[Freedos-user] Again about CPU-loadmeter

2018-01-16 Thread Z. B.
I asked about this "a while" ago, now being back to that question.

Have a look at pages from "Using MS-DOS 6.22" by Jim Cooper, describing
functionality of POWER.EXE utility - I mean pages from 852 to 857 (it's
available e.g. in "Google Books" and various places).

It's splitted into two parts: a device driver, and actual utility.

My question is: do we have any API offered by FDAPM to allow closer
examination of CPU load the way similar to the one described in the book?
I ponder whether it could be possible to create a script/utility, which
could show the details.
-- 
regards,
Zbigniew

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Arduino Port of FreeDOS

2018-01-13 Thread Z. B.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 08:06:15PM +0300, Ercan Ersoy wrote:

> FreeDOS Arduino Port doesn't have to graphics. For managing shell, we can
> use only a UART on Arduino. We needn't 8k RAM for managing standard input,
> standard output and standard error.

Even before you start to discuss technical details - trying to persuade
developers who are much more familiar with the entire FreeDOS thing than
yourself - you should address the very basic question, which has been asked
already twice: WHY, WHAT FOR?

Even, if it was feasible - you encourage others to start really serious and
time-consuming work only because "it would be kinda cool to see DOS running
on Arduino"?
-- 
regards,
Zbigniew

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Arduino Port of FreeDOS

2018-01-12 Thread Z. B.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 06:30:17PM -0500, William Dudley wrote:

> The Uno wouldn't seem to have enough memory (flash OR RAM) to make this
> worth while.
> 
> The Mega2560 has enough flash (ROM) for the OS and BIOS, but only 8K
> of RAM, so I don't think it would be terribly useful either.

The most basic question is: WHY do this at all? If anyone wants OS suited
for microcontrollers, with interactivity, multitasking etc. then the proper
answer is: Forth. In this particular case amForth, avrForth or flashForth,
as examples.
-- 
regards,
Zbigniew

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] Would you use a native 32/64-bit FreeDOS/BIOS system?

2018-01-07 Thread Z. B.
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 04:15:08PM +, Samuel V. via Freedos-user wrote:

> I was thinking that it could become necessary to start implementing a FreeDOS 
> version that included natively its own BIOS, and that this combination of 
> FreeDOS/BIOS is implemented entirely native as 32 or 64-bit code, to keep 
> using the known DOS environment, the same DOS/BIOS INT calls programming 
> style (now also with other ways to call services), but extending everything 
> to more modern CPU modes.
> The intention is to update FreeDOS and the BIOS to 32 and 64-bit modes, 
> without forgetting the original 16-bit version, but now giving native access 
> to features that DOS would benefit from, but that aren't available in Real 
> Mode, like many Gigabytes of RAM, large IDE/SATA hard disks, more capable 
> drivers, more file systems.
> Would you use a FreeDOS version that was entirely native to 32 or 64 bits?
> I've thought that it would be a great additional project and that it would 
> definitely make FreeDOS and DOS in general, along with an integrated BIOS, 
> live as a valid OS choice for any user as long as there are PCs, at least x86 
> ones.

https://sourceforge.net/projects/freedos-32/
http://menuetos.net/
https://kolibrios.org/ (site seems to be down at the moment)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TempleOS

-- 
regards,
Zbigniew

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user