Re: [Freeipa-users] Best practices for core servers

2014-04-30 Thread Martin Kosek
On 04/28/2014 01:03 PM, Bret Wortman wrote:
 We are planning to reconfigure our core Freeipa servers, basically building a 
 replacement infrastructure and migrating to it. What we're planning right now 
 is 
 a core of three Freeipa servers each of which has a CA, with as much 
 distribution of replication as we can manage. I imagine that means one of 
 them 
 replicates to the other two but am open to other ideas.

You can configure them to replica to each other.

 For remote locations, we're planning to stand up caching-only DNS servers, as 
 authenticating back to the main IPA servers works extremely well; it's just 
 DNS 
 that needs a little help.
 
 Any thoughts before I start setting these servers (VMs, most likely) up?

You may want to read our upstream Deployment Recommendations article, it may
save you some bad decisions from the start:

http://www.freeipa.org/page/Deployment_Recommendations

If we see that we missed anything in this article, it would be great to enhance 
it.

Martin

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users


Re: [Freeipa-users] Best practices for core servers

2014-04-30 Thread Bret Wortman
I can already see from this that our key problem may have been that we 
had one server functioning as the hub and every other remote replica had 
just one agreement, but those agreements were all with the hub. So that 
hub had ten agreements.


Badness.

We'll give this some good attention as we move forward. Thanks for the 
pointer, Martin.



Bret

On 04/30/2014 03:15 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:

On 04/28/2014 01:03 PM, Bret Wortman wrote:

We are planning to reconfigure our core Freeipa servers, basically building a
replacement infrastructure and migrating to it. What we're planning right now is
a core of three Freeipa servers each of which has a CA, with as much
distribution of replication as we can manage. I imagine that means one of them
replicates to the other two but am open to other ideas.

You can configure them to replica to each other.


For remote locations, we're planning to stand up caching-only DNS servers, as
authenticating back to the main IPA servers works extremely well; it's just DNS
that needs a little help.

Any thoughts before I start setting these servers (VMs, most likely) up?

You may want to read our upstream Deployment Recommendations article, it may
save you some bad decisions from the start:

http://www.freeipa.org/page/Deployment_Recommendations

If we see that we missed anything in this article, it would be great to enhance 
it.

Martin





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

[Freeipa-users] Best practices for core servers

2014-04-28 Thread Bret Wortman
We are planning to reconfigure our core Freeipa servers, basically 
building a replacement infrastructure and migrating to it. What we're 
planning right now is a core of three Freeipa servers each of which has 
a CA, with as much distribution of replication as we can manage. I 
imagine that means one of them replicates to the other two but am open 
to other ideas.


For remote locations, we're planning to stand up caching-only DNS 
servers, as authenticating back to the main IPA servers works extremely 
well; it's just DNS that needs a little help.


Any thoughts before I start setting these servers (VMs, most likely) up?


--
*Bret Wortman*

http://damascusgrp.com/
http://about.me/wortmanbret



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

Re: [Freeipa-users] Best practices for core servers

2014-04-28 Thread Petr Spacek

On 28.4.2014 13:03, Bret Wortman wrote:

We are planning to reconfigure our core Freeipa servers, basically building a
replacement infrastructure and migrating to it. What we're planning right now is
a core of three Freeipa servers each of which has a CA, with as much
distribution of replication as we can manage. I imagine that means one of them
replicates to the other two but am open to other ideas.

For remote locations, we're planning to stand up caching-only DNS servers, as
authenticating back to the main IPA servers works extremely well; it's just DNS
that needs a little help.

Could you be more specific? I'm very interested in any feedback about IPA DNS!

Thank you!

--
Petr^2 Spacek

___
Freeipa-users mailing list
Freeipa-users@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users