Re: [Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf --projopt

2014-04-09 Thread Joerg Pfannmoeller
Sorry for this question, but now I am confused. Do you mean that I should not 
use projopt and just use the interpolation? If so why should I not use projfrac?


On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 15:02:36 -0400
Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 
 You'll have to do without it for now and just do the interpolation
 
 On 04/08/2014 03:32 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
  Well, I need to use that option. In this case I will just interpolate to 
  the 1 mm grid and proceed this way.
 
 
  On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:14:47 -0400
  Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
  Sorry, I don't understand. You mean it still segfaults without --projopt
  or that you have to use projopt?
 
  On 04/07/2014 02:36 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
  Unfortunately that is no option for me.
 
 
 
  On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:33:47 -0400
  Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
  Don't use --projopt and it won't segfault
 
  On 04/03/2014 02:08 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
  The command is:
 
  mri_vol2surf --mov /.../f001.nii --reg /.../register.f1.dof6.dat 
  --trgsubject subjid --interp nearest --projopt /.../map001 --hemi rh 
  --o /.../f001_surf.nii --noreshape --cortex
 
  The output is the follwoing:
 
 
  srcvol = /.../f001.nii
  srcreg = /.../register.f001.dof6.dat
  srcregold = 0
  srcwarp unspecified
  surf = white
  hemi = rh
  trgsubject = subjid
  surfreg = sphere.reg
  reshape = 0
  interp = nearest
  float2int = round
  GetProjMax = 0
  INFO: float2int code = 0
  INFO: changing type to float
  Done loading volume
  Loading label /.../label/rh.cortex.label
  Reading surface /.../surf/rh.white
  Done reading source surface
  Reading thickness /.../surf/rh.thickness
  Done
  Mapping Source Volume onto Source Subject Surface
  reading gm volume fraction from /.../map001.gm.mgz
  reading wm volume fraction from /.../map001.wm.mgz
  reading csf volume fraction from /.../map001.csf.mgz
  mri_vol2surf --mov /.../f001.nii --reg /.../register.f1.dof6.dat 
  --trgsubject subjid --interp nearest --projopt /.../map001 --hemi rh 
  --o /.../f001_surf.nii --noreshape --cortex: Segmentation fault
  
  Do you have an idea about the cause of the error?
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:28:14 -0400
  Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
  what is your command line that is seg faulting? What is the terminal 
  output?
 
  On 04/02/2014 05:17 PM, pfannmo...@uni-greifswald.de wrote:
  Please help me with this issue:
 
  If I apply mri_surf2vol to a single volume of unprocessed epi-data, it
  results in a segmentation fault. It works if I apply mri_vol2vol for
  registration of epi and anatomy, but than an interpolation is
  involved. I would like to avoid the interpolation and apply
  mri_surf2vol directly to the unprocessed data in order to minimize the
  number of interpolations.
 
 
  At Wednesday, 02-04-2014 on 21:08 Douglas N Greve wrote:
 
 This is something BF added Sept 1 2009:
 
 added --projopt  switch to do optimal linear estimation of 
  gray matter
 values given a set of precomputed gray matter densities.
 
 I don't know what it would mean beyond that
 
 doug
 
 
 On 04/02/2014 10:49 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I found an option in mri_vol2surf for which I could not find 
  a
 documentation. The option is called:
 
  --projopt
 
  It would be nice if somebody could give a description of this
 option.
 
  Respectfully yours
 
  pfannmoe
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 
 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422
 
 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing:
 ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person 
  to
 whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error 
  and
 the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners
 Compliance HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was 
  sent to

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surcluster and centroid option

2014-04-09 Thread Joerg Pfannmoeller
On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:02:24 -0400
Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:


 Is this group data? Or otherwise on fsaverage? Or on the subject's 
 surface? 

It is on a single subject on its on anatomy (self). 

 How are you determining that the centroid is outside of the 
 cluster?

The coordinates are outside the cluster, there is nothing to worry about that.
 
 It should give you a vertex number for the centroid (I think). 

As you told in your last mail it gives Tal-coordinates and not vertices.

 I opted not to use the centroid by default for this reason. This can 
 happen because the centroid is irregular.

I don not understand this: What do you mean by irregular?

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



[Freesurfer] longitudinal template generation with manual registration

2014-04-09 Thread Andreas Werner
Dear Experts,



i am analyzing a longitudinal study (three timepoints for each participant).

I manually register the second and third timepoint to the first timepoint using freeview.

Question: Is it possible to use these manually created transformation matrices to create a common template that is equidistant from all three timepoints to balance interpolation ? If so, which commands do I need to use ?

(As I understand  mri_robust_template  does this, but I would like to use manual rather than automatic registration.)

Many thanks in advance!

Andreas
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] Problem of size

2014-04-09 Thread Andrea Tateo
Hi FreeSurfer expert,I have a problem with command recon-all. In 
recon-all.log I can read:«The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 
mm), which cannot fit in 256^3 mm^3 volume.The resulting volume will have 312 
slices.If you find problems, please let us know 
(freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).»I hope are there anyone to help me.Thank for 
your help.Andrea
  ___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] Questions about byvoxel statistics from Tracula

2014-04-09 Thread Emilie Poirion
Hello

I'm using Tracula to analyse our DWI-images. Freesurfer reconstructions of
the corresponding T1-images have been perfomed before.
Respectively, the version used are 1.53 and 5.3.
The Tracula process works fine and I have extracted the statistics for all
tracts.
About this statistics, I wanted to know what is the difference between FA
and FA_Avg ?

An other question about the values extracted is about the coordinates in
the file byvoxel.txt. Are they correspind with the coordinates of the
voxel in the dtifit image were the values were extracted?

The last question, can we extracted the same by tract statistics from an
other image like a PET registered to the DWI with your code?

Thanks for your answer

-- 
Emilie Poirion

Master 1 Informatique Industrielle et  Imagerie Industrielle
Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6)
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Intermediate stages of cortical inflation

2014-04-09 Thread Bruce Fischl
you can use -w 1 to write out every step in the inflation process and 
choose what you want. If you want it to preserve surface area during 
inflation (as opposed to just at the end), also include -scale 1

cheers
Bruce


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Xuelong Zhao wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I would like to ask whether it is possible to display different levels of
 cortical inflation?
 
 I have been using the command: mris_inflate
 
 but the -dist and -n flags do not seem to make that much difference. Also,
 if I use fsaverage lh.orig as the input file and using the default options
 for mris_Inflate I don't seem to be able to recover the lh.inflated surface.
 
 Are there any alternative commands to control the level of inflation?
 Thanks.
 
 
 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surcluster and centroid option

2014-04-09 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Jeorg

if the cluster is non-convex, the centroid is not guaranteed to be in the 
interior. Think of a C or U shape.

cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Joerg Pfannmoeller 
wrote:

 On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:02:24 -0400
 Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:


 Is this group data? Or otherwise on fsaverage? Or on the subject's
 surface?

 It is on a single subject on its on anatomy (self).

 How are you determining that the centroid is outside of the
 cluster?

 The coordinates are outside the cluster, there is nothing to worry about that.

 It should give you a vertex number for the centroid (I think).

 As you told in your last mail it gives Tal-coordinates and not vertices.

 I opted not to use the centroid by default for this reason. This can
 happen because the centroid is irregular.

 I don not understand this: What do you mean by irregular?

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size

2014-04-09 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Andrea

what size are your voxels? Do you really need an FOV that big? If not, 
you could extract the central 256mm using mri_extract. And I believe this 
is just a warning - does recon-all complete?


cheers
Bruce



On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, 
Andrea Tateo wrote:




Hi FreeSurfer expert,

I have a problem with command recon-all. 

