Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
Which revision of code was accepted as part of the grant? On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Petar Tahchiev donated a cactus related codebase to Jakarta Cactus. Registered under Petar Tahchiev / Representing Self Cactus Maven2 Build System ... http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; - The code is not attached to an issue tracker for review to make it possible for Petar to continue development, awaiting the ip clearance. [1] - Jakarted voted to accept the codebase. [2] - The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in grants.txt (under above description) - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site [3] Please check the clearance. The clearance passes by lazy concensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours (adjusting timeframe to the discussion that just took place). Mvgr, Martin [1] http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08612.html [3] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-cactus-tahchiev.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
Ok, other than the issue of what the actual grant is, I have some other questions on the IP clearance: - Under Copyright, there's an item to ensure the donation has an ASF copyright. I can't see that anywhere at the svn revision http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus at revision 158 when I checked. - I'm a little worried that Vincent's +1 has come without checking or reading the code, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08606.html Martin/Felipe/Vincent? On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Petar Tahchiev donated a cactus related codebase to Jakarta Cactus. Registered under Petar Tahchiev / Representing Self Cactus Maven2 Build System ... http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; - The code is not attached to an issue tracker for review to make it possible for Petar to continue development, awaiting the ip clearance. [1] - Jakarted voted to accept the codebase. [2] - The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in grants.txt (under above description) - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site [3] Please check the clearance. The clearance passes by lazy concensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours (adjusting timeframe to the discussion that just took place). Mvgr, Martin [1] http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08612.html [3] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-cactus-tahchiev.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, other than the issue of what the actual grant is, I have some other questions on the IP clearance: - Under Copyright, there's an item to ensure the donation has an ASF copyright. I can't see that anywhere at the svn revision http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus at revision 158 when I checked. - I'm a little worried that Vincent's +1 has come without checking or reading the code, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08606.html Martin/Felipe/Vincent? On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Petar Tahchiev donated a cactus related codebase to Jakarta Cactus. Registered under Petar Tahchiev / Representing Self Cactus Maven2 Build System ... http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; - The code is not attached to an issue tracker for review to make it possible for Petar to continue development, awaiting the ip clearance. [1] - Jakarted voted to accept the codebase. [2] - The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in grants.txt (under above description) - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site [3] Please check the clearance. The clearance passes by lazy concensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours (adjusting timeframe to the discussion that just took place). Mvgr, Martin [1] http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08612.html [3] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-cactus-tahchiev.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dion hi, I was also wondering how to fill in the software grant, so I wrote the donation as the Cactus Maven2 Build system and the whole repository strucure on http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; But you are right, I didn't mention any revision number, and I guess that is my mistake :-(. As to the copyright statement, there is a license included and it is under documentation/licenses folders. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
On 4/23/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, other than the issue of what the actual grant is, I have some other questions on the IP clearance: - Under Copyright, there's an item to ensure the donation has an ASF copyright. I can't see that anywhere at the svn revision http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus at revision 158 when I checked. - I'm a little worried that Vincent's +1 has come without checking or reading the code, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08606.html Martin/Felipe/Vincent? On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Petar Tahchiev donated a cactus related codebase to Jakarta Cactus. Registered under Petar Tahchiev / Representing Self Cactus Maven2 Build System ... http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; - The code is not attached to an issue tracker for review to make it possible for Petar to continue development, awaiting the ip clearance. [1] - Jakarted voted to accept the codebase. [2] - The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in grants.txt (under above description) - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site [3] Please check the clearance. The clearance passes by lazy concensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours (adjusting timeframe to the discussion that just took place). Mvgr, Martin [1] http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08612.html [3] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-cactus-tahchiev.