Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

[Josh Innis]

Hi Craig,

John Gemingnani (john.gemign...@bitnine.net) is mapped to the github
address jrgemignani. If John isn't getting credit for his work: we need to
fix this immediately. Same with Eya (Eya is mapped to: eyab
eya.abdi...@bitnine.net). I don't understand how they are not mapped. John
and Eya have been here from the beginning and if they are not getting
credit for their years of work on Apache AGE: please let us know. I am
confused to see their names on the list of PPMC members who have not linked
their apache id to their Github id, because I remember all of us doing so
and all of us have had a multi-year long influence on the project.

Everyone else: please subscribe to the private mailing list. Otherwise I
will create an email discussion to have you removed from the project.

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 12:17 PM Craig Russell  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It looks like the project whimsy page shows some concerns highlighted
> below.
> https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/age
>
> > On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >
> > Four more concerns:
> >
> > (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing
> list.
> >
> Jasper Blues?
> Mason Sharp?
> Raphael Bircher?
>
>
> > (2) Four of the Committers including some of the PPMC members have not
> mapped their apache id to their GitHub id. How can they contribute?
> >
> • eya.abdi...@bitnine.net (not recognised)
> • john.gemign...@bitnine.net (not recognised)
>
> > (3) No one has been added to the PPMC.
> >
> > (4) Are all of the License Headers taken care of? I’m seeing a PR that
> indicates they are not. [1]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/pull/150
> >
> >> On Dec 16, 2021, at 6:11 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Putting aside this subproject for a moment I am concerned with your
> >> contributor vs committer counts. If you’ve had 68 contributors why are
> the
> >> numbers for new committers and PPMC so low?
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 21:08 Eya Badal  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Willem,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you very much for your feedback. There have been four official
> >>> Apache releases for the Apache AGE (incubating) project. AGE Viewer is
> a
> >>> sub-project of Apache AGE. As I know, the AGE viewer sub-project will
> start
> >>> the process for the first Apache release today or tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Eya
> >>>
> >>> On 2021/12/17 01:12:55 Willem Jiang wrote:
>  Hi,
> 
>  I just found out that we don't have the Apache release of AGE viewer,
>  even though there are a bunch of tags in github[1].
>  I also found the recent change[1] in master. It looks like we just
>  addressed the License issue during the release of 0.6.0.
>  The release process documentation[1] should be hosted on the website
>  of age.apache.org instead of using a good drive[3] to host.
> 
>  It's quite important that we learn to follow the Apache release
>  policies during the incubation process.
> 
>  Please double check with the mentors for the release of AGE viewer.
> 
>  [1]https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/tags
>  [2]https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/pull/157/files
>  [3]
> >>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zvAESVg7fRdSsxUuuOc3rHMkHcaOF28j/view?usp=sharing
> 
>  Willem Jiang
> 
>  Twitter: willemjiang
>  Weibo: 姜宁willem
> 
>  On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:04 AM Eya Badal  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Everyone,
> >
> >
> > Having passed the Community Graduation Vote [1] by the AGE community
> >>> with a
> > vote result to graduate the incubation [2], our assessment is that
> >>> Apache
> > AGE (Incubating) is ready to graduate as a TLP.
> >
> > We would like to raise the topic for discussion with the IPMC.
> >
> > In addition to building and releasing software the Apache way, the
> AGE
> > project community has grown in the following areas:
> >
> >
> >  -
> >
> >  Close to 900 commits
> >  -
> >
> >  68 unique contributors
> >  -
> >
> >  4 new committers and 1 new PPMC from 3 different
> >>> companies/institutions
> >  -
> >
> >  Gathered > 500 GitHub stars
> >  -
> >
> >  4 Apache releases (0.3.0, 0.4.0, 0.5.0, 0.6.0) [3]
> >  -
> >
> >  6 mentors, 6 PPMC members (mentors excluded) and 4 committers
> >>> (mentors
> >  and PPMC members excluded)
> >
> >
> >  -
> >
> >  Contributions span more than 20 countries across the globe including
> >  Australia, Belarus, Belgium, China, France, Germany, Ireland,
> >>> Israel,
> >  Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Nigeria, The Philippines,
> >>> Russia, South
> >  Korea, Thailand, UK, Ukraine, USA, and Vietnam
> >  -
> >
> >  Developed and maintained Apache AGE website [4]
> >  -
> >
> >  Created and 

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

[Craig Russell]

Hi,

It looks like the project whimsy page shows some concerns highlighted below.
https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/age

> On Dec 17, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
> Four more concerns:
> 
> (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing list.
> 
Jasper Blues?
Mason Sharp?
Raphael Bircher?