In recon-all.log I can read:

«The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot fit
in 256^3 mm^3 volume.

The resulting volume will have 312 slices.

If you find problems, please let us know (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).»

I hope are there anyone to help me.

Thank for your help.

Andrea


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_vol2surf --projopt

2014-04-09 Thread Douglas Greve

You can use --projfrac (which can perform an interpolation with --interp 
trilinear)


On 4/9/14 2:44 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
 Sorry for this question, but now I am confused. Do you mean that I should not 
 use projopt and just use the interpolation? If so why should I not use 
 projfrac?


 On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 15:02:36 -0400
 Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 You'll have to do without it for now and just do the interpolation

 On 04/08/2014 03:32 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
 Well, I need to use that option. In this case I will just interpolate to 
 the 1 mm grid and proceed this way.


 On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:14:47 -0400
 Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 Sorry, I don't understand. You mean it still segfaults without --projopt
 or that you have to use projopt?

 On 04/07/2014 02:36 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
 Unfortunately that is no option for me.



 On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 15:33:47 -0400
 Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 Don't use --projopt and it won't segfault

 On 04/03/2014 02:08 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
 The command is:

 mri_vol2surf --mov /.../f001.nii --reg /.../register.f1.dof6.dat 
 --trgsubject subjid --interp nearest --projopt /.../map001 --hemi rh 
 --o /.../f001_surf.nii --noreshape --cortex

 The output is the follwoing:


 srcvol = /.../f001.nii
 srcreg = /.../register.f001.dof6.dat
 srcregold = 0
 srcwarp unspecified
 surf = white
 hemi = rh
 trgsubject = subjid
 surfreg = sphere.reg
 reshape = 0
 interp = nearest
 float2int = round
 GetProjMax = 0
 INFO: float2int code = 0
 INFO: changing type to float
 Done loading volume
 Loading label /.../label/rh.cortex.label
 Reading surface /.../surf/rh.white
 Done reading source surface
 Reading thickness /.../surf/rh.thickness
 Done
 Mapping Source Volume onto Source Subject Surface
 reading gm volume fraction from /.../map001.gm.mgz
 reading wm volume fraction from /.../map001.wm.mgz
 reading csf volume fraction from /.../map001.csf.mgz
 mri_vol2surf --mov /.../f001.nii --reg /.../register.f1.dof6.dat 
 --trgsubject subjid --interp nearest --projopt /.../map001 --hemi rh 
 --o /.../f001_surf.nii --noreshape --cortex: Segmentation fault
  
 Do you have an idea about the cause of the error?





 On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:28:14 -0400
 Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 what is your command line that is seg faulting? What is the terminal 
 output?

 On 04/02/2014 05:17 PM, pfannmo...@uni-greifswald.de wrote:
 Please help me with this issue:

 If I apply mri_surf2vol to a single volume of unprocessed epi-data, it
 results in a segmentation fault. It works if I apply mri_vol2vol for
 registration of epi and anatomy, but than an interpolation is
 involved. I would like to avoid the interpolation and apply
 mri_surf2vol directly to the unprocessed data in order to minimize the
 number of interpolations.


 At Wednesday, 02-04-2014 on 21:08 Douglas N Greve wrote:

 This is something BF added Sept 1 2009:

 added --projopt  switch to do optimal linear estimation of 
 gray matter
 values given a set of precomputed gray matter densities.

 I don't know what it would mean beyond that

 doug


 On 04/02/2014 10:49 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
  Hello,
 
  I found an option in mri_vol2surf for which I could not 
 find a
 documentation. The option is called:
 
  --projopt
 
  It would be nice if somebody could give a description of 
 this
 option.
 
  Respectfully yours
 
  pfannmoe
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 

 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422

 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing:
 ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the 
 person to
 whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in 
 error and
 the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners
 Compliance HelpLine at
 

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surcluster and centroid option

2014-04-09 Thread Douglas Greve

By irregular, I mean irregularly shaped (non-concave) such that the 
centroid is actually not inside the cluster. Eg, a ring would have the 
centroid in the center but technically it would not be in the ring


On 4/9/14 2:48 AM, Joerg Pfannmoeller wrote:
 On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:02:24 -0400
 Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:


 Is this group data? Or otherwise on fsaverage? Or on the subject's
 surface?
 It is on a single subject on its on anatomy (self).

 How are you determining that the centroid is outside of the
 cluster?
 The coordinates are outside the cluster, there is nothing to worry about that.
   
 It should give you a vertex number for the centroid (I think).
 As you told in your last mail it gives Tal-coordinates and not vertices.

 I opted not to use the centroid by default for this reason. This can
 happen because the centroid is irregular.
 I don not understand this: What do you mean by irregular?

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Fwd: Freesurfer QDEC Buckner Data

2014-04-09 Thread Z K
Saurabh,

Every instance I can recall in which someone on the list has posted an 
issue with downloading freesurfer (or freesurfer data) the issue was due 
to something on the users ends. Most often the problem is due to file 
size limits on clients networks. In every case the problem was solved by 
using another network.

I have tested the link and it is working properly. Please try 
downloading the data from a network other than the one that is giving 
you problems.

-Zeke

On 04/09/2014 01:30 AM, Saurabh Thakur wrote:
 Hello Freesurfer Expert,

 I am not able to download the Bucker_data-tutorial_subjs completely.

 Downloading is stopped after 2.5 Gb.

 I am looking for *quick reply* to download the data set.

 PFA the screen short of terminal window.

 Thanks in advance.

 cheers
 Saurabh Thakur,






 -- Forwarded message --
 From: *Saurabh Thakur* srbht...@gmail.com mailto:srbht...@gmail.com
 Date: Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:57 AM
 Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Freesurfer QDEC Buckner Data
 To: Freesurfer support list freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu


 Hello Freesurfer expert,

 PFA screen short of the terminal.

 It is happening every time i try to download.

 Please suggest some alternative to download the buckner_tutorial_data_subjs.

 Thanks in advance,


 cheers
 Saurabh Thakur,






 On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Saurabh Thakur srbht...@gmail.com
 mailto:srbht...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Louis,

 I have been trying to download using Linux as well as windows but
 after 3.3GB , link is getting disconnected.

 Once i even reached 99.9% download using FTP file but package is not
 getting opened neither getting 100% download complete.

 Do you have any other alternative mirror link to download the file


 
 wgetftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/data/buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz
   -c

 thanks in advance

 cheers
 Saurabh Thakur,






 On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Louis Nicholas Vinke
 vi...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:vi...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 Hi Saurabh,
 Did the wget command fail for you?  I just tried it and the download
 started without any issues.  You can also just paste the ftp
 address into
 your browser and download it that way as well.
 -Louis

 On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Saurabh Thakur wrote:

   Hello Freesurfer Expert,
  
   I am working on QDEC and looking forward to download
 buckner_data from link mentioned below:
  
   wget
 
 ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pub/data/buckner_data-tutorial_subjs.tar.gz
  
   Needing data asap.
  
   Please share alternative mirror link to download the
 buckner_data.
  
   cheers
   Saurabh Thakur,
  
  
  
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
 to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
 and the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners
 Compliance HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
 to you in error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the
 sender and properly
 dispose of the e-mail.






 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] mri_surcluster and centroid option

2014-04-09 Thread Joerg Pfannmoeller
Hi,

I am sorry to disappoint you. I wrote another srcipt to compute the centroid in 
order to clarify whats happening. The centroid computed by the script is in the 
center of the cluster. However, the differences could be due to details of the 
computation. I was not able to unriddle all the details in the freesurfer code. 
Probably I am going to keep this script since it fits what I would like to 
compute. Before I forget about it, I use freesurfer 5.3.

