[FRIAM] Once $399 A Year, Google Earth Pro Is Now Free
FYI. Seems to work for Windows or Mac, but not phones or tablets. Yet. Article: http://techcrunch.com/2015/01/31/once-399-a-year-google-earth-pro-is-now-free/ === Tom Johnson - Inst. for Analytic Journalism Santa Fe, NM SPJ Region 9 Director t...@jtjohnson.com 505-473-9646 === FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
[FRIAM] Don’t harm municipalities for regulating oil costs - The Santa Fe New Mexican: My View
Kim Sorvig, a long time Friamer, wrote this last week: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/my_view/reader-view-don-t-harm-municipalities-for-regulating-oil-costs/article_0235a9bd-0f56-5610-8386-40efc6167e55.html?_dc=234697471139.95255 I just thought this might be an interesting conversation, especially for those of us outside of New Mexico. Basically you don't own your property completely, there is something called Mineral Rights .. which means you don't own your property all the way down .. if its on top of oil, uranium, etc .. the industries may have rights to that. Probably lost in history but basically its a sorta commons argument .. but silly. -- Owen FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Re: [FRIAM] Don’t harm municipalities for regulating oil costs - The Santa Fe New Mexican: My View
It was worse in Pittsburgh. I owned some land down in Torrance County, NM from 1990 to 2000. The deed specified that I owned half the mineral rights, as I recall. Pittsburgh has something called the “Pittsburgh Coal Seam” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittsburgh_coal_seam ) under it. You can’t buy the mineral rights for any price as I understand it. You would own a lot of coal if you could. Apparently the coal under the City won’t be mined any time soon, however. Frank Frank C. Wimberly 140 Calle Ojo Feliz Santa Fe, NM 87505 mailto:wimber...@gmail.com wimber...@gmail.com mailto:wimbe...@cal.berkeley.edu wimbe...@cal.berkeley.edu Phone: (505) 995-8715 Cell: (505) 670-9918 From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 10:35 AM To: Complexity Coffee Group Subject: [FRIAM] Don’t harm municipalities for regulating oil costs - The Santa Fe New Mexican: My View Kim Sorvig, a long time Friamer, wrote this last week: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/my_view/reader-view-don-t-harm-municipalities-for-regulating-oil-costs/article_0235a9bd-0f56-5610-8386-40efc6167e55.html?_dc=234697471139.95255 I just thought this might be an interesting conversation, especially for those of us outside of New Mexico. Basically you don't own your property completely, there is something called Mineral Rights .. which means you don't own your property all the way down .. if its on top of oil, uranium, etc .. the industries may have rights to that. Probably lost in history but basically its a sorta commons argument .. but silly. -- Owen FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Re: [FRIAM] [ SPAM ] RE: clinical diagnosis of [a]theism?
Glen and others, thank you, Someone once claimed that as we age we become transparent. That might frustrate the girl with the mirror fixation. The link to the date.html works like a charm. GREAT. I can see Myself and every one else.! Now is anyone gifted on Graph Theory?. I have a Circulant Graph that appears very Hamiltonian in 3D and not so in 2D, but still interesting? It appears to cross it's own paths or tracks . (4 way intersections are nodes) I am just starting to learn this discipline accidentally and reluctantly, against my stubborn nature. I loaded an example onto One Drive https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=14A5CDB09AEE4237id=14A5CDB09AEE4237%212315v=3 One connected Graph with two isomorphs , blue and red , with one to one correspondence between nodes or vertices. When I transfer the graphs to Eng. Software I can place strut/bridges/connections between two or more copies of the graph and build a skeleton out of a set of structures. It can appear to be moving frame to frame. I have been working on this for some time, on and off, and am entertaining a future public presentation. I had hoped to make a journey to your sunny climes. Somewhere I have a structure with valence of 10 per node causing me some great anxiety. Maybe by the time I figure it out I will be fully transparent, while the presentation has materialized. vib -Original Message- From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of glen Sent: January-30-15 1:44 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] [ SPAM ] RE: clinical diagnosis of [a]theism? On 01/29/2015 07:56 PM, Vladimyr Burachynsky wrote: I have the distinct awkward feeling that, while I write, there is no compelling evidence of my existence, only my utterings. Perhaps my hollow ringing echoes are sufficient to serve as my fake evidence, should I choose to perjure myself in a court. Is there such a beast as the Inverted Solipsist ( everyone else is real but not himself)? We have diagnostic criteria for everything under the sun. So, there's bound to be one. I read a fantasy novel a long time ago about a girl who was unsure of her existence. So she surrounded herself with mirrors to remind her. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mordant%27s_Need I also have heard that many people feel invisible. And I know that, when I regularly eat meals in a pub or restaurant by myself, with the same wait staff and other regular customers, almost nobody gives any evidence they remember me. No recognition at all at least it takes lots and lots of visits to get any recognition. But my wife and I can go to a place _once_ and then return a month or so later, and seemingly everyone who was there last time recognizes us. Ironically, I'm a stickler for eye contact and my wife doesn't seem to care about making eye contact with strangers. Does anyone recall washroom graffiti of the 60's and 70's sometimes eloquent sometimes rather vulgar and blunt. Without a time line one could imagine a dialogue, at times, with penmanship the only distinguishing feature to support the fantasy. At the next gas station, 100 miles further West, the conversation would resume, based only upon the very recognizable penmanship. The trans-Canada highway can be very long. Does the conversation take on a different tone when traveling , in reverse , West to East. All completely arbitrary. So it seems are any and all emotional insights. At a 4-way intersection without lights the first arrival becomes next to leave. But if none of the drivers can remember their arrival sequence there is calamity ahead. Perhaps if a numbering system is used following a thread title, the Real sequence can be re-assembled. That Implies that each quote also contains the number assignment. This depends fundamentally on what you think you're doing when you number something. Are you indexing? Ordering? Merely tagging? Are they metadata tags? They type of music I like best tends to contain nearly nonsensical lyrics ... not only is it difficult to hear them, but even if you download them from the band, assuming they know what they are, they still make very little sense... at least to me. That's why I enjoy[ed] placing them, line by line in my e-mail signature database and having it pseudo-randomly select single lines from all those lyrics to include in my e-mail signature. Nick might think of such things as postmodern. I tend to think of them as cumulative sense-making ... e.g. the only complete way to understand a deck of cards is to shuffle them over and over and try to make sense of them in various new sequences and subsets. If random re-ordering the _moments_ of your life/story make that story meaningless, then perhaps it's time to re-think the meaning of your story/life? Glen quoted Marcus but only gave a date Wed Jan 28... not the thread. I have not received the e-mail from Marcus containing that snippet.
Re: [FRIAM] Don’t harm municipalities for regulating oil costs - The Santa Fe New Mexican: My View
Frank remembers Pennsylvania law correctly—but we had a very good lawyer when we bought our Pittsburgh house, and he simply crossed out the clause that said we didn’t own the mineral rights beneath our house, and made all parties to the transaction initial it. He was actually a civil liberties lawyer, but this tickled me much. Whether it would have held up in court when Consolidated started to mine under our house, I have no idea. Pamela On Feb 1, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Frank Wimberly wimber...@gmail.com wrote: It was worse in Pittsburgh. I owned some land down in Torrance County, NM from 1990 to 2000. The deed specified that I owned half the mineral rights, as I recall. Pittsburgh has something called the “Pittsburgh Coal Seam” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittsburgh_coal_seam ) under it. You can’t buy the mineral rights for any price as I understand it. You would own a lot of coal if you could. Apparently the coal under the City won’t be mined any time soon, however. Frank Frank C. Wimberly 140 Calle Ojo Feliz Santa Fe, NM 87505 wimber...@gmail.com wimbe...@cal.berkeley.edu Phone: (505) 995-8715 Cell: (505) 670-9918 From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Owen Densmore Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 10:35 AM To: Complexity Coffee Group Subject: [FRIAM] Don’t harm municipalities for regulating oil costs - The Santa Fe New Mexican: My View Kim Sorvig, a long time Friamer, wrote this last week: http://www.santafenewmexican.com/opinion/my_view/reader-view-don-t-harm-municipalities-for-regulating-oil-costs/article_0235a9bd-0f56-5610-8386-40efc6167e55.html?_dc=234697471139.95255 I just thought this might be an interesting conversation, especially for those of us outside of New Mexico. Basically you don't own your property completely, there is something called Mineral Rights .. which means you don't own your property all the way down .. if its on top of oil, uranium, etc .. the industries may have rights to that. Probably lost in history but basically its a sorta commons argument .. but silly. -- Owen FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Re: [FRIAM] [ SPAM ] RE: clinical diagnosis of [a]theism?
Vladimyr wrote: I have a Circulant Graph that appears very Hamiltonian in 3D and not so in 2D, but still interesting? Mathematica recently (ver 10) added a graph analysis capability. It has a Hamiltonian predicate (HamiltonianGraphQ). Marcus FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
