[Freedos-user] (no subject)

2014-05-15 Thread kurt godel
Have an old 80 gig hard drive with an HPA(host protected access) partition,
which is wasting space; tried to use linux function 'hdparm'
on it using an ide/usb adapter, but recieved message bad or missing sense
data, exactly what I get with flash drives and sd cards.
   Threw the drive in an old ide machine to hit it with hdparm, but the
machine is non-functional. My other machine is sata only.
   Any ideas to do this?
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2014-05-15 Thread mcelhanon
You could try using a SATA to IDE adapter in your other machine. That
would probably provide the low-level access to the partition table the
software needs.

Do you know why the old IDE machine is non-functional? If you have the
time to troubleshoot the problem it might be something cheap and easy
to repair and you could restore that machine for purposes like this.

Those are my ideas, good luck.



On 5/15/14, kurt godel wb2...@gmail.com wrote:
 Have an old 80 gig hard drive with an HPA(host protected access) partition,
 which is wasting space; tried to use linux function 'hdparm'
 on it using an ide/usb adapter, but recieved message bad or missing sense
 data, exactly what I get with flash drives and sd cards.
Threw the drive in an old ide machine to hit it with hdparm, but the
 machine is non-functional. My other machine is sata only.
Any ideas to do this?


--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2014-05-15 Thread Dale E Sterner
Do you have a floppy drive? If you do then make a dos bootable floppy.
Find wipe on the web and download it.
Run wipe to clean the drive of everything. Your floppy should also have
fdisk  format on it.
After wipe is finished type fdisk/mbr. This should give you a fresh MBR.
Then use fdisk
to install a fat32 partition. Next format C:. Oh by the way if you want
to install XP on FAT32,
it will work without being activated.  You can also buy a cf  to ide
adapter on Amazon.com
and run a CF chip on your ide port. Another good dos program is IDECHECK.
It will read out
all your registers and test the drive for speed.

cheers
DS



On Thu, 15 May 2014 21:57:11 +0800 kurt godel wb2...@gmail.com writes:
 Have an old 80 gig hard drive with an HPA(host protected access) 
 partition,
 which is wasting space; tried to use linux function 'hdparm'
 on it using an ide/usb adapter, but recieved message bad or missing 
 sense
 data, exactly what I get with flash drives and sd cards.
Threw the drive in an old ide machine to hit it with hdparm, but 
 the
 machine is non-functional. My other machine is sata only.
Any ideas to do this?


**
From Dale Sterner - MS organic chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo00975a052
***


Do THIS before eating carbs #40;every time#41;
1 EASY tip to increase fat-burning, lower blood sugar  decrease fat storage
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5374dab4616645ab4612est02duc

--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2014-05-15 Thread dmccunney
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Dale E Sterner sunbeam...@juno.com wrote:

 Oh by the way if you want to install XP on FAT32, it will work without being 
 activated.

XP on FAT32?  shudder

 DS
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2014-05-15 Thread Ray Davison
dmccunney wrote:

 Oh by the way if you want to install XP on FAT32, it will work without being 
 activated.

 XP on FAT32?  shudder

Why the shudder?  I have never run WXP on anything but FAT32.  Currently 
it is on four machines in the office plus whatever is in the shop.  It 
is a matter of cross-platform access; everything can use FAT32, share 
data, and perform maintenance.

Ray



--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] hpa

2014-05-15 Thread kurt godel
I  too have always used xp on fat! As for ide to sata adapter, the sata
machine is too cramped to fit it. As for wipe, is that a dos app? Are you
sure it could remove the HPA partition? I have already used a bootable
cd with active killdisk to wipe the drive, but, ostensibly, regular wipers
cannot even access the HPA to delete it. I know 'hdparm' can do it at low
level access. Trust me, the ide machine is kaput!.
--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2014-05-15 Thread dmccunney
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Ray Davison ray...@charter.net wrote:
 dmccunney wrote:

 Oh by the way if you want to install XP on FAT32, it will work without 
 being activated.

 XP on FAT32?  shudder

 Why the shudder?  I have never run WXP on anything but FAT32.  Currently
 it is on four machines in the office plus whatever is in the shop.  It
 is a matter of cross-platform access; everything can use FAT32, share
 data, and perform maintenance.

Why the shudder?  Dead easy.  FAT *sucks* as a file system.

The advantage is that it's well understood and widely implemented, and
just about everything knows how to read it.

The disadvantage is that it's the opposite of robust, lacks
redundancy, lacks any notion of rights and permissions because there's
no place in the file system to store the needed metadata, and $DIETY
help you if you ever have bad file system damage.

I've spent way too much time over the years trying to repair damaged
FAT file systems.  Have a problem?  Run CHKDSK.  CHKDSK will find an
assortment of lost clusters, and give them names like FILE.CHK in
a FOUND.000 directory.  Can you actually do anything with them?
Unlikely - they probably aren't complete and are unusable.  Your
normal option is to simply delete them, and the FOUND.000 directory.
Were they parts of something important that is now truncated and
broken?  Too bad, and you better have a backup copy of whatever got
trashed.

I use NTFS on Win2K and XP, and would not use anything else.  Why?