Greetings pfannmoe


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:33:26 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 Hi Jeorg
 
 if the cluster is non-convex, the centroid is not guaranteed to be in the 
 interior. Think of a C or U shape.
 
 cheers
 Bruce
 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Joerg Pfannmoeller 
 wrote:
 
  On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:02:24 -0400
  Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
 
  Is this group data? Or otherwise on fsaverage? Or on the subject's
  surface?
 
  It is on a single subject on its on anatomy (self).
 
  How are you determining that the centroid is outside of the
  cluster?
 
  The coordinates are outside the cluster, there is nothing to worry about 
  that.
 
  It should give you a vertex number for the centroid (I think).
 
  As you told in your last mail it gives Tal-coordinates and not vertices.
 
  I opted not to use the centroid by default for this reason. This can
  happen because the centroid is irregular.
 
  I don not understand this: What do you mean by irregular?
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
 at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.
 



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation same divisions between subjects

2014-04-09 Thread Corinna Bauer
In the mri_extract_label, there is a label number. Where would I find this
for the new labels?

i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz 2035
${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Douglas Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:

  yep, exactly


 On 4/8/14 6:00 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:

  Hi Doug,
 After I have the labels then in each subject's T1 space, I will need to
 then put them into diffusion and resting state space.

 I already have scripts that put the parcellations into subject-specific
 diffusion/resting state space (using bbregister, tkregister2, mri_vol2vol
 (using the inverse registration from bbregister to put the T1 into
 diffusion space), mri_extract_label (extract labels from aparc+aseg.mgz),
 and then mri_label2vol (register each of the extracted labels into
 diffusion space). Would a similar approach work for the new labels?

  Corinna


 On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  wrote:


 Exactly what you have described won't work very well because it would be
 in the volume. I would divide up the parcellations in fsaverage space
 like you've done, then map the parcellation to each subject using
 mri_surf2surf (--sval-annot, see example 6)

 doug

 On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
  Hello all,
 
  I am planning to use mris_divide_parcellation to split the Desikan
  atlas into smaller ROIs, but will need the new ROIs to be consistent
  between subjects.
 
  Can I achieve this if I register each subject to fsaverage space and
  then apply the inverse transform to the divided parcellations (which
  are currently done on the fsaverage brain)?
 
  If so, for extracting each label, what would be used for the label
  number?
   (i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz *2035*
  ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii)
 
 
  Thanks
 
  Corinna
 
 
   ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422

 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
 in error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.




 ___
 Freesurfer mailing 
 listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation same divisions between subjects

2014-04-09 Thread Bruce Fischl
$FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt

cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Corinna Bauer 
wrote:

 In the mri_extract_label, there is a label number. Where would I find this
 for the new labels?
 
 i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz 2035
 ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii
 
 
 On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Douglas Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 wrote:
   yep, exactly

   On 4/8/14 6:00 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
   Hi Doug,
   After I have the labels then in each subject's T1 space, I
   will need to then put them into diffusion and resting
   state space.

   I already have scripts that put the parcellations into
   subject-specific diffusion/resting state space (using
   bbregister, tkregister2, mri_vol2vol (using the inverse
   registration from bbregister to put the T1 into diffusion
   space), mri_extract_label (extract labels from
   aparc+aseg.mgz), and then mri_label2vol (register each of
   the extracted labels into diffusion space). Would a
   similar approach work for the new labels?
 
 Corinna
 
 
 On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Douglas N Greve
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

   Exactly what you have described won't work very well
   because it would be
   in the volume. I would divide up the parcellations
   in fsaverage space
   like you've done, then map the parcellation to each
   subject using
   mri_surf2surf (--sval-annot, see example 6)

   doug

   On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
Hello all,
   
I am planning to use mris_divide_parcellation to
   split the Desikan
atlas into smaller ROIs, but will need the new
   ROIs to be consistent
between subjects.
   
Can I achieve this if I register each subject to
   fsaverage space and
then apply the inverse transform to the divided
   parcellations (which
are currently done on the fsaverage brain)?
   
If so, for extracting each label, what would be
   used for the label
number?
  (i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz
 *2035*
  ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii)
 
 
  Thanks
 
  Corinna
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422
 
 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing:
 ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
 person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
 error and the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners
 Compliance HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
 sent to you in error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact
 the sender and properly
 dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
 it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
 in error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
 and properly
 dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation same divisions between subjects

2014-04-09 Thread Corinna Bauer
It looks like the FreeSurferColorLUT.txt does not contain the label number
for the newly created labels (divided from the desikan atlas).


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:

 $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt

 cheers
 Bruce
 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Corinna Bauer
 wrote:

  In the mri_extract_label, there is a label number. Where would I find
 this
  for the new labels?
 
  i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz 2035
  ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Douglas Greve 
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  wrote:
yep, exactly
 
On 4/8/14 6:00 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
Hi Doug,
After I have the labels then in each subject's T1 space, I
will need to then put them into diffusion and resting
state space.
 
I already have scripts that put the parcellations into
subject-specific diffusion/resting state space (using
bbregister, tkregister2, mri_vol2vol (using the inverse
registration from bbregister to put the T1 into diffusion
space), mri_extract_label (extract labels from
aparc+aseg.mgz), and then mri_label2vol (register each of
the extracted labels into diffusion space). Would a
similar approach work for the new labels?
 
  Corinna
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Douglas N Greve
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
Exactly what you have described won't work very well
because it would be
in the volume. I would divide up the parcellations
in fsaverage space
like you've done, then map the parcellation to each
subject using
mri_surf2surf (--sval-annot, see example 6)
 
doug
 
On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
 Hello all,

 I am planning to use mris_divide_parcellation to
split the Desikan
 atlas into smaller ROIs, but will need the new
ROIs to be consistent
 between subjects.

 Can I achieve this if I register each subject to
fsaverage space and
 then apply the inverse transform to the divided
parcellations (which
 are currently done on the fsaverage brain)?

 If so, for extracting each label, what would be
used for the label
 number?
   (i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz
  *2035*
   ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii)
  
  
   Thanks
  
   Corinna
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
  --
  Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
  MGH-NMR Center
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Phone Number: 617-724-2358
  Fax: 617-726-7422
 
  Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
  FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
  www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
  Outgoing:
  ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
  The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
  person to whom it is
  addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
  error and the e-mail
  contains patient information, please contact the Partners
  Compliance HelpLine at
  http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
  sent to you in error
  but does not contain patient information, please contact
  the sender and properly
  dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
  The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
  it is
  addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
  e-mail
  contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
  HelpLine at
  http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
  in error
  but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
  and properly
  dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in 

Re: [Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation same divisions between subjects

2014-04-09 Thread Corinna Bauer
Should I make up my own LUT for the new ROIs that specifies some colour and
label number?


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Corinna Bauer corinna...@gmail.com wrote:

 It looks like the FreeSurferColorLUT.txt does not contain the label number
 for the newly created labels (divided from the desikan atlas).


 On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Bruce Fischl 
 fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:

 $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt

 cheers
 Bruce
 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Corinna Bauer
 wrote:

  In the mri_extract_label, there is a label number. Where would I find
 this
  for the new labels?
 
  i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz 2035
  ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Douglas Greve 
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  wrote:
yep, exactly
 
On 4/8/14 6:00 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
Hi Doug,
After I have the labels then in each subject's T1 space, I
will need to then put them into diffusion and resting
state space.
 
