Re: 2.4 ready to be released

2001-07-02 Thread Olivier Chapuis
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 06:39:37PM +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
 Okay folks,
 
 even if I drop dead before tomorrow, that should not stop the
 release.  All there is left to do:
 
  - Test the tarballs in the testing directory.
  - Rename the tarballs to fvwm-2.4.0.tar.{gz,bz2}
  - Regenerate/update the web page.
  - Move the tarballs to the proper place.
  - Announce the release.
 
 I have already taken care of everything that has to be done in CVS
 for the release (so, if this tarball does not become the release
 tarball, the fvwm-2.4.0 tag has to be moved to the new file
 versions).  If nothing comes until tomorrow, 6 PM (GMT), it's
 release time.  Jason, can you update the web page and send the
 announcement then?


I have found a little problem in the tar ball and I've no solution
to solve it.

I do not know why but modules/FvwmScript/Scripts/FvwmScript-Setup95
is in the tarball (only the .in version should be in it).
FvwmScript-Setup95 is removed (normal) and build (not normal at all)
when we do a make dist. When building fvwm FvwmScript-Setup95 is
not rebuild from FvwmScript-Setup95.in. So, FvwmScript-Setup95
will work only if the prefix=/usr/local (or an other recent
version of fvwm is installed with this prefix ...).

The only fix I see is to do the following:
gunzip fvwm-2.4.0-pre2.tar.gz
tar -delete -vf fvwm-2.4.0-pre2.tar 
fvwm-2.4.0/modules/FvwmScript/Scripts/FvwmScript-Setup95
gzip fvwm-2.4.0-pre2.tar

This is really only a partial fix since it does not seems that
FvwmScript-Setup95 is rebuild at the second configure even
if Makefile's are modified (say by changing the prefix).
Note that modules/FvwmScript/Scripts/Makefile.am is really
similar to modules/FvwmForm/Makefile.am but FvwmForm-Setup is not
in the tarball, however, if you do
./configure; make; ./configure --prefix=/foo; make; make install
FvwmForm-Setup is not rebuild at the second make and so
does not work ... (need a make clean before the second make;
work also for FvwmScript-Setup95)

 Guess it's time to put the Champagne in the Refrigerator :o)


I have only one or two Hoegaarden in my frigerator but
I do not think that this problem should stop the procedure.
I think we will see others small problems in the next few days,
and it will be good to release 2.4.1 in a short time.

Olivier
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm-workers in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 2.4 ready to be released

2001-07-02 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 02 Jul 2001 19:46:22 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote:
 
 I have found a little problem in the tar ball and I've no solution
 to solve it.
 
 I do not know why but modules/FvwmScript/Scripts/FvwmScript-Setup95
 is in the tarball (only the .in version should be in it).
 FvwmScript-Setup95 is removed (normal) and build (not normal at all)
 when we do a make dist. When building fvwm FvwmScript-Setup95 is
 not rebuild from FvwmScript-Setup95.in. So, FvwmScript-Setup95
 will work only if the prefix=/usr/local (or an other recent
 version of fvwm is installed with this prefix ...).

Oh, true. Both rpms suffer from this problem, i.e. they have broken
Setup95. So new users will get the initial menu with a non-working item.

 The only fix I see is to do the following:
 gunzip fvwm-2.4.0-pre2.tar.gz
 tar -delete -vf fvwm-2.4.0-pre2.tar 
 fvwm-2.4.0/modules/FvwmScript/Scripts/FvwmScript-Setup95
 gzip fvwm-2.4.0-pre2.tar

Good hack, but then this should be done by everyone who does
cvs update -r version-2_4_0.

 This is really only a partial fix since it does not seems that
 FvwmScript-Setup95 is rebuild at the second configure even
 if Makefile's are modified (say by changing the prefix).
 Note that modules/FvwmScript/Scripts/Makefile.am is really
 similar to modules/FvwmForm/Makefile.am but FvwmForm-Setup is not
 in the tarball, however, if you do
 ./configure; make; ./configure --prefix=/foo; make; make install
 FvwmForm-Setup is not rebuild at the second make and so
 does not work ... (need a make clean before the second make;
 work also for FvwmScript-Setup95)

I may fix these rebuilding problems too.

  Guess it's time to put the Champagne in the Refrigerator :o)
 
 I have only one or two Hoegaarden in my frigerator but
 I do not think that this problem should stop the procedure.
 I think we will see others small problems in the next few days,
 and it will be good to release 2.4.1 in a short time.

Well, the only true error is inclusion of FvwmScript-Setup95 into the
tarball, others are not critical, make clean fixes them for now,
so I will see whether they are worthy fixing too.

I don't know whether 2.4.0 is announced yet, I suppose it is not.
I will fix this error and retag changed files.

Then I will make distclean2; cvs update -r version-2_4_0; make distcheck2,
on other machine, rename and upload fvwm-2.4.0-pre3.tar.{gz,bz2} files and
Jason will rename them to fvwm-2.4.0.tar.{gz,bz2} tommorow.

Anyway, nothing critical happened. We may continue a celebration. :)

Regards,
Mikhael.
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm-workers in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 2.4 ready to be released

2001-07-01 Thread Dan Espen
Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Okay folks,
 
  - Test the tarballs in the testing directory.

I downloaded the tar.gz, compiled it with Suns Compiler and Suns
Make.  Seems to be good.

-- 
Dan Espen
444 Hoes Lane  Room RRC 1C-214   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Piscataway, NJ 08854 Phone: (732) 699-5570
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm-workers in the
body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]