[ANNOUNCE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 Release

[Anirudh Subramanian]

Hello all,

The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of
Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1!


Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for
both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and
imperative programming to maximize efficiency and productivity.

This release contains bug fixes and performance improvements.

A full list of the changes in this release can be found in the release
notes:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1


A Link to the Download is here:
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mxnet/1.2.1


If you prefer to build from source and experiment with various
compile-time configuration options, use this link to get the
instructions:
http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html

Or You can download and play with MXNet easily using one of the options
below:
   1. The Pip package can be found here: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mxnet
   2. The Docker Images can be found here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/

Links to published scala packages in Maven:
https://mvnrepository.com/search?q=org.apache.mxnet
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/mxnet/


The release tag used for the 1.2.1 release is:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/1.2.1

Some more MXNet Resources:
   1. Issues: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues
   2. Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET
   3. Twitter: @ApacheMXNet

   4. YouTube: Apachemxnet channel

   5. Medium: https://medium.com/apache-mxnet

   6. Reddit: /r/mxnet




If you want to learn more about MXNet visit
http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/

Finally, you are welcome to join and also invite your friends to the
dynamic and growing MXNet community by subscribing to
d...@mxnet.incubator.apache.org

Thanks!

Apache MXNet (incubating) Team
___


DISCLAIMER:

Apache MXNet (incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at The

Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache

Incubator PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted

projects until a further review indicates that the

infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have

stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF

projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection

of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate

that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1.rc1

[Anirudh]

Hi all,

Thanks a lot for taking the time out to vote and for your suggestions.

The vote is passed with 4 +1s (binding).

Binding +1:

Sergio
Sebastian
Jean-Baptiste
Jim

I will proceed with the next steps for the release.


Thanks,

Anirudh

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC1

[Anirudh]

Hi Sebastian,

Thanks for the suggestion. I will take care to fix our docs for future
releases.

Anirudh

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Sebastian  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> verified signatures and checksum, could successfully build from source on
> ubuntu 16
>
> -s
>
>
> On 13.07.2018 05:17, Anirudh Subramanian wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
>> candidate RC1.
>>
>> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>>
>> Vote thread:
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6a0459a54dd0b13fc89f653
>> af91306810aa83d5d1a578a2abbac89fe@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>
>> Results thread:
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94dfdc2cee82664a63a47d7
>> ce0a011629903c5fca8ae96057974526f@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>
>> Explanation for RC1:
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/891c902c28251b0dbb90a64
>> de086c8c5f02c22e070e58d55c923285d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>
>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.1.rc1/
>>
>> The release tag can be found here:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc1
>>
>> The release hash is 106391a1f0ee012b1ea38764d711e76774ce77e1 and can be
>> found here:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/106391a1f0e
>> e012b1ea38764d711e76774ce77e1
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>
>> 0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8  D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D
>>
>> KEYS file available:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>>
>> The vote will end at Monday July 16th, 8:10 PDT.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.1
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Anirudh
>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC1

[Anirudh Subramanian]

Hi all,

This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
candidate RC1.

Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.

Vote thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6a0459a54dd0b13fc89f653af91306810aa83d5d1a578a2abbac89fe@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

Results thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/94dfdc2cee82664a63a47d7ce0a011629903c5fca8ae96057974526f@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

Explanation for RC1:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/891c902c28251b0dbb90a64de086c8c5f02c22e070e58d55c923285d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.1.rc1/

The release tag can be found here:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc1

The release hash is 106391a1f0ee012b1ea38764d711e76774ce77e1 and can be
found here:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/106391a1f0ee012b1ea38764d711e76774ce77e1

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:

0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8  D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D

KEYS file available:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS

The vote will end at Monday July 16th, 8:10 PDT.

[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.1
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Thanks,

Anirudh

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

[Anirudh]

Hi Dave,

Thank you for your inputs. To give more context, the reason we are doing
the release is to fix a backwards incompatible change with the save_params
API. This issue impacted some of our users and the warning message in RC0
showed an alternative API for one use case but not the other when
save_params was called. We are fixing it to provide a warning message for
both use cases, so that users may not end up replacing save_params with the
wrong API.
My sincere apologies to the mentors, for creating additional work.