It's robust.  On the infrequent occasions NFTS has problems, CHKDSK
simply fixes them, and puts everything back under it's right name in
it's proper location.  The only time I ever saw that *not* happen was
when a directory entry happened to be sitting on a bad block.  CHKDSK
collected the files under their right names and assigned them to a
FOUND.000 directory.  All I had to do was rename the directory to what
the original had been.

It supports rights and permissions.  2K and XP introduced the concept
that there may be more than one user on the machine, and NTFS provides
storage for the metadata to specify what user owns what files and what
permissions that user has.  Through XP, Windows used the assumption
that the user of the machine was the Administrator with all powers to
do everything.  That changed in Vista/7/8, and by default, the user is
*not* Administrator.  That was a security measure. as many exploits
that target windows require administrator privileges to do their dirty
work, and bounce off if the user is *not* running as Administrator.
Under XP, you can create a  Power User (XP Pro) or Limited User (XP
Home) userid that works the same way, but you must be under NTFS for
it to work.

It supports links.  Under Unix, a directory entry doesn't point to a
file.  It points to a kernel maintained data structure called an
inode, that holds the information on the file's owner, owner's group,
permissions, and creation/access times, plus pointers to the actual
blocks on disk where the file resides.  This permits a level of
indirection.  You can have the same file appear in more than one
directory, or appear under several different names in the same
directory.  The Unix vi editor is an example.  Ex is the line editor.
Vi is the full screen editor.  View is a read only file viewer.  All
three are links to the same underlying program.  It looks to see what
name it was called by, and behaves accordingly.  You can have hard
links, which are all on teh same file system, or symbolic links, which
can span file systems.  A symbolic link is similar in concept to a
Windows shortcut, but more powerful. It's a pointer to a file or
directory on another file system, and the OS follows it an opens the
file.  You have to do some digging to discover that something *is* a
symlink.

NTFS5 supports hard links, and under Vista/Win7/Win8, symbolic links.
A Japanese developer wrote a driver that provides symlink support
under 2K and XP as well.  I make use of this.

NTFS supports compression, on a directory basis.  I make extensive use of this.

NTFS supports encryption, on a directory basis.

I multiboot Windows, Linux, and FreeDOS.  Windows is on NTFS.  Linux
is on ext4.  FreeDOS is on FAT32.  Linux has native support for NTFS,
and can see the Windows partition and access stuff on it.  I found an
open source driver for Windows that lets it read/write the Linux ext4
partitions.  Windows and Linux can both read/write the FAT32
partition.  FreeDOS can only see its own parition, but I don't *care*.
 I have no need to access Windows or Linux files from FreeDOS.

If WinXP on FAT32 works for you, fine.  I wouldn't touch it with a
stick.  Too much of what I'm accustomed to doing simply can't be done
on FAT32.

FAT originated in the days when hardware was much less powerful, and
the sort of file systems on larger systems weren't possible.  They
have been on PCs for quite some time, and I see no reason not to take
advantage of them.  I have no need to restrict 

[Freedos-user] Command Line Parsing

2014-05-15 Thread Jack Jackson
I've noticed a difference in command line parsing between FreeDOS and PC-DOS.

Both FreeDOS and PC-DOS put the command line, starting with the character 
after the executable, in a buffer at offset 0x80 in the PSP.

The behavior difference I see with FreeDOS is if the first non-blank 
character after the executable is a left parenthesis, then FreeDOS sets 
0x80 in the PSP to zero so the rest of the command line is not available.

Examples of what is in PSP 0x80:

Command Line:  SOMEPROG  (aa bb cc
FreeDOS:  \0
DOS:   (aa bb cc\0

Command Line:  SOMEPROG abc (cc dd ee
FreeDOS and DOS:   abc (cc dd ee\0

Does anyone know why FreeDOS behaves differently when the first character 
after the executable is a left parenthesis?


--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Command Line Parsing

2014-05-15 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Jack Jackson j...@pebbleridge.com wrote:

 I've noticed a difference in command line parsing between FreeDOS and PC-DOS.

 The behavior difference I see with FreeDOS is if the first non-blank
 character after the executable is a left parenthesis, then FreeDOS sets
 0x80 in the PSP to zero so the rest of the command line is not available.

 Does anyone know why FreeDOS behaves differently when the first character
 after the executable is a left parenthesis?

No idea, that's very weird. Please try both 0.82 and 0.84 to confirm
this bug exists in both. (I assume 4DOS doesn't have this problem.)

Feel free to make an official bug report on SourceForge:

http://sourceforge.net/p/freedos/bugs/

--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] (no subject)

2014-05-15 Thread Dale E Sterner
Since MS has stopped supporting XP, you probably won't be able to get it
activated, anymore.
Nothing wrong with fat32 unless you're really thinking BIG..

DS

On Thu, 15 May 2014 11:30:22 -0400 dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
writes:
 On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Dale E Sterner 
 sunbeam...@juno.com wrote:
 
  Oh by the way if you want to install XP on FAT32, it will work 
 without being activated.
 
 XP on FAT32?  shudder
 
  DS
 __
 Dennis
 https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519
 

-
-
 Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For 
 FREE
 Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
 Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform 
 available
 Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
 
 Best Stock Tips for 2014
 Top Investor Reveals 19 Stocks You Must have in Your Portfolio in 
 2014
 http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3165/53756153232ab615308aamp06duc
 


**
From Dale Sterner - MS organic chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo00975a052
***


--
Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user