> (2) Four of the Committers including some of the PPMC members have not mapped 
> their apache id to their GitHub id. How can they contribute?
> 
• eya.abdi...@bitnine.net (not recognised)
• john.gemign...@bitnine.net (not recognised)

> (3) No one has been added to the PPMC.
> 
> (4) Are all of the License Headers taken care of? I’m seeing a PR that 
> indicates they are not. [1]
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/pull/150
> 
>> On Dec 16, 2021, at 6:11 PM, John D. Ament  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Putting aside this subproject for a moment I am concerned with your
>> contributor vs committer counts. If you’ve had 68 contributors why are the
>> numbers for new committers and PPMC so low?
>> 
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 21:08 Eya Badal  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello Willem,
>>> 
>>> Thank you very much for your feedback. There have been four official
>>> Apache releases for the Apache AGE (incubating) project. AGE Viewer is a
>>> sub-project of Apache AGE. As I know, the AGE viewer sub-project will start
>>> the process for the first Apache release today or tomorrow.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Eya
>>> 
>>> On 2021/12/17 01:12:55 Willem Jiang wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I just found out that we don't have the Apache release of AGE viewer,
 even though there are a bunch of tags in github[1].
 I also found the recent change[1] in master. It looks like we just
 addressed the License issue during the release of 0.6.0.
 The release process documentation[1] should be hosted on the website
 of age.apache.org instead of using a good drive[3] to host.
 
 It's quite important that we learn to follow the Apache release
 policies during the incubation process.
 
 Please double check with the mentors for the release of AGE viewer.
 
 [1]https://github.com/apache/incubator-age-viewer/tags
 [2]https://github.com/apache/incubator-age/pull/157/files
 [3]
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zvAESVg7fRdSsxUuuOc3rHMkHcaOF28j/view?usp=sharing
 
 Willem Jiang
 
 Twitter: willemjiang
 Weibo: 姜宁willem
 
 On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 5:04 AM Eya Badal  wrote:
> 
> Dear Everyone,
> 
> 
> Having passed the Community Graduation Vote [1] by the AGE community
>>> with a
> vote result to graduate the incubation [2], our assessment is that
>>> Apache
> AGE (Incubating) is ready to graduate as a TLP.
> 
> We would like to raise the topic for discussion with the IPMC.
> 
> In addition to building and releasing software the Apache way, the AGE
> project community has grown in the following areas:
> 
> 
>  -
> 
>  Close to 900 commits
>  -
> 
>  68 unique contributors
>  -
> 
>  4 new committers and 1 new PPMC from 3 different
>>> companies/institutions
>  -
> 
>  Gathered > 500 GitHub stars
>  -
> 
>  4 Apache releases (0.3.0, 0.4.0, 0.5.0, 0.6.0) [3]
>  -
> 
>  6 mentors, 6 PPMC members (mentors excluded) and 4 committers
>>> (mentors
>  and PPMC members excluded)
> 
> 
>  -
> 
>  Contributions span more than 20 countries across the globe including
>  Australia, Belarus, Belgium, China, France, Germany, Ireland,
>>> Israel,
>  Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Nigeria, The Philippines,
>>> Russia, South
>  Korea, Thailand, UK, Ukraine, USA, and Vietnam
>  -
> 
>  Developed and maintained Apache AGE website [4]
>  -
> 
>  Created and automated documentation to support multiple versions of
>>> AGE.
>  [5]
>  -
> 
>  Developer conversations at d...@age.apache.org
>  -
> 
>  Assessed ourselves against the Apache Project maturity matrix [6]
>>> and
>  didn't find any issues
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/q2cgbnhvpzk2k0m8yfh89lzc75qym9k9
> 
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/lr3x9bm8jyv6o5kvyh7cf3tyxrpp2kwm
> 
> [3] Release at Apache AGE website  under the
> Releases menu.
> 
> [4] https://age.apache.org/
> 
> [5] Documentation at Apache AGE website 
>>> under
> the Documentation menu.
> 
> [6] Apache Project maturity matrix at Apache AGE website
>  under the COMMUNITY menu.
> 
> Please see the proposed board resolution below and let us know what you
> think.
> 
> The discussion will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> 
>>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.0.3-RC1

[peacewong]

Thank Craig.

> For the next release vote (both dev@ and general@ lists) please include a
> check list for folks to use to validate the release. A simple +1 doesn't
> really mean anything.

   We will make clear the  check  rules with PPMC members and everyone else.

"Binding" is a specific term of art at Apache. For a podling release vote,
> it means the voter is a member of the IPMC.
> For votes on the dev@ list, it may be useful to identify three categories
> of voters:
> Mentors
> PPMC members
> everyone else



> For votes on the general@ list, it is useful to identify two categories
> of voters:
> IPMC members (binding votes)
> everyone else

You should encourage your Mentors to vote on the release on the dev@ list.


Thank you for your explanation, we will deal with subsequent process
matters according to Apache Way



Craig Russell  于2022年1月8日周六 00:00写道：

> Hi,
>
> For the next release vote (both dev@ and general@ lists) please include a
> check list for folks to use to validate the release. A simple +1 doesn't
> really mean anything.
>
> "Binding" is a specific term of art at Apache. For a podling release vote,
> it means the voter is a member of the IPMC.
>
> For votes on the dev@ list, it may be useful to identify three categories
> of voters:
> Mentors
> PPMC members
> everyone else
>
> For votes on the general@ list, it is useful to identify two categories
> of voters:
> IPMC members (binding votes)
> everyone else
>
> You should encourage your Mentors to vote on the release on the dev@
> list.
>
> Warm regards,
> Craig
>
> > On Jan 6, 2022, at 6:54 AM, Shuai Di  wrote:
> >
> > Hello Incubator Community,
> >
> > The Apache Linkis community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> > Linkis(incubating) 1.0.3-RC1. We now kindly request IPMC members and the
> > incubator community to help review and vote for this release.
> >
> > Apache Linkis builds a computation middleware layer to decouple the upper
> > applications and the underlying data engines, provides standardized
> > interfaces (REST, JDBC, WebSocket etc.) to easily connect to various
> > underlying engines (Spark, Presto, Flink, etc.), while enables cross
> engine
> > context sharing, unified job& engine governance and orchestration.
> >
> > Linkis community vote thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/rkbqlym5s1zcnqh4ml3nzhfvtx5x5c21
> >
> > Linkis community vote result thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/002dpo7x5hvm2xwxb303y9fqxkjgtmzy
> >
> > The release candidates:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/linkis/release-1.0.3-rc1
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-linkis/releases/tag/release-1.0.3-rc1
> >
> > Release notes: https://linkis.apache.org/docs/1.0.3/release-note
> >
> > The artifacts signed with PGP key [4EE54474], corresponding to [
> > shua...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file:
> >• https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/linkis/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Thanks!
> > On behalf of Apache Linkis(Incubating) community.
>
> Craig L Russell
> c...@apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.0.3-RC1

[peacewong]

>
> > This problem with  -LICENSE and NOTIC , do we need to remove the licenses
> > and notices of  Category   B and  X?


Only licenses from software included in the source release need to be
> mentioned in LICENSE and NOTICE not all dependancies. This may make the
> LICENSE file different for the source release and the binary release.


Also make sure there are no non optional dependancies on Category X
> software.


Thank you, we will handle this according to the rules.

Justin Mclean  于2022年1月8日周六 07:32写道：

> Hi,
>
> > This problem with  -LICENSE and NOTIC , do we need to remove the licenses
> > and notices of  Category   B and  X?
>
> Only licenses from software included in the source release need to be
> mentioned in LICENSE and NOTICE not all dependancies. This may make the
> LICENSE file different for the source release and the binary release.
>
> Also make sure there are no non optional dependancies on Category X
> software.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris flink/spark connector 1.0.0

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

> The connector is released to maven for the convenience of users. It is not
> a new version of Doris. It is base on Doris 0.15 release.

It may be based on 0.15 but would contain other bits of unreleased code right? 
If so it needs to follow the normal release process. See [1], [2] and [3].

Kind Regards,
Justin

1. https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
2. https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#compiled-packages
3. https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-distribution
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache AGE (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> as Sebb mentioned, some PPMC members might have used an email that is not 
> recognized by LDAP.

The extra subscribers are yourself and John Gemignani, who both are also 
subscribed to the list.

> I already reached out to them and asked them to double check. 

Currently Jasper Blues, Nick Sorrell and Pieterjan De Potter are not 
subscribed. (Also Raphael Bircher and Mason Sharp).

Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache AGE Incubating as a Top Level Project

[Eya Badal]

> >> (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing 
> >> list.
> > All the PPMC members should now be subscribed to the private mailing list. 
> This is still not the case.
I believe the only members that are not subscribed are removed from the 
resolution due to their inactivity. 


> >> (2) Four of the Committers including some of the PPMC members have not 
> >> mapped their apache id to their GitHub id. How can they contribute?
> 
> There are still issues here.
The only PPMC member that has not mapped the apache id to their GitHub id is 
the inactive member and has been removed from the resolution. 


On 2022/01/06 06:31:08 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> >> (1) Three of the PPMC members are not subscribed to the private mailing 
> >> list.
> > All the PPMC members should now be subscribed to the private mailing list. 
> 
> This is still not the case.
> 
> >> (3) No one has been added to the PPMC.
> > We have just added two new PPMC members
> 
> However they were not added in the correct way.
> 
> >> (2) Four of the Committers including some of the PPMC members have not 
> >> mapped their apache id to their GitHub id. How can they contribute?
> 
> There are still issues here.
> 
> >> (4) Are all of the License Headers taken care of? I’m seeing a PR that 
> >> indicates they are not. [1]
> 
> This is still an issue as far as I can see.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.0.3-RC1

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> This problem with  -LICENSE and NOTIC , do we need to remove the licenses
> and notices of  Category   B and  X?

Only licenses from software included in the source release need to be mentioned 
in LICENSE and NOTICE not all dependancies. This may make the LICENSE file 
different for the source release and the binary release.

Also make sure there are no non optional dependancies on Category X software.

Kind Regards,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache AGE (Incubating) as a Top Level Project

[Eya Badal]

Hi Justin,

Thank you for your feedback.

> Looking at this list there are several people who:
> a) Are not subscribed to the private list
We recently added two new members to our PPMC(Pieterjan De Potter and Nick 
Sorrell). I believe they are subscribed to @private, but as Sebb mentioned, 
some PPMC members might have used an email that is not recognized by LDAP. I 
already reached out to them and asked them to double check. 

> b) Have not taken part in discussions on the mailing list (that I can find)
We removed Mason Sharp(inactive PPMC) and the two mentors (retired and 
inactive) as initial members of the Apache AGE Project from the resolution. 


Please following find the new resolution: 


Establish the Apache AGE Project

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of
the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance
of open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the public,
related to implementing openCypher Graph query processing engine on
PostgreSQL, one of the most advanced open source relational database
management systems.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
(PMC), to be known as the "Apache AGE Project", be and hereby is
established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache AGE Project be and hereby is responsible for
the creation and maintenance of software related to implementing
openCypher Graph query processing engine on PostgreSQL, one of the most
advanced open source relational database management systems; and be it
further

RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache AGE" be and hereby
is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction of
the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache AGE Project, and to
have primary responsibility for management of the projects within the
scope of responsibility of the Apache AGE Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache AGE Project:

 * Dehowe Feng 
 * Eya Badal   
 * Felix Cheung
 * Jasper Blues
 * John Gemignani  
 * Josh Innis  
 * Juan Pan
 * Kevin Ratnasekera   
 * Nick Sorrell
 * Pieterjan De Potter 
 * Von Gosling 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Eya Badal be appointed to
the office of Vice President, Apache AGE, to serve in accordance with
and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of
the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Apache AGE Project be and hereby is tasked with the
migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator AGE podling; and
be it further

RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache Incubator
AGE podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are hereafter
discharged.





Best regards, 
Eya 


On 2022/01/06 07:15:31 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > * Dehowe Feng 
> > * Eya Badal   
> > * Felix Cheung
> > * Jasper Blues
> > * John Gemignani  
> > * Josh Innis  
> > * Juan Pan
> > * Kevin Ratnasekera   
> > * Mason Sharp 
> > * Nick Sorrell
> > * Pieterjan De Potter 
> > * Raphael Bircher 
> > * Suneel Marthi   
> > * Von Gosling 
> 
> Looking at this list there are several people who:
> a) Are not subscribed to the private list
> b) Have not taken part in discussions on the mailing list (that I can find)
> 
> When putting together a graduation proposal, it's a good idea to find out if 
> the proposed PMC are willing to be PMC members. While there is no real harm 
> in having inactive PMC members, during graduation is a good time to trim the 
> PMC to those who will actually do the work.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.0.3-RC1

[Craig Russell]

Hi,

For the next release vote (both dev@ and general@ lists) please include a check 
list for folks to use to validate the release. A simple +1 doesn't really mean 
anything.

"Binding" is a specific term of art at Apache. For a podling release vote, it 
means the voter is a member of the IPMC.

For votes on the dev@ list, it may be useful to identify three categories of 
voters:
Mentors
PPMC members
everyone else

For votes on the general@ list, it is useful to identify two categories of 
voters:
IPMC members (binding votes)
everyone else

You should encourage your Mentors to vote on the release on the dev@ list. 

Warm regards,
Craig

> On Jan 6, 2022, at 6:54 AM, Shuai Di  wrote:
> 
> Hello Incubator Community,
> 
> The Apache Linkis community has voted and approved the release of Apache
> Linkis(incubating) 1.0.3-RC1. We now kindly request IPMC members and the
> incubator community to help review and vote for this release.
> 
> Apache Linkis builds a computation middleware layer to decouple the upper
> applications and the underlying data engines, provides standardized
> interfaces (REST, JDBC, WebSocket etc.) to easily connect to various
> underlying engines (Spark, Presto, Flink, etc.), while enables cross engine
> context sharing, unified job& engine governance and orchestration.
> 
> Linkis community vote thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/rkbqlym5s1zcnqh4ml3nzhfvtx5x5c21
> 
> Linkis community vote result thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/002dpo7x5hvm2xwxb303y9fqxkjgtmzy
> 
> The release candidates:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/linkis/release-1.0.3-rc1
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-linkis/releases/tag/release-1.0.3-rc1
> 
> Release notes: https://linkis.apache.org/docs/1.0.3/release-note
> 
> The artifacts signed with PGP key [4EE54474], corresponding to [
> shua...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file:
>• https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/linkis/KEYS
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> Thanks!
> On behalf of Apache Linkis(Incubating) community.

Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubating Proposal of HugeGraph

[Juan Pan]

Hello Dave,


There are a few repos of HugeGraph at GitHub, it’s too loose and not easy to 
manage. So the team decides to merge some of repos into [1],  


```
1. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph
2. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-computer
3. https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-commons
4. [PLAN] The ecosystem repository hugegraph-toolchain, including 
hugegraph-client, hugegraph-loader, hugegraph-tools, hugegraph-hubble, 
hugegraph-test, hugegraph-doc:https://github.com/hugegraph/hugegraph-toolchain
```
Double-check here, All the relevant repos at Github will be donated to ASF, 
right? @Jermy


[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/HugeGraphProposal
--
Juan Pan(Trista), Twitter: @tristaZero


On 01/7/2022 01:12，Dave Fisher wrote：
Hi -

Not every repository at GitHub.com/hugegraph is included in the proposal. What 
does the HugeGraph community intend to do with those repositories? Are any of 
those key to the project?

Thanks,
Dave

On Jan 4, 2022, at 9:47 AM, Jermy Li  wrote:

Hi, I'm Jermy from HugeGraph team. Thanks to mentors for introducing the 
project.

@JB
We have sorted out a comparison(some main features of graph database) between
HugeGraph and Neo4j + Titan/Janus, I'm glad to share with you:


(I post a picture here due to the table format can't be displayed well in the 
email,
please refer to this link[1] for a text version.)