I already have scripts that put the parcellations into
subject-specific diffusion/resting state space (using
bbregister, tkregister2, mri_vol2vol (using the inverse
registration from bbregister to put the T1 into diffusion
space), mri_extract_label (extract labels from
aparc+aseg.mgz), and then mri_label2vol (register each of
the extracted labels into diffusion space). Would a
similar approach work for the new labels?
 
  Corinna
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Douglas N Greve
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
Exactly what you have described won't work very well
because it would be
in the volume. I would divide up the parcellations
in fsaverage space
like you've done, then map the parcellation to each
subject using
mri_surf2surf (--sval-annot, see example 6)
 
doug
 
On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
 Hello all,

 I am planning to use mris_divide_parcellation to
split the Desikan
 atlas into smaller ROIs, but will need the new
ROIs to be consistent
 between subjects.

 Can I achieve this if I register each subject to
fsaverage space and
 then apply the inverse transform to the divided
parcellations (which
 are currently done on the fsaverage brain)?

 If so, for extracting each label, what would be
used for the label
 number?
   (i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz
  *2035*
   ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii)
  
  
   Thanks
  
   Corinna
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
  --
  Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
  MGH-NMR Center
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Phone Number: 617-724-2358
  Fax: 617-726-7422
 
  Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
  FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
  www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
  Outgoing:
  ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
  The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
  person to whom it is
  addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
  error and the e-mail
  contains patient information, please contact the Partners
  Compliance HelpLine at
  http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
  sent to you in error
  but does not contain patient information, please contact
  the sender and properly
  dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
  The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
  it is
  addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
  e-mail
  contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
  HelpLine at
  http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
  in error
  but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
  and properly
  dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

Re: [Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation same divisions between subjects

2014-04-09 Thread Bruce Fischl

oh, those should be embedded in the .annot file it creates
On Wed, 9 Apr 
2014, Corinna Bauer wrote:



It looks like the FreeSurferColorLUT.txt does not contain the label number
for the newly created labels (divided from the desikan atlas).


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
wrote:
  $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt

  cheers
  Bruce
  On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Corinna Bauer
  wrote:

   In the mri_extract_label, there is a label number. Where would
  I find this
   for the new labels?
  
   i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz 2035
   ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii
  
  
   On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Douglas Greve
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   wrote:
         yep, exactly
  
         On 4/8/14 6:00 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
         Hi Doug,
         After I have the labels then in each subject's T1 space,
  I
         will need to then put them into diffusion and resting
         state space.
  
         I already have scripts that put the parcellations into
         subject-specific diffusion/resting state space (using
         bbregister, tkregister2, mri_vol2vol (using the inverse
         registration from bbregister to put the T1 into
  diffusion
         space), mri_extract_label (extract labels from
         aparc+aseg.mgz), and then mri_label2vol (register each
  of
         the extracted labels into diffusion space). Would a
         similar approach work for the new labels?
  
   Corinna
  
  
   On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Douglas N Greve
   gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
  
         Exactly what you have described won't work very well
         because it would be
         in the volume. I would divide up the parcellations
         in fsaverage space
         like you've done, then map the parcellation to each
         subject using
         mri_surf2surf (--sval-annot, see example 6)
  
         doug
  
         On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
          Hello all,
         
          I am planning to use mris_divide_parcellation to
         split the Desikan
          atlas into smaller ROIs, but will need the new
         ROIs to be consistent
          between subjects.
         
          Can I achieve this if I register each subject to
         fsaverage space and
          then apply the inverse transform to the divided
         parcellations (which
          are currently done on the fsaverage brain)?
         
          If so, for extracting each label, what would be
         used for the label
          number?
(i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz
   *2035*
${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii)
   
   
Thanks
   
Corinna
   
   
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  
   --
   Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
   MGH-NMR Center
   gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   Phone Number: 617-724-2358
   Fax: 617-726-7422
  
   Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
   FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
   www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
   Outgoing:
   ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  
  
   The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
   person to whom it is
   addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
   error and the e-mail
   contains patient information, please contact the Partners
   Compliance HelpLine at
   http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
   sent to you in error
   but does not contain patient information, please contact
   the sender and properly
   dispose of the e-mail.
  
  
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  
  
   The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
  to whom
   it is
   addressed. If you believe this e-mail was 

Re: [Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation same divisions between subjects

2014-04-09 Thread Douglas N Greve

you'll need to figure it out from the volume itself by loading the seg 
with both -seg and -aux. When you find the label you want, click on it 
and the aux value in the control window will tell you what the id is

doug

On 04/09/2014 09:41 AM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
 In the mri_extract_label, there is a label number. Where would I find 
 this for the new labels?

 i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz 2035 
 ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii


 On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Douglas Greve 
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 yep, exactly


 On 4/8/14 6:00 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
 Hi Doug,
 After I have the labels then in each subject's T1 space, I will
 need to then put them into diffusion and resting state space.

 I already have scripts that put the parcellations into
 subject-specific diffusion/resting state space (using bbregister,
 tkregister2, mri_vol2vol (using the inverse registration from
 bbregister to put the T1 into diffusion space), mri_extract_label
 (extract labels from aparc+aseg.mgz), and then mri_label2vol
 (register each of the extracted labels into diffusion space).
 Would a similar approach work for the new labels?

 Corinna


 On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Douglas N Greve
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:


 Exactly what you have described won't work very well because
 it would be
 in the volume. I would divide up the parcellations in
 fsaverage space
 like you've done, then map the parcellation to each subject using
 mri_surf2surf (--sval-annot, see example 6)

 doug

 On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
  Hello all,
 
  I am planning to use mris_divide_parcellation to split the
 Desikan
  atlas into smaller ROIs, but will need the new ROIs to be
 consistent
  between subjects.
 
  Can I achieve this if I register each subject to fsaverage
 space and
  then apply the inverse transform to the divided
 parcellations (which
  are currently done on the fsaverage brain)?
 
  If so, for extracting each label, what would be used for
 the label
  number?
  (i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz *2035*
  ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii)
 
 
  Thanks
 
  Corinna
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

 --
 Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
 MGH-NMR Center
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Phone Number: 617-724-2358 tel:617-724-2358
 Fax: 617-726-7422 tel:617-726-7422

 Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
 FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
 www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
 Outgoing:
 ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
 person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
 error and the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners
 Compliance HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
 sent to you in error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the
 sender and properly
 dispose of the e-mail.




 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
 whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and
 the e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners
 Compliance HelpLine at
 

Re: [Freesurfer] mris_divide_parcellation same divisions between subjects

2014-04-09 Thread Corinna Bauer
Perfect. Thanks!


On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Douglas N Greve
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote:


 you'll need to figure it out from the volume itself by loading the seg
 with both -seg and -aux. When you find the label you want, click on it
 and the aux value in the control window will tell you what the id is

 doug

 On 04/09/2014 09:41 AM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
  In the mri_extract_label, there is a label number. Where would I find
  this for the new labels?
 
  i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz 2035
  ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Douglas Greve
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
  yep, exactly
 
 
  On 4/8/14 6:00 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
  Hi Doug,
  After I have the labels then in each subject's T1 space, I will
  need to then put them into diffusion and resting state space.
 
  I already have scripts that put the parcellations into
  subject-specific diffusion/resting state space (using bbregister,
  tkregister2, mri_vol2vol (using the inverse registration from
  bbregister to put the T1 into diffusion space), mri_extract_label
  (extract labels from aparc+aseg.mgz), and then mri_label2vol
  (register each of the extracted labels into diffusion space).
  Would a similar approach work for the new labels?
 
