Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Map of covariance
the rational is to make them sum to 1.0 so that the gamma.mgh file has units of mm (or whatever the input units are). It is unimportant for p-values. On 10/10/2017 01:54 PM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: > Thanks > > In which contrast I must change "1" with "0.25"? > What is the rationale to use 0.25? > > > Sent from Virgilio Mobile > > > Il 10/10/2017, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> ha scritto: > > I don't understand what you mean by "where I should use" > > I thought I looked through all those contrasts a few weeks ago, no? > > > On 10/10/2017 04:22 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: >> You have suggested to use >> 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25 >> to look the map where, considering the group differences, the covariate >> predicts the dependent variable (functional connectivity) in 4GV1. >> >> Below I'm reporting the contrast that I have used. >> Please could you check it and suggest correction? >> Could you explain where I should use 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25, please? >> >> Thanks >> >> C1) gr1-gr2_intercept 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >> C2 )gr1-gr2_slope 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >> C3) gr1-gr3_intercept 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >> C4) gr1-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >> C5) gr1-gr4_intercept 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C6) gr1-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >> C7) gr2-gr3_intercept 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >> C8) gr2-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 >> C9) gr2-gr4_intercept 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C10) gr2-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 >> C11) gr3-gr4_intercept 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C12) gr3-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 >> C13) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.intercept 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 >> C14) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.slope 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 >> C15) group.effect.intercept >> 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >> 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >> 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C16) group.effect.slope >>> 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 10/6/17 9:24 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: >>> Thank you very much. >>> Where I should put 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25? >>> Which are the contrast reported below that I should modify? >>> >>> C1) gr1-gr2_intercept 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>> C2 )gr1-gr2_slope 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >>> C3) gr1-gr3_intercept 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>> C4) gr1-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >>> C5) gr1-gr4_intercept 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C6) gr1-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >>> C7) gr2-gr3_intercept 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>> C8) gr2-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 >>> C9) gr2-gr4_intercept 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C10) gr2-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 >>> C11) gr3-gr4_intercept 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C12) gr3-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 >>> C13) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.intercept 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 >>> C14) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.slope 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 >>> C15) group.effect.intercept >>> 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>> 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>> 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C16) group.effect.slope >>> 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >>> Messaggio originale >>> Da: "Douglas Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> Data: 9-ott-2017 22.56 >>> A: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>> Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Map of covariance >>> >>> I don't know what you are asking >>> >>> >>> On 10/6/17 9:24 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: >>>> Thank you very much. >>>> Where I should put 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25? >>>> Which are the contrast reported below that I should modify? >>>> >>>> C1) gr1-gr2_intercept 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>>> C2 )gr1-gr2_slope 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >>>> C3) gr1-gr3_intercept 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>>> C4) gr1-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >>>> C5) gr1-gr4_intercept 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>>> C6) gr1-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >>>> C7) gr2-gr3_intercept 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>>> C8) gr2-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 >>>> C9) gr2-gr4_intercept 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>>> C10) gr2-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 >>>> C11) gr3-gr4_intercept 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 >>>> C12) gr3-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 >>>> C13) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.intercept 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 >>>> C14) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.slope 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 >>>> C15) group.effect.intercept >>>> 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>>> 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>>> 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >&g
[Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Map of covariance
Thanks In which contrast I must change "1" with "0.25"? What is the rationale to use 0.25? Sent from Virgilio Mobile Il 10/10/2017, Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> ha scritto: I don't understand what you mean by "where I should use" I thought I looked through all those contrasts a few weeks ago, no? On 10/10/2017 04:22 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: > You have suggested to use > 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25 > to look the map where, considering the group differences, the covariate > predicts the dependent variable (functional connectivity) in 4GV1. > > Below I'm reporting the contrast that I have used. > Please could you check it and suggest correction? > Could you explain where I should use 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25, please? > > Thanks > > C1) gr1-gr2_intercept 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 > C2 )gr1-gr2_slope 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 > C3) gr1-gr3_intercept 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 > C4) gr1-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 > C5) gr1-gr4_intercept 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 > C6) gr1-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 > C7) gr2-gr3_intercept 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 > C8) gr2-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 > C9) gr2-gr4_intercept 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 > C10) gr2-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 > C11) gr3-gr4_intercept 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 > C12) gr3-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 > C13) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.intercept 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 > C14) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.slope 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 > C15) group.effect.intercept > 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 > 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 > C16) group.effect.slope >> 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >> 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 > > > > > > > > On 10/6/17 9:24 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: >> Thank you very much. >> Where I should put 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25? >> Which are the contrast reported below that I should modify? >> >> C1) gr1-gr2_intercept 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >> C2 )gr1-gr2_slope 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >> C3) gr1-gr3_intercept 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >> C4) gr1-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >> C5) gr1-gr4_intercept 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C6) gr1-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >> C7) gr2-gr3_intercept 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >> C8) gr2-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 >> C9) gr2-gr4_intercept 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C10) gr2-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 >> C11) gr3-gr4_intercept 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C12) gr3-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 >> C13) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.intercept 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 >> C14) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.slope 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 >> C15) group.effect.intercept >> 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >> 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >> 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >> C16) group.effect.slope >> 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >> 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 > >> Messaggio originale >> Da: "Douglas Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> Data: 9-ott-2017 22.56 >> A: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >> Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Map of covariance >> >> I don't know what you are asking >> >> >> On 10/6/17 9:24 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: >>> Thank you very much. >>> Where I should put 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25? >>> Which are the contrast reported below that I should modify? >>> >>> C1) gr1-gr2_intercept 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>> C2 )gr1-gr2_slope 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >>> C3) gr1-gr3_intercept 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>> C4) gr1-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >>> C5) gr1-gr4_intercept 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C6) gr1-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >>> C7) gr2-gr3_intercept 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>> C8) gr2-gr3_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 >>> C9) gr2-gr4_intercept 0 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C10) gr2-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 >>> C11) gr3-gr4_intercept 0 0 1 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C12) gr3-gr4_slope 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 >>> C13) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.intercept 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 >>> C14) gr1+gr2-vs-gr3+gr4.slope 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 >>> C15) group.effect.intercept >>> 1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 >>> 1 0 -1 0 0 0 0 0 >>> 1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 0 >>> C16) group.effect.slope >>> 0 0 0 0 1 -1 0 0 >>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 -1 0 >>> 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 -1 >>> >>> >>>> Messaggio originale >>>> Da: "Douglas Greve" <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>>> Data: 3-ott-2017 16.19 >>>> A: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> >>>> Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: R: Re: R: Re: Map of covariance >>>> >>>> probably you want 0 0 0 0 .25 .25 .25 .25 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/3/17 10:10 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: >>>>> Many thank