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dion hi, I was also wondering how to fill in the software grant, so I wrote the donation as the Cactus Maven2 Build system and the whole repository strucure on http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; But you are right, I didn't mention any revision number, and I guess that is my mistake :-(. It's not a mistake, and please don't get me wrong, I'd really like to get a M2 build system for cactus in place, but we just need to dot the i's and cross the t's when dealing with legal stuff like code donations and licensing. One of the things I don't get is that it *looks like* some of the stuff in the svn repo at http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus is a straight copy from the ASF repo. This makes it confusing, i.e. it looks like you're giving us stuff we already have. As to the copyright statement, there is a license included and it is under documentation/licenses folders. Cool. I was looking for the usual source headers ( http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers ) and didn't see them. I don't think including the license file without explicitly marking the source works. For example, there's no header for http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus/pom.xml Thanks for all your work, and I hope we can get this resolved quickly :-) -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[RESULT] (was Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden M7a release)
The results of the Incubator PMC vote for the Woden M7a release were: Davanum Srinivas +1 Paul Fremantle +1 Sanjiva Weerawarana +1 We have the required 3 IPMC +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes so I will go ahead with an announement for the Woden M7a release. Thanks, John Kaputin. On 4/17/07, John Kaputin (gmail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Woden incubator project is developing a WSDL 2.0 processor in conjunction with efforts of the W3C to deliver the new WSDL 2.0specification. The Woden project team would like to ask the Incubator PMC for approval to publish the Woden Milestone 7a release to support the upcoming Apache WS Axis2 1.2 release. Could Incubator PMC members please vote by Friday 20th April. Woden M7a is an incremental release of Woden M7 which was released on 19th February 2007. M7a adds to M7 two fixes delivered by JIRAs: * WODEN-153 Use the new W3C WSDL 2.0 namespaces. * WODEN-154 A fix to the URI Resolver. The Woden M7a release files are at: http://people.apache.org/~jkaputin/woden/milestones/1.0M7a-incubating/http://people.apache.org/%7Ejkaputin/woden/milestones/1.0M7a-incubating/ This build is based on revision 529170 at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/woden/branches/M7a/ The results of the vote from the woden-dev and WS general lists were: Davanum Srinivas +1 (WSPMC, IPMC) Aleksander Slominski +1 (WSPMC) Jeremy Hughes +1 (WSPMC) Ant Elder +1 (WSPMC) Graham Turrell +1 John Kaputin +1 regards, John Kaputin.
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, other than the issue of what the actual grant is, I have some other questions on the IP clearance: - Under Copyright, there's an item to ensure the donation has an ASF copyright. I can't see that anywhere at the svn revision http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus at revision 158 when I checked. - I'm a little worried that Vincent's +1 has come without checking or reading the code, see http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08606.html Martin/Felipe/Vincent? On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Petar Tahchiev donated a cactus related codebase to Jakarta Cactus. Registered under Petar Tahchiev / Representing Self Cactus Maven2 Build System ... http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; - The code is not attached to an issue tracker for review to make it possible for Petar to continue development, awaiting the ip clearance. [1] - Jakarted voted to accept the codebase. [2] - The ASF secretary recorded the software grant in grants.txt (under above description) - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site [3] Please check the clearance. The clearance passes by lazy concensus if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours (adjusting timeframe to the discussion that just took place). Mvgr, Martin [1] http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08612.html [3] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jakarta-cactus-tahchiev.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dion hi, I was also wondering how to fill in the software grant, so I wrote the donation as the Cactus Maven2 Build system and the whole repository strucure on http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; But you are right, I didn't mention any revision number, and I guess that is my mistake :-(. It's not a mistake, and please don't get me wrong, I'd really like to get a M2 build system for cactus in place, but we just need to dot the i's and cross the t's when dealing with legal stuff like code donations and licensing. One of the things I don't get is that it *looks like* some of the stuff in the svn repo at http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus is a straight copy from the ASF repo. This makes it confusing, i.e. it looks like you're giving us stuff we already have. As to the copyright statement, there is a license included and it is under documentation/licenses folders. Cool. I was looking for the usual source headers ( http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers ) and didn't see them. I don't think including the license file without explicitly marking the source works. For example, there's no header for http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus/pom.xml Thanks for all your work, and I hope we can get this resolved quickly :-) -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dion hi, you are right in some way. The source code on mamouth is the same as in the official cactus repository. I have added only the pom.xml's and refactored the source tree. Sorry for the headers - I just committed them to all of the maven pom.xml's. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
[VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a first alpha release of Ivy. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html In summary we have 7 +1 votes: 5 from PPMC members and 2 non-binding, and no 0s or -1s. We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this version. The candidate distribution is available, together with RAT results for the src distro and KEYS used to sign the release (release was signed by Stefan Bodewig) here: http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/ The build is based on: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/ Cheers, Xavier -- Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ Manage your dependencies with Ivy! http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
On 4/23/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Dion hi, you are right in some way. The source code on mamouth is the same as in the official cactus repository. I have added only the pom.xml's and refactored the source tree. Ah, that makes it a bit clearer. By 'refactored the source tree' does that mean only moving the source directories around to conform to the build, or are there other source code changes? New mojos for the m2 integration? Changes to existing code to support it? Is there some way of using viewvc on sourceforge to show a diff between the latest revision and your import of the Apache source? You can see why it's easier to review a diff/patch or a tarball of just the changes :-) Sorry for the headers - I just committed them to all of the maven pom.xml's. Cool. -- Regards, Petar! Karlovo, Bulgaria. Public PGP Key at: http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x1A15B53B761500F9 Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B 4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9 -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ANN] Announcing the Woden M7a release
April 23 2007 - The Woden incubator project is please to announce its Milestone 7a release! This is an incremental release of Woden M7 which delivers an essential fix to support the new shortened WSDL 2.0 namespace format. Download the M7a release files and view the release notes at: http://people.apache.org/dist/ws/woden/milestones/1.0M7a-incubating More information can be found on the Woden website - http://incubator.apache.org/woden regards, John Kaputin (M7a release mgr)
Incubator April 2007 Board Report
As noted in the March report, Heraldry has had issues because of a vendor deciding that they didn't like having to open up to community development after all. Work is underway to reconstitute the project without them. The heraldry-dev@ archives document the events and process. Accordingly, the Incubator has attempted to restart the Heraldry project with those who have again agree to operate according to ASF policies and practices. We don't know how it will play out, but be there even just 3 good people wanting to collaborate (abuse of literary reference), we will give them a chance. A number of projects wanted to release during the past month, and that appears to be going more smoothly now than it has in the past. I believe that the expectations are perhaps better known, and it seems that more projects are running RBD's RAT before asking for a vote. Tuscany withdrew a set of votes in order to focus on community issues (some conflict), at least one new Tuscany Committer has been voted upon since, and about a month later Tuscany came back with a new request for a release. Trinidad graduated out of the Incubator to MyFaces. Another MyFaces-related project is starting Incubation. There is something of a shortage of people willing and able to act as Mentors, even on some of the larger projects, much less some of the small ones, e.g., FtpServer, that are asking for help. There is no action item for the Board, just an observation. On a related note, we once again revisited the issue of who can be a Mentor, and once again the vast consensus (with a few contrary votes) is that it is not required that one be an ASF Member, but that it is desirable that at least one Mentor on every project be an ASF Member, since that means that the person will have access to archives and information from internal lists that might be useful in the Mentoring process. A number of projects failed to report. They are noted below with a question if they should be put into an archival status, and e-mail has been sent to initiate the process. === CXF === iPMC Reviewers: rdonkin, jukka Project name - CXF Description - SOA enabling framework, web services toolkit Date of entry - August, 2006 Top three items to resolve - 1. Diversity - Active commiters are still 90% IONA people 2. Growth of community - related to diversity. The traffic on both the users and dev lists is growing with new people jumping in, but still is mostly IONA folks. 