  Corinna
 
 
  On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Douglas N Greve
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 wrote:
 
 
  Exactly what you have described won't work very well because
  it would be
  in the volume. I would divide up the parcellations in
  fsaverage space
  like you've done, then map the parcellation to each subject
 using
  mri_surf2surf (--sval-annot, see example 6)
 
  doug
 
  On 04/08/2014 04:54 PM, Corinna Bauer wrote:
   Hello all,
  
   I am planning to use mris_divide_parcellation to split the
  Desikan
   atlas into smaller ROIs, but will need the new ROIs to be
  consistent
   between subjects.
  
   Can I achieve this if I register each subject to fsaverage
  space and
   then apply the inverse transform to the divided
  parcellations (which
   are currently done on the fsaverage brain)?
  
   If so, for extracting each label, what would be used for
  the label
   number?
   (i.e. mri_extract_label ${subj_dir}/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz *2035*
   ${subj_dir}/hardi_labels/ctx-rh-insula.nii)
  
  
   Thanks
  
   Corinna
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
  --
  Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
  MGH-NMR Center
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Phone Number: 617-724-2358 tel:617-724-2358
  Fax: 617-726-7422 tel:617-726-7422
 
  Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
  http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
  FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
  www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
  http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
  Outgoing:
  ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
  The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
  person to whom it is
  addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
  error and the e-mail
  contains patient information, please contact the Partners
  Compliance HelpLine at
  http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
  sent to you in error
  but does not contain patient information, please contact the
  sender and properly
  dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu  mailto:
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
  ___
  Freesurfer mailing list
  Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
 
  The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person 

[Freesurfer] R: Re: Problem of size

2014-04-09 Thread Andrea Tateo

Hi Bruce,
thanks for the quick response.
I report the full error message:

WARNING 
=====The
 physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot fit in 
256^3 mm^3 volume.The resulting volume will have 312 slices.If you find 
problems, please let us know 
(freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).=====
$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $reading from 
/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/001/mri/rawavg.mgz...TR=0.00,
 TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00i_ras = (-1, 0, -0)j_ras = (0, 0, -1)k_ras = 
(-0, 1, -0)Original Data has (1, 1, 1) mm size and (256, 256, 312) voxels.Data 
is conformed to 1 mm size and 312 voxels for all directionschanging data type 
from float to uchar (noscale = 0)...MRIchangeType: Building histogramReslicing 
using trilinear interpolationwriting to 
/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/001/mri/orig.mgz...
ERROR! FOV=312.000  256Include the 
flag -cw256 with recon-all!

Thank you very much
Andrea







Messaggio originale
Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 9-apr-2014 14.45
A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it, Freesurfer support 
listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size

Hi Andrea

what size are your voxels? Do you really need an FOV that big? If not, 
you could extract the central 256mm using mri_extract. And I believe this 
is just a warning - does recon-all complete?

cheers
Bruce



On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, 
Andrea Tateo wrote:

 
 Hi FreeSurfer expert,
 
 I have a problem with command recon-all. 
 
 In recon-all.log I can read:
 
 «The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot fit
 in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
 
 The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
 
 If you find problems, please let us know (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).»
 
 I hope are there anyone to help me.
 
 Thank for your help.
 
 Andrea
 
 



The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



  ___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: Problem of size

2014-04-09 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Andrea

will it fit in 256? You can try specifying -cw256

cheers
Bruce


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Andrea Tateo wrote:



Hi Bruce,

thanks for the quick response.

I report the full error message:


WARNING===
==
The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot fit
in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
If you find problems, please let us know (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).
===
==

$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $
reading 
from/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/001
/mri/rawavg.mgz...
TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
i_ras = (-1, 0, -0)
j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
k_ras = (-0, 1, -0)
Original Data has (1, 1, 1) mm size and (256, 256, 312) voxels.
Data is conformed to 1 mm size and 312 voxels for all directions
changing data type from float to uchar (noscale = 0)...
MRIchangeType: Building histogram
Reslicing using trilinear interpolation
writing 
to/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/001
/mri/orig.mgz...


ERROR! FOV=312.000  256
Include the flag -cw256 with recon-all!


Thank you very much

Andrea






Messaggio originale
Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 9-apr-2014 14.45
A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it, Freesurfer support
listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size

Hi Andrea

what size are your voxels? Do you really need an FOV that big? If not,
you could extract the central 256mm using mri_extract. And I believe this
is just a warning - does recon-all complete?

cheers
Bruce



On Wed, 9 Apr 2014,
Andrea Tateo wrote:


 Hi FreeSurfer expert,

 I have a problem with command recon-all. 

 In recon-all.log I can read:

 «The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot
fit
 in 256^3 mm^3 volume.

 The resulting volume will have 312 slices.

 If you find problems, please let us know
(freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).»

 I hope are there anyone to help me.

 Thank for your help.

 Andrea





The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
properly
dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: Problem of size

2014-04-09 Thread Andrea Tateo
I use
«   recon-all -debug -s 001 -autorecon-all»

and after 
«   mri_label2vol --seg aseg.mgz --temp rawavg.mgz --o 001_rawavg.mgz 
--regheader aseg.mgz   »
Where can I specify-cw256 ?




Messaggio originale
Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 9-apr-2014 16.56
A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it
Cc: Freesurfer support listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Ogg: Re: R: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size

Hi Andrea

will it fit in 256? You can try specifying -cw256

cheers
Bruce


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Andrea Tateo wrote:

 
 Hi Bruce,
 
 thanks for the quick response.
 
 I report the full error message:
 
 
 WARNING===
 ==
 The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot fit
 in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
 The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
 If you find problems, please let us know (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).
 ===
 ==
 
 $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $
 reading 
 from/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/001
 /mri/rawavg.mgz...
 TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
 i_ras = (-1, 0, -0)
 j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
 k_ras = (-0, 1, -0)
 Original Data has (1, 1, 1) mm size and (256, 256, 312) voxels.
 Data is conformed to 1 mm size and 312 voxels for all directions
 changing data type from float to uchar (noscale = 0)...
 MRIchangeType: Building histogram
 Reslicing using trilinear interpolation
 writing 
 to/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/001
 /mri/orig.mgz...
 
 
 ERROR! FOV=312.000  256
 Include the flag -cw256 with recon-all!
 
 
 Thank you very much
 
 Andrea
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Messaggio originale
 Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Data: 9-apr-2014 14.45
 A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it, Freesurfer support
 listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size
 
 Hi Andrea
 
 what size are your voxels? Do you really need an FOV that big? If not,
 you could extract the central 256mm using mri_extract. And I believe this
 is just a warning - does recon-all complete?
 
 cheers
 Bruce
 
 
 
 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014,
 Andrea Tateo wrote:
 
 
  Hi FreeSurfer expert,
 
  I have a problem with command recon-all. 
 
  In recon-all.log I can read:
 
  «The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot
 fit
  in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
 
  The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
 
  If you find problems, please let us know
 (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).»
 
  I hope are there anyone to help me.
 
  Thank for your help.
 
  Andrea
 
 
 
 
 
 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 



  ___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: Problem of size

2014-04-09 Thread Bruce Fischl

on the recon-all command line
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Andrea Tateo wrote:


I use
«   recon-all -debug -s 001 -autorecon-all    »


and after 

«   mri_label2vol --seg aseg.mgz --temp rawavg.mgz --o 001_rawavg.mgz
--regheader aseg.mgz   »

Where can I specify        -cw256 ?