Anirudh

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 6:44 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> Mentors all - Releases are not cheap and we are all volunteers.
>
> Can we teach Release Managers to have a little more judgement about when
> to pull a release?
>
> It seems to be too risk adverse to cancel this vote due to a warning
> message.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 2, 2018, at 5:45 PM, Anirudh  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are cancelling this vote because we need to improve the warning
> message
> > when users use a deprecated API: `save_params`. We will address the issue
> > and send out a new release for another vote.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Anirudh
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

[Anirudh]

Hi,

We are cancelling this vote because we need to improve the warning message
when users use a deprecated API: `save_params`. We will address the issue
and send out a new release for another vote.

Thanks,

Anirudh

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

[Anirudh]

Hi Sergio,

The 1.2.0 release notes have been added to NEWS.md. Thanks for pointing
about CODEOWNERS file. Agree that it is not required in the source release
and I will add its removal to the release steps so that it can be removed
next time.

Anirudh

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Sergio Fernández  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> So far I've checked:
> * signatures and digests
> * source releases file layouts
> * matched git tags and commit ids
> * incubator suffix and disclaimer
> * LICENSE & NOTICE files look good
> * no binary files in the source release
> * clean build (osx 10.12.6)
>
> Some minor details I'd like to comment:
> * I don't understand what's the purposed of CODEOWNERS file in the source
> release
> * I've noticed the patch release is not included in the README's changelog.
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:16 PM Anirudh  wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
> > candidate RC0.
> >
> > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/52a6487bc1389d8865ccc0e42ade49
> > edde02c061090389616c8088d5@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Results thread:
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1d833bc94897132590950668eaff7d
> > 7e253894e2c274b1223ef733e1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.1.rc0/
> >
> > The release tag can be found here:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc0
> >
> > <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc0>
> > The release hash is daa957c9c811b1abd09b98e8fb5ff2c06cad9ad8 and can be
> > found here:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > daa957c9c811b1abd09b98e8fb5ff2c06cad9ad8
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >
> >
> > 0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8  D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D
> >
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> >
> > The vote will end at Tuesday June 26th, 12:15 PDT.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > Anirudh
> >
>

[VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1 release RC0

[Anirudh]

Hi all,

This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.1, release
candidate RC0.

Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.

Vote thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/52a6487bc1389d8865ccc0e42ade49
edde02c061090389616c8088d5@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

Results thread:

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1d833bc94897132590950668eaff7d
7e253894e2c274b1223ef733e1@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.1.rc0/

The release tag can be found here:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc0

<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.1.rc0>
The release hash is daa957c9c811b1abd09b98e8fb5ff2c06cad9ad8 and can be
found here:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
daa957c9c811b1abd09b98e8fb5ff2c06cad9ad8

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:


0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8  D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D


KEYS file available:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS

The vote will end at Tuesday June 26th, 12:15 PDT.

[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

Anirudh

[ANNOUNCE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 Release

[Anirudh Subramanian]

Hello all,

The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of
Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0!



Blog:

https://medium.com/apache-mxnet/announcing-apache-mxnet-1-2-0-d94f56da154b


Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for
both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and
imperative programming to maximize efficiency and productivity.

This release improves usability, performance and interoperability.

A full list of the changes in this release can be found in the release
notes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes


A Link to the Download is here:
https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0


If you prefer to build from source and experiment with various
compile-time configuration options, use this link to get the
instructions:
http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/install/index.html

Or You can download and play with MXNet easily using one of the options
below:
   1. The Pip package can be found here: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/mxnet
   2. The Docker Images can be found here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/mxnet/python/

The release tag used for the 1.2.0 release is:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/tree/1.2.0

Some more MXNet Resources:
   1. Issues: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues
   2. Wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET
   3. Twitter: @ApacheMXNet 

   4. YouTube: Apachemxnet channel 

   5. Medium: https://medium.com/apache-mxnet

   6. Reddit: /r/mxnet 





If you want to learn more about MXNet visit
http://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/

Finally, you are welcome to join and also invite your friends to the
dynamic and growing MXNet community by subscribing to
d...@mxnet.incubator.apache.org

Thanks!

Apache MXNet (incubating) Team
___


DISCLAIMER:

Apache MXNet (incubating) is an effort undergoing incubation at The

Apache Software Foundation (ASF), sponsored by the name of Apache

Incubator PMC. Incubation is required of all newly accepted

projects until a further review indicates that the

infrastructure, communications, and decision making process have

stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF

projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection

of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate

that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF.

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC3

[Anirudh]

Hi,

Thank you all for voting and providing your inputs.

The vote has passed with three +1 binding votes and no -1 or 0 votes.

+1 (binding):
Sergio
Henri
Sebastian

I will follow up on Monday, on the next steps for the release.

Anirudh


On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Sebastian <s...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
>  - checked signatures
>  - checked building from source under ubuntu 16
>
>
> On 19.05.2018 19:25, Hen wrote:
>
>> I am only reviewing the "diff -r" between RC2 and RC3.
>>
>> Confirmed that the DevGuide.md is removed.
>>
>> There is a fix ( https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/10837 )
>> to Dockerfiles, and a pom.xml fix adding a parent tag to the
>> scala-package.
>>
>> These seem fine and rectifies the blocking item in the previous vote.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Anirudh Subramanian <
>> anirudh2...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
>>> candidate RC3.
>>> As suggested by Justin and Henri, we have removed the two category b
>>> license files: DevGuide.md from the release source tarball.
>>>
>>> Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
>>>
>>> Vote thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fee7800da4b701cb62d6dd7c1b43ef
>>> d44c94a3a386f3adb48f343d6e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> Results thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0a43205e47a02a528873e16fe0e578
>>> 9dfcfebc8a8539f17bbcde2062@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0.rc3/
>>>
>>> The release tag can be found here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc3
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc3>
>>> The release hash is 297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c and can be
>>> found here:
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>> 297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
>>> 297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c>
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> 0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8  D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D
>>>
>>> KEYS file available:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
>>>
>>> For information on the contents of the release see:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
>>> Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes
>>>
>>> The vote will end at 1:00 PM on Friday, May 18th, PDT.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Anirudh
>>>
>>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

[VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC3

[Anirudh Subramanian]

Hi all,

This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
candidate RC3.
As suggested by Justin and Henri, we have removed the two category b
license files: DevGuide.md from the release source tarball.

Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.

Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/fee7800da4b701cb62d6dd7c1b43efd44c94a3a386f3adb48f343d6e@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

Results thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0a43205e47a02a528873e16fe0e5789dfcfebc8a8539f17bbcde2062@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0.rc3/

The release tag can be found here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc3

<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc3>
The release hash is 297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c and can be
found here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c

<https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/297c64fd2ee404612aa3ecc880b940fb2538039c>
Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
0D04 3D0F 92CA 7333 22A8  D131 9067 CC8E AF55 CD6D

KEYS file available:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS

For information on the contents of the release see:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes

The vote will end at 1:00 PM on Friday, May 18th, PDT.

[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...


Anirudh

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Thank you Justin for your inputs and explanation ! I really appreciate your
efforts to evaluate the release. I will extend the vote till Monday 12:00
PM PDT (if its permitted) to see what other IPMC members have to say about
category b content in the release.

Anirudh

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > I think we should be good to add the header for Apache v2.0 license:
> >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/cpu_ctc.h
> >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/ctc_helper.h
> >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc.h
> >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc_kernels.h
> >> src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/hostdevice.h
> >
> > Please confirm.
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> > For the docs directory, we did something similar to what other popular
> > Apache projects like spark did:
> > https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/master/docs. (adding docs
> directory to
> > rat-excludes)
>
> Just because a TLP does something doesn't mean it’s right, the Spark
> NOTICE file for instance is a right mess. ASF policy is clear on what
> should be done if you include docs in a release. [1]
>
> > At this point I want to ask you what your blocking concerns are.
> > Is it only the CC-BY-2.5 license for DevGuide.md in googletest submodule
> or
> > is it also the missing headers for contrib and the broad rat excludes ?
>
> My -1 vote is not a blocker to the release as I said before if you get 3
> +1 votes and more +1 than -1 you can release if you want to.
>
> IMO (and others may have differing opinions) the missing headers can be
> fixed in a later release. The main issue is inclusion of Category B content
> in a non binary form in the release.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Justin,

Thank you! They were first added as part of this PR:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/5834. As you can see there
is a LICENSE in src/operator/contrib/ctc_include which is Apache v2.0
license. I am assuming that the intention was to keep the license of files
in the directory or subdirectory the same. I think we should be good to add
the header for Apache v2.0 license:
>  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/cpu_ctc.h
>  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/ctc_helper.h
>  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc.h
>  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc_kernels.h
>  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/hostdevice.h

Please confirm.

For the docs directory, we did something similar to what other popular
Apache projects like spark did:
https://github.com/apache/spark/tree/master/docs. (adding docs directory to
rat-excludes)

At this point I want to ask you what your blocking concerns are.
Is it only the CC-BY-2.5 license for DevGuide.md in googletest submodule or
is it also the missing headers for contrib and the broad rat excludes ?

Anirudh




On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:38 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > In contrib/, I found a few files which don't have a license or have a
> > license but not the full text:
> >  src/operator/contrib/psroi_pooling-inl.h
> >  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/cpu_ctc.h
> >  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/ctc_helper.h
> >  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc.h
> >  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc_kernels.h
> >  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/hostdevice.h
>
> Well they do have a license it’s just unclear what it is as they have no
> header. Do you know where those files came from and how they were licensed?
>
> > In docs/ directory, the files that don't have a license are the .md,
> .html,
> > .js , .css, .svg.
> > I am assuming that these files don't need a license and thus we are good
> to
> > put them in rat excludes file.
>
> .js files are code and as such should have a header either [1] or [2]. The
> html files should have a header also [4]. There’s only a few exception for
> file not having headers [3]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
> 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
> 3. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
> 4. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-siteindocs
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Justin,

I looked at the big directories that were omitted in the RAT excludes file:
contrib/* and docs/*.
In contrib/, I found a few files which don't have a license or have a
license but not the full text:
  src/operator/contrib/psroi_pooling-inl.h
  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/cpu_ctc.h
  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/ctc_helper.h
  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc.h
  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/gpu_ctc_kernels.h
  src/operator/contrib/ctc_include/detail/hostdevice.h

Can you please let me know what are the guidelines for contrib directory.
Do all source files in the contrib
directory have to mandatorily have a license ?

In docs/ directory, the files that don't have a license are the .md, .html,
.js , .css, .svg.
I am assuming that these files don't need a license and thus we are good to
put them in rat excludes file.
Please let me know if my assumption is wrong.

The explanation for other items in rat excludes is available in the doc
maintained by Meghna:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Source+Licenses

Anirudh



On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Hen,
>
> Sorry I misunderstood. The doc can definitely be removed from release when
> doing tar.gz build.
> I for some reason was thinking about the release tag on github.
>
> Anirudh
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I'll poke the legal-discuss thread; however why can't we have the build
>> script for the tar.gz start by removing the .md file?
>>
>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Justin,
>> >
>> > We cannot just remove the documentation without modifying the original
>> > repo, since it is a submodule.
>> > I have opened an issue to googletest to see if it can be relicensed:
>> > https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/1604
>> > Is this acceptable for the release?
>> >
>> > For issue 1 and 2, is the information being in README and API docs
>> enough
>> > or do we need to add a
>> > warning for Creative commons license when script is launched ?
>> >
>> > Anirudh
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > My reading of that is the documentation is under a CC license and the
>> > code
>> > > under a different one. That's quite common. You could just not include
>> > the
>> > > documentation.
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Justin
>> > >
>> > > On Sat., 12 May 2018, 9:48 am Anirudh, <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Justin Mclean <
>> > jus...@classsoftware.com
>> > > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > For 1 and 2, Considering that the Creative Commons License files
>> > > aren't
>> > > > > > part of the release source itself but downloaded when user calls
>> > some
>> > > > > > specific api or runs some script, would these be blocking
>> issues ?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > No but this need to explicitly pointed out to the user that they
>> are
>> > > > > downloading something that is not compatable with the ALv2
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The information regarding the license is currently added both to the
>> > > README
>> > > > of the example for 1, and also on the docs for the API call for 2.
>> > > > Are you suggesting that some kind of warning be provided during
>> > download
>> > > of
>> > > > these datasets?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > For 3, I have added it to known issues and I look forward to any
>> > > other
>> > > > > > suggestions you have related to this.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Ask the owner for it to be relicensed under another license?
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The link (
>> > > >
>> > > > https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/
>> > ec44c6c1675c25b9827aacd08c0243
>> > > 3cccde7780/googlemock/do

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Hen,

Sorry I misunderstood. The doc can definitely be removed from release when
doing tar.gz build.
I for some reason was thinking about the release tag on github.

Anirudh

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote:

> I'll poke the legal-discuss thread; however why can't we have the build
> script for the tar.gz start by removing the .md file?
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Justin,
> >
> > We cannot just remove the documentation without modifying the original
> > repo, since it is a submodule.
> > I have opened an issue to googletest to see if it can be relicensed:
> > https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/1604
> > Is this acceptable for the release?
> >
> > For issue 1 and 2, is the information being in README and API docs enough
> > or do we need to add a
> > warning for Creative commons license when script is launched ?
> >
> > Anirudh
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > My reading of that is the documentation is under a CC license and the
> > code
> > > under a different one. That's quite common. You could just not include
> > the
> > > documentation.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > On Sat., 12 May 2018, 9:48 am Anirudh, <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Justin Mclean <
> > jus...@classsoftware.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > > For 1 and 2, Considering that the Creative Commons License files
> > > aren't
> > > > > > part of the release source itself but downloaded when user calls
> > some
> > > > > > specific api or runs some script, would these be blocking issues
> ?
> > > > >
> > > > > No but this need to explicitly pointed out to the user that they
> are
> > > > > downloading something that is not compatable with the ALv2
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The information regarding the license is currently added both to the
> > > README
> > > > of the example for 1, and also on the docs for the API call for 2.
> > > > Are you suggesting that some kind of warning be provided during
> > download
> > > of
> > > > these datasets?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > For 3, I have added it to known issues and I look forward to any
> > > other
> > > > > > suggestions you have related to this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ask the owner for it to be relicensed under another license?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The link (
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/
> > ec44c6c1675c25b9827aacd08c0243
> > > 3cccde7780/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md
> > > > )
> > > > states the following at the bottom :
> > > >
> > > > "This page is based on the Making GWT Better
> > > > <http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html> guide from
> > the
> > > > Google
> > > > Web Toolkit <http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/> project. Except as
> > > > otherwise noted <http://code.google.com/policies.html#restrictions>,
> > the
> > > > content of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons
> Attribution
> > > 2.5
> > > > License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/>."
> > > >
> > > > At the top it states the following ::
> > > >
> > > > "All Google Mock source and pre-built packages are provided under the
> > New
> > > > BSD License <http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php>."
> > > >
> > > > Since the CC-BY license states "except as otherwise noted", does this
> > > mean
> > > > that the CC-BY-2.5 license at the bottom is void ?
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Justin
> > > > > 
> > -
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Justin,

We cannot just remove the documentation without modifying the original
repo, since it is a submodule.
I have opened an issue to googletest to see if it can be relicensed:
https://github.com/google/googletest/issues/1604
Is this acceptable for the release?

For issue 1 and 2, is the information being in README and API docs enough
or do we need to add a
warning for Creative commons license when script is launched ?

Anirudh


On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:03 PM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> My reading of that is the documentation is under a CC license and the code
> under a different one. That's quite common. You could just not include the
> documentation.
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> On Sat., 12 May 2018, 9:48 am Anirudh, <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > For 1 and 2, Considering that the Creative Commons License files
> aren't
> > > > part of the release source itself but downloaded when user calls some
> > > > specific api or runs some script, would these be blocking issues ?
> > >
> > > No but this need to explicitly pointed out to the user that they are
> > > downloading something that is not compatable with the ALv2
> > >
> >
> > The information regarding the license is currently added both to the
> README
> > of the example for 1, and also on the docs for the API call for 2.
> > Are you suggesting that some kind of warning be provided during download
> of
> > these datasets?
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > For 3, I have added it to known issues and I look forward to any
> other
> > > > suggestions you have related to this.
> > >
> > > Ask the owner for it to be relicensed under another license?
> > >
> >
> > The link (
> >
> > https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/ec44c6c1675c25b9827aacd08c0243
> 3cccde7780/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md
> > )
> > states the following at the bottom :
> >
> > "This page is based on the Making GWT Better
> > <http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html> guide from the
> > Google
> > Web Toolkit <http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/> project. Except as
> > otherwise noted <http://code.google.com/policies.html#restrictions>, the
> > content of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution
> 2.5
> > License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/>."
> >
> > At the top it states the following ::
> >
> > "All Google Mock source and pre-built packages are provided under the New
> > BSD License <http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php>."
> >
> > Since the CC-BY license states "except as otherwise noted", does this
> mean
> > that the CC-BY-2.5 license at the bottom is void ?
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > For 1 and 2, Considering that the Creative Commons License files aren't
> > part of the release source itself but downloaded when user calls some
> > specific api or runs some script, would these be blocking issues ?
>
> No but this need to explicitly pointed out to the user that they are
> downloading something that is not compatable with the ALv2
>

The information regarding the license is currently added both to the README
of the example for 1, and also on the docs for the API call for 2.
Are you suggesting that some kind of warning be provided during download of
these datasets?


>
> > For 3, I have added it to known issues and I look forward to any other
> > suggestions you have related to this.
>
> Ask the owner for it to be relicensed under another license?
>

The link (
https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/ec44c6c1675c25b9827aacd08c02433cccde7780/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md
)
states the following at the bottom :

"This page is based on the Making GWT Better
 guide from the Google
Web Toolkit  project. Except as
otherwise noted , the
content of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5
License ."

At the top it states the following ::

"All Google Mock source and pre-built packages are provided under the New
BSD License ."

Since the CC-BY license states "except as otherwise noted", does this mean
that the CC-BY-2.5 license at the bottom is void ?

> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Justin,

I have a few questions on the category b issues that you raised:

1. example/nce-loss/README.md: This script doesn't ship with CC-BY-SA and
GFDL content by itself but downloads the dataset when user runs the script
example/nce-loss/get_text8.sh.

2. python/mxnet/gluon/contrib/data/text.py: Here the datasets WikiText2 and
WikiText103 with "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike" are also
downloaded when calling API: mxnet.gluon.contrib.data.text.WikiText2 and
mxnet.gluon.contrib.data.text.WikiText103. It also appears in the mxnet
docs here which will help make end users aware about it:
https://mxnet.incubator.apache.org/api/python/gluon/contrib.html?highlight=wikitext2#mxnet.gluon.contrib.data.text.WikiText2

3. 3rdparty/googletest/googletest/docs/DevGuide.md: For this issue Meghna
raised this question on legal-discuss@
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201804.mbox/%3CCAMGgKDDEDkSo-dff_GxU19B7JKMpUz3w6bGTYDs3XbJzyKAOGg%40mail.gmail.com%3E

The problem is that this license is part of googletest submodule and thus
it is not easy for us to remove it without modifying the googletest repo
itself.
I have mentioned this issue in the known issues of the RELEASE.

For 1 and 2, Considering that the Creative Commons License files aren't
part of the release source itself but downloaded when user calls some
specific api or runs some script, would these be blocking issues ?
For 3, I have added it to known issues and I look forward to any other
suggestions you have related to this.

I would really appreciate any other advice or suggestions you have on how
to handle these issues.

Anirudh



On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> Just to make sure I understand: Do you want us to review rat-excludes file
> to make sure we are not omitting important ? We will check the rat-excludes
> file.
> Also, the huge number of files(when run without rat-excludes) is because
> of the third party submodules for whom the licenses have been added to
> LICENSE.
>
> Anirudh
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I am not able to reproduce the issue you mentioned with unknown
>> licenses.
>> > When I try to run apache rat on the downloaded source it says 0 unknown
>> > licenses. Does the source you are looking at include build artifacts by
>> > chance ?
>>
>> No it wasn't but I was ignoring the rat exclusions. Perhaps they have
>> been set too wide wouldn’t be the first time that’s happened.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Justin,

Just to make sure I understand: Do you want us to review rat-excludes file
to make sure we are not omitting important ? We will check the rat-excludes
file.
Also, the huge number of files(when run without rat-excludes) is because of
the third party submodules for whom the licenses have been added to LICENSE.

Anirudh

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:44 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > I am not able to reproduce the issue you mentioned with unknown licenses.
> > When I try to run apache rat on the downloaded source it says 0 unknown
> > licenses. Does the source you are looking at include build artifacts by
> > chance ?
>
> No it wasn't but I was ignoring the rat exclusions. Perhaps they have been
> set too wide wouldn’t be the first time that’s happened.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Justin,

Thanks a lot for the feedback!

I will take a look at license issues and also publish my key to the public
keyserver.

I am not able to reproduce the issue you mentioned with unknown licenses.
When I try to run apache rat on the downloaded source it says 0 unknown
licenses. Does the source you are looking at include build artifacts by
chance ?

Thanks,

Anirudh



On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:48 AM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry but it’s -1 binding as issues raised last incubator vote haven’t
> been fixed and the source release include Category B content. [2]
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - In LICENSE if you link to the license eg "For details, see,
> 3rdparty/googletest/googletest/LICENSE” there is no need to include the
> text of the license
> - NOTICE is fine
> - It’s still impossible to tell if files have correct headers or not as
> 3272 files have unknown licenses. Is this going to be fixed?
> - No unexpected binary files
>
> The source release contains Category B plain text content:
> search "creative commons"
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
> License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike
> ./python/mxnet/gluon/contrib/data/text.py
> Examples in this folder utilize [text8](http://mattmahoney.
> net/dc/textdata.html) dataset, which is a 100MB of cleaned up English
> Wikipedia XML data. Wikipedia data is multi-licensed under the [Creative
> Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License](https://en.wikipedia.
> org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-
> ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License) (CC-BY-SA) and the [GNU Free
> Documentation License](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_
> the_GNU_Free_Documentation_License) (GFDL). For information on licensing
> of Wikipedia data please visit [here](https://en.wikipedia.
> org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_download).
> ./example/nce-loss/README.md
> This page is based on the [Making GWT Better](http://code.google.
> com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html) guide from the [Google Web Toolkit](
> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/) project.  Except as otherwise [noted](
> http://code.google.com/policies.html#restrictions), the content of this
> page is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License](
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/).
> ./3rdparty/googletest/googletest/docs/DevGuide.md
> This page is based on the [Making GWT Better](http://code.google.
> com/webtoolkit/makinggwtbetter.html) guide from the [Google Web Toolkit](
> http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/) project.  Except as otherwise [noted](
> http://code.google.com/policies.html#restrictions), the content of this
> page is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License](
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/).
> ./3rdparty/googletest/googlemock/docs/DevGuide.md
>
> The policy for md5 hashes has change and if you have a sha you have no
> need for a md5. Please don’t publish the md5 hashes. [1]
>
> Would be good to publish your key as well:
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-mxnet-src-1.2.0.rc2-
> incubating.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signature made Thu  3 May 05:09:24 2018 AEST
> gpg:using RSA key 38D5A10C8824C1C0
> gpg: requesting key 38D5A10C8824C1C0 from hkps server
> hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
> 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi Henri,

Thank you for your kind words! Really appreciate you and Sebastian checking
the release.

Anirudh

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1.
>
> Reviewed diff between 1.1.0 and 1.2.0 source releases for anything unusual.
> Sampled new files in 1.2.0 for source headers.
> Happy to see the dmlc code folded into 3rd-party so it's clearer for
> users/reviewers.
>
> Good patient release-managering btw with all those side-issues on the vote
> thread regarding flaky tests/CI fails.
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Anirudh <anirudh2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
> > candidate RC2.
> >
> > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddc088a21aac179144350ea97353a7
> > ea885b2765ccb98db08a03ba2d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Results thread:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4c55ab75f6781e835d4b3e564904a4
> > 3680c760e619d741ce00c55962@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0.rc2/
> >
> > The release tag can be found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc2
> >
> > The release hash is 60641ef1183bb4584c9356e84b6ca6d5fce58d6d and can be
> > found here:
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/
> > 60641ef1183bb4584c9356e84b6ca6d5fce58d6d
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > 6E67 8509 715E 3B63 CDB2  234F F8F3 3A11 7CC1 8E95
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS
> >
> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS>
> > For information on the contents of the release see:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/
> > Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes
> >
> > The vote will end at 10:30 AM on Friday, May 11th, PDT.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ]  -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > Anirudh
> >
>

[VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0 release RC2

[Anirudh]

Hi all,

This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.2.0, release
candidate RC2.

Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release.

Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ddc088a21aac179144350ea97353a7ea885b2765ccb98db08a03ba2d@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

Results thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/4c55ab75f6781e835d4b3e564904a43680c760e619d741ce00c55962@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E

The source tarball, including signatures, digests etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/1.2.0.rc2/

The release tag can be found here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/releases/tag/1.2.0.rc2

The release hash is 60641ef1183bb4584c9356e84b6ca6d5fce58d6d and can be
found here:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/commit/60641ef1183bb4584c9356e84b6ca6d5fce58d6d

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
6E67 8509 715E 3B63 CDB2  234F F8F3 3A11 7CC1 8E95

KEYS file available:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS

<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mxnet/KEYS>
For information on the contents of the release see:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Apache+MXNet+%28incubating%29+1.2.0+Release+Notes

The vote will end at 10:30 AM on Friday, May 11th, PDT.

[ ] +1 Release this package as 1.2.0
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ]  -1 Do not release this package because ...

Anirudh