Please grant me edit access to the Incubator Wiki

[Kathy Saunders]

Please grant me access (username KathySaunders) so that I can add the
Quarks podling report next month

Thanks,
Kathy

Re: Advice for incubator releases and naming

[Kathy Saunders]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz  wrote:

>
> It's ok for a podling to change its name at any time during the
> incubation process, but the earlier the better IMO, by far. If you
> don't get a timely answer to PODLINGNAMESEARCH-105 I suggest starting
> a vote here for renaming the podling, to make the rename a decision of
> this PMC.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Thanks for your reply.  I think we can wait for the suitable name search to
complete their work.  I believe it is better to get the rename decision
done as soon as is reasonable, but also that whatever checks need to be
made do happen.

I mostly posted this question for my understanding.  I wasn't sure how the
name change related to a release.  I did see some notes in one of the older
suitable name search entries in Jira that talked about a podling
establishing themselves and making a release before the name is approved,
but I thought it would be better in this case to have a name that is less
likely to cause confusion before making a release.  I just want to ask
advice on whether there are any dependencies on releases, etc before the
name can be approved.  Or, if there is a dependency on the name approval
before making a release.  I hope that makes sense...

Regards,
Kathy

Advice for incubator releases and naming

[Kathy Saunders]

I'm working on Apache Quarks and the community has been very active over
the last few months.  I was thinking about the right time to start a
release;  we are still working on the build and license issues, but should
be able to start the process once that is done.

I had thought we would want to wait for a release until we have the name
approved.  The name Quarks does have some uniqueness issues, and I have
opened a suitable name search to change the name to Apache Edgent (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-105).

I was looking at the incubator release pages, and realized that there is
nothing that states that the name must be approved prior to a release.
Should we wait until it is approved, particularly given that Quarks has
some uniqueness issues or is it acceptable to proceed?  Is there an
expectation that we will have a release prior to the name being approved?

Thanks for any advice; this is my first direct experience with incubation.

Regards,
Kathy

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

[Kathy Saunders]

> Feedback, spelling errors, legal corrections/queries etc etc all welcome.
> Do people think this is useful and would they like to see more examples?
>
>
Hi Justin,

I think this is very helpful and I'd love to see more examples.  I'm
involved in a project in incubation now, and I am grateful for any examples
on how to do this properly.

Kathy

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Quarks

[Kathy Saunders]

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Julian Hyde  wrote:

> That thread was about renaming Optiq to Calcite, and it turned out just
> fine. We created JIRA cases based on the ones Henrik suggested, and it went
> pretty smoothly. There are a few cosmetic issues, for instance the github
> mirror said “mirrored from incubator-optiq.git” for a long time after
> incubator-optiq.git had disappeared, but nothing major.
>
> Best of luck with the rename. Like moving to a newer and better home, it
> seems crazy now, but you’ll be glad when you arrive.
>
> > On Jun 10, 2016, at 1:32 PM, John D. Ament 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd recommend reviewing some of the past rename processes to see how to
> > proceed.  Unfortunately its not well documented.
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/55ad2af1f8216950a33778aa04518ce552e741483ec35a28c3ee0d58@1411763341@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >
> > John
>
>  Thank you very much John and Julian for the great advice.

Kathy

[RESULT][VOTE] Rename Quarks

[Kathy Saunders]

I want to report that the Quarks community has voted on a new name, and the
result is Apache Edgent.  I have submitted a suitable name search
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-105.

Following is the note I sent to the Quarks dev list with the voting results.

The result of the vote is Edgent is the first place choice.  I will submit
Edgent for a suitable name search and Kinaara will be the backup, in case
there are any issues with Edgent.  Thank you for voting; I think
participation has been excellent through these naming votes!

Kinaara received 8 votes (2 binding) and Edgent received 7 (6) binding.
The overall voting was very close, but Edgent is the choice as the binding
votes are significantly higher.

Here is the breakdown:

Edgent:

Susan (binding)
Queenie (binding)
Dan (binding)
Cazen (binding)
Mike
Victor (binding)
Kathy S (binding)

Kinaara:

Dale (binding)
James
Kendrick
Samantha
Kathey M (binding)
Stanley
Janagan
Sandeep

Regards,
Kathy S

Re: [VOTE] Accept Quarks into the Apache Incubator

[Kathy Saunders]

+1 (non-binding)  I have read through the proposal and everything appears
to be in place.  I think this will be a great incubator project.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Katherine Marsden 
wrote:

> +1  ( non-binding - member request to join IPMC is pending)
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>