Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

2016-10-17 Thread Justin Mclean 
Hi,

+1 binding, but there's a few things that need fixing for the next release.

Missing source release at [1] and this source release(?) at [2] contains jars 
not source. So assuming [3] is the source release - can you confirm this please.

I checked:
- name contains incubating
- hashes good, signatures OK
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is likely to be missing a few things (see below)
- NOTICE is good
- All source files have ASF headers
- No unexpected binaries in source release
- Can compile from source

The LICENSE may be missing these licenses:
- These files[5][6][7] are copyright Mark Pilgrim(?), do you have permission to 
use them? Looks like it may of come from here? [8] IF so I think that is 
covered by a BSD license [9]?
- Do you have permission to distribute this file [10]? From google reverse 
image search it looks like it may come from Dojo Toolkit which is BSD licensed 
[11]?

Looks like this file [4] may need updating (copyright IBM all over the place).

The binary LICENSE and NOTICE file are missing many things [12]. See also the 
guiding principle [13]. I can see code from other projects including Jetty, 
Geronimo, mail classes from Sun, ASM core, Apache commons, Jena, Xerces, etc 
etc. This is likely to require changes to both the LICENSE and NOTICE files. 
Please fix for the next release.

Also please consider signing the release with an apache email address.

Thanks,
Justin

1. 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/juneau/binaries/juneau-6.0.0-incubating-RC3/
2. 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejuneau-1004/org/apache/juneau/apache-juneau/6.0.0-incubating/
3. 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejuneau-1004/org/apache/juneau/juneau/6.0.0-incubating/
4. ./juneau-core/src/main/java/org/apache/juneau/dto/atom/package.html
5. ./juneau-6.0.0-incubating/juneau-core/src/test/resources/dto/atom/test1.xml
6. ./juneau-6.0.0-incubating/juneau-core/src/test/resources/dto/atom/test2.xml
7. ./juneau-6.0.0-incubating/juneau-core/src/test/resources/dto/atom/test3.xml
8. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4287.txt
9. https://trustee.ietf.org/copyright-faq.html (see section 3.1)
10. 
./juneau-samples/src/main/resources/org/apache/juneau/server/samples/averycutedog.jpg
11. https://dojotoolkit.org/license.html
12. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary
13. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#guiding-principle



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating-RC3

2016-10-17 Thread James Bognar 
The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted +3 to release Apache Juneau
6.0.0-incubating RC3.

This vote carries over +1 binding votes from IPMC mentors.
Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release.

Please note that this is our first attempt at a release, so please pay
special attention to details to ensure we've done everything correct.

Apache Juneau  is...
- A toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content types using
a common framework.
- A REST server API for creating self-documenting REST interfaces using
POJOs.
- A REST client API for interacting with REST interfaces using POJOs.
- A REST microservice API that combines all the features above for creating
lightweight standalone  REST interfaces that start up in milliseconds.

Please see original [VOTE] thread
*https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3af75ba134d88afaa6aa363f119f806785956ef252891a49c69f1487@%3Cdev.juneau.apache.org%3E
*
and
[DISCUSS] thread
*https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f4beeac7f7cf676be6b614c0f295077de0782e2c75ea7406349cc588@%3Cdev.juneau.apache.org%3E
*

The binaries are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/juneau/binaries/juneau-6.0.0-incubating-RC3/


The release candidate to be voted over is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/juneau/source/juneau-6.0.0-incubating-RC3/


Build the release candidate using:
mvn clean install

The release candidate is signed with a GPG key available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/juneau/KEYS


A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejuneau-1004/

Please vote on releasing these packages as:
Apache Juneau 6.0.0-incubating

The vote will be open for a minimum of 72 hours.
[ ] +1 Release this package
[ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...

-- 
James Bognar

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-17 Thread Sam Ruby 
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> I see that this is a proposal that originates, basically from IBM.

IBM + Adobe

> I have an issue, based on past history, related to IBM's continued
> efforts and dedication on ASF projects. I will not mention specific
> projects, but the ASF has a number of projects which died (or
> almost died and only were revived via super-human effort) when
> IBM decided to switch gears and no longer support the project.
>
> Now most of all this was our fault: the whole intent of Incubation
> and the Apache Way is to prevent dependence on a single person
> or entity: diversity means being able to continue, in a healthy
> way, should someone (or some-thing) decide that the project is
> no longer for them.
>
> Considering all this, I would hope and expect that this podling
> take extra steps to ensure that we don't get "burned" again...

+1

I see this as an issue to be resolved prior to exiting incubation, not
something that should impact being accepted for incubation.

> PS: Nothing against IBM of course: being a business, their strategy
> is wont to change, and we cannot (and should not) "fault" them
> when such a strategy change adversely affects a project. My
> only point is that, based on past experience, we should simply
> recognize that IBM dropping their support/resources on this
> project at some point is a very real, statistical possibility,
> and be serious in our efforts in ensuring this podling/project
> can and will survive that.

Agreed on both points: this is a general concern that should apply
everywhere, and given IBM's past history is particularly relevant to
this proposal.

- Sam Ruby

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [discuss] Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Proposal

2016-10-17 Thread Jim Jagielski 
I see that this is a proposal that originates, basically from IBM.

I have an issue, based on past history, related to IBM's continued
efforts and dedication on ASF projects. I will not mention specific
projects, but the ASF has a number of projects which died (or
almost died and only were revived via super-human effort) when
IBM decided to switch gears and no longer support the project.

Now most of all this was our fault: the whole intent of Incubation
and the Apache Way is to prevent dependence on a single person
or entity: diversity means being able to continue, in a healthy
way, should someone (or some-thing) decide that the project is
no longer for them.

Considering all this, I would hope and expect that this podling
take extra steps to ensure that we don't get "burned" again...

PS: Nothing against IBM of course: being a business, their strategy
is wont to change, and we cannot (and should not) "fault" them
when such a strategy change adversely affects a project. My
only point is that, based on past experience, we should simply
recognize that IBM dropping their support/resources on this
project at some point is a very real, statistical possibility,
and be serious in our efforts in ensuring this podling/project
can and will survive that.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache S2Graph(incubating) 0.1.0 release RC6

2016-10-17 Thread Sergio Fernández 
Folks, more votes?
The first release is very important for every podling, and we still need
one additional binding vote.
Thanks.

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - name contains incubating
> - signatures and hashes good
> - LICENSE and NOTICE correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - all source code has Apache headers
> - no binary files in release
> - can compile from source
>
> Good to see simple build instructions in the README. A nice simple release
> to check thanks for that.
>
> I did notice this in DEVELOPMENT.md, "The toll will write a report in case
> it finds any issue.” and first misread that as “troll” :-) I assume you
> mean tool?
>
> Also just a minor branding issue you may also want to add some trademark
> attributions [1] to your incubator page [2]. I also notice a prominent
> button to github mirror without and equally prominent button/link to the
> actual Apache git repo, you may want to consider changing that.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#attribution
> 2. http://s2graph.incubator.apache.org
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co