3. Mentor status - recent discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested we really need three active mentors. We currently only have 2 mentors total, only one of which has been active. (the other is getting back up to speed though.) Community aspects: * Voted in Jarek Gawor as a committer due to his excellent work on JAX-WS compliancy fixes. * Have been working closely with Geronimo to integrate CXF into the next version of Geronimo. * Have started working with Camel folks to define requirements and produce API's that allow CXF to work well with Camel Code aspects: * Started to finalize the next milestone release. There are a few remaining features we need to finish. * Ongoing TCK testing may require unexpected code changes. * Very long ongoing discussions about some of the transport API's. Resolutions on these are slow going. === FtpServer === iPMC Reviewers: rdonkin, jukka Description: FtpServer is a Java based implementation of the RFC covering different aspects of FTP. Since the last board report, the main activity within FtpServer has been a rather large rewrite to create an Apache MINA based network implementation. The aim with this is to leverage the asynchronous IO library to get better scalability. The initial performance tests shows that this has been successful and that FtpServer now can handle significant loads. Besides this major work, many minor issues has been closed, mostly based on feedback from users. As reported previously, FtpServer has very few active commiters. Currently, there is only one. This is, for many reasons a big problem and one that we need to resolve. A discussion was started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ton address this. Among many good ideas, one was to seek closer cooperation with Tomcat and write a FTP connector for Tomcat. This is something we will pursue both based on technical (Tomcat is a very stable runtime to base FtpServer on) and community merits. With this, we hope to possibly attract Tomcat developers into the joys of FTP. We also need to reach out using articles, blog posts and talks. No significant progress has been made in this area since the last report. iPMC questions / comments: * jukka: Incubating since 2003-03-29 === Graffito === iPMC Reviewers: rdonkin Graffito is a framework for content-based applications, especially in portlet environments. Graffito entered incubation on September 20, 2004. Despite recent efforts the level of activity within the Graffito project remains low. The only part of the project that
RE: Apache Juice - Incubation
In the past year and a half, one person was voted on as a Committer, and little seems to be happening. Is it time to archive this project? --- Noel -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 13:41 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apache Juice - Incubation Dear Incubator folks, Apache Juice was been stalled for some time because of 1 legal issue on our side, namely the CLA from U of Memphis[1]. This was ok'ed by legal after quite a delay, but the project lost steam. AFAIK, all the legal requirements are taken care of now. There has been some discussions on security-dev and wss4j-dev [2]. We want to explore merging juice with existing projects namely Apache XML Security to carry on the work. Is this a valid option for us? Thoughts please. Also what do we need in terms of process to import the code to xml-security SVN and drop juice as a separate project. thanks, dims [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xml-juice-dev/200407.mbox/%3C40FBB0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02758.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling
Is this project going, or should it be archived? --- Noel -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:25 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Shane Isbell Subject: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling Hi, The Maven PMC has voted to accept NMaven for incubation (see [EMAIL PROTECTED] on [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The full proposal is attached below, and can be viewed here also: http://maven.apache.org/proposals/incubator/nmaven.html I'm posting this here for any feedback or objections from the incubator PMC. I'll give it 5 days (to include the weekend) before going ahead. If there are no objections after that, since the Maven PMC has already voted to accept it and we have 3 incubator PMC members listed on the proposal, I will go about getting the status file in and the allocation of resources started. Cheers, Brett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3
Thanks Dims, Paul. We would greatly apreciate a.n.other IPMC member to vote on this Thank you On 20/04/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 from me! Paul On 4/20/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any one else? On 16/04/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 from me. On 4/16/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new milestone release of the Tuscany Native SCA and C++ SDO implementations. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15640.html In summary we have 6 +1 votes: 5 from committers and 1 non-binding, and no 0s or -1s. We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this version. The candidate distribution is available, together with RAT results for each distro here: http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/ Cheers, -- Pete -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Pete -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oxygenating the Web Service Platform, www.wso2.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Pete
Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling
Hi Noel, The project is going well and as such, should not be archived. I have not reported for April since the NMaven schedule occurs on the February, May, August, November schedule. Thanks, Shane On 4/23/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this project going, or should it be archived? --- Noel -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:25 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Shane Isbell Subject: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling Hi, The Maven PMC has voted to accept NMaven for incubation (see [EMAIL PROTECTED] on [EMAIL PROTECTED]). The full proposal is attached below, and can be viewed here also: http://maven.apache.org/proposals/incubator/nmaven.html I'm posting this here for any feedback or objections from the incubator PMC. I'll give it 5 days (to include the weekend) before going ahead. If there are no objections after that, since the Maven PMC has already voted to accept it and we have 3 incubator PMC members listed on the proposal, I will go about getting the status file in and the allocation of resources started. Cheers, Brett