Messaggio originale
Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 9-apr-2014 16.56
A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it
Cc: Freesurfer support listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Ogg: Re: R: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size

Hi Andrea

will it fit in 256? You can try specifying -cw256

cheers
Bruce


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Andrea Tateo wrote:


 Hi Bruce,

 thanks for the quick response.

 I report the full error message:


WARNING====
===
 ==
 The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot fit
 in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
 The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
 If you find problems, please let us know (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).
===

 ==

 $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $
 
readingfrom/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3
/001
 /mri/rawavg.mgz...
 TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
 i_ras = (-1, 0, -0)
 j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
 k_ras = (-0, 1, -0)
 Original Data has (1, 1, 1) mm size and (256, 256, 312) voxels.
 Data is conformed to 1 mm size and 312 voxels for all directions
 changing data type from float to uchar (noscale = 0)...
 MRIchangeType: Building histogram
 Reslicing using trilinear interpolation
 
writingto/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/0
01
 /mri/orig.mgz...

 
 ERROR! FOV=312.000  256
 Include the flag -cw256 with recon-all!


 Thank you very much

 Andrea






 Messaggio originale
 Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Data: 9-apr-2014 14.45
 A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it, Freesurfer support
 listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size

 Hi Andrea

 what size are your voxels? Do you really need an FOV that big? If not,
 you could extract the central 256mm using mri_extract. And I believe this
 is just a warning - does recon-all complete?

 cheers
 Bruce



 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014,
 Andrea Tateo wrote:

 
  Hi FreeSurfer expert,
 
  I have a problem with command recon-all. 
 
  In recon-all.log I can read:
 
  «The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot
 fit
  in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
 
  The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
 
  If you find problems, please let us know
 (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).»
 
  I hope are there anyone to help me.
 
  Thank for your help.
 
  Andrea
 
 
 


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.






___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Problem of size

2014-04-09 Thread Andrea Tateo
Endless thanks.
I'll try and update you.
Andrea




Messaggio originale
Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Data: 9-apr-2014 17.16
A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it
Cc: Freesurfer support listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Ogg: Re: R: Re: R: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size

on the recon-all command line
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Andrea Tateo wrote:

 I use
 «   recon-all -debug -s 001 -autorecon-all»
 
 
 and after 
 
 «   mri_label2vol --seg aseg.mgz --temp rawavg.mgz --o 001_rawavg.mgz
 --regheader aseg.mgz   »
 
 Where can I specify-cw256 ?
 
 
 
 Messaggio originale
 Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Data: 9-apr-2014 16.56
 A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it
 Cc: Freesurfer support listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Ogg: Re: R: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size
 
 Hi Andrea
 
 will it fit in 256? You can try specifying -cw256
 
 cheers
 Bruce
 
 
 On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Andrea Tateo wrote:
 
 
  Hi Bruce,
 
  thanks for the quick response.
 
  I report the full error message:
 
 
 WARNING====
 ===
  ==
  The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot fit
  in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
  The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
  If you find problems, please let us know (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).
 ===
 
  ==
 
  $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:47 greve Exp $
  readingfrom/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3
 /001
  /mri/rawavg.mgz...
  TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
  i_ras = (-1, 0, -0)
  j_ras = (0, 0, -1)
  k_ras = (-0, 1, -0)
  Original Data has (1, 1, 1) mm size and (256, 256, 312) voxels.
  Data is conformed to 1 mm size and 312 voxels for all directions
  changing data type from float to uchar (noscale = 0)...
  MRIchangeType: Building histogram
  Reslicing using trilinear interpolation
  writingto/lustre/home/tateo/Simulazione_FREESURF_GRID_2/Segmentazione/SUB_1006_3/0
 01
  /mri/orig.mgz...
 
  
  ERROR! FOV=312.000  256
  Include the flag -cw256 with recon-all!
 
 
  Thank you very much
 
  Andrea
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Messaggio originale
  Da: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Data: 9-apr-2014 14.45
  A: Andrea Tateoandrea.ta...@virgilio.it, Freesurfer support
  listfreesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] Problem of size
 
  Hi Andrea
 
  what size are your voxels? Do you really need an FOV that big? If not,
  you could extract the central 256mm using mri_extract. And I believe this
  is just a warning - does recon-all complete?
 
  cheers
  Bruce
 
 
 
  On Wed, 9 Apr 2014,
  Andrea Tateo wrote:
 
  
   Hi FreeSurfer expert,
  
   I have a problem with command recon-all. 
  
   In recon-all.log I can read:
  
   «The physical sizes are (256.00 mm, 256.00 mm, 312.00 mm), which cannot
  fit
   in 256^3 mm^3 volume.
  
   The resulting volume will have 312 slices.
  
   If you find problems, please let us know
  (freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu).»
  
   I hope are there anyone to help me.
  
   Thank for your help.
  
   Andrea
  
  
  
 
 
  The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
 is
  addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
  e-mail
  contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
  HelpLine at
  http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
  error
  but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
  properly
  dispose of the e-mail.
 
 
 
 
 
 



  ___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] read cluster summary into Matlab?

2014-04-09 Thread Caspar M. Schwiedrzik
Hi!
I was wondering whether there is code available to quickly read cluster
summary files into Matlab?
I need access to the cluster-wise p-values.
Thank you very much!
Caspar
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] read cluster summary into Matlab?

2014-04-09 Thread Douglas N Greve
no, sorry
On 04/09/2014 01:18 PM, Caspar M. Schwiedrzik wrote:
 Hi!
 I was wondering whether there is code available to quickly read 
 cluster summary files into Matlab?
 I need access to the cluster-wise p-values.
 Thank you very much!
 Caspar



 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



[Freesurfer] Two positions (post-doc and software engineer) in Marseille, France

2014-04-09 Thread Olivier Coulon
Title: signatureMail2011

  Dear all,
we have two positions opening in Marseille, France, for the study and 
modelling of brain development. Descriptions can be found at the 
following URLs:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3372764/EngineerPosition_lefevreMarseille.pdf
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3372764/PostDocPosition_lefevreMarseille2.pdf

If interested, pease contact Dr Julien Lefvre at: 
julien.lefe...@univ-amu.fr

Olivier 
  
  -- 








Olivier 
Coulon,CNRS research 
Fellow,

olivier.cou...@univ-amu.fr
Tel: +33491828527fax: +33491828550
  

  http://olivier.coulon.perso.esil.univmed.fr
LSIS 
Laboratory, IM TeamESIL, Campus de Luminy, Case 925, 13288
 Marseille cedex 09, FRANCE

  http://www.lsis.org/brainmorph





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] basic high res data question

2014-04-09 Thread Torrisi, Sam (NIH/NIMH) [F]
Good afternoon gurus-

I’m new to FS and working with 0.7mm iso 7T MPRAGEs. After bias-correction with 
AFNI’s 3dUnifize, recon-all ran without hitch but downsampled everything to 
1mm. Now I have basically the same sentiment and question as this thread from 
~2 years ago (i’m linking to the middle for simplicity):

http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg22852.html

What’s the very latest on this? Thanks!

-Salvatore (Sam) Torrisi

Section on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety
National Institute of Mental Health

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] basic high res data question

2014-04-09 Thread Remi Gau

Hello all,

I have a related question as I am also a freesurfer beginner and 
starting to use it on submilliter MP2RAGE 7T images.


After having had a quick look at the videos, tutos and the archives, I 
found this: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HiResRecon

BTW on that page I guess that the line:
recon-all -mprage -normalization -skulstrip -s $SUBJ
should read
recon-all -mprage -normalization *-skullstrip* -s $SUBJ

For a test run and to familiarize mysef with freesurfer and the trouble 
shooting steps, I ran the basic recon-all on one of the native images 
which gave me results at a 1 mm res.


