deciding how the heck to cram it on in is the other half!

And it's hard to update and regenerate everything. I guess Linux
distros have things more streamlined, they can generate and rebuild on
the fly. We don't have any fancy build servers or scripts (that I know
of, anyways).

 No package manager needed for this base system

Assuming someone keeps it updated, which may not always happen!

 Aditional to this, the community or any interested user can release cdroms
 with
 software collections.  Such collections may include a package manager or a
 centralized install menu but is not required.

Right, but it's always a lot of work, a lot to keep track of.

 Simpler to understand and mantain.  Any person will install only the apps
 really need, and the install or update of base system is simple and quick

I guess the desire is low due to real gurus already doing it manually.
Others probably can't be bothered with the tedium, arcane knowledge,
lots of testing, etc.

P.S. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just tedious, somewhat
complicated, exhausting without some more volunteers, hard to decide
what to put where and how. Plus, honestly, you'll get no sympathy for
floppies anymore. That alone is probably the weakest idea (though I'm
not totally opposed). And hardware changes so fast, sometimes I wonder
if it's worth it. Bah.

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] GRUB 2.00 Freedos support

2012-06-28 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:38 AM, escape esc...@front.ru wrote:

 With release of the GNU GRUB version 2.00, Freedos is now supported
 among other boot protocols.

Good to know this has been released.

 Besides technical improvements it is
 important to know that Freedos is considered worth the efforts put in
 development, not only by subscribers of freedos-* lists, but also by
 developers from other projects.

I would doubt that, we don't get a lot of sympathy. If there is any
support, it's more like an afterthought.

 Full announce here:
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2012-06/msg00093.html

This sounds scary powerful and complicated, BTW, way moreso than I
ever imagined. (8 MB .tar.gz uncompressed to 40 MB of srcs!!!)

If anyone here ever actually tests this thing out, esp. re: FreeDOS,
please mail us your experiences! (Probably best to play with under
VirtualBox first to avoid messing up real installs.)

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] fdupdate

2012-06-28 Thread Mark Brown
just about the floppy diskette thing,
floppydisk.com sells usb 2.0 diskette drives that 

plug-and-play auto-recognize and auto-mount, 

even under my windows 7 64-bit ultimate system.
they're advertised as used, but mine that they sent were new.


and naturally they sell floppy diskettes for a pretty good price.

there's substantial support commercially for using floppies,
you just have to find it. 


eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com
eufdp...@yahoo.com





 From: Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net 
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] fdupdate
 
Hi,

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Marco Achury marcoach...@gmail.com wrote:

 I think official freedos release must be just 2 or 3 floppies, as MSDOS
 was
  Boot system + basic drivers and tools (and both, cdrom and floppy image are
 required).

Well, depends on how simplistic you want to make it. I personally
would rather have a liveCD than install only, but then again, it's a
lot more work, much much more.

Just deciding what to put on the floppies is half the job, then
deciding how the heck to cram it on in is the other half!

And it's hard to update and regenerate everything. I guess Linux
distros have things more streamlined, they can generate and rebuild on
the fly. We don't have any fancy build servers or scripts (that I know
of, anyways).

 No package manager needed for this base system

Assuming someone keeps it updated, which may not always happen!

 Aditional to this, the community or any interested user can release cdroms
 with
 software collections.  Such collections may include a package manager or a
 centralized install menu but is not required.

Right, but it's always a lot of work, a lot to keep track of.

 Simpler to understand and mantain.  Any person will install only the apps
 really need, and the install or update of base system is simple and quick

I guess the desire is low due to real gurus already doing it manually.
Others probably can't be bothered with the tedium, arcane knowledge,
lots of testing, etc.

P.S. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, just tedious, somewhat
complicated, exhausting without some more volunteers, hard to decide
what to put where and how. Plus, honestly, you'll get no sympathy for
floppies anymore. That alone is probably the weakest idea (though I'm
not totally opposed). And hardware changes so fast, sometimes I wonder
if it's worth it. Bah.

--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user