Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.3.0-incubating RC0

2020-06-03 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
+1 (binding)

Checked build, signature, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER.

Regards
JB

> Le 2 juin 2020 à 04:18, Guangxu Cheng  a écrit :
> 
> Hello Incubator Community,
> 
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache TubeMQ(incubating) version
> 0.3.0-incubating RC0
> 
> The Apache TubeMQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache TubeMQ(incubating) version 0.3.0-incubating RC0
> 
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> incubator release.
> 
> Apache TubeMQ community vote thread:
> •
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1ff624f8aebc910e862e57477536ff3eb2aa9b0d376f97a50807c1c5%40%3Cdev.tubemq.apache.org%3E
> 
> Vote result thread:
> •
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r03e9d5898a8ed0d766e2f6c531d8362f1c393e3d13070b508a3ac480%40%3Cdev.tubemq.apache.org%3E
> 
> The release candidate:
> •
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tubemq/0.3.0-incubating-RC0
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> • https://github.com/apache/incubator-tubemq/tree/0.3.0-incubating-RC0
> 
> Release notes:
> •
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tubemq/blob/0.3.0-incubating-RC0/CHANGES.md
> 
> The artifacts signed with PGP key 57EC647A, corresponding to
> gxch...@apache.org, that can be found in keys file:
> • https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tubemq/KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Thanks,
> On behalf of Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) community
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Guangxu


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Issue with releases / feedback from ASF board

2020-06-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

> The status quo has been in place since a while. Do you think we have
> time to first discuss the correct solution on the Incubator list, before
> we delete the existing pages?

I’ll ask again. Please remove any releases that are not Apache releases, that 
includes any releases that are not compatible with the Apache license and 
include Category X compiled code. You can’t put 3rd party releases on that page 
as there is no indication that they are not Apache releases. No Apache project 
should be distributing 3rd party releases from their web site without clearly 
informing the users of what they are getting. You were asked to do something 
about this a few weeks ago and as far as I can see have not done so. Please do 
so as soon as you can.

> I'm not sure what you mean. Note that Github automatically creates these
> release pages based on the presence of git tags in the version control
> history.

Yes they do but they consists of Apache releases it looks like you have non 
Apache releases there. Other projects tag these add notes to make it very clear 
they are not Apache releases.

> So is your recommendation here to take down the ASF source archives

No I’m not asking that. I would just clearly mark the releases that are not 
Apache ones or not compatible with the Apache license.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TubeMQ (Incubating) 0.3.0-incubating RC0

2020-06-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi,

+1 (binding)

I checked:
- incubating in name.
- Signatures and hashes are fine but please drop the md5 hash it’s not needed
- DISCLAIMER exists (WIP type)
- LICENSE needs more work (see blow)
- NOTICE may need more work (if other ALv2 code is included)
- No unexpected binary files
- all source file have ASF headers
- can't compile from source

I can’t compile from source as I have a newer version of protobuf installed 
(3.6) and it looks like the build expects 2.5. Perhaps you should consider 
updating to a newer version?

With your LICENSE I think you have included far too many things. You only need 
to mention something if it is bundled in the release you don’t have to mention 
licenses of all dependancies. I can see data tables and jQuery but not much 
else is bundled in your source release. There's also no need to have multiple 
copies of the ALv2 license text.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

2020-06-03 Thread Kevin Ratnasekera
Hi Justin,

I just started the bootstrapping process by updating the podlings.xml,
creating podling status page and requesting DNS and LDAP setup for new
podling. We will continue creating rest of the resources for podling. We
submitted a report, even though not a lot of progress has been made.

Regards
Kevin

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:33 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I’m not seeing any bootstrapping going on for this new podling. Don't
> forget your first report is also due today.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>