Re: Apache Juice - Incubation
Yes, i think so. -- dims On 4/23/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the past year and a half, one person was voted on as a Committer, and little seems to be happening. Is it time to archive this project? --- Noel -Original Message- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 13:41 To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apache Juice - Incubation Dear Incubator folks, Apache Juice was been stalled for some time because of 1 legal issue on our side, namely the CLA from U of Memphis[1]. This was ok'ed by legal after quite a delay, but the project lost steam. AFAIK, all the legal requirements are taken care of now. There has been some discussions on security-dev and wss4j-dev [2]. We want to explore merging juice with existing projects namely Apache XML Security to carry on the work. Is this a valid option for us? Thoughts please. Also what do we need in terms of process to import the code to xml-security SVN and drop juice as a separate project. thanks, dims [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xml-juice-dev/200407.mbox/%3C40FBB0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02758.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posting release candidate artifacts to incubator repo
I had some recent comments on a release candidate I posted for consideration/voting [1]. In particular the comment ... - There are no SDO artifact jars to review, are the SDO jars going to be installed to the Apache maven repository? I want to post my release artifacts to the incubator repo but I'm unsure whether this is OK. Refs [2] and [3] discuss posting artifacts which have not passed the voting process, but I can not derive from them a conclusion whether this is OK or not. Please can you advise if I am OK to go ahead and post such artifacts to the incubator repo. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16525.html [2] http://marc.info/?t=11760705873r=1w=2 [3] http://marc.info/?l=incubator-generalm=117606976901938w=2
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Dion hi, I was also wondering how to fill in the software grant, yeh - the documentation isn't great but please feel free to ask: we're here to help so I wrote the donation as the Cactus Maven2 Build system and the whole repository strucure on http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; But you are right, I didn't mention any revision number, and I guess that is my mistake :-(. It's not a mistake, and please don't get me wrong, I'd really like to get a M2 build system for cactus in place, +1 but we just need to dot the i's and cross the t's when dealing with legal stuff like code donations and licensing. +1 - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]
On 4/23/07, Shane Isbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Noel, The project is going well and as such, should not be archived. I have not reported for April since the NMaven schedule occurs on the February, May, August, November schedule. if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack some sort of automated reminder. maybe work out the best approach next week at apachecon. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Incubator April 2007 Board Report
=== NMaven === No report, and it may be time to archive this project. Consistency error in our lists of projects. NMaven will report next month. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling
Shane Isbell wrote: The project is going well and as such, should not be archived. I have not reported for April since the NMaven schedule occurs on the February, May, August, November schedule. This is one of those problems with maintaining consistency in redundant sets of meta-data. According to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2007, NMaven should have reported this month. It is also listed for May. Sorry for the false flag. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]
if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack some sort of automated reminder. maybe work out the best approach next week at apachecon. We have *got* to get a handle on redundant copies of meta-data. Committers, Mentors, projects, dates are all listed in multiple places. It seems that the work that David Reid was doing needs to be pushed to completion and used, or something like it. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[DISCUSS] Put Apache Juice into dormant status
Any discussion? If not, I'll start a vote. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
What happened here ? Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a new event (was announced on February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous times on general. Would have been nice to caught this earlier. Mvgr, Martin robert burrell donkin wrote: On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Dion hi, I was also wondering how to fill in the software grant, yeh - the documentation isn't great but please feel free to ask: we're here to help so I wrote the donation as the Cactus Maven2 Build system and the whole repository strucure on http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; But you are right, I didn't mention any revision number, and I guess that is my mistake :-(. It's not a mistake, and please don't get me wrong, I'd really like to get a M2 build system for cactus in place, +1 but we just need to dot the i's and cross the t's when dealing with legal stuff like code donations and licensing. +1 - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]