My question is: is there any reason why these steps should work 
differently for a MP2RAGE compared to the MPRAGE described the 
HiResRecon page?


For testing, I am currently running the steps in the page mentioned 
above on one image for practice before running more subjects.


So far, so good but the following command:
mri_nu_correct.mni --i $SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJ/mri/orig.mgz --o 
$SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJ/mri/nu.mgz --proto-iters 1000 --distance 15 --fwhm 
0.15 --n 1 --uchar $SUBJECTS_DIR/$SUBJ/mri/transforms/talairach.xfm


issued the following warning:
Use of ?PATTERN? without explicit operator is deprecated at 
~/Program/freesurfer/mni/bin/sharpen_volume line 153.


Thanks

*Remi Gau

*
On 09/04/14 21:57, Torrisi, Sam (NIH/NIMH) [F] wrote:

Good afternoon gurus-

I’m new to FS and working with 0.7mm iso 7T MPRAGEs. After bias-correction with 
AFNI’s 3dUnifize, recon-all ran without hitch but downsampled everything to 
1mm. Now I have basically the same sentiment and question as this thread from 
~2 years ago (i’m linking to the middle for simplicity):

http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg22852.html

What’s the very latest on this? Thanks!

-Salvatore (Sam) Torrisi

Section on the Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety
National Institute of Mental Health

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


[Freesurfer] Freeview, fsaverage_sym aparc.annot

2014-04-09 Thread Peggy Skelly
Hi Freesurfer experts,

I'm trying to view aparc.annot on a fsaverage_sym surface.

I can load aparc.a2009a.annot with

freeview -f
$SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage_sym/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc.a2009s.annot

but attempting

freeview -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage_sym/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc.annot

results in  freeview crashing. The command window output is in the attached
text file.

(Freeview 1.0 May 14, 2013; Mac OS 10.9.2)

Thanks,

Peggy
 
$ freeview -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage_sym/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc.annot
2014-04-09 17:40:44.789 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.790 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.801 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.802 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.812 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.813 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.824 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.824 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
Did not find any volume geometry information in the surface
ṕ|ÿreading colortable from annotation file...
colortable with 1036 entries read (originally 
/scratch/tmpdir.annot2std.28231/seg.1.073.xhemi.ctab)
[0]PETSC ERROR: 

[0]PETSC ERROR: Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably 
memory access out of range
[0]PETSC ERROR: Try option -start_in_debugger or -on_error_attach_debugger
[0]PETSC ERROR: or see 
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-as/documentation/troubleshooting.html#Signal[0]PETSC
 ERROR: or try http://valgrind.org on linux or man libgmalloc on Apple to find 
memory corruption errors
[0]PETSC ERROR: configure using --with-debugging=yes, recompile, link, and run 
[0]PETSC ERROR: to get more information on the crash.
[0]PETSC ERROR: - Error Message 

[0]PETSC ERROR: Signal received!
[0]PETSC ERROR: 

[0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 2.3.3, Patch 13, Thu May 15 17:29:26 CDT 
2008 HG revision: 4466c6289a0922df26e20626fd4a0b4dd03c8124
[0]PETSC ERROR: See docs/changes/index.html for recent updates.
[0]PETSC ERROR: See docs/faq.html for hints about trouble shooting.
[0]PETSC ERROR: See docs/index.html for manual pages.
[0]PETSC ERROR: 

[0]PETSC ERROR: Unknown Name on a darwin12. named LoanWolf by peggy Wed Apr  9 
17:40:43 2014
[0]PETSC ERROR: Libraries linked from 
/usr/pubsw/packages/petsc/2.3.3-p13-64b/src/petsc-2.3.3-p13/lib/darwin12.2.0-c-opt
[0]PETSC ERROR: Configure run at Mon Dec 17 15:29:35 2012
[0]PETSC ERROR: Configure options --with-debugging=no --with-cc=gcc --with-fc=0 
--download-f-blas-lapack=0 --download-mpich=1 --with-mpi=1 --with-x=0 
--with-gnu-copyright-code=0 --with-shared=0 COPTFLAGS=-O3 CXXOPTFLAGS=-O3 
FOPTFLAGS=-O3
[0]PETSC ERROR: 

[0]PETSC ERROR: User provided function() line 0 in unknown directory unknown 
file
[unset]: aborting job:
application called MPI_Abort(MPI_COMM_WORLD, 59) - process 0
 
$ freeview -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage_sym/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc.annot
2014-04-09 17:40:44.789 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.790 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.801 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.802 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.812 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.813 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.824 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
2014-04-09 17:40:44.824 Freeview[2054:303] invalid drawable
Did not find any volume geometry information in the surface
ṕ|ÿreading colortable from annotation file...
colortable with 1036 entries read (originally 
/scratch/tmpdir.annot2std.28231/seg.1.073.xhemi.ctab)
[0]PETSC ERROR: 

[0]PETSC ERROR: Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation, probably 
memory access out of range
[0]PETSC ERROR: Try option -start_in_debugger or -on_error_attach_debugger
[0]PETSC ERROR: or see 
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-as/documentation/troubleshooting.html#Signal[0]PETSC
 ERROR: or try http://valgrind.org on linux or man libgmalloc on Apple to find 
memory corruption errors
[0]PETSC ERROR: configure using --with-debugging=yes, recompile, link, and run 
[0]PETSC ERROR: to get more information on the crash.
[0]PETSC ERROR: - Error Message 

[0]PETSC ERROR: Signal received!
[0]PETSC ERROR: 

[0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 2.3.3, Patch 13, Thu May 15 17:29:26 CDT 
2008 HG revision: 4466c6289a0922df26e20626fd4a0b4dd03c8124
[0]PETSC ERROR: See 

[Freesurfer] select_talairach_point function?

2014-04-09 Thread Celine Louapre
Hi
I am sorry if my question is really basic, but I am choosing the seeds for
fsfast resting state connectivity analysis, and I am looking at the
different options in the litterature. Seeds are often presented with the
talairach coordinates, and I was looking for a way to find the
corresponding vertex number on fsaverage surface, so that I can build the
corresponding label that I could use for the fcseed-sess command.
I found this previous email, and there seem to be a command to do that but
I don't know how to launch this command select_talairach_point xtal
ytal ztal
Thank you very much
Celine

 -Message d'origine-
 De : Bruce Fischl [mailto:fischl at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
 Envoyé : mercredi, 10. février 2010 16:18
 À : Ben Hamida Cammoun Leila Faiza
 Cc : freesurfer at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 Objet : Re: [Freesurfer] ROI based on Talairach coordinate

 Hi Leila,

 you can use the tcl command

 select_talairach_point xtal ytal ztal

 in tksurfer in the tcl window (with the % prompt), then make a label from
 that point and dilate it a few times.

 cheers,
 Bruce
 On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Ben Hamida
 Cammoun Leila
 Faiza wrote:

 Dear Freesurfer users and experts,
 This is my second attempt :(
 I am trying to construct a roi based on some talairach coordinate
coming from a paper, but I completely fail to do it with matlab and
neither manually with tksurfer.
 My first try was to use the transformation Talairach.xfm with matlab,
inverse it and try to recover RAS coordinate, it gives me completely
wrong values.
 Second try was to introduce the Tal coordinate directly in Tksurfer,
which is not possible I think (correct me if I am wrong), with the
version I have the is a bug in tkmedit I guess when introducing
Talairach coord (the ideas was to save them and to load the vertex in
tksurfer).. the values changes in the edit box..
 Is there another way??
 Is it possible with script? Or how to do this by matlab?
 Please don't ignore the request.
 Leila
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.



