[Bug libstdc++/36428] std::tr1 Header Location
--- Comment #2 from christopher dot kormanyos at al-lighting dot com 2008-06-05 08:21 --- OK now I understand your strategy. Thanks for the explaination. But there is still a problem in the community. Two very popular compilers (VC and GCC) which are often used in cross development projects together now have different include paths for the C++ tr1 stuff. And it seems like support for tr1 must exist for quite some time until the transition to c++0x is complete. We have discussed this with a few other developers and we wonder if it would be possible to somehow add tr1 to the include path based on a new compiler switch. Perhaps there could be an additional compiler switch like std=c++98tr1. This would allow for code-compatibility when using tr1 and simultaneously allow the build system to be independent of the compiler location. Could this be considered as a change request? Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Chris. -- christopher dot kormanyos at al-lighting dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WONTFIX | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36428
[Bug libstdc++/36428] std::tr1 Header Location
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-05 12:24 --- Use -std=c++0x if you want them in the correct location. They are only part of the C++0x standard and not part of C++98/03 standards. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36428
[Bug libstdc++/36428] std::tr1 Header Location
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-03 09:17 --- This is known. At the right time we debated this issue and in fact some people commented that probably TR1 (n1836) should have more conveniently specified tr1/*. In any case, also given the status of TR1 of technical report (*not* standard) on the way of the next (so called C++0x) standard, which is the main focus now, while TR1 is in regression fixes-only mode, we are not going to change the paths now, breaking all *our* existing users. By the way, in C++0x mode, the path is array. per the current working drafts. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c++ |libstdc++ Resolution||WONTFIX Summary|std::tr1 Header Location|std::tr1 Header Location http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36428