On 4/23/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack some sort of automated reminder. maybe work out the best approach next week at apachecon. We have *got* to get a handle on redundant copies of meta-data. Committers, Mentors, projects, dates are all listed in multiple places. It seems that the work that David Reid was doing needs to be pushed to completion and used, or something like it. anyone know if david's going to be around at apachecon? - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3
On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dims, Paul. We would greatly apreciate a.n.other IPMC member to vote on this issues looks to me like http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sdo/runtime/core/test/xhtml1.xsd is under http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720 but the required notice is not distributed. notes --- there are also a lot of test files which are xml or plain text but which lack headers. if it's possible to include headers without breaking the tests then they should be included. (run RAT for a detailed list.) - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
On 4/23/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happened here ? Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a new event (was announced on February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous times on general. should be easy enough to fix: just take a tar ball of the latest revision in svn (taking a note) and checksum or GPG sign it. attach the signature to the grant and commit the tar into svn. development can continue. submit patches for revisions to JIRA. once you have a CCLA for petar, commit them. Would have been nice to caught this earlier. +1 sorry - been a little overstretched recently :-/ - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Posting release candidate artifacts to incubator repo
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had some recent comments on a release candidate I posted for consideration/voting [1]. In particular the comment ... - There are no SDO artifact jars to review, are the SDO jars going to be installed to the Apache maven repository? I want to post my release artifacts to the incubator repo but I'm unsure whether this is OK. i'm not sure i know the official answer but i do have a strong personal opinion as a release manager, i would be uncomfortable posting an artifact anywhere that is mirrored before a release vote. there are a couple of reasons behind this opinion: * in the event of an IP issue with the release, the manager can only be helped by apache if they are acting on the instructions of apache. this is only possible after a release vote. * i've had bad experiences in the past trying to recall bad releases from maven repositories AIUI it would be possible to set up a local repository in your home directory. others can then configure maven to use this. that's the approach that i would take. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]
On 4/23/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...anyone know if david's going to be around at apachecon?.. He says not, http://www.david-reid.com/cynic/?p=532 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Petar Tahchiev donation Jakarta Cactus
On 4/24/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What happened here ? Not that this doesn't need fixing, but this code donation is hardly a new event (was announced on February 3rd on the PMC list and the grant was discussed numerous times on general. I don't know who discussed it previously, but this is the first time it caught my eye. Sorry i missed the initial discussion. Would have been nice to caught this earlier. +1. Mvgr, Martin robert burrell donkin wrote: On 4/23/07, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Dion hi, I was also wondering how to fill in the software grant, yeh - the documentation isn't great but please feel free to ask: we're here to help so I wrote the donation as the Cactus Maven2 Build system and the whole repository strucure on http://mamouth.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mamouth/Cactus; But you are right, I didn't mention any revision number, and I guess that is my mistake :-(. It's not a mistake, and please don't get me wrong, I'd really like to get a M2 build system for cactus in place, +1 but we just need to dot the i's and cross the t's when dealing with legal stuff like code donations and licensing. +1 - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- dIon Gillard Rule #131 of Acquisition: Information is Profit. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3
Thanks for taking a look. On 23/04/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dims, Paul. We would greatly apreciate a.n.other IPMC member to vote on this issues looks to me like http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sdo/runtime/core/test/xhtml1.xsd is under http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720 but the required notice is not distributed. Ouch. That's a mistake. Is the correct way to fix this to add this to the NOTICE : === This product also includes software developed by: - the World Wide Web Consortium ( http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720) === notes --- there are also a lot of test files which are xml or plain text but which lack headers. if it's possible to include headers without breaking the tests then they should be included. (run RAT for a detailed list.) - robert As per our previous releases these are test files that are used to compare generated output so can not contain headers. We run RAT and the output is with the distro at http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/ Cheers, -- Pete
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Tuscany Native/C++ M3