Re: [Freesurfer] Questions about byvoxel statistics from Tracula

2014-04-09 Thread Anastasia Yendiki


Bonsoir Emilie - Tracula draws a large number of path samples, which in 
the end are added up to produce the path probability distribution. FA 
shows the values of FA at each point along the path sample with the 
greatest probability, i.e., along a single 1D curve. FA_Avg averages the 
FA from all the path samples at corresponding points along their 
trajectory. Because it is an average of many values rather than a single 
value, FA_Avg will tend to be less noisy and more reliable.


Currently there is no way to average other values along the path, but you 
can trick the software into doing it. Find the dmri_pathstats command 
line corresponding to the tract that you want in trac-all.log. Rename 
dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz to something else temporarily, and rename the 
volume that you want to get values along the tract from as 
dmri/dtifit_FA.nii.gz. Now when you run the same dmri_pathstats command, 
the pathstats.byvoxel.txt file will contain the values from the new 
volume in the FA/FA_Avg columns, instead of the values from the FA volume.


The coordinates in the stats files are in the subject's native DWI space.

Hope this helps,
a.y

PS: For combining the pathstats.byvoxel.txt files across subjects, get the 
latest tracula update, if you haven't:

http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/Tracula/#Updates


On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Emilie Poirion wrote:


Hello
I'm using Tracula to analyse our DWI-images. Freesurfer reconstructions of
the corresponding T1-images have been perfomed before.
Respectively, the version used are 1.53 and 5.3.
The Tracula process works fine and I have extracted the statistics for all
tracts.
About this statistics, I wanted to know what is the difference between FA
and FA_Avg ?

An other question about the values extracted is about the coordinates in the
file byvoxel.txt. Are they correspind with the coordinates of the voxel in
the dtifit image were the values were extracted?

The last question, can we extracted the same by tract statistics from an
other image like a PET registered to the DWI with your code?

Thanks for your answer

--
Emilie Poirion

Master 1 Informatique Industrielle et  Imagerie Industrielle
Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6)



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Create a label from a binary mask

2014-04-09 Thread Cherisse Onuigbo
Hello,

Sorry for the late reply. It ended up working and overlapping correctly in 
freeview. Thank you
On Friday, April 4, 2014 4:30 PM, Douglas N Greve gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
wrote:
 

Try this first
mri_cor2label --c aseg.mgz --id 17 --l lh.hippo.label
Then load lh.hippo.label

If wramygdala.R.001.nii is not in the conformed space, your command will 
not work

On 04/04/2014 05:17 PM, Cherisse Onuigbo wrote:
 mri_cor2label --c wramygdala.R.001.nii --id 1 --l wramygdala.R.001.label
 tkmedit Subjects_for_Cherisse/S001 T1.mgz -aux brainmask.mgz -seg aseg.mgz

 And then I added the label using the drop down menu.
 On Friday, April 4, 2014 3:45 PM, Douglas N Greve 
 gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:

 What were your mri_cor2label and tkmedit command lines? SPM will never
 work properly for what you are trying to do.

 On 04/04/2014 04:42 PM, Cherisse Onuigbo wrote:
  I first checked it in tkmedit, but I didn't see the region in green as
  I went through the slices. I also put another label in there just to
  check if I was displaying labels correctly and others showed up. Then
  I used the display function in spm and input the coordinates there,
  but it showed that the coordinates were outside the region. Also I was
  wondering why in the label file, all of the vertex id's are -1 instead
  of what I specify in the command.
  On Friday, April 4, 2014 3:08 PM, Douglas N Greve
  gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
 
  How are you checking the vertex coordinates? You can't use SPM, you'll
  have to use tkmedit or freeview
 
  On 04/04/2014 04:04 PM, Cherisse Onuigbo wrote:
   My mask is a volume mask. When I run the function normally, the
   vertices that are in the text file do not fall in the region of my 
 mask.
   On Friday, April 4, 2014 2:28 PM, Douglas N Greve
   gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 wrote:
  
   Hi Cherisse, i don't understand what you have done. Is the mask a 
 volume
   mask or surface mask? In mri_cor2label, you can specify a surface 
 to get
   surface vertex numbers.
  
   doug
  
   On 04/02/2014 07:03 PM, Cherisse Onuigbo wrote:
Hello
   
I was wondering how to create a label from a binary mask. I 
 created a
mask and then normalized it to the template space. When I tried 
 to use
mri_cor2vol, all the vertex numbers come out as -1. I understand 
 that
the vertex numbers should come out as -1, but when I entered the
coordinates in the display function in spm, it was not in the 
 region.
   
Thank you,
Cherisse
  
   
   
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  
   --
   Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
   MGH-NMR Center
   gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   Phone Number: 617-724-2358
   Fax: 617-726-7422
  
   Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
   FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
   www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
   Outgoing: 
 ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
  
  
   The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
   it is
   addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
   e-mail
   contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
   HelpLine at
   http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
   in error
   but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
   and properly
   dispose of the e-mail.


 
  
  
  
  
  
  
   ___
   Freesurfer mailing list
   Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
   https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
 
  --
  Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
  

Re: [Freesurfer] Freeview, fsaverage_sym aparc.annot

2014-04-09 Thread Ruopeng Wang
It appears to have the same issue on Linux as well. Thanks for the feedback. We 
will look into it.

Ruopeng

On Apr 9, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Peggy Skelly peggy.ske...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Freesurfer experts,
 
 I'm trying to view aparc.annot on a fsaverage_sym surface. 
 
 I can load aparc.a2009a.annot with
 
 freeview -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage_sym/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc.a2009s.annot 
 but attempting 
 
 
 freeview -f $SUBJECTS_DIR/fsaverage_sym/surf/lh.pial:annot=aparc.annot
 
 results in  freeview crashing. The command window output is in the attached 
 text file.
 
 (Freeview 1.0 May 14, 2013; Mac OS 10.9.2)
 
 Thanks,
 
 Peggy
 
 error.txterror.txt___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] fsaverage mesh has duplicate pt

2014-04-09 Thread Xuelong Zhao

Hi, 

I loaded the lh.orig cortex for fsaverage into Matlab. My colleague and I found 
that it actually has a duplicate point. 

The index of the duplicate points are: 

1
40970

I checked that both have the same vertices coordinates: 

  -36.7233  -18.4039   64.3611


I'm not sure if this is intentional or not but wanted to draw the freesurfer 
community's attention to this in case it is a bug. Also, I believe a similar 
issue is present for fsaverage's lh.pial and rh.orig (I haven't checked other 
cortices). 

Regards,

AZ



  ___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] fsaverage mesh has duplicate pt

2014-04-09 Thread Thomas Yeo
Can confirm also true for lh.white, but not lh.sphere and lh.inflated.

--Thomas

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Xuelong Zhao andrewz...@live.com.au wrote:

 Hi,

 I loaded the lh.orig cortex for fsaverage into Matlab. My colleague and I
 found that it actually has a duplicate point.

 The index of the duplicate points are:

 1
 40970

 I checked that both have the same vertices coordinates:

   -36.7233  -18.4039   64.3611


 I'm not sure if this is intentional or not but wanted to draw the freesurfer
 community's attention to this in case it is a bug. Also, I believe a similar
 issue is present for fsaverage's lh.pial and rh.orig (I haven't checked
 other cortices).

 Regards,

 AZ



 ___
 Freesurfer mailing list
 Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
 https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


 The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
 addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
 e-mail
 contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
 HelpLine at
 http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
 error
 but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
 properly
 dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer