Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
I run FreeSWITCH on a Windows Server 2008 R2 (x64) box with several analog lines and it works very well. mercutioviz wrote: > > And we shouldn't be using 1.0.4 anyway, should we? ;) > -MC > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Moises Silva > wrote: > >> I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows lately and seems to work pretty >> well. >> Sangoma has been testing more and more lately the Windows drivers with >> FreeSWITCH, and I think you should be just fine.I have not tested 1.0.4 >> though, always using trunk, if you are going to be using PSTN lines (and >> therefore requiring openzap) I think it would be a good idea for you to >> use >> trunk and latest wanpipe drivers. >> >> -- >> Moises Silva >> Senior Software Engineer >> Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R >> 9T3 Canada >> t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. m...@sangoma.com >> >> > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Windows-Stable-enough-for-production-use-tp4174199p4183200.html Sent from the freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
And we shouldn't be using 1.0.4 anyway, should we? ;) -MC On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Moises Silva wrote: > I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows lately and seems to work pretty well. > Sangoma has been testing more and more lately the Windows drivers with > FreeSWITCH, and I think you should be just fine.I have not tested 1.0.4 > though, always using trunk, if you are going to be using PSTN lines (and > therefore requiring openzap) I think it would be a good idea for you to use > trunk and latest wanpipe drivers. > > -- > Moises Silva > Senior Software Engineer > Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R > 9T3 Canada > t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. m...@sangoma.com > > ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
I've been using FreeSWITCH on Windows lately and seems to work pretty well. Sangoma has been testing more and more lately the Windows drivers with FreeSWITCH, and I think you should be just fine.I have not tested 1.0.4 though, always using trunk, if you are going to be using PSTN lines (and therefore requiring openzap) I think it would be a good idea for you to use trunk and latest wanpipe drivers. -- Moises Silva Senior Software Engineer Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. m...@sangoma.com On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Michael Giagnocavo wrote: > We switched to Windows for production after 1.0.4. We've run into no > stability issues with it. The highest we go is only 100 sessions/sec. We're > also use media bypass and mod_managed. > > -Michael > > -Original Message- > From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto: > freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145 > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM > To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org > Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use? > > > Hello > > Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't > anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely > run Freeswitch on that OS. > > Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line > (ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers that they really should buy a > dedicated Linux box to run FS? > > Thank you. > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322p26807322.html > Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > > ___ > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
We switched to Windows for production after 1.0.4. We've run into no stability issues with it. The highest we go is only 100 sessions/sec. We're also use media bypass and mod_managed. -Michael -Original Message- From: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [mailto:freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] On Behalf Of Fred-145 Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 12:39 AM To: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Subject: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use? Hello Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely run Freeswitch on that OS. Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line (ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers that they really should buy a dedicated Linux box to run FS? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322p26807322.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
Re: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
Hi, We've been running FS in win32 in a "semi-production" environment for some time now (since version 1.0.1 - following the trunk all the time since then). We use it as both a lab environment - to distribute SIP-trunks to different PBX'es, and also for "real" endpoints for some (about 10-15) of our internal users. Over the time there have been a few issues (now many though), but from 1.0.4 and later it's been very stable for our use, and no memory leaks etc. We haven't tried analog PSTN connections though, only SIP, h323 (opal) and some (not much) use of Sangoma E1 connected to one of our PBX'es. /Peter Från: freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org [freeswitch-users-boun...@lists.freeswitch.org] för Fred-145 [codecompl...@free.fr] Skickat: den 16 december 2009 08:38 Till: freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org Ämne: [Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use? Hello Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely run Freeswitch on that OS. Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line (ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers that they really should buy a dedicated Linux box to run FS? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322p26807322.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org !DSPAM:4b2891a332931788118788! ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
[Freeswitch-users] [Windows] Stable enough for production use?
Hello Since Freeswitch is also available for Windows (and Mac, but I don't anything about Macintosh), I'd like some feedback from users who routinely run Freeswitch on that OS. Is it stable enough to be used in production to handle a single analog line (ie. SOHO use), or should I warn customers that they really should buy a dedicated Linux box to run FS? Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Windows--Stable-enough-for-production-use--tp26807322p26807322.html Sent from the Freeswitch-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ FreeSWITCH-users mailing list FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users http://www.freeswitch.org
