Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow
Indeed, it does sound interesting. I would find it useful if the "existing Apache projects" bit of "Rainbow is in development, leveraging existing Apache projects." could be expanded in any way. I know there is a list of external dependencies later but any further description of how those technologies are used would be helpful. Also, I'd be interested in knowing how the proposal relates to DLAB: https://dlab.apache.org/ Nice work. Cheers, Paul. On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:34 AM larry mccay wrote: > This seems like an interesting proposal. > > Couple points/questions: > > * The existing source is not available for viewing as it is still in > private repos? > * Is it a primarily java project? > * It seems the intent of Rainbow is to not compete or overlap with the > Hadoop ecosystem projects but rather to provide an efficient interface > above them - correct? > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:51 AM Aviem Zur wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We would like to propose Rainbow as an Apache incubator project. Rainbow > is > > an end-to-end platform for data engineers & scientists, allowing them to > > build, train and deploy machine learning models in a robust and agile > way. > > The project's goal is to operationalize the machine learning process, > > allowing data scientists to quickly transition from a successful > experiment > > to an automated pipeline in production. > > > > The proposal can be found here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Apache+Rainbow > > > > We would appreciate your feedback and thoughts on the proposal. > > > > Thanks, > > Aviem > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow
This seems like an interesting proposal. Couple points/questions: * The existing source is not available for viewing as it is still in private repos? * Is it a primarily java project? * It seems the intent of Rainbow is to not compete or overlap with the Hadoop ecosystem projects but rather to provide an efficient interface above them - correct? On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:51 AM Aviem Zur wrote: > Hi, > > We would like to propose Rainbow as an Apache incubator project. Rainbow is > an end-to-end platform for data engineers & scientists, allowing them to > build, train and deploy machine learning models in a robust and agile way. > The project's goal is to operationalize the machine learning process, > allowing data scientists to quickly transition from a successful experiment > to an automated pipeline in production. > > The proposal can be found here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Apache+Rainbow > > We would appreciate your feedback and thoughts on the proposal. > > Thanks, > Aviem >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - signatures and hashes fine - LICENSE and NOTICE is basically ok(there is still a category b dependency in the source code) - All necessary files have license headers To Willem Jiang, the problem I listed last time was the main license issue(category X should be removed and may keep the category b dependency in binary ) :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling tan zhongyi 于2020年2月21日周五 下午5:21写道： > Yes, we will fix these issues later, > so we add WIP disclaimer as Justin suggested. > Thanks > > > > 在 2020/2/19 下午7:36，“Justin Mclean” 写入: > > Hi, > > > From my understanding, for the CDDL license and LGPL license > > dependencies, if we don't modify the code, it should be fine. > > You can’t have a category X dependancy unless it’s optional. So GPL or > LGPL dependancies are in general not allowed. See [1] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > -- Nothing is impossible
[DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache Rainbow
Hi, We would like to propose Rainbow as an Apache incubator project. Rainbow is an end-to-end platform for data engineers & scientists, allowing them to build, train and deploy machine learning models in a robust and agile way. The project's goal is to operationalize the machine learning process, allowing data scientists to quickly transition from a successful experiment to an automated pipeline in production. The proposal can be found here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Apache+Rainbow We would appreciate your feedback and thoughts on the proposal. Thanks, Aviem
[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-250) Website build (part 1 - Clutch phase) failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17041748#comment-17041748
]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-250:
---
Thank you! It would be good to improve error reporting but for now the build
works indeed.
> Website build (part 1 - Clutch phase) failing
> -
>
> Key: INCUBATOR-250
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-250
> Project: Incubator
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>Assignee: Dave Fisher
>Priority: Major
>
> Recent builds are failing at
> https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/Incubator/job/Incubator%20SVN%20Clutch%20Analysis%20-%20part%201/
> so things like IP clearance forms are not updated on the website.
> I tried running {{sh build_local_clutch.sh}} from
> https://github.com/apache/incubator on my laptop and this gives the following
> error:
> {code}
>
> STATUS: podlings: 44
> Build Clutch Status Pages
> STATUS: pages: 44
> ABORT: clutch2.sh error
> {code}
> I don't know this code so can't tell what's happening from those messages.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03
Yes, we will fix these issues later, so we add WIP disclaimer as Justin suggested. Thanks 在 2020/2/19 下午7:36，“Justin Mclean” 写入: Hi, > From my understanding, for the CDDL license and LGPL license > dependencies, if we don't modify the code, it should be fine. You can’t have a category X dependancy unless it’s optional. So GPL or LGPL dependancies are in general not allowed. See [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
