Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00

[Alissa Cooper]

Joel, thanks for your review. I agree with your comment. I entered a DISCUSS 
ballot as I’m a bit unclear what this spec is achieving. 

Alissa

> On Feb 26, 2018, at 6:01 PM, Donald Eastlake  wrote:
> 
> Hi Joel,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Joel Halpern  > wrote:
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
>  >.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2018-02-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-03-08
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
> 
> Major issues: N/A
> 
> Minor issues: N/A
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> Why does the acknowledgements say:
> "The document was prepared in raw nroff. All macros used were defined
> within the source file."
> ?
> 
> Why not? It's true. I've seen a number of draft with credit in them for MS 
> Word templates and the like. Shouldn't people know their are still drafts 
> being prepared with nroff?

> 
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>  d3e...@gmail.com  
> 
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art 
> 
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00

[Donald Eastlake]

Hi Joel,

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:24 PM, Joel Halpern  wrote:

> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> .
>
> Document: draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2018-02-26
> IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06
> IESG Telechat date: 2018-03-08
>
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
>
> Major issues: N/A
>
> Minor issues: N/A
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> Why does the acknowledgements say:
> "The document was prepared in raw nroff. All macros used were
> defined
> within the source file."
> ?
>

Why not? It's true. I've seen a number of draft with credit in them for MS
Word templates and the like. Shouldn't people know their are still drafts
being prepared with nroff?

Thanks,
Donald
===
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e...@gmail.com
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00

[Joel Halpern]

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-trill-vendor-channel-00
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2018-02-26
IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06
IESG Telechat date: 2018-03-08

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues: N/A

Nits/editorial comments:
Why does the acknowledgements say:
"The document was prepared in raw nroff. All macros used were defined
within the source file."
?


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art