[1] 
https://medium.com/@jermylee/comparison-of-graph-database-neo4j-janusgrraph-and-hugegraph-b144c527a6e2
 


--
Regards,

Jermy Li | Senior Software Engineer @Baidu
javalov...@gmail.com 
Lidong Dai mailto:lidong...@apache.org>> 于2022年1月4日周二 
22:56写道：
I'm so glad to see that HugeGraph will enter into the Apache Incubator!

I'm happy to be the mentor of the project.  As far as I know, HugeGraph
initial team has done a lot of work for this project.

BTW,  our new project also need a graph database, I think HugeGraph is a
good choice


Best Regards



---
Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair
LidongDai
lidong...@apache.org 
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dailidong 

Twitter: @WorkflowEasy >
---


On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:02 PM Yu Li mailto:car...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Thanks for driving this, Williem!

I'm happy to be the mentor of the project. I've had several conversations
with the team (both online and offline), and were attracted by their
technical taste and willingness of open source contribution and
collaboration. Hope the project could be accepted by the incubator, and
move on rapidly and healthy towards building up a great community!

@JB I happen to discuss with the team about comparison of existing graph
database systems, and would like to share some information here:

Comparison with AGE (I didn't find open document and below is my
understanding based on previous discussion):

- Common features of HugeGraph and AGE:
- Both support complete graph query language. AGE supports
openCypher, and HugeGraph supports Apache Gremlin.
- Both support basic graph CRUD operations.
- Both support PostgreSQL as backend storage, and the organisation of
the stored graph data is similar.
- Difference between HugeGraph and AGE:
- Different ways of integrating PostgreSQL: AGE runs as a plug-in of
PostgreSQL, while HugeGraph runs PostgreSQL as an independent storage
system.
- Besides supporting PostgreSQL as the storage backend, HugeGraph
supports a variety of other backends, such as RocksDB (the
default),
Cassandra, HBase, MySQL, etc. in a pluggable way.
- Besides supporting basic graph CRUD operations, HugeGraph also
supports real-time OLTP graph algorithm, distributed OLAP graph
calculation, rich attribute/graph indices and schema constraints,
etc.


Comparison with Neo4j and JanusGraph/Titan:

- Please refer to this document [1], and there are more benchmark data
here [2] (in Chinese now, and I believe English translation is on the
way)


Hope the information helps, and please feel free to correct me or give
supplements here, team (smile).

Best Regards,
Yu

[1]
https://blog.actorsfit.com/a?ID=01650-caeae70a-01c9-4ab8-a440-07b24e732ee7 

[2]

https://hugegraph.github.io/hugegraph-doc/performance/hugegraph-benchmark-0.5.6.html
 


On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 16:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:

Hi Willem,

it looks like an interesting project.

Just for my curiosity, how can we compare HugeGraph with Neo4j, Titan,
or PostgreSQL AGE ?
Especially in term of graph distribution, parallel processing, etc ?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis (Incubating) 1.0.3-RC1

[peacewong]

Hi. Justin
---LICENSE and NOTICE are not correct and include licenses that are not
Category A licenses. One;y code that is Category A can be included in a
source release and there should be no reason to mention any other Category
B or Category X software. The license and notice should represent what is
in the source release and not as I think has been done here and list the
licenses of all dependancies. [1]

This problem with  -LICENSE and NOTIC , do we need to remove the licenses
and notices of  Category   B and  X?

Justin Mclean  于2022年1月7日周五 12:55写道：

> Hi,
>
> Sorry but t’s -1 binding from me.
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes are fine
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are not correct and include licenses that are not
> Category A licenses. One;y code that is Category A can be included in a
> source release and there should be no reason to mention any other Category
> B or Category X software. The license and notice should represent what is
> in the source release and not as I think has been done here and list the
> licenses of all dependancies. [1]
> - There are 2 zips in the release. Theses contain source code without
> headers so it is unknown how they are licensed.
> - Look like ASF headers have been incorrectly added to some files e.g. [2]
> - the source contain files we are not likely to be able to distribute. e.g
> [3]
> - How are these files licensed? [4]
> - I didn’t try to compile
>
> Kind Regards,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html#guiding
> 2. ./web/src/dss/assets/projectIconFont/iconfont.*
> 3. ./web/src/dss/assets/pingfangScMedium.otf
> 4. ./web/src/components/svgIcon/svg/*.svg
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>