Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. That doesn't explains why it's good for gajim, does it ? And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I agree with the upgrade to GPL v3, not that I think that's actually needed or useful, but I absolutely *disagree* to any later version. I'll never agree to license that doesn't exists yet (and that's why gajim was GPL v2 only in the first place) -- Vincent Hanquez ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
On 8/31/07, Vincent Hanquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. That doesn't explains why it's good for gajim, does it ? No if you want to look it up, you're free to do so. :) Yann won't copy paste fsf docs cause everyone here knows fsf. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I agree with the upgrade to GPL v3, not that I think that's actually needed or useful, but I absolutely *disagree* to any later version. I'll never agree to license that doesn't exists yet (and that's why gajim was GPL v2 only in the first place) I agree with you on the or later being too vague, too general but in legal terms it's better than only gplv3 especially because it makes it easier to switch to gplv4 (after 10 years..) and to gplv5 (after 15-20 years). We don't know of course what FLOSS and Gajim will be in the next 5 years so.. Moreover the more developers hack, the less easier it gets to update to v4 v5 etc.. But if we don't then we may lose compatibility (well... officialy that). Google on GPL or later for more. Anyways, good to see you respond. ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
I agree to GPL V3 as well as future versions. Besides, it wouldn't do the rock the boat. :) On 8/29/07, Piotr Gaczkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dnia 27-08-2007, Pn o godzinie 12:12 +0200, Yann Leboulanger napisał(a): Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I agree to use GPLv3 or later. Piotr Gaczkowski ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Dnia 27-08-2007, Pn o godzinie 12:12 +0200, Yann Leboulanger napisał(a): Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I agree to use GPLv3 or later. Piotr Gaczkowski signature.asc Description: To jest część listu podpisana cyfrowo ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Hello On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I'm not sure if any of my patches got in, but in the case of yes, I agree with GPLv3 or any other OpenSource licence. -- grep me no patterns and I'll tell you no lines. Michal 'vorner' Vaner pgpRJyYJGRRhQ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:12:37PM +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. GPL3 or later is fine by me. pgpH6Shy4n0Uv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
I've made a mistake : i agree to use GPLv3 *or later* On 8/27/07, Geobert Quach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree to use GPLv3 On 8/27/07, Yann Leboulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html -- Yann -- Geobert QUACH http://articles-ido.dnsalias.org -- Geobert QUACH http://articles-ido.dnsalias.org ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
I agree to use GPLv3 or later 2007/8/27, Yann Leboulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html -- Yann ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Fine for me as well, I agree to change to GPLv3 or later. Am Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:12:37 +0200 schrieb Yann Leboulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
On 8/27/07, Yann wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. fine with me :-) -- - Norman Rasmussen - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Home page: http://norman.rasmussen.co.za/ ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
On 8/27/07, Yann Leboulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Already said yes :) -- Patryk Zawadzki Generated Content ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Yann Leboulanger píše v Po 27. 08. 2007 v 12:12 +0200: I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. Ok, so for the record - I'm for it, let's make the switch! -- Lukáš Petrovický, http://www.petrovicky.net signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Dnia 27-08-2007, pon o godzinie 12:12 +0200, Yann Leboulanger napisał(a): Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html I worked on gajim mostly during SoC, and due to that I have to agree with project's policy. Therefore even if I've got any objections, I have to agree. Tomasz Melcer ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
2007/8/27, Yann Leboulanger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html -- Yann I agree with relicensing Gajim to GPLv3 or later or GPLv3 only. Of course, the first is better. -- D. Kirov ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
El lun, 27-08-2007 a las 12:12 +0200, Yann Leboulanger escribió: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. I accept it for the small contributions I have done to gajim. Regards Santiago Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Hello to everyone that has hacked Gajim. I, too, agree to use GPLv3 or later. ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 12:12 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. GPL v3 is fine with me. -travis Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Yann Leboulanger wrote: Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. Richard Stallman explains here [0] some reasons to switch to Versino 3 of GPL. And as it's difficult to upgrade from GPL V2 to V3, we'd like to release under V3 *or any later version* so that next version of GPL will be used without having to ask everyone. I know many of you already accepted this change, but with this mail we'll keep a trace of your answers :) So thanks in advance for replying to this mail. [0]: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html Any changes I've made are fine to go under gplv3. -Alex Mauer hawke smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
I agree to switch to GPLv3 or later signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
Re: [Gajim-devel] GPL V3 or any later version
Yann Leboulanger a écrit : Gajim is currently released under GPL V2. We'd like to release next version under GPL V3 or any later version. For that we need that all of you (developers and patchers) accept this change. I'm ok to release future versions in GPL V3 or later. I noticed that xmpppy, which is included in gajim packages, is already under GPL V2 or later. ___ Gajim-devel mailing list Gajim-devel@gajim.org https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
