[galaxy-user] What is the quality score type for the Solid datasets downloaded from SRA of NCBI?

2013-03-05 Thread Gene Genome
Hi all,
Please help with the quality score type for the downloaded Solid datasets.
I downloaded RNA-seq datasets, which were generated by AB Solid system, as
base space and at FastQ format from SRA of NCBI. I uploaded the datasets
onto the online sever Galaxy and change the datatype directly into
fastqsanger and then test the quality by running FastQC. The output per
base quality of solid dataset (please take look at the attached figure
per_base_quality-Solid) is quite different from the output per base
quality of Illumina dataset (please compare with the attached figure per
base quality-Illumina). The top score for Solid dataset is about 31,
however the top score for Illumina dataset is 38. What is the quality score
type for the downloaded Solid datasets when downloaded as base space and at
FastQ format from SRA of NCBI? Please help me solve this problem.

Thanks.
Best regards.

Jianguang Du
attachment: per_base_quality-Illumina.pngattachment: per_base_quality-Solid.png___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

Re: [galaxy-user] What is the quality score type for the Solid datasets downloaded from SRA of NCBI?

2013-03-05 Thread Jennifer Jackson

Hello Jianguang,

The tool NGS: QC and manipulation - FASTQ Groomer has some 
information about this, including a link to a wikipedia entry with more 
details specifically about the SRA:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FASTQ_format#NCBI_Sequence_Read_Archive

And here is the SRA submission form, although the experimental record 
you downloaded from is the best place to find details:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/about/sra_data_format

SRA accepts CS and Fastq. In Galaxy these translate to:

Color space reads:
 - datatype Color Space Sanger
 - annotated as fastqcssanger
Fastq reads:
 - datatype with Phred quality offset 64 Illumina 1.3-1.7
 - annotated as fastqillumina
 and
 - datatype with Phred quality offset 33 Illumina 1.8+
 - annotated as fastqsanger

Many tools require fastqsanger. Use the FASTQ Groomer to transform 
as needed, but double check with FastQC just like you are doing. I have 
seen data labeled as Illumina 1.5 that was really already scaled to 
Phred+33, or at least appeared to be. In the end this is a judgement 
call or you can try to contact SRA/data authors for a definitive answer 
if there are no processing notes in the experiment (often the case).


Hopefully this helps,

Jen
Galaxy team

On 3/5/13 8:18 AM, Gene Genome wrote:

Hi all,

Please help with the quality score type for the downloaded Solid
datasets. I downloaded RNA-seq datasets, which were generated by AB
Solid system, as base space and at FastQ format from SRA of NCBI. I
uploaded the datasets onto the online sever Galaxy and change the
datatype directly into fastqsanger and then test the quality by
running FastQC. The output per base quality of solid dataset (please
take look at the attached figure per_base_quality-Solid) is quite
different from the output per base quality of Illumina dataset (please
compare with the attached figure per base quality-Illumina). The top
score for Solid dataset is about 31, however the top score for Illumina
dataset is 38. What is the quality score type for the downloaded Solid
datasets when downloaded as base space and at FastQ format from SRA of
NCBI? Please help me solve this problem.
Thanks.
Best regards.
Jianguang Du


___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

   http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

   http://lists.bx.psu.edu/



--
Jennifer Hillman-Jackson
Galaxy Support and Training
http://galaxyproject.org
___
The Galaxy User list should be used for the discussion of
Galaxy analysis and other features on the public server
at usegalaxy.org.  Please keep all replies on the list by
using reply all in your mail client.  For discussion of
local Galaxy instances and the Galaxy source code, please
use the Galaxy Development list:

 http://lists.bx.psu.edu/listinfo/galaxy-dev

To manage your subscriptions to this and other Galaxy lists,
please use the interface at:

 http://lists.bx.psu.edu/