Re: [Freeipa-users] ldap tree: etc-location & ca-cas

[Martin Basti]

On 11.03.2017 14:11, lejeczek wrote:
> hi everyone
>
> my domain seems ok but I've decided to watch it closely on more
> regular basis and am in a process of learning the tree.
> I found a few +nsuniqueid and I wonder: is there a relation (surely
> is, but how critical) between etc-location & ca-ca?
>
> Both, location and ca have the same
> +nsuniqueid=647ed0ab-b70911e6-b84df1c7-2176fa48.
> My question would be (if I cannot do that with IPA, which I probably
> cannot): do I clean manually both location & ca in one go?
> Or there is a sequence to it?
> And more importantly: what should also check in the tree in relation
> to these two DNs?
>
> many thank,
> L
>
>

Hi,

you have a replication conflict
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Administration_Guide/Managing_Replication-Solving_Common_Replication_Conflicts.html


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project

[Freeipa-users] ldap tree: etc-location & ca-cas

[lejeczek]

hi everyone

my domain seems ok but I've decided to watch it closely on 
more regular basis and am in a process of learning the tree.
I found a few +nsuniqueid and I wonder: is there a relation 
(surely is, but how critical) between etc-location & ca-ca?


Both, location and ca have the same 
+nsuniqueid=647ed0ab-b70911e6-b84df1c7-2176fa48.
My question would be (if I cannot do that with IPA, which I 
probably cannot): do I clean manually both location & ca in 
one go?

Or there is a sequence to it?
And more importantly: what should also check in the tree in 
relation to these two DNs?


many thank,
L
-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project