Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 05/10] drm/msm: fix drm device leak on bind errors

2023-03-24 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 09:46, Johan Hovold  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:54:51PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On 06/03/2023 12:07, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Make sure to free the DRM device also in case of early errors during
> > > bind().
> > >
> > > Fixes: 2027e5b3413d ("drm/msm: Initialize MDSS irq domain at probe time")
> > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org  # 5.17
> > > Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov 
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> >
> > Can we migrate to devm_drm_dev_alloc instead() ? Will it make code
> > simpler and/or easier to handle?
>
> I'm just fixing the bugs here. Cleanups/rework like that can be done on
> top but should not be backported as it risks introducing new issues.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry


Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 05/10] drm/msm: fix drm device leak on bind errors

2023-03-22 Thread Johan Hovold
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:54:51PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 12:07, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Make sure to free the DRM device also in case of early errors during
> > bind().
> > 
> > Fixes: 2027e5b3413d ("drm/msm: Initialize MDSS irq domain at probe time")
> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org  # 5.17
> > Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov 
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 
> 
> Can we migrate to devm_drm_dev_alloc instead() ? Will it make code 
> simpler and/or easier to handle?

I'm just fixing the bugs here. Cleanups/rework like that can be done on
top but should not be backported as it risks introducing new issues.

Johan


Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 05/10] drm/msm: fix drm device leak on bind errors

2023-03-21 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov

On 06/03/2023 12:07, Johan Hovold wrote:

Make sure to free the DRM device also in case of early errors during
bind().

Fixes: 2027e5b3413d ("drm/msm: Initialize MDSS irq domain at probe time")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org  # 5.17
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov 
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold 


Can we migrate to devm_drm_dev_alloc instead() ? Will it make code 
simpler and/or easier to handle?



---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 10 --
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
index 2f2bcdb671d2..89634159ad75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
@@ -444,12 +444,12 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct 
drm_driver *drv)
  
  	ret = msm_init_vram(ddev);

if (ret)
-   return ret;
+   goto err_put_dev;
  
  	/* Bind all our sub-components: */

ret = component_bind_all(dev, ddev);
if (ret)
-   return ret;
+   goto err_put_dev;
  
  	dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, UINT_MAX);
  
@@ -544,6 +544,12 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv)
  
  err_msm_uninit:

msm_drm_uninit(dev);
+
+   return ret;
+
+err_put_dev:
+   drm_dev_put(ddev);
+
return ret;
  }
  


--
With best wishes
Dmitry