On 23/04/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for taking a look. On 23/04/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/23/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Dims, Paul. We would greatly apreciate a.n.other IPMC member to vote on this issues looks to me like http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/cpp/sdo/runtime/core/test/xhtml1.xsd is under http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720 but the required notice is not distributed. Ouch. That's a mistake. Is the correct way to fix this to add this to the NOTICE : === This product also includes software developed by: - the World Wide Web Consortium (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720 ) === I think the full text of the w3c notice needs to be included having read it, rather than the link. notes --- there are also a lot of test files which are xml or plain text but which lack headers. if it's possible to include headers without breaking the tests then they should be included. (run RAT for a detailed list.) - robert As per our previous releases these are test files that are used to compare generated output so can not contain headers. We run RAT and the output is with the distro at http://people.apache.org/~robbinspg/M3-RC4/ Cheers, -- Pete -- Pete
RE: Reporting schedule [WAS Re: [PROPOSAL] NMaven podling]
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: if we don't have one already, we probably need to hack some sort of automated reminder. maybe work out the best approach next week at apachecon. We have *got* to get a handle on redundant copies of meta-data. Committers, Mentors, projects, dates are all listed in multiple places. It seems that the work that David Reid was doing needs to be pushed to completion and used, or something like it. anyone know if david's going to be around at apachecon? Unfortunately not, but perhaps we can re-engage him on the project. :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating
On Monday 23 April 2007 20:15, Xavier Hanin wrote: We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this version. The candidate distribution is available, together with RAT results for the src distro and KEYS used to sign the release (release was signed by Stefan Bodewig) here: http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/ The build is based on: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/ +1 Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[vote] Propose OpenEJB for graduation to a TLP
Hi to all incubator PMC folk, The OpenEJB community have voted to ask the incubator PMC to recommended the following resolution to the board. For further reference, see the earlier thread on this list: http://www.nabble.com/-proposal--OpenEJB-Graduation-Proposal-tf3509732.html#a9803491 Note that the community has come to consensus on the list of initial PMC members unanimously. Please cast your votes on whether to recommend this proposal. Thanks, Brett (OpenEJB Mentor) Establish Apache OpenEJB Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at no charge to the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee (PMC), to be known as the The Apache OpenEJB Project, be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further RESOLVED, that The Apache OpenEJB Project be and hereby is responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software project related to enterprise application and remoting services; and be it further RESOLVED, that the office of Vice President, OpenEJB be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of The Apache OpenEJB Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of The Apache OpenEJB Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The Apache OpenEJB Project: * David Blevins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Alan Cabrera([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * David Jencks([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Jacek Laskowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Brett Porter([EMAIL PROTECTED]) * Dain Sundstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that David Blevins be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President, OpenEJB, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further RESOLVED, that the initial Apache OpenEJB Project be and hereby is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator OpenEJB podling; and be it further RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache Incubator OpenEJB podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter discharged. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a first alpha release of Ivy. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html In summary we have 7 +1 votes: 5 from PPMC members and 2 non-binding, and no 0s or -1s. We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this version. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Posting release candidate artifacts to incubator repo
On 4/23/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: as a release manager, i would be uncomfortable posting an artifact anywhere that is mirrored before a release vote. there are a couple of reasons behind this opinion: * in the event of an IP issue with the release, the manager can only be helped by apache if they are acting on the instructions of apache. this is only possible after a release vote. * i've had bad experiences in the past trying to recall bad releases from maven repositories AIUI it would be possible to set up a local repository in your home directory. others can then configure maven to use this. that's the approach that i would take. ++1 to all of the above. -- justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha1-incubating
On 4/23/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this version +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
